Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton October 28, 2017

A dutch multiethnolect? Metalinguistic commentary from Gouda

  • Khalid Mourigh EMAIL logo

Abstract

It is assumed that there exists a multiethnolect in the Netherlands that is used by Dutch youth with different heritage backgrounds. It is lexically mainly influenced by Sranan Tongo while phonetically it is mainly influenced by a Moroccan Dutch accent. In this article, I will argue, based on metalinguistic comments given in interviews, that Moroccan Dutch youth speech in the city of Gouda departs from this conception of multiethnolect. Interviews with Moroccan Dutch teenagers there reveal that, in their youth variety, Sranan Tongo lexical items are not readily accepted and used. In addition, their perception of Straattaal differs from the perception of their Indigenous Dutch peers in Gouda. In this way, a different light can be shed on multiethnolect in the Netherlands.

References

Aarsæther, Finn, Stefania Marzo, Ingvild Nistov & Evy Ceuleers. 2015. Indexing locality: contemporary urban vernaculars in Belgium and Norway. In Jacomine Nortier & Bente A. Svendsen (eds.), Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century. Linguistic Practices across Urban Spaces, 249–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139061896.018Search in Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1). 38–59.10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38Search in Google Scholar

Aissati, Abderrahman el, Louis Boumans, Leonie Cornips, Margreet Dorleijn & Jacomine Nortier. 2005.Turks- en Marokkaans-Nederlands [Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch]. In Nicoline Van Der Sijs (ed.), Wereld Nederlands. Oude en jonge variëteiten van het Nederlands [World Dutch. Old and new varieties of Dutch], 149–183. Den Haag: SDU.Search in Google Scholar

Appel, René. 1999. Straattaal. De mengtaal van jongeren in Amsterdam [Straattaal. The mixed language of youth in Amsterdam]. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 62. 39–55.10.1075/ttwia.62.04appSearch in Google Scholar

Appel, René & Rob Schoonen. 2005. Street language: a multilingual youth register in the Netherlands. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26(2). 85–117.10.1080/01434630508668399Search in Google Scholar

CBS. 2016. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek [Central Statistics Office]. www.cbs.nl (27 October 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny, Jacomine Nortier & David Adger. 2015. Emerging multiethnolects in Europe. (Queen Mary’s Occasional Papers Advancing Linguistics 33). London: Queen Mary University London.Search in Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie & Vincent de Rooij. 2013. Selfing and othering through categories of race, place, and language among minority youths in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. In Peter Siemund, Ingrid Gogolin, Monika Schulz & Julia Davydova (eds.), Multilingualism and language diversity in urban areas: acquisition, identities, space, education (Hamburg studies on linguistic diversity, 1), 129–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hsld.1.07corSearch in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language variation and identity. Key Topics in Linguistics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755064Search in Google Scholar

Dorleijn, Margreet, Maarten Mous & Jacomine Nortier. 2015. Urban youth speech styles in Kenya and the Netherlands. In Jacomine Nortier & Bente A. Svendsen (eds.), Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century. Linguistic Practices across Urban Spaces, 271–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139061896.019Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1). 25–42.10.1177/13670069080120010301Search in Google Scholar

Gal, Susan & Judith Irvine. 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62. 967–1002.Search in Google Scholar

Haan, Henk de. 2005. Social and material appropriation of neighborhood space: Collective space and resistance in a Dutch Urban Community. In Marco Van Der Land & Leeke Reinders (eds.), Doing, Thinking, Feeling Home: The Mental Geography of Residential Environments. (Proceedings of the International ENR Conference, Delft, 14-15 October 2005), 1–26. Delft: University of Technology: OTB.Search in Google Scholar

HCP. Haut-Commissariat au plan. 2016. http://www.hcp.ma/Recensement-general-de-la-population-et-de-l-habitat-2004_a633.html (27 October 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Jaspers, Jürgen. 2004. Tegenwerken, belachelijk doen. Talige sabotage van Marokkaanse jongens op een Antwerpse middelbare school. Een sociolinguïstische etnografie. [Sabotage, acting ridiculous. Linguistic sabotage by Moroccan boys in an Antwerp secondary school. A sociolinguistic ethnography]. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.Search in Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 2010. Language and geographical space. In: Peter Auer & Jürgen E. Schmidt (eds.), Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, 1–18. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110220278.1Search in Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara, Jennifer Andrus & Andrew E. Danielson. 2006. Mobility, Indexicality, and the Enregisterment of “Pittsburghese.” Journal of English Linguistics 32(4). 77–104.10.1177/0075424206290692Search in Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara & Scott F. Kiesling. 2008. Indexicality and Experience: Variation and Identity in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1). 5–33.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00351.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kossmann, Maarten. fc. Is Dutch Straattaal a mixed multiethnolect? A Moroccan perspective. Applied Linguistics Review.10.1515/applirev-2017-0050Search in Google Scholar

Lemon, Alaina M. 2002. Form and Function in Soviet Stage Romani: Modeling Metapragmatics through Performance. Language in Society 31(1). 29–64.10.1017/S0047404502001021Search in Google Scholar

Lier, Eva van. 2004. Straattaal [Street language]. Neerlandica Extra Muros. Tijdschrift van de Internationale Vereniging voor Neerlandistiek. 43(1). 12–26.Search in Google Scholar

Meel, Linda van. 2016. The Roots of Ethnolects. A Sociophonological Study in Amsterdam and Nijmegen. (Ph.D. dissertation). Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.Search in Google Scholar

Montrul, Silvina. 2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139030502Search in Google Scholar

Mourigh, Khalid. fc. Sibilant Palatalization in Gouda Moroccan Dutch. Nederlandse Taalkunde.Search in Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 2013. Ethnolects of Dutch. In Frans Hinskens & Johan Taeldeman (eds.), Language and Space: Dutch, 739–761. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110261332.739Search in Google Scholar

Nortier, Jacomine. 2001. Murks en Straattaal. Vriendschap en taalgebruik onder jongeren [Murks and street language. Friendship and language use among youngsters]. Amsterdam: Prometheus.Search in Google Scholar

Nortier, Jacomine & Margreet Dorleijn. 2008. A Moroccan accent in Dutch: a socio-cultural style restricted to the Moroccan community? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2). 125–143.10.1177/13670069080120010801Search in Google Scholar

Nortier, Jacomine & Margreet Dorleijn. 2013. Multi-ethnolects: Kebabnorsk, Perkerdansk, Verlan, Kanakensprache, Straattaal, etc. In Peter Bakker & Yaron Matras (eds.), Contact Languages, 237–270. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614513711.229Search in Google Scholar

Rampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among adolescents. Real language series. London & New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Rampton, Ben. 1998. Language crossing and the redefinition of reality. In Peter Auer (ed.), Codeswitching in Conversation, 290–320. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ruiter, Jan Jaap de. 1989. Young Moroccans in the Netherlands: An Integral Approach to their Language Situation and Acquisition of Dutch. (PhD Thesis). Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1985. Language and the culture of gender: at the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In Elizabeth Mertz & Richard Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives, 219–259. Orlando: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-491280-9.50016-9Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23(3). 193–229.10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2Search in Google Scholar

Woolard, Kathryn A. 2008. Why dat now? Linguistic-anthropological contributions to the explanations of sociolinguistic icons and change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 432–452.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00375.xSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-10-28
Published in Print: 2019-09-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2017-0053/html
Scroll to top button