A review of recent studies on the life history and ecology of European cephalopods with emphasis on species with the greatest commercial fishery and culture potential
Introduction
Wider recognition of cephalopods as key elements of marine ecosystems (Gasalla et al., 2010; de la Chesnais et al., 2019), evidence of increasing cephalopod abundance (Doubleday et al., 2016), and their potential to replace traditional fishery resources (Caddy and Rodhouse, 1998; Hunsicker et al., 2010; Rodhouse et al., 2014) have led to increased interest in these animals from the scientific community (e.g. Arkhipkin et al., 2015; Jereb et al., 2015). However, in European waters, cephalopods continue to be considered as minor fishery resources, not covered by the EU Common Fisheries Policy. While cephalopods are targeted by many small-scale fisheries, in most large-scale fisheries they are landed as a bycatch. Consequently, fished stocks are not well defined, monitoring of their status is limited and there is no routine assessment of stock status. There are no quota limits for cephalopod catches, although some EU countries specify minimum landing sizes and many directed small-scale fisheries are heavily regulated (see Pierce et al., 2010; Jereb et al., 2015).
A comprehensive review by Jereb et al. (2015) identified various knowledge and implementation gaps hindering the achievement of sustainable fisheries and culture of the main cephalopod resource species in European seas. These gaps (not all applying to all species) included (i) environmental effects on life history, distribution and abundance, including effects of climate change; (ii) age estimation techniques; (iii) basic life history traits; (iv) inferences on life history and ecology from studies of trace element and isotope composition of hard structures; (v) stock assessment; (vi) diet and nutrition.
Here, we review recent publications on life history, ecology, and fisheries of a key cephalopod species exploited in European seas to assess progress in filling these gaps. The following species were chosen for review based on the level of (or potential for) commercial exploitation and their distribution: octopuses – Octopus vulgaris, Eledone cirrhosa, Eledone moschata; cuttlefishes – Sepia officinalis, S. elegans and S. orbignyana; sepiolids – Sepietta oweniana and squids – Loligo vulgaris, Loligo forbesii, Alloteuthis subulata, Alloteuthis media, Illex coindetii, Todarodes sagittatus, Todaropsis eblanae, Ommastrephes caroli1 and Gonatus fabricii.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Over 200 journal articles devoted to studies of life history, distribution, trophic relationships, taxonomy, fisheries and impact of climate change on these species have been published during the last seven years (from 2013) and these articles form the main source material for the present review. The articles published before the second half of 2013 were not reviewed because they were comprehensively considered in ICES cooperative research report (Jereb et al., 2015). We have not specifically
Sepia elegans and S. orbignyana
The elegant cuttlefish Sepia elegans and the pink cuttlefish S. orbignyana are small cuttlefish species (maximum DML of 9 cm and 12 cm respectively) distributed across deep waters (up to 580 m depth) of the North East Atlantic and Mediterranean (Jereb et al., 2015). They are of relatively low interest for fisheries, despite their high abundance in some parts of the range. Jereb et al. (2015) recognised several fields of research as important for the understanding of the biology of these
Alloteuthis spp
European common squid Alloteuthis subulata and midsize/little squid A. media have the widest distributions among European myopsid squids. In addition, A. media is considered to be a suitable species for laboratory research on cephalopod growth and its responses to changes in environmental conditions, due to its small size, high growth plasticity and easily interpretable statolith microstructure. However, perhaps due to a lack of direct commercial interest in most parts of Europe, although
Summary
Studies on cephalopods in European waters published during 2013–2019 were largely focused on three species, Octopus vulgaris, Sepia officinalis and Loligo vulgaris, the first of which was the subject of over 100 journal articles. While some progress was made on better understanding of environmental effects on O. vulgaris populations, further research is still required on early life stages (including their distribution and abundance) and work is needed to develop better artificial diets for
Concluding remarks
There is an ongoing need for systematic collection of species-level data (amounts caught, biological information) from fisheries - including recreational and illegal fishing and fisheries discards - and from fishery-independent surveys, to support stock assessment, the provision of management advice, and the monitoring of the success of management interventions. Obtaining useful data at a sufficiently high temporal resolution also remains a challenge. While similar statements have been made
CRediT authorship contribution statement
F. Lishchenko: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. C. Perales-Raya: Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. C. Barrett: Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. D. Oesterwind: Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. A.M. Power: Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. A. Larivain:
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This review was conducted under the auspices of ICES WGCEPH. GJP, AMP, CPR and AL were supported by the Cephs & Chefs project of the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg Atlantic Area Programme grant number EAPA_282/2016 of the We thank Angel Guerra for his input to discussion about Sepia officinalis off the African coast.
References (241)
- et al.
Characteristics and functional properties of gelatin extracted from squid (Loligo vulgaris) skin
LWT- Food Sci Technol.
(2016) - et al.
Small MPAs do not protect cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis)
Fish. Res.
(2013) - et al.
Microplastics in commercial molluscs from the lagoon of Bizerte (Northern Tunisia)
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2019) - et al.
Trophic structure of pelagic species in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea
J. Sea Res.
(2016) - et al.
A Bayesian two-stage biomass model for stock assessment of data-limited species: an application to cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) in the English Channel
Fish. Res.
(2017) - et al.
Exploring the embryonic development of upper beak in Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797: new findings and implications for age estimation
Fish. Res.
(2020) - et al.
The traditional small-scale octopus trap fishery off the Galician coast (Northeastern Atlantic): historical notes and current fishery dynamics
Fish. Res.
(2018) Predators of the squid Gonatus fabricii (Lichenstein) in the Norwegian Sea
Fish. Res.
(2001)- et al.
Chapter One - A Review of the Factors Influencing Spawning, Early Life Stage Survival and Recruitment Variability in the Common Cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis)
Adv. Mar. Biol.
(2013) - et al.
Evluation of alternative sources of collagen fractions from Loligo vulgaris squid mantle
Int. J. Biol. Macromol.
(2016)