Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:50:54.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Military Law and Systemic Issues in the Military's Handling of Sexual Assault Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Carolyn M. Warner Open the ORCID record for Carolyn M. Warner [Opens in a new window]  and
Mia A. Armstrong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Allegations of sexual assault and sexual harassment by prominent entertainment and media figures and politicians in the United States have brought renewed attention to a political debate that earlier had been focused on universities and the military: the apparent failure of institutions to address and punish cases of sexual assault by their members. In light of this debate, we consider how cases fare in an institution that is perennially accused of gender bias and of tolerating rape: the US military. Through the analysis of 585 sexual assault report summaries from the US military bases in Japan, we find that the military often tries to punish cases of sexual assault. However, many cases do not have sufficient evidence for prosecution as sexual assault cases. Low conviction rates at court-martial for reported sexual assaults may indicate systemic problems with the nature of the cases themselves and the circumstances in which the cases arise. Low conviction rates may also reflect the military's legal mandate to prioritize mission, and its legal system's multiple options for addressing crime outside of trial procedures. Case characteristics interact with the primary concerns of command authority and complainants, within a highly institutionalized, closed context, to affect the military's handling and disposition of reported sexual assault cases.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 265 - 300
Copyright
© 2019 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbey, Antonia. 2011. “Alcohol's Role in Sexual Violence Perpetration: Theoretical Explanations, Existing Evidence and Future Directions.” Drug and Alcohol Rev. 30: 481–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alderden, Megan A. and Ullman, Sarah E. 2012. “Creating a More Complete and Current Picture: Examining Police and Prosecutor Decision-Making when Processing Sexual Assault Cases.” Violence Against Women 18: 525–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alderden, M. and Long, L. 2016. “Sexual Assault Victim Participation in Police Investigations and Prosecution.” Violence and Victims 31(5): 819–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anders, Mary C. and Christopher, F. Scott. 2011. “A Sociological Model of Rape Survivors’ Decisions to Aid in Case Prosecution.” Psychology of Women Q. 35: 92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, Deborah. 1998. “Conflicting Indicators of ‘Crisis’ in American Civil-Military Relations.” Armed Forces & Society 24: 375–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barany, Zoltan. 2012. The Soldier and the Changing State. Building Democratic Armies in Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Basile, Kathleen C. 1999. “Rape by Acquiescence: The Ways in which Women ‘Give in’ to Unwanted Sex with Their Husbands.” Violence Against Women 5: 1036–58.Google Scholar
Belkin, Aaron. 2012. Bring Me Men. Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire, 1898–2001. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Berrey, Ellen, Nelson, Robert L., and Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2017. Rights on Trial. How Workplace Discrimination Law Perpetuates Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Black, Donald J. 1989. Sociological Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Branum, James M. 2014. “Non-Judicial Punishment: Middle Ground between Admin Proceedings and Courts-Martial.” Military Law Task Force 25.Google Scholar
Breen, Patricia D. and Johnson, Brian D. 2018. “Military Justice: Case Processing and Sentencing Decisions in America's ‘Other’ Criminal Court.” Justice Q. 35: 639–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Hannah and Darcy, Kathleen. 2017. “Toward a Civilized System of Justice: Re-Conceptualizing the Response to Sexual Violence in Higher Education.” Cornell Law Rev. 102: 127–59.Google Scholar
Brenner, Hannah, Darcy, Kathleen, and Kubiak, Sheryl. 2017. “Sexual Violence as an Occupational Hazard & Condition of Confinement in Closed Institutional Systems of the Military and Detention.” Pepperdine Law Review 44: 881–956.Google Scholar
Bryden, David and Lengnick, Sonja. 1997. “Rape in the Criminal Justice System.” J. of Criminal Law and Criminology 87: 1194–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Rebecca and Fehler-Cabral, Giannina. 2018. “Why Police ‘Couldn't or Wouldn't’ Submit Sexual Assault Kits for Forensic DNA Testing: A Focal Concerns Theory Analysis of Untested Rape Kits.” Law & Society Rev. 52: 73–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Eric R. 2016. “Evidence of the Military's Sexual Assault Blind Spot.” Virginia J. of Criminal Law 4: 154–240.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Eric R. 2017. “An Empirical Look at Commander Bias in Sexual Assault Cases.” Berkeley J. of Criminal Law 22: 45–89.Google Scholar
Cerretti, Josh. 2016. “Rape as a Weapon of War(riors): The Militarisation of Sexual Violence in the United States, 1990-2000.” Gender & History 28: 794–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2010. “Comparative Gender and Institutions: Directions for Research.” Perspectives on Politics 8: 183–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, Raewyn W. 1987. Gender and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
D'Ambrosio-Woodward, Tricia. 2014. “Military Sexual Assault: A Comparative Legal Analysis of the 2012 Department of Defense Report on Sexual Assault in the Military.” Wisconsin J. of Law, Gender & Society 29: 173–211.Google Scholar
Department of Defense [United States]. 2013. 2013 Demographics. Profile of the Military Community. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2007. Globalization and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter. D. 2003. Armed Servants. Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felson, Richard B. and Paré, Paul-Philippe. 2007. “Does the Criminal Justice System Treat Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Offenders Leniently?” Justice Q. 42: 435–59.Google Scholar
Fidell, Eugene R., Hillman, Elizabeth L., and Sullivan, Dwight H. 2007. Military Justice: Cases and Materials. Newark: Matthew Bender & Company.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 2005. “Coming of Age: Law and Society Enters an Exclusive Age.” Annual Rev. Law and Social Science 1: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohmann, Lisa. 1997. “Convictability and Discordant Locales: Reproducing Race, Class and Gender Ideologies in Prosecutorial Decision-Making.” Law & Society Rev. 31: 531–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavey, Nicola. 2005. Just Sex? The Cultural Scaffolding of Rape. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gillibrand, Senator Kirsten. 2017. Snapshot Review of Sexual Assault Report Files. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=804057 (accessed April 1, 2019).Google Scholar
Gilson, Erinn Cunniff. 2016. “Vulnerability and Victimization: Rethinking Key Concepts in Feminist Discourse on Sexual Violence.” Signs: J. of Women in Culture and Society 42: 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillibrand, K. 2015. Snapshot Review of Sexual Assault Report Files at the Four Largest U.S. Military Bases in 2013. Washington, D.C.: Office of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
Gray, Jeremy J. 2006. “The Military's Ban on Sodomy in a Post-Lawrence World.” Washington University J. of Law & Policy 21: (Jan.).Google Scholar
Greeson, M.R. and Campbell, R. 2011. “Rape Survivors' Agency Within the Legal and Medical Systems.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 35(4): 582–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Diane. 1984. “The Rape Culture.” In Women: A Feminist Perspective, 3rd ed.,, edited by Jo, Freeman, 20–34. Mayfield: Palo Alto.Google Scholar
Hillman, Elizabeth Lutes. 2005. Defending America. Military Culture and the Cold War Court-Martial. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, Elizabeth Lutes. 2009. “Front and Center: Sexual Violence in U.S. Military Law.” Politics and Society 37: 101–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inspector General. 2013. United States Department of Defense. Evaluation of the Military Criminal Investigative Organizations Sexual Assault Investigations. Inspector General: Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. 2004. Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Joint Service Committee on Military Justice. 2012. Manual for Courts-Martial United States 2012. USAPD.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jan. 2011. “Here we Go Round the Review-Go-Round: Rape Investigation and Prosecution: Are Things Getting worse Not Better?” J. of Sexual Aggression 17: 234–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judicial Proceedings Panel. 2016a. Report on Retaliation Related to Sexual Assault Offenses. Committee Print.Google Scholar
Judicial Proceedings Panel 2016b. Report on Statistical Data on Military Adjudication of Sexual Assault Offenses. Committee Print.Google Scholar
Judicial Proceedings Panel 2017a. Report on Military Defense Counsel Resources and Experience in Sexual Assault Cases. Committee Print.Google Scholar
Judicial Proceedings Panel 2017b. Panel Concerns Regarding the Fair Administration of Military Justice in Sexual Assault Cases. Committee Print.Google Scholar
Kageyama, Yuri and Gardner, Richard. 2014. “Documents Reveal Chaotic Military Sex-Abuse Records." USA Today. Feb. 9.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod and Reppy, Elizabeth, eds. 1999. Beyond Zero Tolerance: Discrimination in Military Culture. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kintzle, Sara, Keeling, Mary, Xintarianos, Elizabeth, Taylor-Diggs, Kamil, Munch, Chris, Hassan, Anthony M., and Castro, Carl A. 2015. Exploring the Economic and Employment Challenges Facing U.S. Veterans. Los Angeles: USC School of Social Work.Google Scholar
Kovner, S. 2012. Occupying Power: Sex Workers and Servicemen in Postwar Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kovner, Sarah. 2013. Occupying Power: Sex Workers and Servicemen in Post-War Japan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus-Black, Mindie. 2007. Everyday Harm: Domestic Violence, Court Rites, and Cultures of Reconciliation. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lea, S. and Auburn, T. 2001. “The Social Construction of Rape in the Talk of a Convicted Rapist.” Feminism & Psychology 11: 11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, Susan J., Lanvers, Ursula, and Shaw, Steve. 2003. “Attrition in Rape Cases: Developing a Profile and Identifying Relevant Factors.” British J. of Criminology 43: 583–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippy, Caroline and DeGue, Sarah. 2016. “Exploring Alcohol Policy Approaches to Prevent Sexual Violence Perpetration.” Trauma, Violence and Abuse 17: 26–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonsway, Kimberley A. and Archambault, Joanne. 2012. “The 'Justice Gap’ for Sexual Assault Cases: Future Directions for Research and Reform.” Violence Against Women 18: 145–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López, Ian F. Haney. 2010. “Post-Racial Racism: Racial Stratification and Mass Incarceration in the Age of Obama.” California Law Rev. 98: 1023–74.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory M. 1993. Reproducing Rape. Domination through Talk in the Courtroom. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
McGlynn, Clare. 2011. “Feminism, Rape and the Search for Justice.” Oxford J. of Legal Studies 31: 825–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morral, A., Gore, K.L., Schell, T.L., eds. 2015. Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment in the U.S. Military. Volume 2. Estimates for Department of Defense Service Members from the 2014 RAND Military Workplace Study. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Morris, Madeline. 1996. “By Force of Arms: Rape, War and Military Culture.” Duke Law J. 45: 652–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, L. J. 2010. Military Justice. A Guide to the Issues. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
Moulta-Ali, U. 2015. Who is a ‘Veteran’?–Basic Eligibility for Veterans' Benefits. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Muehlenhard, Charlene L., Humphreys, Terry P., Jozkowski, Kristen N., and Peterson, Zoë D. 2016. “The Complexities of Sexual Consent among College Students: A Conceptual and Empirical Review.” The J. of Sex Research 53: 457–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Donald and Feldman, Valerie. 2017. “Toward a more Comprehensive Analysis of the Role of Organizational Culture in Child Sexual Abuse in Institutional Contexts.” Child Abuse & Neglect 74: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Response Systems to Adult Sexual Assault Crimes Panel (2014) Report of the Response Systems Panel to Adult Sexual Assault Crimes. Committee Print.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah L. 2016. “Rape on Campus and in the Military: An Agenda for Reform.” UCLA Women's Law J. 23: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Frank. 1994. “Journal: The Girl Next Door." New York Times, Feb. 20.Google Scholar
Rustico, Greg. 2016. “Overcoming Overcorrection. Towards Holistic Military Sexual Assault Reform.” Virginia Law Rev. 102: 2027–74.Google Scholar
Saguy, Abigail C. 2018. “Europeanization or National Specificity? Legal Approaches to Sexual Harassment in France, 2002-2012.” Law & Society Rev. 52: 140–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAPRO. Department of Defense Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office. 2013. Department of Defense Annual Report on Sexual Assault in the Military. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense.Google Scholar
SAPRO. Department of Defense Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office (2016) Appendix B: Statistical Data on Sexual Assault. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense.Google Scholar
SAPRO. Department of Defense Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office. 2018. Appendix B. Statistical Data on Sexual Assault. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense.Google Scholar
Saunders, Candida L. 2012. “The Truth, the Half-Truth, and Nothing like the Truth: Reconceptualizing False Allegations of Rape.” British J. of Criminology 52: 1152–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenck, Lisa M. 2014. “Informing the Debate about Sexual Assault in the Military Services: Is the Department of Defense its own Worst Enemy?” Ohio State Criminal Law J. 11: 579–671.Google Scholar
Schenck, Lisa M. 2016. “‘Just the Facts, Ma'am': How Military Appellate Courts Rely on Factual Sufficiency Review to Overturn Sexual Assault Cases When Victims are 'Incapacitated’.” Southwestern Law Review 45: 523–560.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jessica, et al. 2017. “Beyond Surveys and Scales: How Rape Myths Manifest in Sexual Assault Police Records.” Psychology of Violence 7: 602–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sleath, Emma and Smith, Lisa L. 2017. “Understanding the Factors that Predict Victim Retraction in Police Reported Allegations of Intimate Partner Violence.” Psychology of Violence 7: 140–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carly Parnitzke and Freyd, Jennifer J. 2014. “Institutional Betrayal.” American Psychologist 69: 575–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speier, Jackie. 2017. Press Release. Aug. 23. (https://speier.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-speier-responds-allegations-sexual-misconduct-involving-fort-benning) (accessed September 28, 2017).Google Scholar
Spohn, Cassia. 2016. Adjudication of Sexual Assaults Reported in the Military Services. Updated Feb. 25, 2016. Judicial Proceedings Panel. Federal Advisory Committee.Google Scholar
Spohn, Cassia and Tellis, Katharine. 2012. “The Criminal Justice System's Response to Sexual Violence.” Violence Against Women 18: 169–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spohn, C., Tellis, K. 2019. “Sexual Assault Case Outcomes: Disentangling the Overlapping Decisions of Police and Prosecutors.” 36: 383–411.Google Scholar
Spohn, Cassia, Beichner, Dawn, and Davis-Frenzel, Erika. 2001. “Prosecutorial Explanations for Sexual Assault Case Rejection: Guarding the Gateway to Justice.” Social Problems 48: 206–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spohn, Cassia, White, Clair, and Tellis, Katharine. 2014. “Unfounding Sexual Assault: Examining the Decision to Unfound and Identifying False Reports.” Law & Society Rev. 48: 161–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffensmeier, Darrell, Ulmer, Jeffery, and Kramer, John. 1998. “The Interaction of Race, Gender and Age in Criminal Sentencing: The Punishment Cost of Being Young, Black, and Male.” Criminology 36: 763–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiehm, Judith Hicks. 1989. Arms and the Enlisted Woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Times, New York. 1950. “Truman Signs Code of Service Justice." New York Times. May 7.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Services. 1949. Eighty-First Congress First Hearing on H.R.2498. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services. 2019. Hearing to Receive Testimony on the Military Services’ Prevention of and Response to Sexual Assault. March 6. Committee Print.Google Scholar
Venema, Rachel M. 2016. “Police Officer Schema of Sexual Assault Reports: Real Rape, Ambiguous Cases, and False Reports.” J. of Interpersonal Violence 31: 872–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venema, Rachel M. 2019. “Making Judgments: How Blame Mediates the Influence of Rape Myth Acceptance in Police Response to Sexual Assault.” J. of Interpersonal Violence 34: 2697–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, Carolyn M. 2019. “The Politics of Sex Abuse in Sacred Hierarchies. A Comparative Study of the Catholic Church and the Military in the United States.” Religions 10(April): https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10040281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Courtney. 2017. “US lawmakers shaken as #MeToo engulfs Congress." Financial Times. Dec 16/17.Google Scholar
Weigley, Russell F. 2004. “The American Military and the Principle of Civilian Control from McClellan to Powell.” The J. of Military History 57: 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherill, Reagan R. and Fromme, Kim. 2016. “Alcohol-Induced Blackouts: A Review of Recent Clinical Research with Practical Implications and Recommendations for Future Studies.” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 40: 922–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, Elisabeth Jean and Toppelberg, Nathaniel. 2017. “The Persistence of Sexual Assault within the US Military.” J. of Peace Research 54: 620–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar