Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Acing the test: an examination of teachers’ perceptions of and responses to the threat of state takeover

  • Published:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act, states have increased latitude over school improvement and accountability policies. At the same time, school takeover via state-run turnaround districts has emerged as a prominent education reform. Although policies takeover influence how teachers are prepared, supported, and evaluated, little is known about how teachers may perceive and respond to the threat of state takeover. Using Georgia as a case study, this article (a) examines the ways in which teachers’ perceptions and practices shift in response to the threat of state takeover and (b) explores how accountability pressures associated with the threat of state takeover may result in organizational changes at the school level. We find that teachers have negative attitudes toward the threat of state takeover and there have been marked changes in practices. It appears that teaching to test is being normalized. School administrators and teachers appear to display a cognitive dissonance between their moral and ethical reactions to the practice and their use of the practices in response to heightened accountability pressures. Teachers acknowledge the difficulties of overhauling the inclusion of students’ test scores in evaluations, but they also raise several concerns regarding the process of testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, N. A., Jang, S. T., & Kankane, S. (2017). The performance cycle: the association between student achievement and state policies tying together teacher performance, student achievement, and accountability. American Journal of Education, 123(3), 413–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amrein-Beardsley, A., Berliner, D. C., & Rideau, S. (2010). Cheating in the first, second, and third degree: educators’ responses to high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. H. (2006). How can we know what we think until we see what we said?: a citation and citation context analysis of Karl Weick’s The Social Psychology of Organizing. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1675–1692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. (2002). The effects of competition between schools on educational outcomes: a review for the United States. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 279–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berntson, E., Näswall, K., & Sverke, M. (2010). The moderating role of employability in the association between job insecurity and exit, voice, loyalty and neglect. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(2), 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry Cullen, J., & Reback, R. (2006). Tinkering toward accolades: school gaming under a performance accountability system. In Improving school accountability (pp. 1–34). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Bishop, J. Z. (2009). The Impact of a State Takeover on Academic Achievement, School Performance, and School Leadership in a Rural South Carolina School District. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.

  • Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: ‘Educational Triage’ and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005). Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students. American Economic Review, 95(2), 166–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broemmel, A. D. (2006). No teacher left behind: Valuing teacher voice in elementary reading teacher education reform. Literacy Research and Instruction, 46(1), 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buras, K. (2014). Charter schools, race, and urban space: Where the market meets grassroots resistance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, P. (2010). Race and support for state takeovers of local school districts. Urban Education, 45(3), 274–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, P. (2003). Regime theory, state government, and a takeover of urban education. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(3), 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd-Blake, M., Afolayan, M. O., Hunt, J. W., Fabunmi, M., Pryor, B. W., & Leander, R. (2010). Morale of teachers in high poverty schools: a postNCLB mixed methods analysis. Education and Urban Society, 42, 450–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver-Thomas, D., Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher turnover: why it matters and what we can do about it. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-turnover-report. Accessed Sept 2018

  • Center on Education Policy. (2006). From the capital to the classroom: year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Available from www.cep-dc.org. Accessed Jan 2019

  • Cheng, G. H. L., & Chan, D. K. S. (2008). Who suffers more from job insecurity? A meta-analytic review. Applied Psychology, 57(2), 272–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, M., Kane, T. J., Kozakowski, W., Schueler, B. E., & Staiger, D. O. (2019). School district reform in Newark: Within-and between-school changes in achievement growth. ILR Review, 72(2), 323–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo, C. W. (2001). Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning. Information Research, 7(1), 7–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: how teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American educational research journal, 43(3), 343–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives, 8, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: the irony of ‘No Child Left Behind’. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Can value added add value to teacher evaluation? Educational Researcher, 44(2), 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Bae, S., Cook-Harvey, C. M., Lam, L., Mercer, C., Podolsky, A., & Stosich, E. L. (2016). Pathways to new accountability through the Every Student Succeeds Act. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Sutcher, L., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2018). Teacher shortages in California: Status, sources, and potential solutions.

  • Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2009). School system strategies for supporting data use. Handbook of data-based decision making in education, 191–206.

  • Davis, S. H., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Innovative principal preparation programs: what works and how we know. Planning and Changing, 43(1/2), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Blake, A., Broschak, J. P., & George, E. (2003). Happy together? How using nonstandard workers affects exit, voice, and loyalty among standard employees. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 475–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate Cultures: TheRitesandRitualsofCorporate Life. Reading: AddisonWesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T., Jacob, B., & Schwartz, N. (2013). The effects of NCLB on school resources and practices. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 252–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelstein, F. (2008). The evolving political role of urban mayors in education. Handbook of education politics and policy, 179-194.

  • Eberts, R. W., Hollenbeck, K. M., & Stone, J. 2002 . Teacher performance incentives, collective bargaining, and student outcomes. In proceedings of the annual meeting-industrial relatoins research association (pp. 180-192). IRRA; 1999.

  • Ehren, M. C., & Hatch, T. (2013). Responses of schools to accountability systems using multiple measures: The case of New York City elementary schools. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(4), 341–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, S. N. (1988). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: review of variables that influence treatment selection. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19(1), 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. E. (2007). School leaders and their sensemaking about race and demographic change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 159–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D. (2006). Testing, crime and punishment. Journal of Public Economics, 90(4), 837–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D. N., & Getzler, L. S. (2006). Accountability, ability and disability: gaming the system?. In Improving school accountability (pp. 35–49). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Figlio, D., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. In Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 3, pp. 383–421). Elsevier.

  • Figlio, D. N., & Rouse, C. E. (2006). Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools? Journal of Public Economics, 90(1–2), 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. C., & Hirsch, P. M. (2005). The discourse of globalization: Framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynt, S. W., & Morton, R. C. (2009). The teacher shortage in America: pressing concerns. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 19(3), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallucci, C. (2003). Communities of Practice and the Mediation ofTeachers' Responses to Standards-based Reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, J. L., & Egan, C. (2018). The ties that bind: Building civic capacity for the Tennessee Achievement School District. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 928–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L. S. (2008). Kindergarten teachers making “street-level” education policy in the wake of No Child Left Behind. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 448–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D. (2008). Teachers matter, but effective teacher quality policies are elusive. Handbook of research in education finance and policy, 1.

  • Goldhaber, D., Lavery, L., & Theobald, R. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational researcher, 44(5), 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, R., Rinaldi, C., Proctor, C. P., & Cardarelli, A. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of a response to intervention (RTI) reform effort in an urban elementary school: a consensual qualitative analysis. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(1), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, L., & Rosenblatt, Z. (1984). Job insecurity: toward conceptual clarity. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 438–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grissom, J. A., Nicholson-Crotty, S., & Harrington, J. R. (2014). Estimating the effects of No Child Left Behind on teachers’ work environments and job attitudes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 417–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haladyna, T., Haas, N., & Allison, J. (1998). Continuing tensions in standardized testing. Childhood Education, 74(5), 262–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., Marsh, J. A., McCombs, J. S., & Robyn, A. (2007). Standards-based accountability under No Child Left Behind: experiences of teachers and administrators in three states. Rand Corporation.

  • Hannaway, J., & Hamilton, L. (2008). Performancebased accountability policies: implications for school and classroom practices. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute and RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. (1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: estimation using micro data. The American Economic Review, 61(2), 280–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A. (1981). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A. (1989). Throwing money at schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1, 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanuskek, E. A. (2014) Encyclopedia of EEF Ed production functions and productivity.

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: possibilities and prospects. Teacher training agency annual lecture.

  • Hargrove, T. Y., Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., & Davis, M. (2000). Unintended consequences of high-stakes testing in North Carolina: teacher perceptions. ERS Spectrum, 18(4), 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. N., & Herrington, C. D. (2006). Accountability, standards, and the growing achievement gap: lessons from the past half-century. American Journal of Education, 112(2), 209–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverly, C., Calabrese Barton, A., Schwarz, C. V., & Braaten, M. (2018). “Making Space”: How Novice Teachers Create Opportunities for Equitable Sense-Making in Elementary Science. Journal of Teacher Education, 0022487118800706.

  • Henig, J. R., Hula, R. C., Orr, M., & Pedescleaux, D. S. (2001). The color of school reform: race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton University Press.

  • Hill, C. E., Nutt-Williams, K., Heaton, K. J., Thompson, B. J., & Rhodes, R. H. (1996). Therapist retrospective recall of impasses in long-term psychotherapy: a qualitative analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(2), 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (Vol. 25). Harvard university press.

  • Honig, M. I., & Coburn, C. (2008). Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices: toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy, 22(4), 578–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, C. M. (2000). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review, 90(5), 1209–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D. (2007). Assessing No Child Left Behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American educational research journal, 44(3), 493–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, D., & Marlow, L. (2004). Teacher retention: why do beginning teachers remain in the profession? Education, 124(4), 605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irby, D. J. (2018). Mo’Data, Mo’Problems: making sense of racial discipline disparities in a large diversifying suburban high school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 0013161X18769051.

  • Isenberg, T., Isenberg, P., Chen, J., Sedlmair, M., & Möller, T. (2013). A systematic review on the practice of evaluating visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2818–2827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbar, H. (2015). ‘Drenched in the past’: the evolution of market-oriented reforms in New Orleans. Journal of Education Policy, 30(6), 751–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, B. A. (2005). Accountability, incentives and behavior: the impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago public schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 761–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. (2003). Rotten apples: an investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 843–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. K. (2009). Student demographics, teacher sorting, and teacher quality: Evidence from the end of school desegregation. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(2), 213–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, N. E. (1996). Interpreting policy in real classrooms: case studies of state reform and teacher practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. L., & Bearak, J. M. (2014). “Teaching to the Test” in the NCLB Era how test predictability affects our understanding of student performance. Educational Researcher, 0013189X14554449.

  • Jennings, J. L., & Lauen, D. L. (2016). Accountability, inequality, and achievement: the effects of the No Child Left Behind Act on multiple measures of student learning. RSF.

  • Jensen, T. B., & Aanestad, M. (2007). Hospitality and hostility in hospitals: a case study of an EPR adoption among surgeons. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(6), 672–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, T. B., Kjærgaard, A., & Svejvig, P. (2009). Using institutional theory with sensemaking theory: a case study of information system implementation in healthcare. Journal of Information Technology, 24(4), 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., Jones, B. D., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., Yarbrough, T., & Davis, M. (1999). The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, P. (2011). America’s biggest teacher and principal cheating scandal unfolds in Atlanta. Christian Science Monitor, 5.

  • Kalogrides, D., Loeb, S., & Béteille, T. (2013). Systematic sorting: Teacher characteristics and class assignments. Sociology of Education, 86(2), 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kam, C. M., Greenberg, M. T., & Walls, C. T. (2003). Examining the role of implementation quality in school-based prevention using the PATHS curriculum. Prevention Science, 4(1), 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, K. V., & Zucker, S. (2005). Curriculum narrowing. Harcourt Policy Report. Retrieved May, 20, 2006.

  • Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (2001). Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Journal of curriculum studies, 33(5), 551–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirst, M., & Edelstein, F. (2006). The maturing mayoral role in education. Harvard Educational Review, 76(2), 152–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kober, N., & Rentner, D. S. (2012). Year two of implementing the Common Core State Standards: States' Progress and Challenges. Center on Education Policy.

  • Koretz, D., Barron, S., Mitchell, K., & Stecher, B. (1996). The perceived effects of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, M. A., Brunner, E. J., Dougherty, S. M., & Schwegman, D. J. (2018). Teacher Evaluation Reforms and the Supply and Quality of New Teachers.

  • Kvale, S. (1996). The 1,000-page question. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(3), 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (2000). No exit: public education as an inescapably public good. Reconstructing the common good in education: coping with intractable American dilemmas, 110–129.

  • Ladd, H. F. (2002). School vouchers: a critical view. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, H. (Ed.). (2011). Holding schools accountable: performance-based reform in education. Brookings Institution Press.

  • Lamar, N. (2017). After failure of opportunity school district amendment, new bill addresses struggling schools. Retrieved from http://www.gpbnews.org/post/after-failure-opportunity-school-district-amendment-new-bill-addresses-struggling-schools. Accessed Dec 2018

  • Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: a descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Betebenner, D. W. (2002). Accountability systems: implications of requirements of the no child left behind act of 2001. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S., & Grissom, J. (2013). What do we know about the use of value-added measures for principal evaluation. The Carnegie Knowledge Network.

  • Louis, K. S., Febey, K., & Schroeder, R. (2005). State-mandated accountability in high schools: Teachers’ interpretations of a new era. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 177–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, A. J. (2010, January 1). The relationship of No Child Left Behind Mandates on elementary teacher instructional practices, test preparation, professional development, and school climate. ProQuest LLC,

  • Lubienski, C. (2005). Public schools in marketized environments: shifting incentives and unintended consequences of competition-based educational reforms. American Journal of Education, 111(4), 464–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matland, R. E. (1995). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect in an urban school system. Social Science Quarterly, 76(3), 506–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawhinney, H. B. (2013). Reactive sequences in the evolution of Maryland’s Consequential Accountability Regime. Educational Policy, 27(2), 279–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, K. A. (2007). “Expanding the moral community” or “blaming the victim”? The politics of state education accountability policy. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 77–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcneil, M. (2014). Georgia forfeits, for now, $9 million in race to top funds. Education Week. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2014/01/georgia_forfeits_9_million_in_.html. Accessed May 2018

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Huberman, M. A., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. sage.

  • Milner, R. (2013). Policy reforms and de-professionalization of teaching.

  • Morel, D. (2018). Takeover: race, education, and American democracy. Oxford University Press.

  • Mulvenon, S. W., Stegman, C. E., & Ritter, G. (2005). Test anxiety: A multifaceted study on the perceptions of teachers, principals, counselors, students, and parents. International Journal of Testing, 5(1), 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R. J., & Papay, J. P. (2010). Teachers’ views on No Child Left Behind: support for the principles, concerns about the practices. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). America’s teachers: profile of a profession, 1993–94. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Teacher Quality. (2015). 2015 State Teacher Policy Yearbook. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oluwole, J. O., & Green, P. C., III. (2009). State takeover of school districts: race and the equal protection clause. Independent Review, 42, 343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, M. (1999). Black social capital: the politics of school reform in Baltimore, 1986–1998. Studies in government and public policy. University Press of Kansas, 2501 West 15th Street, Lawrence, KS 66049-3905 (paperbound: ISBN-0-7006-0982-2, $17.95; hardbound: ISBN-0-7006-0981-4, $35).

  • Owens, S. J. (2015). Georgia’s teacher dropout crisis. Atlanta: GA: GADOE. Retrieved from http://www.gadoe.org/External-Affairs-and-Policy/communications/Documents/Teacher%20Survey%20Results.pdf . Accessed Sept 2018

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: a personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedulla, J. J., Abrams, L. M., Madaus, G. F., Russell, M. K., Ramos, M. A., & Miao, J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Boston: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, R. P. (2011). Educators cheating on tests is nothing new: doing something about it would be.

  • Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: the case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 397–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reback, R., Rockoff, J., & Schwartz, H. L. (2014). Under pressure: Job security, resource allocation, and productivity in schools under No Child Left Behind. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(3), 207–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, C., & Henry, G. T. (2019). Leaving school early: An examination of novice teachers’ within-and end-of-year turnover. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 204–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. H., Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Elliott, R. (1994). Client retrospective recall of resolved and unresolved misunderstanding events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringwalt, C. L., Ennett, S., Johnson, R., Rohrbach, L. A., Simons-Rudolph, A., Vincus, A., & Thorne, J. (2003). Factors associated with fidelity to substance use prevention curriculum guides in the nation's middle schools. Health Education & Behavior, 30(3), 375–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2000). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement (Working Paper W6691).

  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrics, 73, 417458 Retrieved from http://edpro.stanford.edu/Hanushek/files_det.asp?FileId=73. Accessed Sept 2018

  • Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roulston, K. (2010). Reflective interviewing: a guide to theory and practice. Sage.

  • Rouse, C. E., Hannaway, J., Goldhaber, D., & Figlio, D. (2007). Feeling the Florida heat? How low-performing schools respond to voucher and accountability pressure (no. w13681). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A. G., III. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: an integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russakoff, D. (2015). The prize: who’s in charge of America’s schools? Houghton Mifflin: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schueler, B. E. (2019). A third way: the politics of school district takeover and turnaround in Lawrence, Massachusetts. In Annual Meeting of the Association of Public Policy and Analysis, Washington, DC.

  • Shepard, L. A. (1988). The harm of measurement-driven instruction. Washington, DC: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, J. S. (2013). A study of the perceptions of leadership behaviors and the morale of elementary teachers in a selected school district (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri--Columbia).

  • Siskin, L. S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (2013). Redefining the school district in Tennessee. Part one of a three-part series. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

  • Smith, N. (2014). Redefining the school district in Michigan. Part two of a three-part series. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

  • Spillane, J. P. (1998). State policy and the nonmonolithic nature of the local school district: organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 33–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: the mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., & Jennings, N. E. (1997). Aligned instructional policy and ambitious pedagogy: exploring instructional reform from the classroom perspective. Teachers College Record, 98, 439–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. 1979. The ethnographic interview. New York (ua).

  • Stecher, B. B. M., & Hamilton, L. S. (2002). Putting theory to the test. Foresight, 9(2).

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Sunderman, G. L., Tracey, C. A., Kim, J., Orfield, G., & Harvard civil rights project, CM (2004). Listening to teachers: classroom realities and no child left behind. Civil Rights Project At Harvard University (The)

  • Sundin, E., & Wikman, A. (2004). Work life changes and new forms of production. Work life and Health. Liber Idéförlag, Arbetslivsinstitutet, Arbetsmiljöverket och författarna, Malmö.

  • Sutcher, L., Darling-Hammond, L., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2016). A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the US. Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/coming-crisis-teaching. Accessed Nov 2018

  • Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., & Näswall, K. (2002). No security: a meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(3), 242–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tydeman, C. K. (2009). The influence of no child left behind status on teacher perceptions of school organizational cohesiveness. ProQuest LLC.

  • Vang, M. (2017). Racial composition of school district on school leaders’ responses to state takeover: a field experiment on the application of Michigan’s Emergency Manager Law. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(2), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1996). The challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press.

  • Vogell, H. (2011). Investigation into APS cheating finds unethical behavior across every level. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

  • Weber, K., & Glynn, M. A. (2006). Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization studies, 27(11), 1639–1660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage.

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinbaum, E. H., Weiss, M. J., Beaver, J. K., & Consortium for policy research in, E. (2012). Learning from NCLB: school responses to accountability pressure and student subgroup performance. Policy brief. RB-54. Consortium For Policy Research In Education.

  • Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies. Simon and Schuster.

  • Welsh, R. O. (2018). Recovery, achievement, and opportunity: a comparative analysis of state takeover districts in Louisiana, Tennessee, and Georgia. Urban Education, 0042085918801884.

  • Welsh, R. O., & Williams, S. M. (2018). Incentivizing improvement or imposition? An examination of the response to gubernatorial school takeover and statewide turnaround districts. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, 124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, R. O., Williams, S., Little, S., & Graham, J. (2017). Right cause, wrong method? Examining the politics of state takeover in Georgia. Urban Affairs Review, 1078087417714061.

  • Wong, K. K., & Shen, F. X. (2003). Measuring the effectiveness of city and state takeover as a school reform strategy. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(4), 89–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. K., & Shen, F. X. (2007). Mayoral leadership matters: lessons learned from mayoral control of large urban school systems. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(4), 737–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, V. C., & Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. (2011). Games schools play: how schools near the proficiency threshold respond to accountability pressures under No Child Left Behind. Society For Research On Educational Effectiveness.

  • Yin, R. (1984). Case study research. Beverly Hills.

  • Ziebarth, T. (2002). State Takeovers and Reconstitutions. Policy Brief.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA

    Richard Welsh

  2. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Jerome Graham & Sheneka Williams

Authors
  1. Richard Welsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jerome Graham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sheneka Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Welsh.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Welsh, R., Graham, J. & Williams, S. Acing the test: an examination of teachers’ perceptions of and responses to the threat of state takeover. Educ Asse Eval Acc 31, 315–347 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-019-09301-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-019-09301-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation