Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton January 25, 2019

Creativity in language learning and teaching: Translingual practices and transcultural identities

  • Rodney H. Jones EMAIL logo

Abstract

This introduction explores the four main themes of the papers in this special issue: 1) ‘language, languaging and translanguaging’ 2) ‘mobility and space’ 3) ‘transcultural identities’ and 4) ‘institutional and individual constraints on creativity’, and discusses how engagement with these themes helps the authors to move beyond traditional notions of linguistic creativity and creative pedagogy to formulate new ways of imagining creativity in language learning based on encouraging learners to make use of the full range of their semiotic resources and social experiences when communicating.

References

Alim, H. S. 2007. Critical Hip-Hop Language Pedagogies: combat, consciousness, and the cultural politics of communication. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 6(2). 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348450701341378.Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. & M. Khaire. 2008 October 1. Creativity and the role of the leader. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2008/10/creativity-and-the-role-of-the-leader (accessed October 2008).Search in Google Scholar

Benson, P. & P. Voller. 2014. Autonomy and independence in language learning. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315842172Search in Google Scholar

Bhabha, H. K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Blackman, L. 2012. Immaterial bodies: Affect, embodiment, mediation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.10.4135/9781446288153Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, P. D. J. 2010. The sociolinguistics of globalization. 1st edn. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845307Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, J., E. Moore, J. Simpson & L. Atkinson. 2018. Translanguaging space and creative activity: theorising collaborative arts-based learning. Language and Intercultural Communication 18(1). 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2017.1401120.Search in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, M. & K. Hall. 2016. Embodied sociolinguistics. In N. Coupland (ed.), Sociolinguistics, 173–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009.Search in Google Scholar

Canagarajah, S. 2012. Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203073889Search in Google Scholar

Carter, R. 2004. Language and creativity: The art of common talk. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar

Chow, B. W.-Y., A. N. N. Hui & B. H.-T. Chui. 2018. Creative literacy activities promote positive reading attitude in children learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Research in Reading 41(2). 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12096.Search in Google Scholar

Darvin, R. & B. Norton. 2015. Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35. 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000191.Search in Google Scholar

Doughty, P. S., G. M. Thornton & G. Thornton. 1973. Language study: The teacher and the learner. London: Hodder.Search in Google Scholar

Garcia, O. & W. Li. 2013. Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Houndmills, Baisingstoke, UK: Palgrave Pivot.Search in Google Scholar

Guilloteaux, M. J. & Z. Dörnyei. 2008. Motivating language learners: A Classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly 42(1). 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00207.x.Search in Google Scholar

Hafner, C. A. 2014. Embedding digital literacies in English Language Teaching: students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly 48(4). 655–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.138.Search in Google Scholar

Hafner, C. A. 2015. Remix culture and English Language teaching: The expression of learner voice in digital multimodal compositions. TESOL Quarterly 49(3). 486–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.238.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, C. 2010. Creativity in recent educational discourse in England. World Englishes 29(4). 481–492.10.1111/j.1467-971X.2010.01676.xSearch in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Heller, M. 2007. Bilingualism as ideology and practice. In M. Heller (ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach, 1–22. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596047_1.Search in Google Scholar

Jacquemet, M. 2005. Transidiomatic practices: language and power in the age of globalization. Language & Communication 25(3). 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2005.05.001.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, R. H. 2010. Creativity and discourse. World Englishes 29(4). 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2010.01675.x.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, R. H. 2016. Creativity and language. In R. H. Jones & J. C. Richards (eds.), Creativity and language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice, 16–31. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315730936-2Search in Google Scholar

Jones, R. H. 2018. Messy creativity. Language Sciences 65. 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.06.003.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, R.H. in press. Towards and embodied visual semiotics. In C. Thurlow, C. Dürscheid & F. Diemoz (eds.), Visualizing (in) the new media. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, J., M. S. Karrebæk, L. M. Madsen & J. S. Møller. 2011. Polylanguaging in superdiversity. Diversities 13(2). 23–37.Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, J. N. 2008. Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism 5(3). 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710802387562.Search in Google Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. V. 2009. The role of bilingualism in creative performance on divergent thinking and invented alien creatures tests. The Journal of Creative Behavior 43(1). 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01306.x.Search in Google Scholar

Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, G., B. Jones & C. Baker. 2012. Translanguaging: origins and development from school to street and beyond. Educational Research and Evaluation 18(7). 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2012.718488.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Wei. 2011. Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics 43(5). 1222–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.035.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Wei. 2016. New Chinglish and the post-multilingualism challenge: Translanguaging ELF in China. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 5. 1–25.10.1515/jelf-2016-0001Search in Google Scholar

Makoni, S. & A. Pennycook. 2005. Disinventing and (Re)constituting languages. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 2(3). 137–156.10.1207/s15427595cils0203_1Search in Google Scholar

Maybin, J. & J. Swann. 2007. Everyday creativity in language: textuality, contextuality and critique. Applied Linguistics 28(4). 497–517.10.1093/applin/amm036Search in Google Scholar

National Council of Teachers of English, & International Reading Association (Eds.). 1996. Standards for the English language arts. Newark, Del. : Urbana, Ill: International Reading Association; National Council of Teachers of English.Search in Google Scholar

Norton, B. 2000. Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Norton, B. 2013. Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. 2nd edn. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783090563Search in Google Scholar

Otheguy, R., O. García & W. Reid 2015. Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review 6(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0014Search in Google Scholar

Paechter, C. 2004. Metaphors of space in educational theory and practice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 12(3). 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360400200202.Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, A. & E. Otsuji. 2015. Metrolingualism: Language in the city. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315724225Search in Google Scholar

Phipps, A. & M. Gonzalez. 2004. Modern languages: Learning and teaching in an intercultural field. SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781446221419Search in Google Scholar

Piat, J. 2006. Towards a stylistics of imaginary languages. Corpus 5(Dec). 113–141.10.4000/corpus.441Search in Google Scholar

Pope, R. 2005. Creativity: Theory, history and practice. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203695319Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, K .2007 January 6. Do schools kill creativity? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG9CE55wbtY (accessed 3 November 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Rymes, B. 2013. Communicating beyond language. 1st edn. New York; London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203129616Search in Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. K., V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. Feldman, J. Nakamura & M. Csikszentmihalyi. 2003. Creativity and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195149005.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R., S. W. Scollon & R. H. Jones. 2012. Intercultural communication: A discourse approach, 3rd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0555Search in Google Scholar

Stevick, E. W. 1980. Teaching languages: A way and ways. 1st edn. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Pub.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, M. 2006. Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, 95–108. London-New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Tin, T. B. 2013. Towards creativity in ELT: The need to say something new. English Language Teaching Journal 67(4). 385–397.10.1093/elt/cct022Search in Google Scholar

UK Department of Education. 2014. National curriculum in England: framework for key stages 1 to 4. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4/the-national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4 (accessed 13 November 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Revised edn. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. 1998. Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195117530.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

World Economic Forum. 2016. The future of jobs employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Davos: WEF.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-01-25
Published in Print: 2020-11-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2018-0114/html
Scroll to top button