Abstract
Can grammatical cues affect the way people activate event knowledge? We used mouse tracking to study the effect of grammatical aspect on the mental activation of instruments in Persian. Verb aspect is defined as how an action or event is extended over time, whether it is perfective (complete) or imperfective (incomplete). We predicted that imperfective aspect would trigger the mental activation of event knowledge, thus making participants mistakenly believe that the instrument with which the action is normally performed was present in the sentence. We tested this hypothesis using manual action verbs. Fifty female participants read a simple active sentence in which an actor had done or was doing an action (e.g., Sara has sliced/is slicing the zucchinis) with an implied instrument (knife). Then, they were presented with a picture of the implied instrument and judged whether the instrument was mentioned in the sentence they just read by clicking on the PRESENT or ABSENT response option. We predicted that participants would be less efficient at clicking ABSENT in the imperfective condition. In line with this prediction, we found that the imperfective condition caused significant deviation to the incorrect response PRESENT. However, no significant time differences emerged. The results are consistent with embodied views of language comprehension.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The linguistic data used in this study are from Farsi, the variety of Persian language spoken in Iran.
References
Anderson, S. E., Matlock, T., & Spivey, M. (2013). Grammatical aspect and temporal distance in motion descriptions. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00337
Anvari, H., & Ahmadi Givi, H. (1997). Dastur-e zaban-e farsi [The Grammar of Farsi] (2nd ed., Vol. 2). Tehran: Fatemi Publication.
Athanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E. (2013). Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science, 37(2), 286–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12006
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–609. ((Discussion 610–660)).
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Embodied Language Processing: Neuroimaging, Behavioural, and Neurocomputational Perspectives, 112(3), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.07.002
Borghi, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory and Cognition, 32(6), 863–873. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196865
Bosbach, S., Cole, J., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Inferring another’s expectation from action: The role of peripheral sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 8(10), 1295. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1535
Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: semantic Somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY), 19(8), 1905–1914. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn217
Carrera, P., Muñoz, D., Caballero, A., Fernández, I., Aguilar, P., & Albarracín, D. (2014). How verb tense affects the construal of action: The simple past tense leads people into an abstract mindset. Psicologica: Revista de Metodologia y Psicologia Experimental, 35(2), 209–223.
Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12(4), 478–484. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0635
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Berlin: Mouton.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Koning, B. B., Wassenburg, S. I., Bos, L. T., & Van der Schoot, M. (2017). Size does matter: implied object size is mentally simulated during language comprehension. Discourse Processes, 54(7), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1119604
Dowty, D. R. (1986). The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics? Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627434
Erdocia, K., & Laka, I. (2018). Negative transfer effects on L2 word order processing. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00337
Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007). Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.182
Flecken, M., Stutterheim, C. V., & Carroll, M. (2014). Grammatical aspect influences motion event perception: Findings from a cross- linguistic non-verbal recognition task*. Language and Cognition, 6(1), 45–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2013.2
Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.226
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 21(3), 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(3), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196313
Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2006). Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(18), 4917–4921. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5389-05.2006
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307.
Hinnell, J. (2018). The multimodal marking of aspect: The case of five periphrastic auxiliary constructions in North American English. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(4), 773–806. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0009
Hoeben Mannaert, L., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. (2017). Is color an integral part of a rich mental simulation? Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0708-1
Incera, S., & McLennan, C. T. (2016). Mouse tracking reveals that bilinguals behave like experts*. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000218
Incera, S., & McLennan, C. T. (2018). Bilingualism and age are continuous variables that influence executive function. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 25(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2017.1319902
Johnson, M. (1990). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis Of Meaning, Imagination, And Reason (1 edition). University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1986). An introduction to cognitive grammar. Cognitive Science, 10(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1001_1
Langacker, R. W. (2001). Concept, image, and symbol, The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857733
Liu, N., & Bergen, B. (2016). When do language comprehenders mentally simulate locations? Cognitive Linguistics, 27(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0123
Madden, C. J., Dominey, P. F., & Ventre-Dominey, J. (2017). Grammatical verb aspect and event roles in sentence processing. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189919
Madden, C. J., & Therriault, D. J. (2009). Verb aspect and perceptual simulations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 62(7), 1294–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802696088
Madden, C. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196106
Mahootian, Sh. (2004). Dastur-e zabaan-e farsi az didgaah-e radeshenaasi [The Grammar of Persian from Typological Perspective] (M. Samaei, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e Markaz.
Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143
Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory and Cognition, 32(8), 1389–1400.
Matlock, T., Sparks, D., Matthews, J. L., Hunter, J., & Huette, S. (2012). Smashing new results on aspectual framing: How people talk about car accidents. Studies in Language. International Journal Sponsored by the Foundation Foundations of Language, 36(3), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.3.09mat
Ostarek, M., Joosen, D., Ishag, A., de Nijs, M., & Huettig, F. (2019). Are visual processes causally involved in “perceptual simulation” effects in the sentence-picture verification task? Cognition, 182, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.017
Parrill, F., Bergen, B., & Lichtenstein, P. (2012). Grammatical aspect in multimodal language production: Using gesture to reveal event representations. In 11th Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language Conference. https://csdl2012.sites.olt.ubc.ca/2012/04/16/grammatical-aspect-in-multimodal-language-production-using-gesture-to-reveal-event-representations/.
Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (2010). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (Reuse Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pulvermüller, F. (2001). Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(12), 517–524.
Purmohammad, M. (2015). Grammatical encoding in bilingual language production: A focus on code-switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1797. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01797
R Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (3.5.3) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2004). Perceiving action identity: How pianists recognize their own performances. Psychological Science, 15(9), 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00727.x
Rezaee, V. (2012). Nomood-e estemraari dar zabaan-e farsi [The progressive aspect and its manifestation in contemporary Persian]. Literary Arts, 4(1), 79–92.
Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27(5), 767–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00064-8
Rommers, J., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F. (2013). Object shape and orientation do not routinely influence performance during language processing. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2218–2225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613490746
Salomon, M. M., Magliano, J. P., & Radvansky, G. A. (2013). Verb aspect and problem solving. Cognition, 128(2), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.012
Shabani-Jadidi, P. (2016). Compound verb processing in second language speakers of Persian. Iranian Studies, 49(1), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2015.1047644
Shapiro, L. A. (2019). Flesh matters: The body in cognition. Mind and Language, 34(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12203
Sherrill, A. M., Eerland, A., Zwaan, R. A., & Magliano, J. P. (2015). Understanding how grammatical aspect influences legal judgment. PLoS ONE, 10(10), e0141181. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141181
Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(29), 10393–10398. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503903102
Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00326
Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., & Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context. Memory and Cognition, 16(4), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197039
Truitt, T. P., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Verb aspect affects the generation of instrument inferences. In 38th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Vahidian-Kamyar, T., & Emrani, G. (2000). Persian grammar (1st ed.). Tehran: Samt.
Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00430
Funding
This research was supported by Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) under grant No. 95827444.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The first author (Ramin Golshaie) declares that he has no conflict of interest. The second author (Sara Incera) declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in this research were in accordance with the ethical standards of Alzahra University Ethical Committee. The procedures performed in this research were also in accordance with the APA ethical guidelines and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Golshaie, R., Incera, S. Grammatical Aspect and Mental Activation of Implied Instruments: A Mouse-Tracking Study in Persian. J Psycholinguist Res 50, 737–755 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09742-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09742-3