Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:43:05.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft – Second Complaint – Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by the European Union (US – Large Civil Aircraft (2nd Complaint) (Article 21.5 – EU)), DS353

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2020

Sara Angeleska
Sara Angeleska*
Affiliation:
Works at WTO, Geneva, but writes in a person capacity
*
Email: sara.angeleska@wto.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This compliance proceeding under Article 21.5 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) concerned measures adopted by the United States to comply with the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) recommendations and rulings in US–Large Civil Aircraft (2nd Complaint). The types of measures at issue that were found to have caused adverse effects to the European Union (EU, formerly European Communities) in the original Panel and Appellate Body proceedings were NASA aeronautics R&D instruments; United States Department of Defence (DOD) military research instruments (‘assistance instruments’); the business and occupancy (B&O) tax rate reduction in the State of Washington in relation to Boeing's production of the 787; property and sales tax abatements related to Industrial Revenue Bonds issued by the City of Wichita, Kansas; and the FSC/ETI subsidies.

Type
Case Summaries
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 472 - 476
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Panel Report, US–Large Civil Aircraft (2nd Complaint) (Article 21.5 – EU), para. 1.5.

2 Ibid., para. 6.25.

3 Ibid.. para. 2.2.

4 Ibid. para. 7.35.

5 Ibid. para. 7.35.

6 Panel Report, US–Large Civil Aircraft (2nd Complaint), para. 7.1171.

7 Appellate Body Report, US–Large Civil Aircraft, para. 620.

8 Panel Report, US–Large Civil Aircraft (2nd Complaint) (Article 21.5 – EU), para. 7.128.

9 Ibid. para. 7.129.

10 Ibid. para. 7.130.

11 Ibid. paras. 8.376–8.378.

12 Appellate Body Report, US – Large Civil Aircraft (2nd Complaint) (Article 21.5 – EU), para. 5.34.

13 Ibid. para. 5121.

14 Panel Report, US – Large Civil Aircraft (2nd Complaint) (Article 21.5 – EU), para. 10.3.

15 Ibid. para. 10.29.

16 Ibid. para. 10.27.

17 Ibid. para. 8.6.

18 Ibid. para. 8.8.

19 Ibid. paras. 8.41–8.45.

20 Ibid. para. 8.50.

21 Ibid. para. 9.128.

22 Ibid. paras. 9.132–9.135.

23 Ibid. para. 9.136.

24 Ibid. paras. 9.153.

25 Ibid. paras. 9.155–9.157 and 9.176–9.177.

26 Appellate Body Report, US – Large Civil Aircraft (2nd Complaint) (Article 21.5 – EU), para. 5.387.

27 Ibid. para. 5.408.

28 Ibid. paras. 5.416 and 5.443.

29 Ibid. para. 8.106.

30 Ibid. para. 9.407.

31 Ibid. para. 9.444.

32 Ibid. para. 9.467.

33 Appellate Body Report, US – Large Civil Aircraft (2nd Complaint) (Article 21.5 – EU), para. 5.569.