Skip to main content
Log in

Axiomatizations for the Shapley–Shubik power index for games with several levels of approval in the input and output

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Shapley–Shubik index is a specialization of the Shapley value and is widely applied to evaluate the power distribution in committees drawing binary decisions. It was generalized to decisions with more than two levels of approval both in the input and the output. The corresponding games are called (jk) simple games. Here we present a new axiomatization for the Shapley–Shubik index for (jk) simple games as well as for a continuous variant, which may be considered as the limit case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In our definition of a (jk) simple game we will deviate from Freixas and Zwicker (2003) by numbering the input and output levels starting from 0 instead of 1 and assuming that lower numbers correspond to a lower level of approval.

  2. Note that we slightly deviate from the original definition of a (jk) simple game in Freixas and Zwicker (2003), see Footnote 1. With this, we ensure that (2, 2) simple games are in one-to-one correspondence to simple games encoding ‘‘no’’ as 0 and ‘‘yes’’ as 1.

  3. Using the notation introduced at the beginning of Sect. 2, we have \(v(x_{-i},y_i)=v(x_{N\backslash \{i\}},y_i)= v(x_1,\ldots ,x_{i-1},y_i,x_{i+1},\ldots ,x_n)\).

  4. The definition of unanimity games has already been given in the second paragraph of Sect. 2.

References

  • Algaba E, Fragnelli V, Sánchez-Soriano J (2019) Handbook of the Shapley value. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amer R, Carreras F, Magaña A (1998) Extension of values to games with multiple alternatives. Ann Oper Res 84:63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey P (1975) On the uniqueness of the Shapley value. Int J Game Theory 4(3):131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal DS, Machover M (1998) The measurement of voting power. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freixas J (2005) The Shapley–Shubik power index for games with several levels of approval in the input and output. Decis Support Syst 39(2):185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freixas J (2019) A value for \(j\)-cooperative games: some theoretical aspects and applications. In: Algaba E, Fragnelli V, Sánchez-Soriano J (eds) Handbook of the Shapley value, vol chapter 14. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 281–311

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freixas J, Zwicker WS (2003) Weighted voting, abstention, and multiple levels of approval. Soc Choice Welf 21(3):399–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J, Parker C (2018) The conditional Shapley–Shubik measure for ternary voting games. Games Econ Behav 108:379–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch M, Marichal J, Mesiar R, Pap E (2009) Aggregation functions. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi JC (1963) A simplified bargaining model for the n-person cooperative game. Int Econ Rev 4(2):194–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C-R, Raghavan T (1993) Shapley value for multichoice cooperative games, i. Games Econ Behav 5(2):240–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X (2006) An asymmetric Shapley–Shubik power index. Int J Game Theory 34(2):229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz S (2014) Measuring voting power in convex policy spaces. Economies 2(1):45–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz S (2018) Importance in systems with interval decisions. Adv Complex Syst 21(6):1850024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz S, Moyouwou I, Touyem H (2019) An axiomatization of the Shapley–Shubik index for interval decisions. arXiv:1907.01323

  • Kurz S, Napel S (2018) The roll call interpretation of the Shapley value. Econ Lett 173:108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann I, Shapley L (1964) The a priori voting strength of the electoral college. In: Shubik M (ed) Game theory and related approaches to social behavior. Robert E. Krieger Publishing, Malabar, pp 151–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A (1994) A course in game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pongou R, Tchantcho B, Tedjeugang N (2012) Revenue sharing in hierarchical organizations: a new interpretation of the generalized Banzhaf value. Theor Econ Lett 2(4):369–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley LS (1953) A value for \(n\)-person games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Contributions to the theory of games, Annals of mathematical studies, vol 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 307–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley LS, Shubik M (1954) A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am Polit Sci Rev 48(3):787–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Hilaire Touyem benefits from a financial support of the CETIC (Centre d’Excellence Africain en Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication) Project of the University of Yaounde I. We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sascha Kurz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurz, S., Moyouwou, I. & Touyem, H. Axiomatizations for the Shapley–Shubik power index for games with several levels of approval in the input and output. Soc Choice Welf 56, 569–594 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01296-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01296-6

Navigation