Skip to main content
Log in

Parental Responsibilities for Truanting Children: An Analysis of the Laws in Australia

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of Australia’s legal provisions and policies regarding truancy. We examine how low frequency truants feature in Australia’s truancy law and policy and highlight similarities and differences in the cultural–legal context between Australian states and territories. Similarities include requirements to attend school from about six to 17 years of age and the legal culpability of (predominantly) the parents for children’s non-attendance. Differences include little consistency in the threshold at which schools in different Australian states and territories are required to intervene once truancy has been identified and disparities in prosecutions and fines. We conclude that harmonising truancy laws in Australia is likely to increase parental understanding and thereby compliance with school attendance laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Considering that the truancy cases doubled from 1995 to 2007, the current figures may far exceed the 2007 estimate.

  2. Australian territories that are not part of mainland Australia—Ashmore and Cartier Islands; Australian Antarctic Territory; Christmas Island; Cocos (Keeling) Islands; Coral Sea Islands; Jervis Bay Territory; and Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands (Australian Government, Undated)—are not part of this exercise.

  3. We opted for Google searches rather than using the search facility on state education department websites, as websites’ search functionality is unlikely superior to Google (e.g. some website search facilities return nil results because the exact name of the document is not provided).

  4. There are minor differences in the terminology used by each jurisdiction.

  5. This is usually a school premises but may be another location, such as a location to participate in approved training or employment.

  6. Or other types of education or participation.

  7. In South Australia, each parent can be culpable (Education Act 1972, s. 76(3)). In other jurisdictions, they do not specify whether it is one or both parents. The term “parents” includes legal guardians and others regarded as parents, such as those from Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander backgrounds who, because of tradition or custom, are “regarded as a parent of the child” (Education (General Provisions) Act2006, s. 10)).

  8. Each Act contains defences that broadly relate to the following: the parent is not aware of the truancy (and the circumstances of their lack of knowledge are reasonable); the parent cannot control the child’s behaviour; or the child is living independent of her or his parents.

  9. This applies to Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, Australian Capital Territory, South Australia, and Tasmania.

  10. Some Acts present dollar amounts, while others present the fine in penalty units. I have rendered all as dollar amounts (rounded to the nearest whole dollar) for comparability, using penalty unit values as of June 2019 (Australian dollars presented).

  11. I remind the reader that this section describes the wording of the legal provisions regarding truancy, and that there is a gap between law and practice. A Minister’s preferences, state education policies, and decision making at the district, school, and individual level can each influence how laws are applied.

  12. However, offences such as obstructing or hindering an authorised person in the performance of their official duties exist in other Acts in these jurisdictions, which have a general application.

References

Law Cited

Download references

Funding

A scholarship was received from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorraine Mazerolle.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Collingwood, P., Mazerolle, L. Parental Responsibilities for Truanting Children: An Analysis of the Laws in Australia. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 31, 71–80 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00539-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00539-5

Keywords

Navigation