Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton September 11, 2018

Language acquisition and linguistic theory: When linguistic theory meets empirical data

  • Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes EMAIL logo

Abstract

This Special Issue brings together the current work of well-established and well-known researchers in the field of language acquisition from a formal approach across several languages and of bilingual acquisition (2L1 and adult simultaneous and successive bilinguals), focusing on the syntax, semantics and pragmatics of different linguistic phenomena. Specifically, the four papers that will encompass this Special Issue together with an afterword paper written by a leading researcher in the field, Itziar Laka, discuss two main issues for current linguistic theory, both related, in this discussion, to Spanish: on the one hand, how do data and phenomena from the acquisition of different Romance languages inform and shape generative linguistic theory? And, on the other, how does generative linguistic theory frame and constrain research on the acquisition of Romance languages? To that end, divergent bilingual populations are used in these studies, which present longitudinal or cross-sectional data using a diverse range of methodologies (more on this within the individual summaries).

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Li Wei and his associated editors for his kind invitation to put together this Special Issue. I would also like to thank all the contributors and reviewers who make possible this research endeavour, and last, but not least, the presenters and audience at an international workshop held at CSIC (Madrid-Spain) in March 2015.

References

Borgonovo, Claudia, Joyce Bruhn de Garavito & Philippe Prévost. 2015. Mood selection in relative clauses: Interfaces and variability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37(1). 33–69.10.1017/S0272263114000321Search in Google Scholar

Carminati, Maria Nella. 2002. The processing of Italian subject pronouns. Amherst, MA: University Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Fábregas, Antonio. 2013. Differential object marking in Spanish: State of the art. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2013(2/2). 1–80.10.7557/1.2.2.2603Search in Google Scholar

Lardiere, Donna. 2008. Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In Juana Liceras, Helmut Zobl & Helen Goodluck (eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition, 106–140. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781315085340-5Search in Google Scholar

Lardiere, Donna. 2009. Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 25. 173–227.10.1177/0267658308100283Search in Google Scholar

López, Luis. 2012. Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions, and differential marking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9165.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Paradis, Michel. 1998. Neurolinguistic aspects of the native speaker. In R. Singh (ed.), The native speaker: Multilingual perspectives, 205–219. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Quer, Josep. 2001. Intepreting mood. Probus 13(1). 81–111.10.1515/prbs.13.1.81Search in Google Scholar

Schwenter, Scott. 2014. Two kinds of differential object marking in Portuguese and Spanish. In Patricia Amaral & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds.), Portuguese-Spanish interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact, 237–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.1.12schSearch in Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella. 2011. Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to. Bilingualism 1(1). 1–33.10.1075/lab.1.1.01sorSearch in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon & Diogo Almeida. 2013. The role of experimental syntax in an integrated cognitive science of language. In Cedric Boeckx & Kleanthes K. Grohmann (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics, 181–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511980435.013Search in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 1998. The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2337.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 2002. Aspect in the prepositional system of Romance. In Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora & Diana Cresti (eds.), Current issues in romance languages, 337–357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.220.23torSearch in Google Scholar

von Heusinger, Klaus & Georg Kaiser. 2007. Differential object marking and the lexical semantics of verbs in Spanish. In Georg Kaiser & Manuel Leonetti (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Definiteness, specificity and animacy in ibero-romance languages”, 85–110. Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft: Konstanz.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-09-11
Published in Print: 2020-09-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2017-0102/html
Scroll to top button