Abstract
In this paper we investigate the ways in which creativity is understood and enacted by language teachers. Although the term ‘creativity’ has gained enormous traction in language pedagogy, and in education more generally, we suggest that the concept remains a floating signifier carrying different personal connotations that are shaped by wider institutional and professional constraints. We report on interview data with practising language teachers who discuss their interpretation of creativity and how it manifests in their classrooms. Our analysis considered how teachers positioned themselves and their students in relation to each other and how the agency of the different actors was shaped by discursive constructions (of creativity) which were, in turn, underpinned by broader socio-historical and disciplinary frames. In particular, we focus on distinctions between creative language and creative language teaching and how these are construed differently across professional contexts. While teachers are keen to adopt creative approaches, findings show that there are significant differences in their interpretations of the concept that point to deeply rooted epistemological dissonances in the perception of language and personhood in the pedagogical encounter. In the final section we develop the implications of these findings for professional cultures and identities, in particular some of the critical but under-explored issues surrounding the idea of creativity in language teaching, including the ever-present ‘teacher-ledness’, the curricularised nature of taught languages and the absence of personal development.
References
Canagarajah, A. S. 2006. Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly 3(3). 229–242.10.1207/s15434311laq0303_1Search in Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A.S. 2011. Translanguaging in the classrom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review 2. 1–27.10.1515/9783110239331.1Search in Google Scholar
Carter, R. 1996. Look both ways before crossing: Developments in the language and literature classroom. In R. Carter & J. McRae (eds.), Language, literature and the learner, 1–15. London & NY: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Cook, G. 2000. Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Csíkszentmihályi, M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. NY: Harper Perennial.Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, J. 1967. Growth through English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Douglas Fir Group. 2016. A transdisciplinary framework for SLA on a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal 100(1). 19–47.10.1111/modl.12301Search in Google Scholar
Gray, J. 2010. The construction of English culture, consumerism and promotion in the ELT global coursebook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Hennink, M., Hutter, I. & Bailey, A. 2011 Qualitative Research Methods. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-to-the-national-college-annual-conference-birmingham.Search in Google Scholar
Kumaravadivelu, B. 2001. Towards a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly 35. 537–560.10.2307/3588427Search in Google Scholar
Kumaravadivelu, B. 2012. Language teacher education for a global society: A modular model for knowing, analysing, recognising, doing, and seeing. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203832530Search in Google Scholar
Leung, C. 2013. Second/additional language teacher professionalism - What is it? In M. Olofsson (Ed.), Symposium 2012: Lärarrollen I svenska som andraspräk (pp. 11–27). Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, A. 2004. The good teacher: Dominant discourses in teaching and teacher education. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9780203420270Search in Google Scholar
Nelson, C. 2006. Queer inquiry in language education. Journal of Language, Identity and Education 5(1). 1–9.10.1207/s15327701jlie0501_1Search in Google Scholar
Nystrand, M. & S. Zeiser. 1970. Dewey, Dixon, and the future of creativity. The English Journal 59. 1138–1140.10.2307/813529Search in Google Scholar
Pearson Education Ltd. 2017. Edexcel GCSE (9-1) Chinese (spoken Manadarin and spoken Cantonese). London: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar
Saslow, J. & A. Ascher. 2006. Top notch 3. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1989. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. 1986. The bulge: A theory of speech behavior and social distance Working Papers in Educational Linguistics (UPenn), 55–83Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
