Abstract
The Shapley–Shubik index is a specialization of the Shapley value and is widely applied to evaluate the power distribution in committees drawing binary decisions. It was generalized to decisions with more than two levels of approval both in the input and the output. The corresponding games are called (j, k) simple games. Here we present a new axiomatization for the Shapley–Shubik index for (j, k) simple games as well as for a continuous variant, which may be considered as the limit case.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In our definition of a (j, k) simple game we will deviate from Freixas and Zwicker (2003) by numbering the input and output levels starting from 0 instead of 1 and assuming that lower numbers correspond to a lower level of approval.
Note that we slightly deviate from the original definition of a (j, k) simple game in Freixas and Zwicker (2003), see Footnote 1. With this, we ensure that (2, 2) simple games are in one-to-one correspondence to simple games encoding ‘‘no’’ as 0 and ‘‘yes’’ as 1.
Using the notation introduced at the beginning of Sect. 2, we have \(v(x_{-i},y_i)=v(x_{N\backslash \{i\}},y_i)= v(x_1,\ldots ,x_{i-1},y_i,x_{i+1},\ldots ,x_n)\).
The definition of unanimity games has already been given in the second paragraph of Sect. 2.
References
Algaba E, Fragnelli V, Sánchez-Soriano J (2019) Handbook of the Shapley value. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Amer R, Carreras F, Magaña A (1998) Extension of values to games with multiple alternatives. Ann Oper Res 84:63–78
Dubey P (1975) On the uniqueness of the Shapley value. Int J Game Theory 4(3):131–139
Felsenthal DS, Machover M (1998) The measurement of voting power. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Freixas J (2005) The Shapley–Shubik power index for games with several levels of approval in the input and output. Decis Support Syst 39(2):185–195
Freixas J (2019) A value for \(j\)-cooperative games: some theoretical aspects and applications. In: Algaba E, Fragnelli V, Sánchez-Soriano J (eds) Handbook of the Shapley value, vol chapter 14. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 281–311
Freixas J, Zwicker WS (2003) Weighted voting, abstention, and multiple levels of approval. Soc Choice Welf 21(3):399–431
Friedman J, Parker C (2018) The conditional Shapley–Shubik measure for ternary voting games. Games Econ Behav 108:379–390
Grabisch M, Marichal J, Mesiar R, Pap E (2009) Aggregation functions. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
Harsanyi JC (1963) A simplified bargaining model for the n-person cooperative game. Int Econ Rev 4(2):194–220
Hsiao C-R, Raghavan T (1993) Shapley value for multichoice cooperative games, i. Games Econ Behav 5(2):240–256
Hu X (2006) An asymmetric Shapley–Shubik power index. Int J Game Theory 34(2):229–240
Kurz S (2014) Measuring voting power in convex policy spaces. Economies 2(1):45–77
Kurz S (2018) Importance in systems with interval decisions. Adv Complex Syst 21(6):1850024
Kurz S, Moyouwou I, Touyem H (2019) An axiomatization of the Shapley–Shubik index for interval decisions. arXiv:1907.01323
Kurz S, Napel S (2018) The roll call interpretation of the Shapley value. Econ Lett 173:108–112
Mann I, Shapley L (1964) The a priori voting strength of the electoral college. In: Shubik M (ed) Game theory and related approaches to social behavior. Robert E. Krieger Publishing, Malabar, pp 151–164
Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A (1994) A course in game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge
Pongou R, Tchantcho B, Tedjeugang N (2012) Revenue sharing in hierarchical organizations: a new interpretation of the generalized Banzhaf value. Theor Econ Lett 2(4):369–372
Shapley LS (1953) A value for \(n\)-person games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Contributions to the theory of games, Annals of mathematical studies, vol 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 307–317
Shapley LS, Shubik M (1954) A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am Polit Sci Rev 48(3):787–792
Acknowledgements
Hilaire Touyem benefits from a financial support of the CETIC (Centre d’Excellence Africain en Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication) Project of the University of Yaounde I. We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurz, S., Moyouwou, I. & Touyem, H. Axiomatizations for the Shapley–Shubik power index for games with several levels of approval in the input and output. Soc Choice Welf 56, 569–594 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01296-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01296-6