Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Listed SMEs and innovation: the role of founding board members

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing from the resource-based view of the firm, Penrosean theory, and the resource dependence theory, it is argued in this study that the characteristics of directors are key factors for achieving the resources that listed SMEs will require to develop innovation, a scenario that often highlights the necessary replacement of the founding board members. We test our proposed relationships with a sample consisting of all the companies listed on the MAB (Alternative Spanish Stock Market) between 2010 and 2017. Our results offer new insights into the role of the founding board members, highlighting the need for the professionalization of the governance of these SMEs, by appointing independent outside directors and by decreasing the proportion of founding members on the board. Likewise, our results showed that this relationship is moderated by the age of the company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.bolsasymercados.es/mab/ing/MaB/IAmMaB.aspx

References

  • Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: a review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, R., Jindal, V., & Seth, R. (2019). Board diversity and firm performance: the role of business group affiliation. International Business Review, 28(6), 101600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, N. H., Halim, H. A., & Zainal, S. (2010). Is entrepreneurial competency the silver bullet for SME success in a developing nation. International Business Management, 4, 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R., & Reeb, D. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the SP 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Añón-Higón, D., Manjón-Antolin, M., Mañez, J. A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2015). Does R&D protect SMEs from the hardness of the cycle? Evidence from Spanish SMEs (1990-2009). International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(2), 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arosa, B., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2013). The board structure and firm performance in SMEs: evidence from Spain. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19, 127–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzubiaga, U., Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Maseda, A., & Iturralde, T. (2018a). Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation in family SMEs: unveiling the (actual) impact of the Board of Directors. Journal of Business Venturing, 33, 455–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzubiaga, U., Iturralde, T., Maseda, A., & Kotlar, J. (2018b). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in family SMEs: the moderating effects of family, women, and strategic involvement in the board of directors. International Entrepreneurships and Management Journal, 14, 217–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin, A. S., Krishnan, R. T., & George, R. (2016). Board characteristics, financial slack and R&D investments: an empirical analysis of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. International Studies of Management & Organization, 46(1), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balkin, D. B., Markman, G. D., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2000). Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1118–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & Van Gils, A. (2011). Boards of directors in family businesses: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 134–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, V. L., & Muller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristic and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(1), 782–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer, B. R., Jones, F. F., & Neubaum, D. O. (2005). A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 663–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barroso, C., Villegas, M. M., & Pérez-Calero, L. (2011). Board influence on a firm’s internationalization. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia, D., Neirotti, P., & Paolucci, E. (2018). The role of R&D investments and export on SMEs’ growth: a domain ambidexterity perspective. Management Decisions, 56, 1883–1903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C. M., Burton, M. D., & O’Reilly, C. (2007). Early teams: the impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloc, F. (2014). Innovation in state-owned enterprises: reconsidering the conventional wisdom. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(3), 821–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloc, F., Laurenza, E., & Rossi, M. A. (2016). Corporate governance effects on innovation when both agency costs and asset specificity matter. Industrial and Corporate Change., dtw009.

  • Ben-Amar, W., Francoeur, C., Hafsi, T., & Labelle, R. (2013). What makes better boards? A closer look at diversity and ownership. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berraies, S., & Rejeb, W. B. (2019). Boards of directors' roles and size: what effects on exploitative and exploratory innovations? Case of listed Tunisian firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 23(2), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 257–273.

  • Block, J. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: an agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 248–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, W., & Karichalil, R. (2002). Entrepreneurial transitions: factors influencing founder departure. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 818–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommaraju, R., Ahearne, M., Krause, R., & Tirunillai, S. (2019). Does a customer on the board of directors affect business-to-business firm performance? Journal of Marketing, 83(1), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, F., & Reguera-Alvarado, N. (2017). The effect of board of directors on R&D intensity: board tenure and multiple directorships. R&D Management, 47(5), 701–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunninge, O., Nordqvist, M., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Corporate governance and strategic change in SMEs: the effects of ownership, board composition and top management teams. Small Business Economics, 29(3), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, H. R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M., Fossen, F. M., & Kritikos, A. S. (2009). Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs – new evidence from an experimentally validated survey. Small Business Economics, 32(2), 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannella Jr., A. A., Jones, C. D., & Withers, M. C. (2015). Family-versus lone-founder-controlled public corporations: social identity theory and boards of directors. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 436–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Q., Maruping, L. M., & Takeuchi, R. (2006). Disentangling the effects of CEO turnover and succession on organizational capabilities: a social network perspective. Organization Science, 17(5), 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Q., Simsek, Z., & Jansen, J. J. (2015). CEO social capital and entrepreneurial orientation of the firm: bonding and bridging effects. Journal of Management, 41(7), 1957–1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capezio, A., Shields, J., & O'Donnell, M. (2011). Too good to be true: board structural independence as a moderator of CEO pay for firm performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 487–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certo, S. T., Holcomb, T. R., & Holmes Jr., R. M. (2009). IPO research in management and entrepreneurship: moving the agenda forward. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1340–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chahine, S., Filatotchev, I., & Zahra, S. A. (2011). Building perceived quality of founder–involved IPO firms: founders’ effects on board selection and stock market performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S., Wu, W., & Wong, Y. (2010). Family control and stock market reactions to innovation announcements. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 152–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. R., & Chuang, W. T. (2009). Alignment or entrenchment? Corporate governance and cash holdings in growing firms. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1200–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H.-L., & Hsu, W.-T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22(4), 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, V. Y. S., Tsao, S. M., & Chen, G. Z. (2013). Founding family ownership and innovation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 20(4), 429–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., Hsieh, L., Elbanna, S., Karmowska, J., Marinova, S., Puthusserry, P., & Zhang, Y. (2017). SME international business models: the role of context and experience. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 664–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S. Y., & Kim, S. K. (2017). Horizon problem and firm innovation: the influence of CEO career horizon, exploitation and exploration on breakthrough innovations. Research Policy, 46(10), 1801–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNMV, (2006) Good governance code of listed companies.comision Nacional de Mercado de Valores. Madrid.

  • Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: the role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombelli, A. (2010). Alternative investment market: a way to promote entrepreneurship. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 10(3–4), 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2010). On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: exploring the role of founders’ human capital and venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 610–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusmano, L., & Thompson, J. (2013). Alternative financing instruments for SMEs and entrepreneurs: The case of mezzanine finance. OECD Publishing.

  • Dalziel, T., Gentry, R. J., & Bowerman, M. (2011). An integrated agency–resource dependence view of the influence of directors’ human and relational capital on firms’ R&D spending. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1217–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cleyn, S. H., & Braet, J. (2012). Do board composition and investor type influence innovativeness in SMEs? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(3), 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, P., & Wiklund, J. (2017). The effects of CEO founder status and stock ownership on entrepreneurial orientation in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 32–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Y. (2005). The impact of board composition on firms’ critical decisions: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 31(3), 424–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Y. (2007). The influence of outside directors’ stock-option compensation on firms’ R&D. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 816–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dushnitsky, G. (2010). Entrepreneurial optimism in the market for technological inventions. Organization Science, 21, 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Shoubaki, A., Laguir, I., & den Besten, M. (2019). Human capital and SME growth: the mediating role of reasons to start a business. Small Business Economics, 54, 1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0129-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2019). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/63/small-and-medium-sized-enterprises

  • Fernández, Z., & Nieto, M. J. (2006). Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 340–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Toms, S., & Wright, M. (2006a). The firm’ss strategic dynamics and corporate governance life-cycle. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2(4), 256–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Wright, M., & Arberk, M. (2006b). Venture capitalists, syndication and governance in initial public offerings. Small Business Economics, 26(4), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H. M., & Pollock, T. G. (2004). Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: the case of initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 463–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: understanding board of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2005). Outside directors in SME boards: a call for theoretical reflections. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 1(1), 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y., & Hafsi, T. (2015). R&D spending among Chinese SMEs: the role of business owners’ characteristics. Management Decision, 53(8), 1714–1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, S., Li, Q., & Shaw, J. (2019). Entrepreneurial firms grow up: board undervaluation, board evolution, and firm performance in newly public firms. Strategic Management Journal., 40, 1882–1907. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic, E., Lubatkin, M. H., & Schulze, W. S. (2004). Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: a governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 899–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randøy, T., & Goel, S. (2003). Ownership structure, founder leadership, and performance in Norwegian SMEs: implications for financing entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 619–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. G. (2001). A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guldiken, O., & Darendeli, I. S. (2016). Too much of a good thing: board monitoring and R&D investments. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2931–2938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M. L., Shepherd, D. A., & Griffin, D. (2006). A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Science, 52(2), 160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, B., & Filatotchev, I. (2019). Founder retention as CEO at IPO in emerging economies: the role of private equity owners and national institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 34, 418–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidrick, T., & Struggles, H. (2011). Challenging board performance―European report on corporate governance. Chicago: Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.

  • Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M.S. (2000). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Working paper, University of California at Berkeley.

  • Hernández, A. B., Camelo, C., & Valle, R. (2010). The effects of boards of directors on R&D investments: the case of Spain. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 10(2), 152–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, A., Camelo, C., & Valle, R. (2014). Does board member stock ownership influence the effect of board composition on innovation? European Journal of International Management, 8(4), 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2005). Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: an empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm-performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28, 383–396.

  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: a review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, W. T., Chen, H. L., & Cheng, C. Y. (2013). Internationalization and firm performance of SMEs: the moderating effects of CEO attributes. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). How does profitability of innovation change with firm age? Small Business Economics, 22(3–4), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, B. A., & Tabak, F. (2008). Factors influencing the choice between founder versus non-founder CEOs for IPO firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman, N., Khorana, A., Nelling, D., & Covin, J. (2000). CEO founder status and firm financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12), 1215–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J., Ocasio, W., & McDonnell, M. H. (2014). The structural elaboration of board independence: executive power, institutional logics, and the adoption of CEO-only board structures in US corporate governance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1834–1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. (2012). Antecedents of board composition: the role of nomination committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 474–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammerlander, N., Dessi, C., Bird, M., Floris, M., & Murru, A. (2015). The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation: a multicase study. Family Business Review, 28(4), 332–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, M., Okamuro, H., & Honjo, Y. (2015). Does founders’ human capital matter for innovation? Evidence from Japanese Start-ups. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 114–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khurshed, A., Kostas, D., & Saadouni, B. (2016). Warrants in underwritten IPOs: the alternative investment market (AIM) experience. Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 1081–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2009). Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management, 35(4), 981–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. M. (2005). A comparison of ownership structures and innovations of US and Japanese firms. Managerial and Decisions Economics, 26, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. G., & O’Neil, H. M. (2003). Ownership structures and R&D investments of U.S. and Japanese firms: agency and stewardship perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 212–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. M., Kim, J., & Bae, J. (2020). Founder CEOs and innovation: evidence from CEO sudden deaths in public firms. Research Policy In press, 49, 103862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Terjesen, S., & Umans, T. (2018). Corporate governance in entrepreneurial firms: a systematic review and research agenda. Small Business Economics, 1–32.

  • Love, J. H., Roper, S., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Experience, age and exporting performance in UK SMEs. International Business Review, 25(4), 806–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado-Guzmán, G., Garza-Reyes, J., Pinzón, S., & Kumar, V. (2019). Innovation capabilities and performance: are they truly linked in SMEs? International Journal of Innovation Science, 11, 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C., & Ow-Yong, K. (1998). Corporate governance in small companies–the alternative investment market. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(4), 224–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. L., Khanna, P., & Westphal, J. D. (2008). Getting them to think outside the circle: corporate governance, CEOs’ external advice networks, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 453–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Lester, R. H. (2011). Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: social context, identity, and institutional logics. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R. (2004). R&D collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitation in the face of globalization. Technovation, 24, 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nason, R. S., & Wiklund, J. (2018). An assessment of resource-based theorizing on firm growth and suggestions for the future. Journal of Management, 44(1), 32–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nason, R. S., Wiklund, J., McKelvie, A., Hitt, M., & Yu, W. (2019). Orchestrating boundaries: the effect of R&D boundary permeability on new venture growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. (2003). The persistence of founder influence: management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 707–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojok, F., & Okema, S. (2016). How does board composition affect R&D investments? Master’s Thesis. Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Business Administration.

  • Ortega-Argilés, R., Moreno, R., & Suriñach Caralt, J. (2005). Ownership structure and innovation: Is there a real link? The Annals of Regional Science, 39, 637–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osma, B. G. (2008). Board independence and real earnings management: the case of R&D expenditure. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(2), 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacín-Sánchez, M. J., Bravo, F., & Reguera-Alvarado, N. (2019). Characteristics and determinants of the board of directors of growing Spanish SMEs going public. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(3), 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C. (2018). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge University Press.

  • Peng, M.V (2004). Outsider directors and Firm Performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 453–471.

  • Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: the nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1955). The theory of the growth of the firm (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Pérez-Calero, L., Larrañeta, B. & Wright, M. (2019). Initial public offering valuation and prior shared experience in the boardroom of threshold ventures: A study of industry effects. Corporate Governance: An International Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12281.

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The extemal control of organizations. In A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picken, J. C. (2017). From founder to CEO: an entrepreneur’s roadmap. Business Horizons, 60, 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pombo, C., & Gutiérrez, L. H. (2011). Outside directors, board interlocks and firm performance: empirical evidence from Colombian business groups. Journal of Economics and Business, 63(4), 251–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). Core competency concept. Harvard Business Review, 64(3), 70–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preisendörfer, P., Bitz, A., & Bezuidenhout, F. J. (2012). Business start-ups and their prospects of success in south African townships. South African Review of Sociology, 43(3), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2009). Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: substituting technology by management in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J., & Ortt, R. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the mediating role of functional performances. Management Research Review, 41(7), 878–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to. Difference” and “System” GMM in Stata.” Working Paper, 103.

  • Saeed, A., & Ziaulhaq, H. M. (2019). The impact of CEO characteristics on the internationalization of SMEs: evidence from the UK. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 36(3), 322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapra, H., Subramanian, A., & Subramanian, K. V. (2014). Corporate governance and innovation: theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(4), 957–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M. A., & Phelps, C. C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: the impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, C. L., Nicolai, A. T., & Covin, J. G. (2018). Are founder-led firms less susceptible to managerial myopia? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1042258718806627.

  • Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P., Astrachan, J. H., & Pieper, T. M. (2013). Family involvement in the board of directors: effects on sales internationalization. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciascia, S., Nordqvist, M., Mazzola, P., & De Massis, A. (2015). Family ownership and R&D intensity in small and medium sized firms. Journal Product Innovation Management, 349–360.

  • Serrasqueiro, Z., & Macas Nunes, P. (2012). Is Age a determinant of SMEs’ financing decisions? Empirical evidence using panel data models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 627–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, I. A., & Peters, L. (2018). The value of board monitoring in promoting R&D: a test of agency-theory in the US context. Journal of Management and Governance, 22(2), 339–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, I. A., O'Brien, J. P., & Peters, L. (2018). Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms. Journal of Business Research, 82, 192–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D., Tang, T., Wang, M., & Zhang, W. (2015). The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 13, 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, H., Xu, H., & Zhang, X. (2018). Do politically connected independent directors create or destroy value? Journal of Business Research, 83, 82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Floyd, S. W. (2003). Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurial behavior: a structural embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management, 29(3), 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., & Veiga, J. J. F. (2010). The impact of CEO core self-evaluation on the firm’s entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. G., & Cao, Q. (2007). An entrepreneurial perspective on the firm-environment relationship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, J., & Stuart, T. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly., 45, 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., Fischer, E., Mitchell, R., & Phan, P. (2009). At the center of the action: Innovation and technology strategy research in the small business setting. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 233–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theriou, G., & Chatzoudes, D. (2013). Exploring the entrepreneurship-performance relationship: evidence from Greek SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(2), 352–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2000). Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1157–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribo, J., Berrone, P., & Surroca, J. (2007). Do the type and number of blockholders influence R&D investments? New evidence from Spain, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 828–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2004). The R&D performance in Taiwan’s electronics industry: a longitudinal examination. R&D Management, 34(2), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzabbar, D., & Margolis, J. (2017). Beyond the startup stage: the founding team’s human capital, new venture’s stage of life, founder–CEO duality, and breakthrough innovation. Organization Science, 28(5), 857–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah, S., Akhtar, P., & Zaefarian, G. (2018). Dealing with endogeneity bias: the generalized method of moments (GMM) for panel data. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gils, A., Voordeckers, W., & van den Heuvel, J. (2004). Environmental uncertainty and strategic behavior in Belgian family firms. European Management Journal, 22(5), 588–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., & Song, M. (2016). Are founder directors detrimental to new ventures at initial public offering? Journal of Management, 42, 644–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, N. (2006). Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 960–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, N. (2017). The throne vs. the kingdom: founder control and value creation in startups. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., & Örtqvista, D. (2010). Does network board capital matter? A study of innovative performance in strategic SME networks. Journal of Business Research, 63, 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, X., & O’Neil, H. (2013). Boards as resource providers and monitors for research and development. Journal of Business Strategies, 30(2), 180–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, T., & Sung, T. (2015). How outside directors facilitate corporate R&D investment? Evidence from large Korean firms. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1251–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating impact of industrial technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713–1735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Filatotchev, I. (2004). Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: a knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 885–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., Neubaum, D. O., & Huse, M. (2000). Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management, 26(5), 947–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O., & Naldi, L. (2007). The effects of ownership and governance on SMEs’ international knowledge-based resources. Small Business Economics, 29(3), 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zona, F., Zattoni, A., & Minichilli, A. (2013). A contingency model of boards of directors and firm innovation: the moderating role of firm size. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain (ECO2017-84364-R).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Marketing, Universidad de Sevilla, Ramón y Cajal, n° 1, Sevilla, Spain

    Carmen Barroso-Castro, Marta Domínguez de la Concha Castañeda & Mª de los Ángeles Rodríguez Serrano

Authors
  1. Carmen Barroso-Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marta Domínguez de la Concha Castañeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mª de los Ángeles Rodríguez Serrano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Barroso-Castro.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barroso-Castro, C., Domínguez de la Concha Castañeda, M. & Rodríguez Serrano, M.d.l.Á. Listed SMEs and innovation: the role of founding board members. Int Entrep Manag J 18, 901–934 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00709-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00709-3

Keywords

JEL classifications

Search

Navigation