Skip to main content
Log in

College Students’ Time Management: a Self-Regulated Learning Perspective

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite its recognized importance for academic success, much of the research investigating time management has proceeded without regard to a comprehensive theoretical model for understanding its connections to students’ engagement, learning, or achievement. Our central argument is that self-regulated learning provides the rich conceptual framework necessary for understanding college students’ time management and for guiding research examining its relationship to their academic success. We advance this larger purpose through four major sections. We begin by describing work supporting the significance of time management within post-secondary contexts. Next, we review the limited empirical findings linking time management and the motivational and strategic processes viewed as central to self-regulated learning. We then evaluate conceptual ties between time management and processes critical to the forethought, performance, and post-performance phases of self-regulated learning. Finally, we discuss commonalities in the antecedents and contextual determinants of self-regulated learning and time management. Throughout these sections, we identify avenues of research that would contribute to a greater understanding of time management and its fit within the framework of self-regulated learning. Together, these efforts demonstrate that time management is a significant self-regulatory process through which students actively manage when and for how long they engage in the activities deemed necessary for reaching their academic goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, G. A., & Jex, S. M. (1999). Relationships between time management, control, work family conflict, and strain. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4(1), 72–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aeon, B., & Aguinis, H. (2017). It’s about time: new perspectives and insights on time management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31, 309–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 205–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balduf, M. (2009). Underachievement among college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 274–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banahan, L., & Mullendore, R. (2014). Navigating the first college year. A guide for parents and families. Columbia: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, J. M., Magun-Jackson, S., & Ryan, J. J. (2010). Dispositional approach-avoidance achievement motivation and cognitive self-regulated learning: the mediation of achievement goals. Individual Differences Research, 8, 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basila, C. (2014). Good time management and motivation level predict student academic success in college on-line courses. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 4, 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bembenutty, H. (2009). Academic delay of gratification, self-regulation of learning, gender differences, and expectancy-value. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 347–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuhler, R., Griffin, D., & Peetz, J. (2010). The planning fallacy: cognitive, motivational, and social origins. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidjerano, T., & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist, 1, 100–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: a perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. J., & Feather, N. T. (1988). Some correlates of structure and purpose in the use of time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., & Glynn, S. M. (1989). Mental management and creativity: a cognitive model of time management for intellectual productivity. In J. Glover, R. Ronning, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 429–440). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, R., & Griffin, D. (2015). When plans lead to optimistic forecasts. In M. D. Mumford & M. Frese (Eds.), The psychology in planning in organizations: research and applications (pp. 31–57). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlison, J. D., Murphy, C. S., & Dwyer, W. O. (2009). Evaluation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire for predicting academic performance in college students of varying scholastic aptitude. College Student Journal, 43, 1313–1323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnette, J., O’Boyle, E., VanEpps, E., Pollack, J., & Finkel, E. (2013). Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, C. D., Weststrate, A., Brown, C., & Champion, F. (2010). Development of the time management environment (TiME) scale. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 649–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano, F. (2006). An in-depth analysis of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 1023–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capdeferro, N., Romero, M., & Barberà, E. (2014). Polychronicity: review of the literature and a new configuration for the study of this hidden dimension of online learning. Distance Education, 35, 294–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, S. (2011). Self-regulated learning in higher education: identifying key component processes. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 989–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, A., & Nguyen, L. T. (2011). The mediating effects of time structure on the relationships between time management behaviour, job satisfaction, and psychological well-being. Australian Journal of Psychology, 63, 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B. (2016). How people learn in an asynchronous online learning environment: the relationships between graduate students’ learning strategies and learning satisfaction. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuderski, A. (2016). Time pressure prevents relational learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36, 255–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, R. (2001). Time flies: investigating the connection between intrinsic motivation and the experience of time. Journal of Personality, 69(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L., Cronbach, L. J., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D. F., Mandinach, E. B., Porteus, A. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: extending the legacy of Richard E Snow. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crede, M., & Kuncel, N. R. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: the third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 425–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crede, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crede, M., Roch, S. G., & Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010). Class attendance in college: a meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80, 272–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, M. H., & Eaton, M. J. (2000). Self-regulation of academic learning in middle-level schools. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, A., & Koenka, A. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 425–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Morales, J. F., Ferrari, J. R., & Cohen, J. R. (2008). Indecision and avoidant procrastination: the role of morningness—eveningness and time perspective in chronic delay lifestyles. The Journal of General Psychology, 135(3), 228–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donker, A., de Boer, H., Kostons, D., Dignath van Ewijk, C., & van der Werf, M. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. E., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2016). Coping with university education: the relationships of time management behaviour and work engagement with the five factor model aspects. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 268–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumen, S., Broeckmans, J., & Masui, C. (2014). The role of self-study time in freshmen’s achievement. Educational Psychology, 34, 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40, 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncheon, J. C., & Tierney, W. G. (2013). Changing conceptions of time: implications for educational research and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83, 236–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011). Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 103–140). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. (2004). Flawed self-assessments. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: the MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 6–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam, B., & Aharon, I. (2003). Students’ planning in the process of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 304–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, J. R., & Díaz-Morales, J. F. (2007). Procrastination: different time orientations reflect different motives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 707–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring cost: the forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanigan, A. E., & Kiewra, K. A. (2018). What college instructors can do about student cyber-slacking. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 585–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis-Smythe, J. A., & Robertson, I. T. (1999a). On the relationship between time management and time estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis-Smythe, J. A., & Robertson, I. T. (1999b). Time-related individual differences. Time & Society, 8, 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromme, K., Corbin, W., & Kruse, M. (2008). Behavioral risks during the transition from high school to college. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1497–1504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, P. A., & Poole, B. D. (2012). Time flies when you’re having approach-motivated fun: effects of motivational intensity on time perception. Psychological Science, 23(8), 879–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, J. M., Rutte, C. G., & Van Eerde, W. (2006). Meeting deadlines in work groups: implicit and explicit mechanisms. Applied Psychology, 55, 52–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., & Skinner, D. (2005). Does time management training work? An evaluation. International Journal of Training and Development, 9, 124–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulec, M., Selvi, Y., Boysan, M., Aydin, A., Oral, E., & Aydin, E. F. (2013). Chronotype effects on general well-being and psychopathology levels in healthy young adults. Biological Rhythm Research, 44, 457–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzman, G., Goldberg, T., & Swanson, H. (2018). A meta-analysis of self-monitoring on reading performance of K-12 students. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113, 240–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, A., Stock, A., Pinneker, L., & Strohle, S. (2014). Stress prevention through a time management training intervention: an experimental study. Educational Psychology, 34, 403–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, C., Cowell, J. M., Wiprzycka, U. J., Goldstein, D., Ralph, M., Hasher, L., & Zelazo, P. D. (2012). Circadian rhythms in executive function during the transition to adolescence: the effect of synchrony between chronotype and time of day. Developmental Science, 15(3), 408–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkin, B., Webb, T. L., Chang, B. P. I., Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Kellar, I., et al. (2016). Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 142(2), 198–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, N., Comer, J., & Hamilton-Lee, M. (1988). Gender and achievement status differences on learning factors among Black high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, L. C., Wolters, C. A., Won, S., & Brady, A. C. (2018). Academic probation, time management, and time use in a college success course. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 48, 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, T., & Heastie, S. (2008). High school to college transition: a profile of the stressors, physical and psychological health issues that affect the first-year on-campus college students. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 15(3), 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbrecht, M., Zuzanek, J., & Mannell, R. C. (2008). Time use, time pressure and gendered behavior in early and late adolescence. Sex Roles, 58, 342–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Teaching college students to be self-regulated learners. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: from teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 57–85). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(Pt 3), 703–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huie, F. C., Winsler, A., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Employment and first-year college achievement: the role of self-regulation and motivation. Journal of Education and Work, 27, 110–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, R., Frese, M., & Johnson, R. (2017). Motivation related to work: a century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantrowitz, T. M., Grelle, D. M., Beaty, J. C., & Wolf, M. B. (2012). Time is money: polychronicity as a predictor of performance across job levels. Human Performance, 25, 114–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauderer, S., & Randler, C. (2013). Differences in time use among chronotypes in adolescents. Biological Rhythm Research, 44, 601–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman-Scarborough, C., & Lindquist, J. D. (1999). Time management and polychronicity: comparisons, contrasts, and insights for the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 288–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, D. P. (2012). Cognitive and brain development in adolescence. Enfance, 64, 267–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesici, Ş., Baloğlu, M., & Deniz, M. E. (2011). Self-regulated learning strategies in relation with statistics anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 472–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. R., & Seo, E. H. (2015). The relationship between procrastination and academic performance: a meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., Winsler, A., & Huie, F. (2008). Self-regulation and ability predictors of academic success during college: a predictive validity study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 42–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C. J., & Kleinmann, M. (2002). A stitch in time saves nine: behavioural decision-making explanations for time management problem. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konig, C. J., & Waller, M. J. (2010). Time for reflection: a critical examination of polychronicity. Human Performance, 23, 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooij, D. T. A. M., Kanfer, R., Betts, M., & Rudolph, C. W. (2018). Future time perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 867–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., Newton, F. B., Kim, E., & Wilcox, D. (2013). Psychosocial factors predicting first-year college student success. Journal of College Student Development, 54, 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, R. E., Turrisi, R., & Brandel, J. M. (2006). College students’ study time: course level, time of semester, and grade earned. Psychological Reports, 98(3), 675–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liborius, P., Bellhauser, H., & Schmitz, B. (2017). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students’ time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction.

  • Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Patall, E. (2016). Motivation. In L. Corno & E. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 91–1030). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, O. L., Rijmen, F., MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. (2009). The assessment of time management in middle-school students. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 174–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E., & Latham, G. (2019). The development of goal setting theory: a half-century retrospective. Motivation Science, 5, 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro, F., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2015). Morning or evening person? Which type are you? Self-assessment of chronotype. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 168–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, D. J. (2010). Application of online discussion and cooperative learning strategies to online and blended college courses. College Student Journal, 44, 920–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macan, T. H. (1994). Time management: test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macan, T. H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Phillips, A. P. (1990). College students’ time management: correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 760–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. D. (2010). Do time management, grit, and self-control relate to academic achievement independently of conscientiousness? In R. E. Hicks (Ed.), Personality and individual differences: current directions (pp. 79–90). Bowen Hills: Australian Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCann, C., Fogarty, G. J., & Roberts, R. D. (2012). Strategies for success in education: time management is more important for part-time than full-time community college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 618–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R., & Lockenhoff, C. (2010). Self-regulation and the five-factor model of personality traits. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 143–168). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, D., & King, R. (2018). Culture and self-regulation in educational contexts. In D. Schunk & J. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 485–502). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuwisse, M., Born, M. P., & Severiens, S. E. (2013). Academic performance differences among ethnic groups: do the daily use and management of time offer explanations? Social Psychology of Education, 16, 599–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melancon, J. G. (2002). Reliability, structure, and correlates of Learning and Study Strategies Inventory scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 1020–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miele, D. B., & Scholer, A. A. (2018). The role of metamotivational monitoring in motivation regulation. Educational Psychologist, 53, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42, 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework and some new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 125–173). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonis, S., Teng, J., & Ford, C. (2005). A cross-cultural investigation of time management practices and job outcomes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 409–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonis, S. A., Philhours, M. J., & Hudson, G. I. (2006). Where does the time go? A diary approach to business and marketing students’ time use. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olaussen, B. S., & Bråten, I. (1998). Identifying latent variables measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) in Norwegian college students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olejnik, S., & Nist, S. L. (1992). Identifying latent variables measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). The Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panadero, E., Brown, G., & Strijbos, J. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: a review of known and unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(803), 830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panek, E. (2014). Left to their own devices: college students’ “guilty pleasure” media use and time management. Communication Research, 41, 561–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: an evidence based perspective (pp. 731–810). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43–97). Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevatt, F., Petscher, Y., Proctor, B. E., Hurst, A., & Adams, K. (2006). The revised Learning and Study Strategies Inventory: an evaluation of competing models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 448–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pychyl, T. A., Morin, R. W., & Salmon, B. R. (2000). Procrastination and the planning fallacy: an examination of the study habits of university students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranellucci, J., Hall, N. C., & Goetz, T. (2015). Achievement goals, emotions, learning, and performance: a process model. Motivation Science, 1, 98–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M., & Tauber, S. (2011). The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. H. (1987). Time management—a review. Work & Stress, 1, 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert, N. P., Meras, I. L., & Witkow, M. R. (2014). Theories of intelligence and students’ daily self-handicapping behaviors. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskes, M., Elliot, A. J., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2013). Time pressure undermines performance more under avoidance than approach motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 803–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rytkonen, H., Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., Virtanen, V., & Postareff, L. (2012). Factors affecting bioscience students’ academic achievement. Instructional Science, 40, 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, L., Reedy, D., & Frizell, M. (Eds.). (2018). Learning centers in the 21st century: a modern guide for learning assistance professionals in higher education. Bentonville: AR. Iona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansgiry, S. S., Bhosle, M., & Sail, K. (2006). Factors that affect academic performance among pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell, K. L., & Conte, J. M. (2008). Associations among polychronicity, goal orientation, and error orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (2006). Knowledge: structures and processes. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 245–263). Mahwah: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: from teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Yilmaz, A. (2016). Devising a structural equation model of relationships between preservice teachers’ time and study environment management, effort regulation, self-efficacy, control of learning beliefs, and metacognitive self-regulation. Science Education International, 27, 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaunessy-Dedrick, E., Suldo, S. M., Roth, R. A., & Fefer, S. A. (2015). Students’ perceptions of factors that contribute to risk and success in accelerated high school courses. The High School Journal, 98, 109–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2001). The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective beliefs in achievement and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 481–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Lacante, M. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49, 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirois, F. M. (2014). Procrastination and stress: exploring the role of self-compassion. Self and Identity, 13, 128–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: what we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K., & Bauer, K. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: a cognitive learning or affective measure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 169–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. (1989). Cognitive-conative aptitude interactions in learning. In R. Kanfer, P. Ackerman, & R. Cudeck (Eds.), Abilities, motivation, and methodology: the Minnesota symposium on learning and individual differences (pp. 435–474). Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jackson III, D. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243–310). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Testing facilitates the regulation of subsequent study time. Journal of Memory and Language, 73, 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, T., & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (2004). The learning and study strategies inventory-high school version: issues of factorial invariance across gender and ethnicity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 332–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strunk, K. K., Cho, Y., Steele, M. R., & Bridges, S. L. (2013). Development and validation of a 2× 2 model of time-related academic behavior: procrastination and timely engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, J. R., Stewart, G., Maples, G. M., & Totaro, M. W. (2009). How business students spend their time—do they really know? Research in Higher Education Journal, 3, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P., Rendon, L., Upcraft, M. L., Millar, S., Allison, K., Gregg, P., & Jalomo, R. (1994). The transition to college: diverse students, diverse stories. Research in Higher Education, 35, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueman, M., & Hartley, J. (1996). A comparison between the time-management skills and academic performance of mature and traditional-entry university students. Higher Education, 32, 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truschel, J., & Reedy, D. L. (2009). National survey—what is a learning center in the 21st century? Learning Assistance Review, 14, 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, H. C., & Liu, S. H. (2015). Relationships between time-management skills, Facebook interpersonal skills and academic achievement among junior high school students. Social Psychology of Education, 18, 503–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse (2016). Studies of interventions for students in developmental education intervention report: first year experience courses for students in developmental education. Retrieved from http://whatworks.ed.gov. Accessed 20 Jan 2020.

  • Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78, 751–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Den Hurk, M. (2006). The relation between self-regulated strategies and individual study time, prepared participation and achievement in a problem-based curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7, 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, J., Jansen, E., & Torenbeek, M. (2010). ‘It’s almost a mindset that teachers need to change’: first-year students’ need to be inducted into time management. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 777–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eerde, W. (2015). Time management and procrastination. In M. D. Mumford & M. Frese (Eds.), The psychology of planning in organizations: research and applications (pp. 312–333). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, P., Schober, B., & Spiel, C. (2008). Time students spend working at home for school. Learning and Instruction, 18, 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2005). Motivation from an attribution perspective and the social psychology of perceived competence. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 73–84). New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D. R., & Acee, T. W. (2016). LASSI user’s manual (3th ed.). Clearwater: H & H Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Baker, R. (2013). The potentials of educational data mining for researching metacognition, motivation, and self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P., & Perry, N. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkow, M. R. (2009). Academic achievement and adolescents’ daily time use in the social and academic domains. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A. (2011). Regulation of motivation: contextual and social aspects. Teachers College Record, 113, 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A., & Gonzalez, A. L. (2008). Classroom climate and motivation: a step toward integration. Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Social Psychological Influences, 15, 493–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A., & Hoops, L. D. (2015). Self-regulated learning interventions for motivationally disengaged college students. In T. L. Cleary (Ed.), Self-regulated learning interventions with at-risk youth: Enhancing adaptability, performance, and well-being (pp. 67–88). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C., & Taylor, D. (2012). A self-regulated learning perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 635–651). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A., & Won, S. (2018). Validity and the use of self-report questionnaires to assess self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 307–322). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A., Won, S., & Hussain, M. (2017). Examining the relations of time management and procrastination within a model of self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 12, 381–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Won, S., & Yu, S. L. (2018). Relations of perceived parental autonomy support and control with adolescents’ academic time management and procrastination. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk, A. E., & Woolfolk, R. L. (1986). Time management: an experimental investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, K., Heddy, B. C., & Greene, B. A. (2019). Affordances of using mobile technology to support experience-sampling method in examining college students’ engagement. Computers & Education, 128, 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. (2008). Models of secondary school students’ interest in homework: a multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1180–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. (2010). Predicting homework time management at the secondary school level: a multilevel analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Du, J., & Fan, X. (2013). “Finding our time”: predicting students’ time management in online collaborative groupwork. Computers & Education, 69, 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Yuan, R., Xu, B., & Xu, M. (2014). Modeling students’ time management in math homework. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, M., Goda, Y., Matsuda, T., Saito, Y., Kato, H., & Miyagawa, H. (2016). How does self-regulated learning relate to active procrastination and other learning behaviors? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28, 326–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. G., & Hopp, J. M. (2014). 2012-2013 national survey of first-year seminars: exploring high-impact practices in the first college year (Research report No. 4). Columbia: University of South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (1999). Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: theory, research, and applications (pp. 13–29). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: a social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. (2012). Motivation: an essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research and applications (pp. 1–30). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Self-regulating academic study time: a strategy approach. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: issues and educational applications (pp. 181–199). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zusho, A. (2017). Toward an integrated model of student learning in the college classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 301–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zusho, A., & Pintrich, P. (2003). Skill and will: the role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1081–1094.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher A. Wolters.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolters, C.A., Brady, A.C. College Students’ Time Management: a Self-Regulated Learning Perspective. Educ Psychol Rev 33, 1319–1351 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z

Keywords

Navigation