Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Convergence of multiple synthetic paradigms in a universally programmable chemical synthesis machine

Nature Chemistry volume 13, pages 63–69 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

This article has been updated

Abstract

Although the automatic synthesis of molecules has been established, each reaction class uses bespoke hardware. This means that the connection of multi-step syntheses in a single machine to run many different protocols and reactions is not possible, as manual intervention is required. Here we show how the Chemputer synthesis robot can be programmed to perform many different reactions, including solid-phase peptide synthesis, iterative cross-coupling and accessing reactive, unstable diazirines in a single, unified system with high yields and purity. Developing universal and modular hardware that can be automated using one software system makes a wide variety of batch chemistry accessible. This is shown by our system, which performed around 8,500 operations while reusing only 22 distinct steps in 10 unique modules, with the code able to access 17 different reactions. We also demonstrate a complex convergent robotic synthesis of a peptide reacted with a diazirine—a process requiring 12 synthetic steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The aim of this work is the convergence of distinct automated synthesis approaches into a single programmable and unified technology.
Fig. 2: Mapping of a specific synthesis to a generalized automated laboratory hardware assembly.
Fig. 3: Automated synthesespresented in this work.
Fig. 4: Summary of the available hardware modules.
Fig. 5: Implementation and topology of the synthesis platform.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data are available in the supplementary volume. This includes full experimental details to build the Chemputer as well as compound characterization.

Code availability

The code to run the hardware for the automated platforms and the scripts to run the reactions are available in the supplementary volume and in the open-source repository (https://github.com/croningp/ChemputerConvergence).

Change history

  • 24 January 2024

    In the version of the article initially published, the Supplementary Software file was corrupted. This has now been replaced.

References

  1. Peplow, M. Organic synthesis: the robo-chemist. Nature 512, 20–22 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davies, I. W. The digitization of organic synthesis. Nature 570, 175–181 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Merrifield, R. B. Automated synthesis of peptides. Science 150, 178–185 (1965).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alvarado-Urbina, G. et al. Automated synthesis of gene fragments. Science 214, 270–274 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Plante, O. J., Palmacci, E. R. & Seeberger, P. H. Automated solid-phase synthesis of oligosaccharides. Science 291, 1523–1527 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, J. et al. Synthesis of many different types of organic small molecules using one automated process. Science 347, 1221–1226 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Coley, C. W. et al. A robotic platform for flow synthesis of organic compounds informed by AI planning. Science 365, eaax1566 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adamo, A. et al. On-demand continuous-flow production of pharmaceuticals in a compact, reconfigurable system. Science 352, 61–67 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chatterjee, S., Guidi, M., Seeberger, P. H. & Gilmore, K. Automated radial synthesis of organic molecules. Nature 579, 379–384 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Steiner, S. et al. Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language. Science 363, eaav2211 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Merrifield, R. B., Stewart, J. M. & Jernberg, N. Instrument for automated synthesis of peptides. Anal. Chem. 38, 1905–1914 (1966).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kates, S. A., Daniels, S. B. & Albericio, F. Automated allyl cleavage for continuous-flow synthesis of cyclic and branched peptides. Anal. Biochem. 212, 303–310 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen, K. J., Shelton, P. T. & Pedersen, S. L. Peptide Synthesis and Applications (Humana Press, 2013).

  14. Zheng, H. et al. An automated Teflon microfluidic peptide synthesizer. Lab Chip 13, 3347 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iyer, L. K., Moorthy, B. S. & Topp, E. M. Photolytic cross-linking to probe protein–protein and protein–matrix interactions in lyophilized powders. Mol. Pharm. 12, 3237–3249 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng, X. et al. Light-triggered assembly of gold nanoparticles for photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging of tumors in vivo. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604894 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsuguma, H. J. & Audrieth, L. F. The stability of aqueous solutions of hydroxylamine-O-sulphonic acid. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 12, 186–192 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mehr, S. H. M., Craven, M., Leonov, A. I., Keenan, G. & Cronin, L. A universal system for digitization and automatic execution of the chemical synthesis literature. Science 370, 101–108 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank BUCHI for supplying us with an R-300 rotary evaporator and an API to interface it with the Chemputer software package, D. Castro for help with the NHS-diazirine peptide synthesis and purity assessment, H. Mehr for Python advice on the conductivity sensor development and A. Jones for suggesting the diazirine synthesis challenge. We also thank M. Symes, P. Kitson and N. Bell for comments on the manuscript as well as N. A. B. Johnson for her artistic depiction of the Chemputer platform in the TOC graphic. We thank the following funders: EPSRC (Grant Nos. EP/H024107/1, EP/J00135X/1, EP/J015156/1, EP/K021966/1, EP/K023004/1, EP/L023652/1), ERC (project 670467 SMART-POM). This research was developed with funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The views, opinions and/or findings expressed are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official views or policies of the Department of Defense or the US Government.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Davide Angelone, Alexander J. S. Hammer, Simon Rohrbach.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, UK

    Davide Angelone, Alexander J. S. Hammer, Simon Rohrbach, Stefanie Krambeck, Jarosław M. Granda, Jakob Wolf, Sergey Zalesskiy, Greig Chisholm & Leroy Cronin

Authors
  1. Davide Angelone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander J. S. Hammer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simon Rohrbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefanie Krambeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jarosław M. Granda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jakob Wolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sergey Zalesskiy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Greig Chisholm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Leroy Cronin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.C. conceived the concept, the selection of the chemistry, the architecture, outline module design, and the programming approach. D.A., A.J.S.H., S.R., S.K., J.M.G. and J.W. helped configure the robots, run the synthetic protocols and characterize the products. The new modules were designed and built by D.A., A.J.S.H., S.R. and S.Z., and the construction manuals were compiled by G.C. L.C. wrote the paper together with D.A., A.J.S.H. and S.R. with help from all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leroy Cronin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

L.C. is the founder of DeepMatter Group PLC and Chemify Ltd., which aims to commercialize various aspects of the digitization of chemistry, including discovery and synthesis using universal robotic platforms.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angelone, D., Hammer, A.J.S., Rohrbach, S. et al. Convergence of multiple synthetic paradigms in a universally programmable chemical synthesis machine. Nat. Chem. 13, 63–69 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-00596-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-00596-9

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing