The Theory and Empirics of the Marriage Market

Literature Cited

1. Abdulkadiroǧlu A, Pathak P, Roth A 2005. The New York City high school match. Am. Econ. Rev. 95:364–67
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abdulkadiroǧlu A, Sonmez T. 2003. School choice: a mechanism design approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:729–47
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ahn S-Y. 2017. Matching across markets: theory and evidence on cross-border marriage Work. Pap., Columbia Univ New York:
4. Aiyagari SR, Greenwood J, Guner N 2000. On the state of the union. J. Political Econ. 109:213–44
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ashraf N, Bau N, Nunn N, Voena A 2020. Bride price and female education. J. Political Econ. 128:591–641
   [Google Scholar]
6. Atakan A. 2006. Assortative matching with explicit search costs. Econometrica 74:3667–80
   [Google Scholar]
7. Azevedo E, Hatfield J. 2015. Existence of equilibrium in large matching markets with complementarities Work. Pap., Wharton Sch., Univ. Pa Philadelphia:
8. Banerjee A, Duflo E, Ghatak M, Lafortune J 2013. Marry for what? Caste and mate selection in modern India. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 5:33–72
   [Google Scholar]
9. Becker G. 1973. A theory of marriage: part I. J. Political Econ. 81:813–46
   [Google Scholar]
10. Becker G. 1974. A theory of marriage: part II. J. Political Econ. 82:S11–26
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bisin A, Tura G. 2019. Marriage, fertility, and cultural integration of immigrants in Italy Work. Pap., New York Univ New York:
12. Bojilov R, Galichon A. 2015. Matching in closed-form: equilibrium, identification, and comparative statics Work. Pap., Pontif. Cathol. Univ. Chile Santiago:
13. Bronson MA, Mazzocco M. 2018. Cohort size and the marriage market: explaining nearly a century of changes in U.S. marriage rates Work. Pap., Univ. Calif Los Angeles:
14. Burtless G. 1999. Effects of growing wage disparities and changing family composition on the U.S. income distribution. Eur. Econ. Rev. 43:4–6853–65
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chiappori PA. 2017. Matching with Transfers Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
16. Chiappori PA, Costa Dias M, Meghir C 2018a. The marriage market, labor supply and education choice. J. Political Econ. 126:S1S26–72
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chiappori PA, Costa Dias M, Meghir C 2019a. Measuring assortativeness Work. Pap., Columbia Univ New York:
18. Chiappori PA, Costa Dias M, Meghir C, Xiao PP 2019b. Education, marriage and child development Work. Pap., Yale Univ New Haven, CT:
19. Chiappori PA, Galichon A, Salanié B 2019c. On human capital and team stability. J. Hum. Cap. 13:2236–59
    [Google Scholar]
20. Chiappori PA, Gugl E. 2020. Transferable utility and demand functions. Econ. Theory. In press
    [Google Scholar]
21. Chiappori PA, Iyigun M, Lafortune J, Weiss Y 2017a. Changing the rules midway: the impact of granting alimony rights on existing and newly formed partnerships. Econ. J. 127:6041874–905
    [Google Scholar]
22. Chiappori PA, Iyigun M, Weiss Y 2009. Investment in schooling and the marriage market. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:51689–717
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chiappori PA, McCann R, Nesheim L 2010. Hedonic price equilibria, stable matching, and optimal transport: equivalence, topology, and uniqueness. Econ. Theory 42:2317–54
    [Google Scholar]
24. Chiappori PA, McCann R, Pass B 2017b. Multi- to one-dimensional transportation. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 70:122405–44
    [Google Scholar]
25. Chiappori PA, Nguyen L, Salanié B 2019d. Matching with random components: simulations Work. Pap., Columbia Univ New York:
26. Chiappori PA, Oreffice S, Quintana Domeque C 2012. Fatter attraction: anthropometric and socioeconomic matching on the marriage market. J. Political Econ. 120:4659–95
    [Google Scholar]
27. Chiappori PA, Oreffice S, Quintana Domeque C 2018b. Bidimensional matching with heterogeneous preferences in the marriage market. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 16:1161–98
    [Google Scholar]
28. Chiappori PA, Oreffice S, Quintana Domeque C 2020. Fatter attraction: anthropometric and socioeconomic matching on the marriage market: a corrigendum. J. Political Econ In press
    [Google Scholar]
29. Chiappori PA, Salanié B. 2016. The econometrics of matching models. J. Econ. Lit. 54:3832–61
    [Google Scholar]
30. Chiappori PA, Salanié B, Weiss Y 2017c. Partner choice, investment in children, and the marital college premium. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:82109–67
    [Google Scholar]
31. Chiappori PA, Weiss Y. 2006. Divorce, remarriage and welfare: a general equilibrium approach. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 4:4415–26
    [Google Scholar]
32. Chiappori PA, Weiss Y. 2007. Divorce, remarriage and child support. J. Labor Econ. 25:137–74
    [Google Scholar]
33. Choo E, Siow A. 2006. Who marries whom and why. J. Political Econ. 114:175–201
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ciscato E. 2019. Matching models with and without frictions: applications to the economics of the family PhD Thesis, Paris Inst. Political Stud Paris:
35. Ciscato E, Galichon A, Goussé M 2020. Like attract like? A structural comparison of homogamy across same-sex and different-sex households. J. Political Econ. 128:2740–78
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ciscato E, Weber S. 2019. The role of evolving marital preferences in growing income inequality Work. Pap., Inst. Étud. Politiques Paris Paris:
37. Cole HL, Mailath GJ, Postlewaite A 2001. Efficient non-contractible investments in large economies. J. Econ. Theory 101:2333–73
    [Google Scholar]
38. Dagsvik JK. 2000. Aggregation in matching markets. Int. Econ. Rev. 41:27–57
    [Google Scholar]
39. Diamond PA. 1982. Wage determination and efficiency in search equilibrium. Rev. Econ. Stud. 49:217–27
    [Google Scholar]
40. Diamond PA. 1984. A Search-Equilibrium Approach to the Micro Foundations of Macroeconomics Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
41. Doepke M, Tertilt M. 2016. Families in macroeoconomics. Handbook of Macroeconomics 2 JB Taylor, H Uhlig 1789–891 Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
42. Dokko J, Li G, Hayes J 2015. Credit scores and committed relationships Work. Pap., Finance Econ. Discuss. Ser. 2015-081, Board Gov. Fed. Reserv. Syst Washington, DC: http://dx.doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2015.081
    [Crossref]
43. Dupuy A, Galichon A. 2014. Personality traits and the marriage market. J. Political Econ. 122:61271–319
    [Google Scholar]
44. Eika L, Mogstad M, Zafar B 2019. Educational assortative mating and household income inequality. J. Political Econ. 127:62795–835
    [Google Scholar]
45. Fernández R 2002. Education, segregation and marital sorting: theory and an application to the UK. Eur. Econ. Rev 46:993–1022
    [Google Scholar]
46. Fernández R, Guner N, Knowles J 2005. Love and money: a theoretical and empirical analysis of household sorting and inequality. Q. J. Econ. 120:273–344
    [Google Scholar]
47. Fernández R, Rogerson R 2001. Sorting and long-run inequality. Q. J. Econ 116:1305–41
    [Google Scholar]
48. Fiorio C, Verzillo S. 2018. Watching in your partner's pocket before saying “Yes!”: income assortative mating and inequality. Work. Pap., Eur. Comm. Joint Res. Cent., Brussels Belg.:
    [Google Scholar]
49. Fox J. 2008. Estimating matching games with transfers NBER Work. Pap14382
50. Fox J. 2010. Identification in matching games. Quant. Econ. 1:203–54
    [Google Scholar]
51. Fox J, Bajari P. 2013. Measuring the efficiency of an FCC spectrum auction. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 5:100–46
    [Google Scholar]
52. Frémeaux N, Lefranc A. 2017. Assortative mating and earnings inequality in France IZA Discuss. Pap. 11084, Inst. Labor Econ Bonn, Ger.:
53. Gale D, Shapley LS. 1962. College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am. Math. Mon. 69:19–15
    [Google Scholar]
54. Galichon A. 2015. Optimal Transport Methods in Economics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
55. Galichon A, Kominers SD, Weber S 2019. Costly concessions: an empirical framework for matching with imperfectly transferable utility. J. Political Econ. 127:62875–925
    [Google Scholar]
56. Galichon A, Salanié B. 2015. Cupid's invisible hand: social surplus and identification in matching models Work. Pap., New York Univ New York:
57. Galichon A, Salanié B. 2017. The econometrics and some properties of separable matching models. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5251–55
    [Google Scholar]
58. Gayle GL, Shephard A. 2019. Optimal taxation, marriage, home production, and family labor supply. Econometrica 87:1291–326
    [Google Scholar]
59. Gersbach H, Haller H. 2017. Groups and Markets: General Equilibrium with Multi-Member Households New York: Springer
60. Goussé M, Jacquemet N, Robin J-M 2017. Marriage, labor supply, and home production. Econometrica 85:61873–919
    [Google Scholar]
61. Greenwood J, Guner N. 2004. Marriage and divorce since World War II: analyzing the role of technological progress on the formation of households NBER Work. Pap. w10772
62. Greenwood J, Guner N, Knowles J 2003. More on marriage, fertility, and the distribution of income. Int. Econ. Rev. 44:827–62
    [Google Scholar]
63. Greenwood J, Guner N, Kocharkov G, Santos C 2014. Marry your like: assortative mating and income inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:5348–53
    [Google Scholar]
64. Greenwood J, Guner N, Kocharkov G, Santos C 2016. Technology and the changing family: a unified model of marriage, divorce, educational attainment, and married female labor-force participation. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 8:11–41
    [Google Scholar]
65. Greinecker M, Kah C. 2019. Pairwise stable matching in large economies Work. Pap., Univ. Gratz Gratz, Austria:
66. Grossbard S. 1993. On the Economics of Marriage: A Theory of Marriage, Labor, and Divorce Boulder, CO: Westview Press
67. Harris M, Cronin C. 2014. The effects of prospective mate quality on investments in healthy body weight among single women Work. Pap., Univ. Tenn Knoxville:
68. Hitsch G, Hortacsu A, Ariely D 2010. Matching and sorting in online dating. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:130–63
    [Google Scholar]
69. Iyigun MF, Lafortune J. 2016. Why wait? A century of education, marriage timing and gender roles IZA Discuss. Pap. 9671, Inst. Labor Econ Bonn, Ger.:
70. Iyigun M, Walsh R. 2007. Building the family nest: a collective household model with competing pre-marital investments and spousal matching. Rev. Econ. Stud. 74:507–35
    [Google Scholar]
71. Lauermann S, Nöldeke G. 2015. Existence of steady-state equilibria in matching models with search frictions. Econ. Lett. 131:1–4
    [Google Scholar]
72. Legros P, Newman AF. 2007. Beauty is a beast, frog is a prince: assortative matching with nontransferabilities. Econometrica 75:41073–102
    [Google Scholar]
73. Liu Q. 2018. Rational expectations, stable beliefs, and stable matching Work. Pap., Columbia Univ New York:
74. Liu Q, Mailath GJ, Postlewaite A, Samuelson L 2014. Stable matching with incomplete information. Econometrica 82:541–87
    [Google Scholar]
75. Low C. 2014. Essays in gender economics PhD Thesis, Columbia Univ New York:
76. Low C. 2019. A “reproductive capital” model of marriage market matching Work. Pap., Wharton Sch., Univ. Pa Philadelphia:
77. Lundberg S, Pollak R. 2009. Marriage market equilibrium and bargaining Presidential address delivered at the Society of Labor Economists 14th Annual Meeting Boston, MA:
78. Mare RD. 1991. Five decades of educational assortative mating. Am. Sociol. Rev. 56:115–32
    [Google Scholar]
79. Mazzocco M. 2004. Saving, risk sharing, and preferences for risk. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:1169–82
    [Google Scholar]
80. Mortensen D. 1988. Finding a partner for life or otherwise. Am. J. Sociol. 94:S215–40
    [Google Scholar]
81. Nocera N. 2019. Marital segregation and the labor market outcomes of immigrants Work. Pap., Univ. Chicago Chicago:
82. Nöldeke G, Samuelson L. 2015. Investment and competitive matching. Econometrica 83:3835–96
    [Google Scholar]
83. Persson P. 2020. Social insurance and the marriage market. J. Political Econ. 128:1252–300
    [Google Scholar]
84. Pissarides CA. 1990. Equilibrium Unemployment Theory Oxford, UK: Blackwell
85. Pollak RA. 2003. Gary Becker's contributions to family and household economics. Rev. Econ. Househ. 1:1–2111–41
    [Google Scholar]
86. Reynoso A. 2019. Polygamy, co-wives' complementarities, and intra-household inequality Work. Pap., Univ. Mich Ann Arbor:
87. Roth AE. 1984. The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: a case study in game theory. J. Political Econ. 92:991–1016
    [Google Scholar]
88. Roth AE, Sonmez T, Utku Unver M 2004. Kidney exchange. Q. J. Econ. 119:2457–88
    [Google Scholar]
89. Roth AE, Sonmez T, Utku Unver M 2005. Pairwise kidney exchange. J. Econ. Theory 125:2151–88
    [Google Scholar]
90. Roth AE, Sotomayor M. 1992. Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
91. Schulhofer-Wohl S. 2006. Negative assortative matching of risk-averse agents with transferable expected utility. Econ. Lett. 92:3383–88
    [Google Scholar]
92. Schwartz CR. 2010. Earnings inequality and the changing association between spouses' earnings. Am. J. Sociol. 115:51524–57
    [Google Scholar]
93. Schwartz CR, Mare RD. 2005. Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography 42:4621–46
    [Google Scholar]
94. Shapley LS, Shubik M. 1971. The assignment game I: the core. Int. J. Game Theory 1:1111–30
    [Google Scholar]
95. Shephard A. 2019. Marriage market dynamics, gender, and the age gap Work. Pap., Univ. Pa Philadelphia:
96. Shimer R, Smith L. 2000. Assortative matching and search. Econometrica 68:343–69
    [Google Scholar]
97. Smith L. 2011. Frictional matching models. Annu. Rev. Econ. 3:319–38
    [Google Scholar]
98. Tinbergen J. 1956. On the theory of income distribution. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 77:2155–73
    [Google Scholar]
99. Weiss Y, Willis RJ. 1993. Transfers among divorced couples: evidence and interpretation. J. Labor Econ. 11:629–79
    [Google Scholar]
100. Weiss Y, Willis RJ. 1997. Match quality, new information, and marital dissolution. J. Labor Econ. 15:S293–329
     [Google Scholar]