Skip to main content
Log in

Nexus between defence spending, economic growth and development: evidence from a disaggregated panel data analysis

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the causal effect relationship between defence spending, economic growth and development in three regions for the period 1990–2018. It further estimates the trivariate impacts of defence spending, growth and development in three regions. To measure growth, we used real gross domestic product as the proxy, while economic development was measured by the Human Development Index. The empirical results suggest the existence of a bidirectional long-run relationship between defence spending, economic growth and development in the entire sample and the three regions of sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and North Africa, and Latin America and the Caribbean countries. The causality results reveal that there is feedback causality between defence spending, economic growth and development. There is thus a need to promote holistic policies to reduce the defence spending necessary for the enhancement of inclusive economic growth and development in these three regions. A decrease in defence spending in the three regions will encourage aggregate output and the standard of living to increase, and move simultaneously in the same direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Note: We computed the IRFs using the PVAR coefficients. In order to take into account the standard errors of these coefficients we used the Monte Carlo simulation, in which the parameters of the model are re-calculated 200 times using the estimated coefficients and their variance–covariance matrices as underlying distribution. The 5th and 95th‰ from the resulting distribution were then used to generate the lower and upper bounds of the impulse response functions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Several earlier studies have noted controversies surrounding the nature of the relationship between defence spending and economic growth. Some of these studies include Al-Yousif (2002), Abu-Bader and Abu-Qarn (2003), Yildirim et al. (2005), Ahmed (2012), Pan et al. (2015), Saba and Ngepah (2018, 2019a, b), among others. However, most of the studies applied different econometric techniques in investigating the causality between defence spending and economic growth.

  2. Previous studies failed to measure economic development.

  3. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

  4. We measured economic development by using the human development index as it comprises key dimensions of social and economic dimensions of countries (Haq 1995; Sen 1999; United Nations Development Programme 2010).

  5. These regions include Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and the Latin America & Caribbean (LAC) countries.

  6. The countries were further disaggregated into three regions.

  7. The results of the study show that military spending positively affects economic growth when the level of military spending is low, while the effect turns to negative for high levels of military spending.

  8. Defence spending has positive and significant effects for 39 countries, while being negative and significant for eight countries, and insignificant on economic growth for the remaining 38 countries.

  9. No significant impact of DEF on growth, as a result of income distribution (i.e., income inequality).

  10. The study finds a nonlinear relationship between military spending and economic growth in Turkey and the Middle Eastern countries.

  11. Interested readers are referred to Levin et al. (2002), Im et al. (2003), Breitung (2001), and Breitung and Das (2005) methodological framework for more details.

  12. The details of this methodology have been extensively discussed in the literature, and warrant detailed discussion here. However, for details and steps involved in the use of this methodology, consult Pesaran (2007).

  13. Interested readers are referred to Westerlund (2007) methodological framework for more details.

  14. The group-mean panel dynamic OLS (DOLS) estimator uses the lead and lagged differences of the regressors to correct for endogeneity, while the group-mean FMOLS estimator applies a semi-parametric correction to the OLS estimator to eliminate serial correlation and endogeneity.

  15. Interested readers are referred to the Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) methodological framework for more details.

  16. This study used the latest STATA pvar programs made available to other researchers by Abrigo and Love (2015). It was first used by Love and Zicchino (2006) and later updated with additional functionality, including optimal moment and model selection, following Andrews and Lu (2001) etc.

  17. Interested readers are referred to Abrigo and Love (2015) for more details. We refer readers to this paper to save space.

  18. See, for instance, Lutkepohl (2005) for details applied in time-series VAR.

  19. We test the null hypothesis (H0) of non-stationarity of all series against the alternative hypothesis (H1), which supports their stationarity. To accept/reject the null hypothesis for the entire sample and the three regions, we compare the p value to a threshold level of 1%. We may accept H0 if the p value is greater than 1% and reject it if the p value is less than 1%. The results reported in Table 3 indicate that all the variables have a unit root problem at the level. However, at first difference, we reject the null hypothesis and confirm the stationarity of all the variables. This shows that all the variables have a unique order of integration, i.e., I(1).

  20. We note that the Pesaran (2007) panel unit root test assumes the existence of one common factor that affects all countries in the same way. This restrictive assumption should be considered when interpreting the results.

  21. We find that the null hypothesis of no cointegration is rejected at 1% and 5% levels, respectively, which confirms the existence of cointegration between the variables for entire sample and the three regions. This further confirms that empirical results are robust and reliable.

  22. The results of the model and moment selection criteria and the Hansen test statistics are not reported to save space, but are available upon request.

References

  • Abrigo MR, Love I (2015) Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata: a package of programs. http://paneldataconference2015.ceu.hu/Program/Michael-Abrigo.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2020

  • Abu-Bader S, Abu-Qarn AS (2003) Government expenditures, military spending and economic growth: causality evidence from Egypt, Israel, and Syria. J Policy Model 25(6–7):567–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Qarn AS, Abu-Bader S (2009) On the dynamics of the Israeli–Arab arms race. Q Rev Econ Finance 49(3):931–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed AD (2012) Debt burden, military spending and growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: a dynamic panel data analysis. Def Peace Econ 23(5):485–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-jarrah MA (2005) Defense spending and economic growth in an oil-rich country: the case of Saudi Arabia. Pak Econ Soc Rev 43(2):151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Yousif YK (2002) Defense spending and economic growth: some empirical evidence from the Arab from the Arab Gulf region. Def Peace Econ 13(3):187–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DW, Lu B (2001) Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models. J Econ 101(1):123–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit E (1973) Defense and growth in developing countries. Lexington Books, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit E (1978) Growth and defense in developing countries. Econ Dev Cult Change 26(2):271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdi A, Dunne JP (2002) An econometric analysis of military spending and economic growth in South Africa. In: Brauer J, Dunne JP (eds) The economics of military expenditures, arms production and trade in developing countries. Palgrave, London, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J (2001) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi BH, Fomby TB, Carter Hill R (eds) Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. Advances in econometrics, vol 15. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J, Das S (2005) Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence. Stat Neerl 59:414–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks C (2014) Introductory econometrics for finance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Canova F, Ciccarelli M (2013) Panel vector autoregressive models: a survey. In: VAR models in macroeconomics – new developments and applications: Essays in honor of Christopher A. Sims. Advances in econometrics, vol 32. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 205–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0731-9053(2013)0000031006

  • Cevik S, Ricco J (2018) No buck for the bang: revisiting the military-growth nexus. Empirica 45(4):639–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang T, Fang W, Wen LF, Liu C (2001) Defence spending, economic growth and temporal causality: evidence from Taiwan and mainland China, 1952–1995. Appl Econ 33(10):1289–1299

    Google Scholar 

  • Chletsos M, Roupakias S (2020) The effect of military spending on income inequality: evidence from NATO countries. Empir Econ 58(3):1305–1337

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulomb F, Bellais R (2008) The Marxist analysis of war and military expenditures, between certainty and uncertainty. Def Peace Econ 19(5):351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Agostino G, Dunne JP, Pieroni L (2019) Military expenditure, endogeneity and economic growth. Def Peace Econ 30(5):509–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakurah AH, Davies SP, Sampath RK (2001) Defense spending and economic growth in developing countries: a causality analysis. J Policy Model 23(6):651–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Desli E, Gkoulgkoutsika A (2020) Military spending and economic growth: a panel data investigation. Econ Change Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09267-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA (2016) Is the causal nexus of military expenditures and economic growth asymmetric in G-6. J Appl Res Finance Econ 1(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Dritsakis N (2004) Defense spending and economic growth: an empirical investigation for Greece and Turkey. J Policy Model 26(2):249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne JP (1996) Economic effects of military expenditure in developing countries: a survey. Making peace pay. Regina Books, Claremont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne P, Coulomb F (2008) Peace, war and international security: economic theories. In: Fontanel J, Chatterji M (eds) War, peace and security. Contributions to conflict management, peace economics and development, vol 6. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-8323(08)06002-5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne P, Tian N (2013) Military expenditure and economic growth: a survey. Econ Peace Secur J 8:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne P, Tian N (2016) Military expenditure and economic growth, 1960–2014. Econ Peace Secur J 11:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne JP, Uye M (2009) Military spending and development. working papers 0902. Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol

  • Dunne JP, Uye M (2010) Military spending and development. The global arms trade, Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne JP, Nikolaidou E, Smith R (2002) Military spending, investment and economic growth in small industrialising economies. S Afr J Econ 70(5):789–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne JP, Smith RP, Willenbockel D (2005) Models of military expenditure and growth: a critical review. Def Peace Econ 16(6):449–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Granger CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econom J Econ Soc 55(2):251–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzanegan MR (2014) Military spending and economic growth: the case of Iran. Def Peace Econ 25(3):247–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Feridun M, Sawhney B, Shahbaz M (2011) The impact of military spending on economic growth: the case of North Cyprus. Def Peace Econ 22(5):555–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvin H (2003) The impact of defence spending on the economic growth of developing countries: a cross-section study. Def Peace Econ 14(1):51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerace MP (2002) US military expenditures and economic growth: some evidence from spectral methods. Def Peace Econ 13(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottheil FM (1986) Marx versus Marxist on the role military production in capitalists economies. J Post Keynes Econ 89(3):379–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta R, Kabundi A, Ziramba E (2010) The effect of defense spending on US output: a factor augmented vector autoregression (favar) approach. Def Peace Econ 21(2):135–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyimah-Brempong K (1989) Defense spending and economic growth in Subsaharan Africa: an econometric investigation. J Peace Res 26(1):79–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Halicioglu F (2003) An econometrical analysis of effects of aggregate defence spending on aggregate output. In: METU international conference in economics/VII September, pp 6–9

  • Halicioğlu F (2004) Defense spending and economic growth in Turkey: an empirical application of new macroeconomic theory. Rev Middle East Econ Finance 2(3):193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis, vol 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 690–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq M (1995) Reflections on human development, part one. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Mintz A (1991) Defence expenditures and economic growth: the externality effect. Def Peace Econ 3(1):35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerding W (1986) Economic growth and defense spending: Granger causality. J Dev Econ 21(1):35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagianni S, Pempetzoglu M (2009) Defense spending and economic growth in Turkey: a linear and non-linear Granger causality approach. Def Peace Econ 20(2):139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagol E, Palaz S (2004) Does defence expenditure deter economic growth in Turkey? A cointegration analysis. Def Peace Econ 15(3):289–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein T (2004) Military expenditure and economic growth: Peru 1970–1996. Def Peace Econ 15(3):275–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollias C, Paleologou SM (2013) Guns, highways and economic growth in the United States. Econ Model 30:449–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollias C, Paleologou S (2016) Investment, growth, and defense expenditure in the EU15: revisiting the nexus using SIPRI’s new consistent dataset. Econ Peace Secur 11:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollias C, Paleologou SM (2019) Military spending, economic growth and investment: a disaggregated analysis by income group. Empir Econ 56(3):935–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollias C, Naxakisb C, Zarangasb L (2004) Defence spending and growth in Cyprus: a causal analysis. Def Peace Econ 15(3):299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollias C, Paleologou SM, Tzeremes P, Tzeremes N (2017) Defence expenditure and economic growth in Latin American countries: evidence from linear and nonlinear causality tests. Latin Am Econ Rev 26(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • LaCivita CJ, Frederiksen PC (1991) Defense spending and economic growth: an alternative approach to the causality issue. J Dev Econ 35(1):117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebovic JH, Ishaq A (1987) Military burden, security needs, and economic growth in the Middle East. J Confl Res 31(1):106–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC, Chen ST (2007) Non-linearity in the defence expenditure-economic growth relationship in Taiwan. Def Peace Econ 18(6):537–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom 108:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Love I, Zicchino L (2006) Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: evidence from panel VAR. Q Rev Econ Finance 46(2):190–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutkepohl H (2005) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeski SJ (1992) Defence budgeting, fiscal policy, and economic performance. In: The political economy of military spending in the United States. Routledge, London, pp 217–237. https://books.google.co.za/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZPGJAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA217&dq=Majeski+SJ+(1992)+Defence+budgeting,+fiscal+policy,+and+economic+performance.+The+Political++Economy+of+Military+Spending+in+the+United+States&ots=LPb0h_lvD3&sig=byXF5x7ZOMh54uLuHGgLiOPCM-Y&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

  • Mintz A, Huang C (1990) Defense expenditures, economic growth, and the “peace dividend”. Am Polit Sci Rev 84(4):1283–1293

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz A, Stevenson RT (1995) Defense expenditures, economic growth, and the “peace dividend” a longitudinal analysis of 103 countries. J Confl Res 39(2):283–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK, Singh B (2007) Modelling the relationship between defense spending and economic growth for the Fiji Islands. Def Peace Econ 18(4):391–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey WK, West KD (1994) Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Rev Econ Stud 61(4):631–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz C, Alvarado R, Salinas A (2019) The effect of military spending on output: new evidence at the global and country group levels using panel data cointegration techniques. Econ Anal Policy 62:402–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan CI, Chang T, Wolde-Rufael Y (2015) Military spending and economic growth in the Middle East countries: bootstrap panel causality test. Def Peace Econ 26(4):443–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2001a) Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In: Baltagi BH (ed) Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration and dynamic panels. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 93–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2001b) Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Rev Econ Stat 83(4):727–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2007) Social capital barriers to production and capital shares implications for the importance of parameter heterogeneity from a nonstationary panel approach. J Appl Econ 22(2):429–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo working paper 1229; IZA discussion paper 1240

  • Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econom 22(2):265–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PC, Moon HR (2000) Nonstationary panel data analysis an overview of some recent developments. Econ Rev 19(3):263–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Phiri A (2019) Does military spending nonlinearly affect economic growth in South Africa? Def Peace Econ 30(4):474–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos EM (2004) Country survey XIX: Mexico. Def Peace Econ 15(1):83–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitschuler G, Loening J (2005) Modeling the defence-growth nexus in Guatemala. World Dev 33(3):513–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle T (1986) Marxism and military spending. J Post Keynes Econ 8(4):574–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen HS (1999) Public finance, 5th edn. Mc-Graw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saba CS (2020a) Military expenditure and security outcome convergence in Africa: an application of club clustering approach. Afr Secur 13(3):260–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Saba CS (2020b) Convergence or divergence patterns in global defence spending: further evidence from a nonlinear single factor model. Peace Econ Peace Sci Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2020-0012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saba CS, Ngepah N (2018) Military expenditure, industrialisation and economic growth in Africa: evidence from a panel causality analysis. Afr J Bus Econ Res (AJBER) 13(3):29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Saba CS, Ngepah N (2019a) A cross-regional analysis of military expenditure, state fragility and economic growth in Africa. Qual Quant 53(6):2885–2915

    Google Scholar 

  • Saba CS, Ngepah N (2019b) Military expenditure and economic growth: evidence from a heterogeneous panel of African countries. Econ Res 32(1):3586–3606

    Google Scholar 

  • Saba CS, Ngepah N (2019c) Empirical analysis of military expenditure and industrialisation nexus: a regional approach for Africa. Int Econ J 34(1):58–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Saba CS, Ngepah N (2019d) Military expenditure and security outcome convergence in African regional economic communities: evidence from the convergence club algorithm. Peace Econ Peace Sci Public Policy 26(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Saba CS, Ngepah N (2020) Convergence in military expenditure and economic growth in Africa and its regional economic communities: evidence from a club clustering algorithm. Cogent Econ Finance 8(1):1832344

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1999) Development as freedom, 1st edn. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezgin S (2001) An empirical analysis of Turkey’s defence-growth relationships with a multi-equation model (1956–1994). Def Peace Econ 12(1):69–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Shabbir MS (2012) Military spending and economic growth in Pakistan: new evidence from rolling window approach. Econ Res-Ekonomska istraživanja 25(1):119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Afza T, Shabbir MS (2013) Does defence spending impede economic growth? Cointegration and causality analysis for Pakistan. Def Peace Econ 24(2):105–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econom J Econ Soc 48(1):11–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R (2000) Defence expenditure and economic growth. Making peace pay: a bibliography on disarmament and conversion. Regina Books, Claremont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroup MD, Heckelman JC (2001) Size of the military sector and economic growth: a panel data analysis of Africa and Latin America. J Appl Econ 4(2):329–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang CF (2008) Defence expenditure and economic growth in Malaysia: a reassessment using bounds and modified Wald tests. IUP J Public Finance 6(2):45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Töngür Ü, Elveren AY (2016) The impact of military spending and income inequality on economic growth in Turkey. Def Peace Econ 27(3):433–452

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme [UNDP] (2010) Human development report, overcoming barriers: human mobility and development. Palgrave, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward MD, Davis DR (1992) Sizing up the peace dividend: economic growth and military spending in the United States, 1948–1996. Am Polit Sci Rev 86(3):748–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim J, Öcal N (2016) Military expenditures, economic growth and spatial spillovers. Def Peace Econ 27:87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim J, Sezgin S, Öcal N (2005) Military expenditure and economic growth in Middle Eastern countries: a dynamic panel data analysis. Def Peace Econ 16(4):283–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Yolcu Karadam D, Yildirim J, Öcal N (2017) Military expenditure and economic growth in Middle Eastern countries and Turkey: a non-linear panel data approach. Def Peace Econ 28(6):719–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Zhao L, Chen BF (2017) The interrelationship between defence spending, public expenditures and economic growth: evidence from China. Def Peace Econ 28(6):703–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong M, Chang T, Tang DP, Wolde-Rufael Y (2015) The causal nexus between military spending and unemployment in the G7: a bootstrap panel causality test. Def Peace Econ 26(6):609–622

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author(s) would like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewer(s) for their valuable comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Shaaba Saba.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the author(s).

Informed consent

This manuscript is an original work and has been done by the author(s). CSS and NN are aware of its content and approve its submission. It is also important to mention that the manuscript has not been published elsewhere in part or in entirety and is not under consideration by another journal. The author(s) have given consent for this article to be submitted for publication in Economic Change and Restructuring.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 12.

Table 12 Optimum lag length selection results

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saba, C.S., Ngepah, N. Nexus between defence spending, economic growth and development: evidence from a disaggregated panel data analysis. Econ Change Restruct 55, 109–151 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09311-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09311-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation