Information management and the return-entry process: Examining information needs, sources, and strategies after Superstorm Sandy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102015Get rights and content

Abstract

The effective management of disasters requires timely and accurate information. Both emergency management (EM) organizations and the public are involved in information management activities during and after a disaster where they seek information from various sources to reduce disaster-related uncertainties. While studies have focused on information needs and source reliance behaviors of EM organizations amid a disaster, the information management behaviors of the organizations during return-entry phase has gained little scholarly attention. This study examines the information management strategies of local EM organizations while managing the initial return-entry movement following Superstorm Sandy. Using a qualitative research design, the researchers conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 25 EM officials from New Jersey. The data analysis yielded five themes that highlight the information management strategies of the EM organizations – information needs, information sources, information seeking behavior, information exchange, and applying information for return-entry decisions. This paper discusses these findings and provides proactive strategies to gather and manage information to facilitate return-entry decision-making and risk communication in the immediate aftermath of a disaster.

Introduction

Emergency managers utilize a variety of information when formulating protective action recommendations and managing risks during and after a disaster [[1], [2], [3]]. During the response and short-term recovery phases, emergency managers require information about the nature and extent of disaster impacts and secondary hazards, location of disaster survivors needing assistance, magnitude of damage to the communities, and statuses related to the restoration of services and infrastructure [4,5]. Despite these vital information needs, the acquisition and transmission of information after an event may be challenging, especially in circumstances where communities experience disruptions and damage to utilities and communication infrastructure [6]. Additionally, because disasters are non-routine events, they often introduce uncertainties into the decision-making process, as emergency managers may need to make timely decision based on limited or incomplete information [[7], [8], [9]].

Both the public and emergency management (EM) organizations participate in information management activities to acquire information, overcome uncertainties, and to guide their actions during and after a crisis. Information management is defined as “… the various stages of information processing from production to storage and retrieval to dissemination in order to facilitate work of an organization; information can be from internal and external sources and in any format” (AIM, 2005 as cited in OCHA, 2006) [10, p.2]. Information management is an important aspect of emergency management, as timely and accurate information is crucial in reducing disaster-related uncertainties. Within this process, individuals often undertake activities such as seeking information, evaluating the content, and using the gathered information to make decisions that protect people and property [[11], [12], [13]]. Although numerous studies have focused on information seeking and source reliance behaviors of individuals and households [[14], [15], [16]] the examination of information management behaviors of EM organizations post-disaster has gained less scholarly attention. The purpose of this paper is to examine the information management strategies of EM organizations while overseeing the initial return-entry movement of residents back to their homes following Superstorm Sandy. The paper first reviews prior literature on information management and is then followed by the method and the results section. Finally, the findings are discussed, and recommendations are offered for effective information management after a disaster.

Section snippets

Literature review

Information is crucial for the management of hazards and disasters. While timely and accurate information fosters effective response and recovery activities, the lack of information can compromise the safety of the public and the first responders and delay post-impact activities.

Disaster information enables the public and the emergency managers to overcome uncertainties and guides them in decision-making related to response and recovery activities [10,12].

At the organizational level, some

Event

This study aims to provide insights into the local EM organization's information needs, sources, and information management strategies during the initial return movement following Sandy. Superstorm Sandy made landfall in the U.S. on October 29, 2012 near Brigantine, New Jersey. Communities along the Jersey shore, especially those in Ocean, Monmouth, and Middlesex counties, experienced severe flooding to the barrier islands and mainland areas near the coastal bay as a result of the storm surge [

Results

The data analysis yielded five themes pertaining to the information management behaviors of the EM organizations. The themes include: 1) Information Needs, 2) Information Sources, 3) Information Seeking Behavior, 4) Information Exchange, and 5) Applying Information for Return-Entry Decisions. Table 2 presents these five themes along with their definitions and associated sub-themes.

Discussion

Effective management following a disaster requires that local EM organizations possess timely, accurate, and relevant information. The results of this study indicated information on secondary hazards, damage sustained to community, infrastructure status, utility update, and other information to be critical in the management of post-event risks and in the development of return-entry strategies. As such, information management strategies were used in order to acquire information, meet specific

Conclusion

Information management is crucial in order to assess disaster risks and to guide emergency management activities. This study advanced the understanding on information needs and information seeking strategies of EM organizations during the return phase. However, this study has some limitations that should be considered when generalizing the findings of this study. First, the interviews were conducted in Spring 2015, which was two and half years after Superstorm Sandy. Hence, informants may have

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors are thankful to the twenty-five emergency management officials for their participation in this study. The authors are also grateful to the reviewers for their helpful feedback on the manuscript.

References (49)

  • F.A. Drews et al.

    Information search and decision-making in computer-based wildfire simulations

    J. Cognitive Eng. Decision-making

    (2015)
  • S. Hoekstra et al.

    Decisions under duress: factors influencing emergency management decision-making during Superstorm Sandy

    Nat. Hazards

    (2017)
  • M.K. Lindell et al.

    Organizational communication and decision-making for hurricane emergencies

    Nat. Hazards Rev.

    (2007)
  • N. Bharosa et al.

    Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: propositions from field exercises

    Inf. Syst. Front

    (2010)
  • S. Celik et al.

    Role of information in collective action in dynamic disaster environments

    Disasters

    (2010)
  • R. Manandhar et al.

    Return-entry risk communication challenges: experiences of local emergency management organizations following Superstorm Sandy

    Int. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters

    (2018)
  • F.A. Drews et al.

    Environmental factors that influence wildfire protective-action recommendations

    Int. J. Emerg. Manag.

    (2014)
  • B. Reynolds et al.

    Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model

    J. Health Commun.

    (2005)
  • S. Veil et al.

    CERC as a theoretical framework for research and practice

    Health Promot. Pract.

    (2008)
  • Ocha

    Guideline for OCHA Field Information Management

    (2006)
  • L.K. Comfort et al.

    Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: the world trade center attacks, september 11, 2001

    Nat. Hazards

    (2006)
  • N. Kapucu

    Collaborative emergency management: better community organizing, better public preparedness and response

    Disasters

    (2008)
  • E.L. Quarantelli

    The Warning Process and Evacuation Behavior: the Research Evidence

    (1990)
  • M.K. Lindell et al.

    Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities

    (2003)
  • C.C. Lin et al.

    Evacuees' information sources and reentry decision-making in the aftermath of Hurricane Ike

    Nat. Hazards

    (2014)
  • R.E. Morss et al.

    Understanding public hurricane evacuation decisions and responses to forecast and warning messages

    Weather Forecast.

    (2016)
  • A.L. Hughes et al.

    Online public communications by police & fire services during the 2012 Hurricane Sandy

  • N. Kapucu et al.

    Emergency information management and public disaster preparedness: lessons from the 2004 Florida hurricane season

    Int. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters

    (2008)
  • B.F. McLuckie

    The Warning System in Disaster Situations: a Selective Analysis

    (1970)
  • D.S. Mileti et al.

    Communication of Emergency Public Warnings: a Social Science Perspective and State-Of-The-Art Assessment (No. ORNL-6609)

    (1990)
  • R.A. Stallings

    Communications in Natural Disasters

    (1971)
  • J. Sutton et al.

    Changing channels: communicating tsunami warning information in Hawaii

  • M.K. Lindell et al.

    A hurricane evacuation management decision support system (EMDSS)

    Nat. Hazards

    (2007)
  • G. Guven et al.

    Identification of local information items needed during search and rescue following an earthquake

    Disaster Prev. Manag.: Int. J.

    (2011)
  • View full text