In situ initiator-free gelation of highly concentrated lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide-1,3-dioxolane solid polymer electrolyte for high performance lithium-metal batteries

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2020.100623Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The initiator-free in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE integrates a high ionic conductivity (7.9 mS cm−1 at room temperature) and high Li+ transference number (0.82).

  • The Li|Li symmetric battery with the in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL can be stably stripped/plated for over 1000 cycles with a low overpotential of 45 mV at 5 mA cm−2 & 5 mAh cm−2.

  • The Li-S battery with the in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE shows good compatibility and stability.

Abstract

The safety concern on the uncontrollable growth of lithium dendrites in liquid electrolytes is the main challenge for high performance lithium-metal batteries. The traditional ex situ solid electrolytes can solve these issues to a great extent but are still plagued by low ionic conductivity, low Li+ transference number, and high interfacial impedance. Herein, a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) with highly concentrated (3.5 M) lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) in 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) is developed via a simple in situ initiator-free gelation route at room temperature. This simple and ingeniously designed in situ SPE integrates a high ionic conductivity (7.9 mS cm−1 at room temperature), high Li+ transference number (0.82), and low interface impedance. As a result, the in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE demonstrates a superior lithium dendrite-free behavior, which enables the Li|Li symmetric battery to be stably stripped/plated for more than 1000 cycles with a low overpotential of 45 mV at 5 mA cm−2 and 5 mAh cm−2. Moreover, the Li|Cu battery with the in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE also exhibits a high coulombic efficiency (CE) up to 98.0% at 5 mA cm−2. In addition, the in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE used in the Li|LiFePO4 battery leads to superior cycle life (500 cycles), CE (98.8%), rate performance, and good mechanical flexibility. Remarkably, the Li-S batteries with the in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE also show good compatibility and stability. This work shows tremendous prospect toward high performance solid-state lithium-metal batteries by combining the in situ polymerization and high concentration electrolyte.

Graphical abstract

An in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL solid polymer electrolyte showing high ionic conductivity (7.9 mS cm−1 at room temperature) and high Li+ transference number (0.82) is prepared free from any external driving conditions, and it demonstrates a resultant superior lithium dendrite-free behavior. LiFSI, lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide; DOL, 1,3-dioxolane.

Image 1
  1. Download : Download high-res image (171KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

The state-of-the-art lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are facing a critical challenge to follow and meet the rapid development and high demand of high energy storage systems owing to the limitation of their low theoretical specific capacity [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. Attention has been drawn to lithium-metal battery (LMB) because of its much higher theoretical specific capacity (3860 mAh g−1) and the reported lowest oxidation-reduction potential (−3.04 V vs. SHE) [[5], [6], [7], [8]]. Unfortunately, the practical application of LMB with liquid electrolytes (LEs) is still hindered by the safety hazards due to the uncontrollable growth of lithium dendrites [[9], [10], [11]], as illustrated in Fig. 1a. Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) have attracted wide attention because of their superior stability toward lithium [[12], [13], [14]]. The traditional ex situ SPEs have made great progress in inhibiting the growth of lithium dendrites but still suffer from low ionic conductivity, low Li+ transference number, and high interfacial impedance (Fig. 1b) [[15], [16], [17], [18]].

Researchers have proposed in situ SPEs to mitigate these problems because the in situ SPEs can greatly reduce the interface impedance between the electrodes (Fig. 1c) [14,19,20]. Nevertheless, most previous in situ strategies require undesirable external driving conditions such as non-electrolytic monomers, initiators, high temperature, and long gelation time [[21], [22], [23], [24], [25]]. From this perspective, to develop a facile preparation method of in situ SPEs showing high stability of lithium, high ionic conductivity, and high transference number of Li+ is still critical and indispensable. Notably, most of the reported batteries along this line are concomitant with the relatively low current density (e.g. <2 mA cm−2) and low stripping/plating capacity (e.g. <2 mAh cm−2), which are failed to meet the practical requirements (e.g. higher than 3 mA cm−2 and 4 mAh cm−2) [[26], [27], [28]].

In 2018, we studied the electrochemical behaviors of lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI)-1,3-dioxolane (DOL) electrolytes with LiFSI concentrations less than 3 M. In these cases, the electrolytes are mainly liquid or viscous due to the slow polymerization process [29]. Herein, a novel SPE with highly concentrated (3.5 M) LiFSI in DOL is developed via a simple in situ initiator-free gelation routine at room temperature. The highly concentrated LiFSI can effectively induce DOL ring-opening polymerization. In contrast with the conventional in situ SPEs, our in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPEs are prepared free from any external driving conditions. We find that our in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPEs showing high ionic conductivity (7.9 mS cm−1 at room temperature) and high Li+ transference number (0.82) can effectively inhibit the growth of lithium dendrites. The in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE demonstrates a resultant superior lithium dendrite-free behavior, and it enables our Li|Li symmetric battery to be stably stripped/plated over 1000 cycles showing a low polarization voltage of 45 mV at a high current density of 5 mA cm−2 and a high platting/striping capacity of 5 mAh cm−2. Moreover, our Li|Cu battery with the in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE also exhibits a high coulombic efficiency (CE) up to 98.0% at 5 mA cm−2. Impressively, the Li|LiFePO4 and the Li|S batteries coupled with the in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE demonstrate enhanced electrochemical behaviors in capacity property, cycle stability, and CE, compared with the LiFSI-DOL LEs with low concentration (1 M).

Section snippets

Gelation process and properties of LiFSI-DOL SPEs

The details of the experiment in this work are described in the supporting information. The chemical structures and in situ gelation mechanism of LiFSI and DOL are shown in Fig. 1d. The electrolyte becomes a uniform and transparent solid (hereafter, 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE) after dissolving 3.5 M LiFSI and gelating for 48 h, whereas the 1 M LiFSI-DOL still remains liquid properties (hereafter, 1 M LiFSI-DOL LE) as presented in Fig. 1e. To elucidate the structural transformation, 1H NMR

Conclusions

In summary, an in situ SPE with highly concentrated 3.5 M LiFSI in DOL is developed via a simple synthetic route of initiator-free gelation at room temperature. The in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE not only reduces the interface contacts between the anode and cathode but also facilitates the rapid transfer of Li+ featuring the high ionic conductivity (7.9 mS cm−1) and high Li+ transference number (0.82) at room temperature. The in situ 3.5 M LiFSI-DOL SPE demonstrates a superior lithium

CRediT authorship contribution statement

H. Cheng: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Investigation, Writing - original draft. J. Zhu: Validation, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing, Data curation. H. Jin: Writing - review & editing, Data curation. C. Gao: Writing - review & editing, Software. H. Liu: Writing - review & editing, Software. N. Cai: Validation, Formal analysis. Y. Liu: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. P. Zhang: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. M. Wang: Resources,

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61471317) and Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (Grant No. LGJ21B030001).

References (36)

  • R. Miao et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2014)
  • Z. Li et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2014)
  • Z. Lin et al.

    Nano Energy

    (2017)
  • D. Zhou et al.

    Nano Energy

    (2017)
  • M. Liu et al.

    Nano Energy

    (2016)
  • S. Huang et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2019)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Energy Storage Mater.

    (2020)
  • P. Zhang et al.

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2018)
  • Y. Yuan et al.

    Energy Storage Mater.

    (2019)
  • Y. Yuan et al.

    J. Energy Chem.

    (2019)
  • K. Xu

    Chem. Rev.

    (2014)
  • P. Bai et al.

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2016)
  • R. Weber et al.

    Nat. Energy

    (2019)
  • L.H. Hu et al.

    Nat. Commun.

    (2013)
  • M. Armand et al.

    Nature

    (2008)
  • D. Lin et al.

    Nat. Nanotechnol.

    (2017)
  • W. Xu et al.

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2014)
  • C. Fang et al.

    Nature

    (2019)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text