Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment policies and practices in contexts of diversity: unravelling the tensions

  • Published:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is no question that teachers nowadays are challenged to adapt their teaching practices to the needs that arise from increasing diversity in the current classroom. Since effective teaching asks for alignment between teaching and assessment practices, the increasing diversity challenges teachers’ assessment practices and schools’ assessment policies as well. This study will explore these practices and policies in schools with a diverse student population. To this end, data was collected in 2017 through case studies in six primary schools, three of which are characterized by a heterogeneous pupil composition and three of which have a homogeneous composition. The data collection includes interviews with six school principals and 24 teachers in primary education, six of whom are employed in pre-primary education. Although the results show a variety in reported assessment practices, there is no evidence for differences linked to schools’ pupil composition. This study emphasizes the crucial role of an assessment policy at the school level, as it serves as a condition for high-quality assessment practices that support effective teaching, while also responding to the challenges of diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedi, J. (2014). The use of computer technology in designing appropriate test accommodations for English language learners. Applied Measurement in Education, 27(4), 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agirdag, O., & Van Houtte, M. (2011). A tale of two cities bridging families and schools. Educational Leadership, 68(8), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre, J., & Speer, N. M. (1999). Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 327–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainscow, M. (2007). Teacher development in responding to student diversity: The way ahead. Paper presented at the Responding to student diversity. Teacher education and classroom practice. Proceedings of the International Conference on Teacher Education for Responding to Student Diversity.

  • Akintade-Ogunleye, O. (2012). Special education in the first decade of no child left behind legislation: Patterns of student performance and teachers' perceptions in one school district. University of Redlands

  • Aschbacher, P., & Alonzo, A. (2006). Examining the utility of elementary science notebooks for formative assessment purposes. Educational Assessment, 11(3–4), 179–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J., & al. (2007). Teaching diverse learners. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Fransisco.

  • Birenbaum, M. (2014). Conceptualizing assessment culture in school. In Designing assessment for quality learning (pp. 285–302). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Birenbaum, M. (2016). Assessment culture versus testing culture: The impact on assessment for learning. In Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 275–292). Springer, Cham.

  • Birenbaum, M., Kimron, H., & Shilton, H. (2011). Nested contexts that shape assessment for learning: School-based professional learning community and classroom culture. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. (2012). Formative and summative aspects of assessment: Theoretical and research foundations in the context of pedagogy. SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment: SAGE Publications.

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Lessons from around the world: How policies, politics and cultures constrain and afford assessment practices. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, S. M. (2016). Teachers' perceptions about assessment: Competing narratives. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (2004). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coubergs, C., Struyven, K., Vanthournout, G., & Engels, N. (2017). Measuring teachers’ perceptions about differentiated instruction: The DI-Quest instrument and model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Backer, F., Van Avermaet, P., & Slembrouck, S. (2017). Schools as laboratories for exploring multilingual assessment policies and practices. Language and Education, 31(3), 217–230.

  • Dierick, S., Dochy, F., & van de Watering, G. A. (2001). Assessment in het hoger onderwijs: over de implicaties van nieuwe toetsvormen voor de edumetrie. Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs, 19(1), 2–18.

  • Duncan, C. R., & Noonan, B. (2007). Factors affecting teachers’ grading and assessment practices. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53(1).

  • Duncan, C., Noonan, B., Simon, M., Tierney, R., Forgette-Giroux, R., & Hachey, K. (2009). Comparing grading practices between secondary mathematics teachers in Ontario and Saskatchewan. Unpublished Manuscript, Canadian Educational Research Association, Canadian Society for the Study of Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa.

  • Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercikan, K., & Solano-Flores, G. (2016). Section discussion: Assessment and sociocultural context: A bidirectional relationship. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemish Ministry of Education. (2014). M-Decreet [Measures for Children with Special Educational Needs]. Retrieved May 20, 2020 from https://onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/nl/grote-lijnen-van-het-m-decreet. Accessed 20 May 2020.

  • Fulmer, G. W., Lee, I. C., & Tan, K. H. (2015). Multi-level model of contextual factors and teachers’ assessment practices: An integrative review of research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(4), 475–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottheiner, D. M., & Siegel, M. A. (2012). Experienced middle school science teachers’ assessment literacy: Investigating knowledge of students’ conceptions in genetics and ways to shape instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(5), 531–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, T., Gore, J., & Ladwig, J. (2006). Teachers’ fundamental beliefs, commitment to reform and the quality of pedagogy. Paper presented at the Proceedings Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference.

  • Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). The human and social experience of assessment: Valuing the person and context. In L. R. Harris & G. T. L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., Rea, A., & Teney, C. (2009). De sociale lift blijft steken. De prestaties van allochtone leerlingen in de Vlaamse Gemeenschap en de Franse Gemeenschap [The social lift stops working. The performance of immigrant pupils in the Flemish Community and the French Community]. Brussels: Koning Boudewijnstichting.

  • James, M. (2006). Assessment, teaching and theories of learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 47–60). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelchtermans, G. (2006). Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions. A review. Zeitschrift fur padagogik, 52(2), 220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Feldman, A., & Beatty, I. D. (2012). Factors that affect science and mathematics teachers’ initial implementation of technology-enhanced formative assessment using a classroom response system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 523–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. H., Myran, S., & Workman, D. (2002). Elementary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, T. R. (2005). The role of assessment in differentiation. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 226–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, T. R. (2016). Differentiated instruction and assessment: An approach to classroom assessment in conditions of student diversity. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 284–301). New Yord: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortelmans, D. (2013). Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden: Acco.

  • Nayir, F., Brown, M., Burns, D., Joe, O. H., McNamara, G., Nortvedt, G., et al. (2019). Assessment with and for migration background students-cases from Europe. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(79), 39–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Chróinín, D., & Cosgrave, C. (2013). Implementing formative assessment in primary physical education: Teacher perspectives and experiences. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18(2), 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2020.

  • Pangatungan, M. (2018). The impact of read-aloud accommodations of fourth-and fifth-grade elementary students with and without learning impairment: A descriptive case study.

  • Penninckx, M., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). Evaluatie in het Vlaamse onderwijs. Beleid en praktijk van leerling tot overheid. Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.

  • Phelan, J. C., Choi, K., Niemi, D., Vendlinski, T. P., Baker, E. L., & Herman, J. (2012). The effects of assessments on middle-school students’ math performance. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(2), 211–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remesal, A. (2007). Educational reform and primary and secondary teachers' conceptions of assessment: The Spanish instance, building upon Black and Wiliam. The Curriculum Journal, 18(1), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remesal, A. (2011). Primary and secondary teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 472–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing. The art of hearing data (3th ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sach, E. (2015). An exploration of teachers' narratives: What are the facilitators and constraints which promote or inhibit ‘good’formative assessment practices in schools? Education 3–13, 43(3), 322–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (2004). Beliefs, practices, and interactions of teachers in a Japanese high school English department. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 797–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schissel, J. L. (2014). Classroom use of test accommodations: Issues of access, equity, and conflation. Current issues in language planning, 15(3), 282–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective sixth edition: Pearson.

  • Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewbridge, C., Hulshof, M., Nusche, D., & Stoll, L. (2011). School Evaluation in the Flemish Community of Belgium. Retrieved May 20, 2020, fromhttp://www.oecd.org/education/school/49177884.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2020.

  • Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests. A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. A. (2007). Exploring the importance of teachers' institutional structure on the development of teachers' standards of assessment in Belgium. Sociology of Education, 80(4), 314–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, R. (2013). Fairness in classroom assessment. In J. H. Mc Millan (Ed.), Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 125–141). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. S. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). Grading and differentiation: Paradox or good practice? Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 262–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago press.

  • UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Salamanca: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1993). Standard rules on the equalisation of opportunities for persons with disabilities. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Avermaet, P., Van Houtte, M., & Van den Branden, K. (2011). Promoting equity and excellence in education. An overview. In K. Van den Branden, P. Van Avermaet, & M. Van Houtte (Eds.), Equity and excellence in education. towards maximal learning opportunities for all students (pp. 1–20). New York, Routledge.

  • Van Avermaet, P., Agirdag, O., Slembrouck, S., Struys, E., Van de Craen, P., Van Houtte, M., . . . & Van Hulle, E. (2016). MARS: Meertaligheid Als Realiteit op School. Onderzoek in opdracht van het Vlaams Ministerie van Onderwijs en Vorming.

  • Van Bruggen, J. C. (2010). Inspectorates of education in Europe; some comparative remarks about their tasks and work. Brussels: SICI.

  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.

  • Wang, M. C., & Zollers, N. J. (1990). Adaptive instruction: An alternative service delivery approach. Remedial and Special Education, 11(1), 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning?. Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1):3–14

  • Wolf, M. K., Kim, J., & Kao, J. (2012). The effects of glossary and read-aloud accommodations on English language learners’ performance on a mathematics assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 25(4), 347–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 49, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Joke Ysenbaert & Piet Van Avermaet

  2. Departement of Sociology, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Ghent University, Korte Meer 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Mieke Van Houtte

Authors
  1. Joke Ysenbaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mieke Van Houtte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Piet Van Avermaet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joke Ysenbaert.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ysenbaert, J., Van Houtte, M. & Van Avermaet, P. Assessment policies and practices in contexts of diversity: unravelling the tensions. Educ Asse Eval Acc 32, 107–126 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09319-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09319-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation