Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T06:18:14.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robust long-term interest rate risk hedging in incomplete bond markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2020

Sally Shen ,
Antoon Pelsser  and
Peter Schotman
Sally Shen*
Affiliation:
Global Risk Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Network for Studies on Pensions Aging and Retirement, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands and
Antoon Pelsser
Affiliation:
Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Peter Schotman
Affiliation:
Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Email: sallyshenmaastricht@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pricing ultra-long-dated pension liabilities under the market-consistent valuation is challenged by the scarcity of the long-term market instruments that match or exceed the terms of pension liabilities. We develop a robust self-financing hedging strategy which adopts a min–max expected shortfall hedging criterion to replicate the long-dated liabilities for agents who fear parameter misspecification. We introduce a backward robust least squares Monte Carlo method to solve this dynamic robust optimization problem. We find that both naive and robust optimal portfolios depend on the hedging horizon and the current funding ratio. The robust policy suggests taking more risk when the current funding ratio is low. The yield curve constructed by the robust dynamic hedging portfolio is always lower than the naive one but is higher than the model-based yield curve in a low-rate environment.

Keywords

Incomplete marketleast squares Monte Carloliability valuationparameter uncertaintyrobust optimizationG11C61E43
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 273 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, E, Hansen, L and Sargent, T (2003) A quartet of semigroups for model specification, robustness, prices of risk, and model detection. Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 68–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ang, A, Chen, B and Sundaresan, S (2013) Liability-driven investment with downside risk. Journal of Portfolio Management 40, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberis, N (2000) Investing for the long run when returns are predictable. The Journal of Finance 55, 225–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzoni, L, Collin-Dufresne, P and Goldstein, RS (2007) Portfolio choice over the life-cycle when the stock and labor markets are cointegrated. The Journal of Finance 62, 2123–2167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, M, Goyal, A, Santa-Clara, P and Stroud, J (2005) A simulation approach to dynamic portfolio choice with an application to learning about return predictability. Review of Financial Studies 18, 831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, MJ (1998) The role of learning in dynamic portfolio decisions. European Finance Review 1, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broeders, D, Jong, FD and Schotman, P (2014) Interest rate models for pension and insurance regulation. Technical Report. Working paper. Netspar Design Papers.Google Scholar
Campbell, JY and Viceira, L (2001) Who should buy long-term bonds? American Economic Review 91, 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, CD (2006) The method of endogenous gridpoints for solving dynamic stochastic optimization problems. Economics Letters 91, 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, JH and Saa-Requejo, J (2000) Beyond arbitrage: good-deal asset price bounds in incomplete markets. Journal of Political Economy 108, 79–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detemple, J and Rindisbacher, M (2008) Dynamic asset liability management with tolerance for limited shortfalls. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 43, 281–294.Google Scholar
Diris, B (2011) Model uncertainty for long-term investors. Available at SSRN 1786587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffee, GR (2002) Term premia and interest rate forecasts in affine models. The Journal of Finance 57, 405–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D and Kan, R (1996) A yield-factor model of interest rates. Mathematical Finance 6, 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybvig, PH, Ingersoll, JE Jr and Ross, SA (1996) Long forward and zero-coupon rates can never fall. Journal of Business 69, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, L (2010) A paradox for the smooth ambiguity model of preference. Econometrica 78, 2085–2099.Google Scholar
Föllmer, H and Leukert, P (2000) Efficient hedging: cost versus shortfall risk. Finance and Stochastics 4, 117–146.Google Scholar
Gilboa, I and Marinacci, M (2011) Ambiguity and the Bayesian paradigm. Advances in Economics and Econometrics 7, 179–242.Google Scholar
Gilboa, I and Schmeidler, D (1989) Max-min expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürkaynak, RS, Sack, B and Wright, JH (2007) The us treasury yield curve: 1961 to the present. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 2291–2304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L and Sargent, T (2001) Robust control and model uncertainty. American Economic Review 91, 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L and Sargent, T (2007) Robustness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, RW and Bawa, VS (1976) The effect of estimation risk on optimal portfolio choice. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koijen, R, Nijman, T and Werker, B (2007) Appendix describing the numerical method used in ‘when can life-cycle investors benefit from time-varying bond risk premia?’. Available at SSRN 945720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koijen, RS, Nijman, TE and Werker, BJ (2010) When can life cycle investors benefit from time-varying bond risk premia? Review of Financial Studies 23, 741–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, D and Zeldes, SP (2006) Valuing and hedging defined benefit pension obligations – the role of stocks revisited. Northwestern University and Columbia University, Working Paper, September.Google Scholar
Maenhout, P (2004) Robust portfolio rules and asset pricing. Review of Financial Studies 17, 951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R (1969) Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous-time case. The Review of Economics and Statistics 51, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C and Siegel, A (1987) Parsimonious modeling of yield curves. Journal of Business 60, 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, WF and Tint, LG (1990) Liabilities – a new approach. The Journal of Portfolio Management 16, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, S, Pelsser, A and Schotman, P (2019) Robust hedging in incomplete markets. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 18, 473–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A and Wilson, T (2001) Fitting yield curves with long term constraints. Technical Report.Google Scholar
Svensson, LE (1994) Estimating and interpreting forward rates: Sweden 1992–4. NBER Working Paper 4871.Google Scholar
Vasicek, O (1977) An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics 5, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellekoop, M (2016) The ultimate forward rate: time for a step backwards? Netspar industry paper series.Google Scholar
Waggoner, DF (1997) Spline methods for extracting interest rate curves from coupon bond prices. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working Paper, No. 97-10.Google Scholar