Abstract
Isobutane/olefin alkylation is an important route to obtain high-quality gasoline. There is an apparent interest to apply zeolite based catalysts for this process to eliminate large scale usage of liquid catalysts such as H2SO4 and HF. Solid catalysts require a specific reactor system design involving frequent catalyst regeneration and operation at low concentration of the olefin. The aim of this work was to compare different reactor types: CSTR, “once-through” fixed bed type and circulating flow reactors (CFR), which are typically considered as suitable options for industrial implementation. The experiments were done on decationated Y-zeolite catalyst. Different paraffin/olefin ratios, temperature and circulation rates were studied. Catalysts and process performance are discussed based on the catalyst lifetime and the alkylate octane number. Analysis of diffusion limitations in different reactor types and optimization of the circulation rate in CFR were done. It was found that isobutane alkylation in a circulating flow reactor shows approximately the same catalyst lifetime even at a high circulation rate not exhibiting any positive impact of back-mixing on this process. However, a circulating flow reactor has demonstrated a much better quality of alkylate with the research octane number higher by 4.9 points. Additional operational costs related to the reactor effluent recycle are fully covered by the alkylate quality improvement even at a high circulation ratio.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Vogt, E.T.C., Whiting, G.T., Chowdhury, A.D., and Weckhuysen, B.M., Adv. Catal., 2015, vol. 58, p. 143.
Feller, A. and Lercher, J.A., Adv. Catal., 2004, vol. 48, p. 229.
Sievers, C., Zuazo, I., Guzman, A., Olindo, R., Syska, H., and Lercher, J.A., J. Catal., 2007, vol. 246, p. 315.
Guzman, A., Zuazo, I., Feller, A., Olindo, R., Sievers, C., and Lercher, J.A., Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 2005, vol. 83, p. 309.
Feller, A., Guzman, A., Zuazo, I., and Lercher, J.A., J. Catal., 2004, vol. 224, p. 80.
Corma, A. and Martínez, A., Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 1993, vol. 35, p. 483.
Corma, A., Martínez, A., and Martínez, C., Catal. Lett., 1994, vol. 28, p. 187.
Li, K.W., Eckert, R.E., and Albright, L.F., Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 1970, vol. 9, p. 434.
Guzman, A., Zuazo, I., Feller, A., Olindo, R., Sievers, C., and Lercher, J.A., Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 2006, vol. 97, p. 49.
Sievers, C., Liebert, J.S., Stratmann, M.M., Olindo, R., and Lercher, J.A., Appl. Catal., A, 2008, vol. 336, p. 89.
de Jong, K.P., Mesters, C.M.A.M., Peferoen, D.G.R., van Brugge, P.T.M., and de Groot, C., Chem. Eng. Sci., 1996, vol. 51, p. 2053.
Nivarthy, G.S., Feller, A., Seshan, K., and Lercher, J.A., Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 2000, vols. 35–36, p. 75.
Klingmann, R., Josl, R., Traa, Y., Glaser, R., and Weitkamp, J., Appl. Catal., A, 2004, vol. 281, p. 215.
Chen, Z., Gao, F., Ren, K., Wu, Q., Luo, Y., Zhou, H., Zhang, M., and Xu, QW., RSC Adv., 2018, vol. 8, p. 3392.
Corma, A., Martínez, A., and Martínez, C., J. Catal., 1994, vol. 146, p. 185.
Ginosar, D.M., Thompson, D.N., and Burch, K.C., Appl. Catal., A, 2004, vol. 262, p. 223.
Dalla Costa, B.O. and Querini, C.A., Appl. Catal., A, 2010, vol. 385, p. 144.
Pater, J., Cardona, F., Canaff, C., Gnep, N.S., Szabo, G., and Guisnet, M., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1999, vol. 38, p. 3822.
Liu, Z., Tang, X., Hu, L., and Hou, S., China Pet. Process. Petrochem. Technol., 2016, vol. 18, p. 63.
Murzin, D.Y., Engineering Catalysis, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020, 2nd ed.
Khadzhiev, S.N., Gerzeliev, I.M., Vedernikov, O.S., Kleymenov, A.V., Kondrashev, D.O., Oknina, N.V., Kuznetsov, S.E., Saitov, Z.A., and Baskhanova, M.N., Catal. Ind., 2017, vol. 9, p. 198.
van Broekhoven, E.R., Mas Cabré, F. R., Bogaard, P., Klaver, G., and Vonhof, M., US Patent 5986158, 1999.
van Broekhoven, E.R. and Mas Cabré, F.R., US Patent 6855856, 2005.
Panattoni, G. and Querini, C.A., Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 2001, vol. 139, p. 181.
Emeis, C.A., J. Catal., 1993, vol. 141, p. 347.
Balaban, A.T., Kier, L.B., and Joshi, N., MATCH, 1992, vol. 28, p. 13.
Sladkovskiy, D.A., Kuzichkin, N.V., Semikin, K.V., Zernov, P.A., and Murzin, D.Y., Chim. Oggi–Chem. Today, 2015, vol. 33, p. 32.
Querini, C.A. and Roa, E., Appl. Catal., A, 1997, vol. 163, p. 199.
Sengar, A., van Santen, R.A., Johannes, E.S., Kuipers, A.M., and Padding, J., ACS Catal., 2018, vol. 8, p. 9016.
Ramaswamy, R.C., Ramachandran, P.A., and Dudukovic, M.P., Int. J. Chem. Reactor Eng., 2005, vol. 3, A4.
Simpson, M., Wei, J., and Sundaresan, S., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1996, vol. 35, p. 3861.
Simpson, M., Wei, J., and Sundaresan, S., in Green Chemistry: Designing Chemistry for the Environment, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 626, Washington, DC: Am Chem. Soc., 1996.
Umesi, N.O. and Danner, R.P., Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 1981, vol. 20, p. 662.
Li, Y., Liu, R., Zhao, G., Zhou, Z., Zhang, J., Shi, C., Liu, X., Zhang, X., and Zhang, S., Fuel, 2018, vol. 216, p. 686.
Funding
The work was performed as a part of the state contract awarded on the basis of a grant of the Government of the Russian Federation for support of scientific research conducted under the supervision of leading scientists at Russian institutions of higher education, research institutions of State Academies of Sciences and state research centre of the Russian Federation on March 19, 2014 no. 14.Z50.31.0013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The evaluation and decision of acceptance of this paper was made by the Editorial board without input of the authors or any persons affiliated with them.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sladkovskiy, D.A., Semikin, K.V., Utemov, A.V. et al. Comparison of Isobutane/n-Butenes Alkylation over Y-Zeolite Catalyst in CSTR, Fixed Bed and Circulating Flow Reactors. Ref. J. Chem. 10, 58–72 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079978020010045
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079978020010045