Introduction

Recently, microwave energy has attracted increasing interest in the field of metallurgy to improve the recovery of valuable metals from raw materials and secondary wastes. Microwave energy is a type of electromagnetic wave with frequencies ranging from 300 MHz to 300 GHz [1, 2]. Microwave heating is produced by the interaction between the dielectric material and the microwave field [3, 4]. By contrast, in conventional thermal heating, a sample is heated from the outside to the inside through heat transfer mechanisms [5, 6]. Recent studies have reported a significant enhancement in reaction rates when using microwave heating instead of conventional thermal heating [7, 8]. For example, Hunt et al. [7] found that microwave-induced heating influences the thermodynamics of a reaction; specifically, it accelerates a reaction by reducing the activation energy.

Pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical processes are commonly used for zinc recovery from steelmaking dusts [9, 10]. Steelmaking wastes are fine-grained materials comprising metal oxides (Fe, Cr, Zn) that can be recycled back into the steelmaking cycle. The main phases in such dusts are zincite (ZnO) and franklinite (Zn, Fe)Fe2O4 [11], and the presence of zinc causes operational problems that hinder the direct recycling of steelmaking wastes in the steelmaking cycle. To solve these problems, a pyrometallurgical method has been proposed for zinc recovery from steelmaking dusts through the reduction and evaporation of zinc [12]. The Waelz kiln method is the principal pyrometallurgical process used for treating steelmaking dust. This method involves the carbothermic reduction of zinc phases and the volatilization of metallic zinc [9, 12]. However, it suffers from disadvantages such as high energy requirements, environmental pollution, and requirement of a gas system to treat the evaporated dusts and gases [9]. Hydrometallurgical methods are based on the chemical leaching of zinc phases contained in steelmaking dusts. However, they suffer from disadvantages such as the difficulty of leaching zinc ferrite and the undesirable dissolution of iron [13].

In light of these problems, microwave energy has attracted increasing interest as a means for recycling steelmaking dusts while protecting the environment. Vereš et al. [14] applied microwave-assisted leaching for zinc removal from steelmaking dusts. Omran and Fabritius [9] found that microwave heating is a promising and effective technology for zinc removal from steelmaking dusts [14,15,16]. Microwave absorption ability tests indicated that steelmaking wastes are good microwave-absorbing materials [17]. Lee [18] and Nishioka et al. [19] applied microwaves to electric arc furnace (EAF) dust and successfully recovered metallic zinc. These studies showed that microwaves were effective for processing steelmaking wastes.

The abovementioned studies showed that microwaves could effectively recover zinc from wastes; however, they did not compare the zinc recovery results of microwave heating to those of conventional thermal heating. The present study aims to reuse and recycle steelmaking by-products and to reduce the use of primary raw materials by using microwave heating. Specifically, it examines the effect of microwave radiation on zinc recovery from steelmaking dusts. The zinc recovered from chromium converter (CRC) and EAF dusts using microwave heating was compared with that recovered using conventional thermal heating.

Experimental

Preparation of Materials and Pellets

CRC and EAF carbon steel dust were obtained from Outokumpu Tornio and Ovako Imatra Steel Plants in Finland, respectively.

Table 1 lists the chemical compositions of CRC and EAF dusts. EAF dust mainly contains zinc and iron in the form of franklinite (ZnFe2O4) and zincite (ZnO); further, its ZnO and Fe2O3 contents were 34.45 wt% and 45.64 wt%, respectively. CRC dust mainly contains zinc, iron, and chromium oxides with chromite (FeCr2O4) and zincite (ZnO) main phases; further, its ZnO, Fe2O3, and Cr2O3 contents were 19.08 wt%, 20.83 wt%, and 22.89 wt%, respectively. In addition to Fe, Zn, and Cr, EAF and CRC dusts also contain Ca, Si, Mg, and Mn (Table 1).

Table 1 Compositions of CRC and EAF dusts considered in the calculations

After drying the samples, the CRC and EAF dusts were mixed homogenously with graphite using a gate mortar. The percentage of graphite was 1.2 times the stoichiometric quantity of carbon needed to reduce both zincite and zinc ferrite into elemental zinc and iron. Approximately 0.5% of bentonite was added to the mixture as a binder. Around 3 g of the sample was compressed at 150 kg f cm−2 for 60 s by using a hydraulic oil press.

Experimental

Microwave Furnace

Figure 1 shows the experimental setup of the microwave furnace. The microwave source consisted of two magnetrons with 1.1 kW power and a 2.45 GHz frequency. The temperature was detected using a thermocouple. This thermocouple was linked to a setting panel that controlled the temperature throughout the experiments. The experiments were performed at 650, 750, and 850 °C for 20 min. The sample was placed in an alumina crucible. N2 gas was flowed over the sample from the top and bottom with flow rates of 1 and 5 L min−1, respectively. The evaporated zinc vapor from the sample was pulled by a pump into a collector. The weight loss of the sample was recorded every 60 s. The sample was left to cool down in the microwave furnace after the experiment. Then, the sample was prepared for chemical and mineralogical analyses.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Experimental setup for microwave heating

Conventional Furnace

Figure 2 shows the experimental setup of the conventional furnace. A thermocouple was used to measure the temperature. The experiments were performed at 850, 950, and 1050 °C for 2 h. The sample was placed in a basket and then placed into the furnace through a platinum wire at room temperature and heated to the chosen experimental temperature with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The sample wire was connected to a digital mass loss recording software that measured the weight loss during the experiments. N2 gas was flowed over the sample from the top and bottom with flow rates of 1 and 5 L min−1, respectively. The output vapors and gases from the furnace were cooled and condensed with water. After the experiment, the sample was left to cool down in the furnace in the N2 atmosphere. Then, the sample was prepared for chemical and mineralogical analyses.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Experimental setup for conventional thermal heating

Characterization Methods

The chemical composition of the CRC and EAF dusts was determined using an X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer (Model Bruker AXS S4 Pioneer XRF). The XRF source was a Rh-tube with a maximum power of 4 kW. The carbon content was measured using a LECO carbon analyzer. The mineralogical composition of the dusts was identified using a Rigaku SmartLab 9 kW XRD. Measurements were performed using a cobalt tube with Co Kα radiation operated at 40 kV voltage and a 135 mA (5.4 kW) rotating anode. A Zeiss ULTRA plus field-emission scanning electron microscope was used to examine the micromorphology of the dust.

A Netzsch STA 409 PC Luxx was used to investigate the thermal behavior of the dusts. The thermal behavior was studied in N2 atmosphere from 20 to 1300 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. For the experiments, 30.84 mg of the dusts was packed in a platinum crucible.

Thermodynamic Calculations

FactSage (version 7.2) and its FactPS, FToxid, and FSstel databases were used for the thermodynamic calculations. Table 1 lists the compositions and the initial amounts of the dusts for the calculations. The calculations were performed for 100 g of dust at a total pressure of 1 atm, whereas the initial amount of carbon was calculated separately for each case. These calculations were performed to estimate the occurrence of zinc in different phases as a function of temperature. The quantity of carbon was chosen to be 1.2 times the percentage required to reduce the zinc and iron to an elemental form through the following reactions:

$${\text{ZnO}}_{{({\text{s}})}} + {\text{C}}_{{({\text{s}})}} = {\text{Zn}}_{{({\text{g}})}} + {\text{CO}}_{{({\text{g}})}} ,$$
(1)
$${\text{ZnFe}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{{4\;({\text{s}})}} + 4{\text{C}}_{{({\text{s}})}} = {\text{Zn}}_{{({\text{g}})}} + 2{\text{Fe}}_{{({\text{s}})}} + 4{\text{CO}}_{{({\text{g}})}} ,$$
(2)
$${\text{Fe}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{{3\;({\text{s}})}} + 3{\text{C}}_{{({\text{s}})}} = 2{\text{Fe}}_{{({\text{s}})}} + 3{\text{CO}}_{{({\text{g}})}} .$$
(3)

Figure 3 shows the standard Gibbs free energies for these three reactions. Zinc oxide and zinc ferrite spontaneously reduce to zinc at 950 °C and 800 °C, respectively. On the other hand, hematite spontaneously reduced to iron at 650 °C.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Standard Gibbs free energies for Eqs. (1)–(3)

Figure 4 shows the equilibrium distributions of zinc in the different phases of the thermodynamic calculations. These diagrams provide an idea of how much zinc can theoretically be reduced in different cases and at different temperatures. Relative amounts (percentages) were used to perform comparisons between different calculations, even though the initial amounts of zinc were different in each calculation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Portion of zinc in different phases of thermodynamic equilibrium as a function of temperature when a CRC dust and b EAF dust are heated with carbon

Figure 4 shows that the reduction of zinc from EAF and CRC dusts is more complicated than that from pure zincite and zinc ferrite owing to the other components present in these systems. Solid solutions with spinel and monoxide structures are thermodynamically assumed to be formed in the system, and the reduction of zinc existing in these phases is more difficult owing to the lower activity and higher stability of ZnO in comparison to those of pure stoichiometric compounds.

Figure 4a shows that when reducing EAF dust with carbon, zinc in the solid monoxide phase is expected to form. According to the calculations, higher temperatures of ~ 1200 °C are required to ensure the “complete” removal of zinc from the EAF dust to the gas phase. For CRC dust (Fig. 4b), the situation is even more complicated, with the occurrence of a zinc-containing spinel phase in equilibrium even at high temperatures. Owing to the high stability of the spinel phase, according to our calculations, higher temperatures of up to 1300 °C are needed to remove all the zinc.

However, it should be noted that Fig. 4 represents a situation in equilibrium. Therefore, the reduction and removal of zinc from the zinc-monoxide and zinc-containing spinel phases would require high temperatures if these phases existed in the original material. If it does not, it is possible that it does not have enough time to form during heating despite its high thermodynamic stability. In this case, zinc would mainly exist in phases from which it is more easily reduced, and lower temperatures than those presented in Fig. 4 could be sufficient for its reduction and removal. For instance, in the original CRC dust, zinc was not present in its spinel form. Therefore, zinc in the spinel phase was not expected to form during the heating process.

Results and Discussion

Thermal Behavior of CRC and EAF Dusts

Figure 5 shows differential scanning calorimetry–thermogravimetry (DSC–TG) curves of the CRC and EAF dusts with 1.2 times the stoichiometric amount of the reducing agent. For CRC dust, the DSC curve exhibited two main reactions at 955–1100 °C and 1222–1297 °C (Fig. 5a). The reduction of ZnO initiated at 955 °C. Zinc was completely reduced at a temperature of ~ 1100 °C [9, 20]. Calcium ferrites formed at high temperatures of 1222–1297 °C [20]. The TG curve shows the two stages of weight loss for these two reactions. For EAF dust, DSC curves show two main reactions occurring at 807–865 °C and 925–951 °C owing to the reduction of zinc-containing phases into zinc vapor [9]. First, ZnFe2O4 reduces to ZnO and Fe2O3 at 807–895 °C; then, ZnO reduces at 925–1000 °C. TG weight loss within this temperature range is related to ZnFe2O4 decomposition and zinc evaporation (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Thermal analyses of CRC and EAF dusts: a TG and b DSC

Interaction of CRC and EAF Dusts with Microwave Energy

The dielectric properties of CRC and EAF have been studied in detail previously [17]. At temperatures of 20–600 °C, the changes in the dielectric constant (ɛ′) and loss factor (ɛ″) of CRC and EAF dusts were insignificant. When the temperature exceeded 600 °C, the ɛ′ and ɛ″ values of the dusts increased (Fig. S1, Supplementary Material).

Omran et al. [17] stated that the changes in the ɛ′ and ɛ″ values of CRC and EAF dusts matched the spectra curves of the CO/CO2 gases released from the dusts at 622–645 °C. Yonglin et al. [21] stated that phase decomposition resulted in a change in the electrical and ionic conductivities.

Figure 6 shows the temperature profiles of the CRC and EAF dusts at a microwave power of 1.1 kW. Initially, the temperature increases rapidly owing to phase decomposition and CO/CO2 release [22]. Figure 6 shows that the microwave heating of the dusts improved after adding graphite to the dusts. The temperature of the CRC and EAF dusts increased from 578 and 639 °C to 1022 and 1044 °C, respectively, after 210 s of microwave heating.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Microwave heating profile of CRC and EAF dusts at a microwave power of 1.1 kW

Zinc Recovery from CRC and EAF Dusts

For comparison, zinc recovery experiments were performed using both microwave and conventional furnaces under similar conditions.

Measurement of Weight Loss During Experiments

Figure 7 shows the weight loss of the CRC dust in microwave and conventional heating experiments. Similar weight loss patterns were observed in both experiments. With microwave heating, rapid weight loss was seen in the early stages of the experiment, following which the mass became constant. With conventional thermal heating, rapid weight loss was seen in the early stages, following which the rate decreased gradually. The total weight loss of CRC dusts at 1050 °C with conventional heating was 28.45 wt%; this was consistent with the thermogravimetric analysis result for this temperature. With microwave heating, the weight loss at 850 °C was 25.48 wt%.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Experimental mass loss for CRC dust: a microwave heating and b conventional thermal heating

Figure 8 shows the weight loss of the EAF dust in microwave and conventional heating experiments. In both experiments, rapid weight loss was seen in the very early stages of the reactions; however, after ~ 10 min, the mass became constant. These findings indicated that almost all zinc was removed from the dust in the early stage of the experiments. The weight loss of the EAF dust with conventional heating at 1050 °C was 62.73 wt%, whereas that with microwave heating at 850 °C was 59.22 wt%.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Experimental mass loss for EAF dust: a microwave heating and b conventional thermal heating

Comparison of Zinc Recovery Between Microwave and Conventional Heating

Table 2 lists the chemical compositions of the CRC dust and the zinc recovery rate after microwave and conventional heating experiments. In conventional heating experiments, the zinc recovery rate was 37.84%, 77.46%, and 98.47% at 850, 950, and 1050 °C, respectively. In microwave heating experiments, the zinc recovery rate was 39.47%, 75.73%, and 97.43% at 650, 750, and 850 °C, respectively. The highest zinc recovery rates were 98.47% with conventional heating at 1050 °C and 97.43% with microwave heating at 850 °C (Fig. 9a). The difference between the reaction temperatures required to obtain the same zinc recovery rate was ~ 200 °C. The residues were found to be rich in Cr and Fe as well as Si and Ca.

Table 2 Main elements of CRC residues
Fig. 9
figure 9

Comparison of zinc recovery rates at different temperatures: a CRC dust and b EAF dust

The XRD patterns of CRC dust show that the ZnO phase reduced with increases in temperature in both microwave and conventional heating experiments (Fig. 10a). For conventional heating at 1050 °C and microwave heating at 850 °C, XRD indicated that the ZnO phase was completely removed from CRC dust. Chromite and calcium silicate phases were seen in the residues. Figure 11 shows SEM images of the products obtained with conventional heating at 1050 °C and microwave heating at 850 °C. These images show spheroids of chromite enclosed by Ca–Mg silicates phases (Fig. 11). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses indicated that no zinc-bearing phases (zincite and franklinite) were detected in the residues.

Fig. 10
figure 10

XRD patterns of steelmaking dusts: a CRC dust and b EAF dust

Fig. 11
figure 11

SEM images of CRC dust: a microwave heating at 850 °C and b conventional thermal heating at 1050 °C. c and d EDX analyses of (1, 2) in a and b, respectively

Table 3 lists the chemical compositions of EAF and zinc recovery after the microwave and conventional heating experiments. With conventional heating, zinc recovery rates of 79.88%, 86.83%, and 98.40% were obtained at 850, 950, and 1050 °C, respectively. With microwave heating, zinc recovery rates of 61.19%, 79.29%, and 98.20% were obtained at 650, 750, and 850 °C, respectively (Fig. 9b). The highest zinc recovery rates were ~ 98% with conventional heating at 1050 °C and microwave heating at 850 °C. As in the results for CRC dusts, the same zinc recovery rate could be obtained under microwave heating at a reaction temperature that was lower by ~ 200 °C. The EAF residues were rich in Fe (~ 58 wt%) as well as Si and Ca.

Table 3 Main elements of EAF residues

The XRD patterns show that ZnO and ZnFe2O4 peaks nearly vanished in the samples with conventional heating at 1050 °C and microwave heating at 850 °C (Fig. 10b). Figure 12 shows SEM images of the residue with conventional and microwave heating at 1050 °C and 850 °C, respectively. SEM images show that the residue was mostly composed of an agglomeration of calcium ferrite and calcium silicate along with iron. The morphology of the particles was different: with microwave heating, the particles were agglomerated, which is a property of microwave heating.

Fig. 12
figure 12

SEM images of EAF dust: a microwave heating at 850 °C and b conventional thermal heating at 1050 °C. c and d EDX analyses of (1, 2) in a and b, respectively

The results indicated that the zinc-containing spinel phases and zinc in the monoxide phase do not form during the reduction process, as predicated by the thermodynamic calculations. Almost all zinc could be removed from CRC and EAF dusts with microwave heating at lower temperatures than those in conventional thermal heating, as discussed above. Previous studies [7, 23, 24] have already reported improvements in the zinc recovery rate with microwave heating owing to the rapid nature of microwave heating in addition to the interactions between the electromagnetic field of the microwaves and the heated molecules [7, 23, 24]. Zhou et al. [8] found that microwave energy improves the reaction rate through the direct reduction of the activation energy required to activate the reactant molecules. However, a more detailed analysis of these mechanisms is needed to completely explain these phenomena.

Conclusions

This study investigates the effect of microwave radiation on the zinc recovery rate from CRC and EAF dusts and compares it with those achieved in conventional thermal heating. The results indicated that nearly all zinc could be recovered from CRC and EAF dusts with microwave heating at lower temperatures (by ~ 200 °C) than those in conventional thermal heating.

For CRC dusts, zinc recovery rates of 37.84% and 97.43% were obtained in conventional and microwave heating experiments, respectively, at 850 °C. For EAF dusts, zinc recovery rates of 79.88% and 98.20% were obtained in conventional and microwave heating experiments, respectively, at 850 °C. Although microwave heating is a promising and effective technique for zinc recovery from steelmaking dusts, scaling it up to an industrial scale remains challenging. Fundamentals studies on the microwave cavity design and dielectric properties of treated materials are required to understand the engineering challenges of scaling up microwave heating.