Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:55:48.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptualizing Legal Mobilization: How Should We Understand the Deployment of Legal Strategies?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2019

Emilio Lehoucq  and
Whitney K. Taylor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social movements have increasingly incorporated legal strategies into their repertoires of contention. Yet, both sociolegal and social movement scholarship lack a systematic and theoretically coherent way to conceptualize legal mobilization. In fact, scholars disagree (sometimes in fundamental ways) about what constitutes legal mobilization, which has resulted in conceptual slippage around how the term is used. This article proposes a more self-conscious approach that will facilitate the aggregation of findings across studies. To do so, it sets forth a systematic conceptualization of legal mobilization and situates it within a typology of uses of the law. It also contextualizes the typology with respect to emerging literatures within social movement and sociolegal scholarship and proposes areas for further research that would benefit from a more rigorous conceptualization of legal mobilization.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 166 - 193
Copyright
© 2019 American Bar Foundation 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are very thankful to Sidney Tarrow, Robert Nelson, Joshua Basseches, Erin M. Adam, Lisa Hilbink, Lynette Chua, Michael McCann, and four anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on previous drafts of this article. This article did not receive any funding.

References

REFERENCES

Adam, Erin M. “Intersectional Coalitions: The Paradoxes of Rights-Based Movement Building in LGBTQ and Immigrant Communities.” Law & Society Review 51, no. 1 (2017): 132–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, Erin M., and Cooper, Betsy L.. “Equal Rights vs. Special Rights: Rights Discourses, Framing, and Lesbian and Gay Antidiscrimination Policy in Washington State.” Law & Social Inquiry 42, no. 3 (2017): 830–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” American Political Science Review 95, no. 3 (2001): 529–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alimi, Eitan Y. “Repertoires of Contention.” The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, 410, 2015. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678402.013.42.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Mike, Cheibub, José Antonio, Limongi, Fernando, and Przeworski, Adam. “Classifying Political Regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID) 31, no. 2 (1996): 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Ellen Ann. Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Elizabeth A., and Bernstein, Mary. “Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements.” Sociological Theory 26, no. 1 (2008): 74–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrington, Celeste L. “Leprosy, Legal Mobilization, and the Public Sphere in Japan and South Korea.” Law & Society Review 48, no. 3 (2014): 563–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrington, Celeste L. “Hiding in Plain Sight: Pseudonymity and Participation in Legal Mobilization.” Comparative Political Studies 52, no. 2 (2019): 310–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert, Vilhelm. “Competition and Dissensus: Two Types of Conflict and of Conflict Resolution.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 7, no. 1 (1963): 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jeb, and Burke, Thomas F.. “Making Way: Legal Mobilization, Organizational Response, and Wheelchair Access.” Law & Society Review 46, no. 1 (2012): 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrenechea, Rodrigo, and Castillo, Isabel. “The Many Roads to Rome: Family Resemblance Concepts in the Social Sciences.” Quality & Quantity 53, no. 1 (2018), 1–24.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and Snow, David A.. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26, no. 1 (2000): 611–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Donald J. “The Mobilization of Law.” The Journal of Legal Studies 2, no. 1 (1973): 125–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, Amy, Uggen, Christopher, and McLaughlin, Heather. “Legal Consciousness and Responses to Sexual Harassment.” Law & Society Review 43, no. 3 (2009): 631–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” Hastings Law Journal 38 (1986): 805–53.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A., and Stobaugh, James E.. “Law and Social Movements.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm120, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, Kirk, Lehoucq, Fabrice, and Mahoney, James. “Measuring Political Democracy: Case Expertise, Data Adequacy, and Central America.” Comparative Political Studies 38, no. 8 (2005): 939–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010.Google Scholar
Cain, Maureen, and Kulcsar, Kalman. “Thinking Disputes: An Essay on the Origins of the Dispute Industry.” Law & Society Review 16 (1981): 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram. “The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation.” Harvard Law Review 89, no. 7 (1976), 1281–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in an Authoritarian State. Singapore: NUS Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J., and Gilbert, David. “Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Minorities in Transition: LGBT Rights and Activism in Myanmar.” Human Rights Quarterly 37, no. 1 (2015): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. “The European Court of Human Rights, Amicus Curiae, and Violence against Women.” Law & Society Review 50, no. 4 (2016): 890–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Christopher, Nee, Laurence D., and Rubinowitz, Leonard S.. “Social Movements and Social-Change Litigation: Synergy in the Montgomery Bus Protest.” Law & Social Inquiry 30, no. 4 (2005): 663–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, LaPorte, Jody, and Seawright, Jason. “Putting Typologies to Work: Concept Formation, Measurement, and Analytic Rigor.” Political Research Quarterly 65, no. 1 (2012): 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” World Politics 49, no. 3 (1997): 430–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, Jean, and Comaroff, John L.. Of Revelation and Revolution, Volume 1: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fazio, Gianluca. “Legal Opportunity Structure and Social Movement Strategy in Northern Ireland and Southern United States.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 53, no. 1 (2012): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLuca, Kevin Michael. “Unruly Arguments: The Body Rhetoric of Earth First!, ACT UP, and Queer Nation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 36, no. 1 (1999): 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamant, Neil Jeffrey, Lubman, Stanley B., and O’Brien, Kevin J.. Engaging the Law in China: State, Society, and Possibilities for Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Leachman, Gwendolyn, and McAdam, Doug. “On Law, Organizations, and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6 (2010): 653–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., and Suchman, Mark C.. “The Legal Environments of Organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology 23, no. 1 (1997): 479–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rhonda, Evans Case, and Givens, Terri E.. “Re-Engineering Legal Opportunity Structures in the European Union? The Starting Line Group and the Politics of the Racial Equality Directive.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 48, no. 2 (2010): 221–41.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S.. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., and Sarat, Austin. “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming … ” Law & Society Review 15, no. 3/4 (1980): 631–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Daniel. Rebels in the Name of the Tsar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and McAdam, Doug. A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Fu, Diana. Mobilizing without the Masses: Control and Contention in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Janice. “The Last Mile Problem: Activists, Advocates, and the Struggle for Justice in Domestic Courts.” Comparative Political Studies 50, no. 12 (2017): 1666–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Mary E. “Mobilizing the Law in China: ‘Informed Disenchantment’ and the Development of Legal Consciousness.” Law & Society Review 40, no. 4 (2006): 783–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Mary, and Yang, Yujeong. “Getting Schooled: Legal Mobilization as an Educative Process.” Law & Social Inquiry 42, no. 1 (2017): 163–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. “Causality and Statistical Learning.” American Journal of Sociology 117, no. 3 (2011): 955–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Moustafa, Tamir. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudy, Agustina. “Conceptualizing State Strength: Moving Beyond Strong and Weak States.” Revista de Ciencia Política 32, no. 3 (2012): 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleeson, Shannon. “From Rights to Claims: The Role of Civil Society in Making Rights Real for Vulnerable Workers.” Law & Society Review 43, no. 3 (2009): 669–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleeson, Shannon. “Labor Rights for All? The Role of Undocumented Immigrant Status for Worker Claims Making.” Law & Social Inquiry 35, no. 3 (2010): 561–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, Gary. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Mahoney, James. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gould, Deborah. “Life during Wartime: Emotions and the Development of ACT UP.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 7, no. 2 (2002): 177–200.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. “Rewriting the Rules of the Game in Russia: The Neglected Issue of the Demand for Law.” East European Constitutional Review 8 (1999): 89.Google Scholar
Hilson, Chris. “New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity.” Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 2 (2002): 238–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahraman, Filiz. “Claiming Labor Rights as Human Rights: Legal Mobilization at the European Court of Human Rights.” PhD diss., University of Washington, Seattle, 2017.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 23, no. 1 (1990): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, Robert L. “The End of the Road? Problems in the Analysis of Disputes.” Law & Society Review 15, no. 3/4 (1980), 717–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur, and Sunstein, Cass R.. “Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation.” Stanford Law Review 51 (1998): 683–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leachman, Gwendolyn. “Legal Framing.” In Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, edited by Sarat, Austin, 25–29. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoucq, Emilio, and Tarrow, Sidney. “The Rise of a Transnational Movement to Protect Privacy.” Mobilization (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Lemaitre, Julieta, and Sandvik, Kristin Bergtora. “Shifting Frames, Vanishing Resources, and Dangerous Political Opportunities: Legal Mobilization among Displaced Women in Colombia.” Law & Society Review 49, no. 1 (2015): 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Richard O. “Mobilizing Private Law: An Introductory Essay.” Law & Society Review 11, no. 2 (1976): 173–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Richard O.. “Grievances and Legitimacy: The Beginnings and End of Dispute Settlement.” Law & Society Review 15, no. 3/4 (1980): 707–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Sandra R. “Law and Social Movements.” In The Handbook of Law and Society, edited by Sarat, Austin and Ewick, Patricia, 382–98. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1985.Google Scholar
Lovell, George I., McCann, Michael, and Taylor, Kirstine. “Covering Legal Mobilization: A Bottom-Up Analysis of Wards Cove v. Atonio.” Law & Social Inquiry 41, no. 1 (2016): 61–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29, no. 4 (2000): 507–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. “After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research.” World Politics 62, no.1 (2010): 120–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Vanderpoel, Rachel Sweet. “Set Diagrams and Qualitative Research.” Comparative Political Studies 48, no. 1 (2015): 65–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria. “Closing the Gaps: Plaintiffs in Pivotal Sexual Harassment Cases.” Law & Social Inquiry 23, no. 4 (1998): 761–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, Lynn, and Yngvesson, Barbara. “Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes.” Law & Society Review 15, no. 3/4 (1980), 775–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, Leon H. “Institutions of Representation: Civil Justice and the Public.” Law & Society Review 9, no. 3 (1975): 401–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. “Dynamics of Contention.” Social Movement Studies 2, no. 1 (2003): 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. “Methods for Measuring Mechanisms of Contention.” Qualitative Sociology 31, no. 4 (2008): 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCammon, Holly J., Muse, Courtney Sanders, Newman, Harmony D., and Terrell, Teresa M.. “Movement Framing and Discursive Opportunity Structures: The Political Successes of the US Women’s Jury Movements.” American Sociological Review 72, no. 5 (2007): 725–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael. “Causal versus Constitutive Explanations (or, on the Difficulty of Being so Positive …).” Law & Social Inquiry 21, no. 2 (1996): 457–82.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. “Law and Social Movements: Contemporary Perspectives.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2 (2006): 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael. “Litigation and Legal Mobilization.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Caldeira, Gregory A., Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Whittington, Keigh E., 522–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
McDonnell, Mary-Hunter, King, Brayden G., and Soule, Sarah A.. “A Dynamic Process Model of Private Politics: Activist Targeting and Corporate Receptivity to Social Challenges.” American Sociological Review 80, no. 3 (2015): 654–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Boutcher, Steven A.. “Signals and Spillover: Brown v. Board of Education and Other Social Movements.” Perspectives on Politics 5, no. 1 (2007): 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Minkoff, Debra C.. “Conceptualizing Political Opportunity.” Social Forces 82, no. 4 (2004): 1457–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, Verónica, and Sikkink, Kathryn. “Human Rights Prosecutions and the Participation Rights of Victims in Latin America.” Law & Society Review 47, no. 4 (2013): 873–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Richard E., and Sarat, Austin. “Grievances, Claims, and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture.” Law & Society Review 15, no. 3/4 (1980): 525–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Neal. “The Right to Refuse Treatment: Four Case Studies of Legal Mobilization.” Law & Society Review 21, no. 3 (1987): 447–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, Stephen L., and Winship, Christopher. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. “Law versus the State: The Judicialization of Politics in Egypt.” Law & Social Inquiry 28, no. 4 (2003): 883–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. “Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment.” Law & Society Review 34, no. 4 (2000): 1055–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolette, Paul. “Law Enforcement as Legal Mobilization: Reforming the Pharmaceutical Industry through Government Litigation.” Law & Social Inquiry 40, no. 1 (2015): 123–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Kevin J., and Li, Lianjiang. Rightful Resistance in Rural China. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, Michael. “Legal Mobilization and the Politics of Reform: Lessons from School Finance Litigation in Kentucky, 1984-1995.” Law & Social Inquiry 26, no. 3 (2001): 631–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedriana, Nicholas. “Help Wanted NOW: Legal Resources, the Women’s Movement, and the Battle over Sex-Segregated Job Advertisements.” Social Problems 51, no. 2 (2004): 182–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedriana, Nicholas. “From Protective to Equal Treatment: Legal Framing Processes and Transformation of the Women’s Movement in the 1960s.” American Journal of Sociology 111, no. 6 (2006): 1718–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierceson, Jason. Courts, Liberalism, and Rights: Gay Law and Politics in the United States and Canada. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos Ar. State, Power, Socialism. Vol. 29. London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar
Prasad, Monica. “Problem-Solving Sociology.” Contemporary Sociology 47, no. 4 (2018): 393–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Vol. 240. Wiley Online Library, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rixen, Thomas, and Viola, Lora Anne. “Putting Path Dependence in Its Place: Toward a Taxonomy of Institutional Change.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 27, no. 2 (2015): 301–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, César, and Rodríguez-Franco, Diana. Radical Deprivation on Trial. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. “Positivism, Interpretivism, and the Study of Law.” Law & Social Inquiry 21, no. 2 (1996): 435–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H.. “Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds.” Harvard Law Review 117, no. 4 (2004): 1015–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64, no. 4 (1970): 1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. Tower of Babel: On the Definition and Analysis of Concepts in the Social Sciences. Vol. 6. Pittsburgh: International Studies Association, University Center for International Studies, University of Pittsburgh, 1975.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Frederic Charles. Elucidating Social Science Concepts: An Interpretivist Guide. Vol. 4. New York: Routledge, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q., and Wagemann, Claudius. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics (The Norton Series in World Politics). New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. “After Legal Consciousness.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1 (2005): 323–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Erica S., and Smith, Nicholas Rush. “Comparison with an Ethnographic Sensibility.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50, no. 1 (2017): 126–30.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina, and Peruzzotti, Enrique. “Societal Accountability in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 11, no. 4 (2000): 147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, David A., and Benford, Robert D.. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1, no. 1 (1988): 197–217.Google Scholar
Stern, Rachel E. Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen Ann. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Tam, Waikeung. Legal Mobilization under Authoritarianism: The Case of Post-Colonial Hong Kong. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics, Nueva York. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. Strangers at the Gates: Movements and States in Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. “Contentious Politics.” The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm051, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Verta, and Van Dyke, Nella. “‘Get Up, Stand Up’: Tactical Repertoires of Social Movements.” The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 262–93, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103.ch12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Whitney K. “Ambivalent Legal Mobilization: Perceptions of Justice and the Use of the Tutela in Colombia.” Law & Society Review 52, no. 2 (2018): 337–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teles, Steven M. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Edward Palmer. The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Open Road Media, 2016.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. “From Mobilization to Revolution.” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. Abingdon, UK: Routledge 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2011. “Legal Mobilization.” In Oxford Bibliographies. doi:10.1093/OBO/9780199756223-0031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. “Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK.” Law & Society Review 46, no. 3 (2012): 523–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa.“Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, and Italy.” Comparative Political Studies 51, no. 3 (2017). doi:10.1177/0010414017710257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vet, Freek van der. “‘When They Come for You’: Legal Mobilization in New Authoritarian Russia.” Law & Society Review 52, no. 2 (2018): 301–36.Google Scholar
White, Lucie E. “Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G.” Buffalo Law Review 38 (1990): 1–58.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bruce M. “Institutional Reform and Rights Revolutions in Latin America: The Cases of Costa Rica and Colombia.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 1, no. 2 (2009): 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Bruce M., and Rodríguez Cordero, Juan Carlos. “Legal Opportunity Structures and Social Movements: The Effects of Institutional Change on Costa Rican Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 3 (2006): 325–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Joshua C. “Sustaining the State: Legal Consciousness and the Construction of Legality in Competing Abortion Activists’ Narratives.” Law & Social Inquiry 36, no. 2 (2011): 455–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.Google Scholar
Woodward, Jennifer. “Making Rights Work: Legal Mobilization at the Agency Level.” Law & Society Review 49, no. 3 (2015): 691–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn. “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System.” American Political Science Review 77, no. 3 (1983): 690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lehoucq and Taylor supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Lehoucq and Taylor supplementary material(File)
File 159.6 KB