Prosody and Sociolinguistic Variation in American Englishes

Literature Cited

1. Ahn B, Veilleux N, Shattuck-Hufnagel S 2019. Annotating prosody with PoLaR: conventions for a decompositional annotation system. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences S Calhoun, P Escudero, M Tabain, P Warren 1302–6 Canberra, Aust: Australas. Speech Sci. Technol. Assoc.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bauman C. 2016. Speaking of sisterhood: a sociolinguistic study of an Asian American sorority PhD Diss., NYU New York:
3. Beckman ME, Ayers Elam G 1997. Guidelines for ToBI Labelling Columbus: Dep. Linguist., Ohio State Univ http://www.cs.columbia.edu/∼agus/tobi/labelling_guide_v3.pdf
4. Benor SB. 2012. Becoming Frum: How Newcomers Learn the Language and Culture of Orthodox Judaism New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
5. Blake R. 2014. African American and Black as demographic codes. Lang. Linguist. Compass 8:11548–63
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blum H. 2016. Totally fried: what do you need to know about vocal fry? Speech-language pathologists and a linguist weigh in on where cultural influence ends and clinical intervention begins. ASHA Lead 21:250–56
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bucholtz M. 1999. “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Lang. Soc. 28:2203–23
   [Google Scholar]
8. Burdin RS. 2016. Variation in form and function in Jewish English intonation PhD Diss., Ohio State Univ Columbus:
9. Burdin RS. 2017. New notes on the rise-fall contour. J. Jewish Lang. 5:2145–73
   [Google Scholar]
10. Burdin RS, Holliday N, Reed PE 2018. Rising above the standard: variation in L+H^* contour use across 5 varieties of American English. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody K Klessa, J Bachan, A Wagner, M Karpiński, D Śledziński 354–58 Baixas, Fr: Int. Speech Commun. Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Carter P. 2007. Phonetic variation and speaker agency: Mexicana identity in a North Carolina middle school. Univ. Pa. Work. Pap. Linguist. 13:21
    [Google Scholar]
12. Carter PM, Valdez LL, Sims N 2020. New dialect formation through language contact: vocalic and prosodic developments in Miami English. Am. Speech 95:2119–48
    [Google Scholar]
13. Clopper CG, Smiljanic R. 2011. Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. J. Phon. 39:2237–45
    [Google Scholar]
14. Coggshall EL. 2008. The prosodic rhythm of two varieties of Native American English. Univ. Pa. Work. Pap. Linguist. 14:22
    [Google Scholar]
15. Colantoni L, Cuza A, Mazzaro N 2016. Task-related effects in the prosody of Spanish heritage speakers and long-term immigrants. Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches Across Linguistic Subfields ME Armstrong, N Henriksen, MM Vanrell 1–24 Amsterdam: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
16. Eckert P. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School New York: Teachers College Press
17. Eckert P. 2012. Three waves of variation study: the emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 41:87–100
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fairbanks G. 1940. Voice and Articulation Drill Book New York: Harper
19. Gooden S. 2020. Creole language prosody in the 21st century Presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America New Orleans, LA: Jan 2–5
20. Goodine A, Johns A. 2014. “Would you like fries with thaaaat?” Investigating vocal fry in young, female Canadian English speakers Work. Pap., Queen's Univ Kingston, Can:.
21. Greene R. 2006. Pitch accents in Appalachian English Work. Pap., Stanford Univ Stanford, CA:
22. Grieser J. 2015. The language of professional blackness: African American English at the intersection of race, place, and class in Southeast, Washington, DC. PhD Diss., Georgetown Univ. Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
23. Holliday NR. 2016. Intonational variation, linguistic style, and the black/biracial experience PhD Diss., NYU New York:
24. Holliday NR. 2019. Multiracial identity and racial complexity in sociolinguistic variation. Lang. Linguist. Compass 13:8e12345
    [Google Scholar]
25. Holliday NR, Jaggers ZS. 2015. Influence of suprasegmental features on perceived ethnicity of American politicians Presented at the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences Glasgow, UK: Aug 10–14 https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0354.pdf
26. Holliday NR, Villarreal D. 2020. Intonational variation and incrementality in listener judgments of ethnicity. Lab. Phonol. 11:13
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hollien H, Michel JF. 1968. Vocal fry as a phonational register. J. Speech Hear. Res. 11:600–4
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jun SA 2006. Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing 1 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
29. Jun SA, Foreman C. 1996. Boundary tones and focus realization in African American English intonations Poster presented at the 3rd Joint Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the Acoustical Society of Japan Honolulu, HI: Dec 2–6
30. Kim JY. 2019. Heritage speakers’ use of prosodic strategies in focus marking in Spanish. Int. J. Biling. 23:5986–1004
    [Google Scholar]
31. King S. 2016. On negotiating racial and regional identities: vocalic variation in African Americans in Bakersfield, California. Univ. Pa. Work. Pap. Linguist. 22:212
    [Google Scholar]
32. Low EL, Grabe E, Nolan F 2000. Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: syllable-timing in Singapore English. Lang. Speech 43:377–401
    [Google Scholar]
33. McLarty J. 2018. African American language and European American English intonation variation over time in the American South. Am. Speech 93:132–78
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mendoza‐Denton N. 2011. The semiotic hitchhiker's guide to creaky voice: circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 2:2261–80
    [Google Scholar]
35. Murphy K. 2013. Universals and variation in question intonation: a comparative study of Hawaiian and HCE speech melodies. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium About Language and Society–Austin (SALSA XXI)34–41 Tex. Linguist. Forum Vol. 56: Austin: Dep. Linguist., Univ. Tex.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pierrehumbert JB. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation PhD Thesis, MIT Cambridge, MA:
37. Pierrehumbert JB, Hirschberg J. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. Intentions in Communication PR Cohen, J Morgan, ME Pollack 271–311 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
38. Podesva RJ. 2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: the use of falsetto in constructing a persona. J. Socioling. 11:478–504
    [Google Scholar]
39. Podesva RJ, Callier P. 2015. Voice quality and identity. Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 35:173–94
    [Google Scholar]
40. Purnell T, Idsardi W, Baugh J 1999. Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 18:110–30
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rahman J. 2008. Middle-class African Americans: reactions and attitudes toward African American English. Am. Speech 83:2141–76
    [Google Scholar]
42. Reed P. 2016. Sounding Appalachian: /aI/ monophthongization, rising pitch accents, and rootedness PhD Diss., Univ. S.C Columbia:
43. Rickford JR, McNair-Knox F. 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: a quantitative sociolinguistic study. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register D Biber, E Finegan 235–76 New York/Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
44. Robles-Puente S. 2019. Rhythmic variability in Spanish/English bilinguals in California. Span. Context 16:3419–37
    [Google Scholar]
45. Slobe T. 2018. Style, stance, and social meaning in mock white girl. Lang. Soc. 47:4541–67
    [Google Scholar]
46. Spears AK. 1988. Black American English. Anthropology for the Nineties JB Cole 96–113 New York: Free Press
    [Google Scholar]
47. Thomas ER. 2015. Prosodic features of African American English. The Oxford Handbook of African American Language J Bloomquist, LJ Green, S Lanehart 420–38 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
48. Thomas ER, Reaser J. 2004. Delimiting perceptual cues used for the ethnic labeling of African American and European American voices. J. Socioling. 8:154–87
    [Google Scholar]
49. Weinreich U. 1956. Notes on the Yiddish rise-fall contour. For Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday, 11 October 1956 M Halle 633–43 The Hague, Neth: Mouton
    [Google Scholar]