Leader development for adolescent girls: State of the field and a framework for moving forward

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101457Get rights and content

Abstract

For most leaders, their first exposure to formal leader development training occurs in adolescence, through school, extra-curricular activities, or youth leader development programs. As with many adolescent experiences, the processes and challenges of leader development are different for girls than they are for boys. With increasing calls to address gender inequity worldwide, adolescent girls' leader development has become an important cross-disciplinary research topic. Though the literature on developing adolescent girls has grown substantially, it is fragmented across disciplines, with a lack of integration and theoretical framing hindering our advancement in knowledge. Therefore, there is a critical need for a comprehensive review article to guide scholars to build an integrated knowledge of how leader development occurs for adolescent girls. We searched for literature relevant to leader and leadership development designed for adolescent girls and reviewed a total of 108 academic papers (2000–2019). We identify and critique five themes in this literature that hold important implications for the leader development of adolescent girls. To advance knowledge, we offer social cognitive theory as a theoretical frame to understand adolescent girls' leader development and provide guidance on future research. Finally, we offer insights on how the processes and practices of adolescent girls' leader development could inform adult leader development.

Introduction

Leader development, namely the changing of competencies, characteristics, and behaviors of individuals or groups in or in preparation for leadership (formal or informal), has become a multi-billion dollar industry that has quickly found its way to boardrooms and business schools (Crossan, Mazutis, Seijts, & Gandz, 2013; Day, Fleenor, Atwater, Sturm, & McKee, 2014; Reyes et al., 2019). This emphasis on leader development during the adult years, however, fails to take into account the life-long process of acquiring the skills and mindsets that help individuals effectively take on and succeed in various leadership roles inside and outside of organizations (Liu, Venkatesh, Murphy, & Riggio, 2020; Murphy & Johnson, 2011). Research that takes a long-lens perspective to leader development has confirmed that leadership begins in childhood (Day, 2011; Gottfried et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2020; Oliver et al., 2011; Reichard et al., 2011), as most future managers experience their initial formal leader development during their adolescence (Murphy & Johnson, 2011; Reitan & Stenberg, 2019). Indeed, promoting early leader development experiences is a critical investment as today's adolescents can expect to hold several leader roles in adulthood and to face multiple, challenging demands in an uncertain and rapidly changing global society (Larson et al., 2019).

Adolescence is a critical time to examine leader development as adolescents' “identities and potential are being profoundly and rapidly influenced and shaped, including their development of a leadership identity” (Hoyt & Kennedy, 2008, p. 203). Leader development experiences in adolescence are particularly important for girls. Girls, in contrast to boys, are exposed to socialization processes and culturally entrenched values that may make them less likely to view themselves as (potential) leadership material, receive fewer signals that they are expected to become leaders, and are praised and labeled as leaders less frequently (Archard, 2012; Murphy & Johnson, 2011). We emphasize these socio-cultural influences specifically as the conceptualizations of who is a leader and what leadership looks like have been heavily rooted in the existing (adult) white, male concepts of leadership (Ayman & Korabik, 2010; Eagly & Carli, 2007). These concepts have been applied to adolescent girls with only minor adaptations that do not address the mismatch between concept and application (Dempster, Stevens, & Keeffe, 2011; MacNeil, 2006). Although societal shifts in the late 20th century have led to more inclusive conceptualizations of leadership (Dinh et al., 2014), the traditional concepts of (male) leadership endure and continue to present barriers for the leader development of adolescent girls (Archard, 2012, Archard, 2013a; McNae, 2011).

The importance of research into adolescent girls' leader development has been acknowledged across diverse research domains such as leadership, developmental psychology, education, and health. Although the cumulative knowledge on this topic has grown substantially, it remains bifurcated in silos. This division challenges scholars, practitioners, and educators on several fronts and hampers the advancement of knowledge that could enhance leader development for girls and subsequently women. First, there is no shared understanding of the current state of the literature on adolescent girls' leader development, as the research is fragmented across diverse research domains. Second, there is no integrated model of adolescent girls' leader development due to both the scarcity of research integration and a lack of theorizing on adolescent girls' leader development (Ely, Ibarra, & Kolb, 2011). Third, the lack of research integration creates follow-on effects for leader development providers as we currently do not know how adolescent girls' leader development complements or challenges our existing paradigms that inform adult leader development programs.

Research on leader development utilizes an array of theoretical lenses, with most delineating the precursors, processes, and outcomes of effective leader development (Liu et al., 2020). We draw from Day and Dragoni's (2015) conceptual work to focus our review mostly on the individual-level development factors for adolescent girls that help inform subsequent leader development activities. Day and Dragoni (2015) explain in detail how individual capabilities work with developmental experiences to produce developmental indicators such as leader identity, self-awareness, leader self-efficacy, and particular knowledge, skills and abilities. These indicators then foster opportunities for practice, which in turn produces improved individual leader capacities. We extend Day and Dragoni's (2015) framework by contextualizing leader development to adolescent girls. Specifically, we highlight the role gender may play on the experiences and interventions provided for leader development, and the support developing leaders receive. In doing so, we integrate our findings with their framework to provide a model of adolescent girls' leader development. To illuminate the process of adolescent girls' leader development, we incorporate theoretical explanations from social cognitive theory (SCT; Bandura, 1989, Bandura, 1999, Bandura, 2001; Bussey & Bandura, 1999; Wood & Bandura, 1989). Scholars have applied SCT to gender development (Bussey & Bandura, 1999) and adolescent development (Bandura, 2005), and more recently, SCT has become one of the most common perspectives applied in leader development research (O'Connell, 2014; Vogel, Reichard, Batistič, & Černe, 2020; Yeow & Martin, 2013). For research on adolescent girls' leader development, SCT offers a theoretical framework that examines: (1) the learning process in-depth, drawing on the reciprocal nature of the adolescent girl (person, behaviors) and their environment (Bandura, 1989); (2) how adolescent girls vicariously learn through the modeling process (attention, retention, behavioral, motivational; Wood & Bandura, 1989); and (3) how adolescent girls develop the self-efficacy to engage in leadership (social modeling; mastery; social persuasion; psychological and emotional state; Bandura, 1999; Bussey & Bandura, 1999). The SCT frame allows for incorporation of new thinking unique to adolescent girls, interpretation of the processes used in leader development programs, and creation of a bridge to the broader leadership development literature.

We approached our analysis of the adolescent girls' leader development literature over the past 20 years with three overarching questions in mind. We have structured our review in three sections that address each of our questions:

  • 1.

    What do we know about adolescent girls' leader development through existing research?

  • 2.

    How can social cognitive theory frame our understanding of adolescent girls' leader development and provide guidance to advance our knowledge?

  • 3.

    What are the implications of research on adolescent girls' leader development for adult leader development programs?

Section snippets

Literature search process

We consulted several best practice sources to ensure that we were holistic in our review of the literature (e.g., Aguinis, Pierce, Bosco, & Muslin, 2009; Briner & Denyer, 2012; Neuendorf, 2002; Tranfield, Denyer, & Smart, 2003). We created two advisory groups to help formulate our research questions and search parameters (Briner & Denyer, 2012). The first was the board of a girls' secondary school who provided expert and practical insights into the current state of adolescent girls' leader

Overview of the literature on adolescent girls' leader development

Over the past 20 years, research on adolescent girls' leader development has grown dramatically. While there were relatively few studies conducted in the first five years of this review (nine before 2006), the most recent decade brought much more empirical evidence. In total, there were 87 empirical articles, 12 conceptual articles, and nine literature reviews (see Fig. 2). The multidisciplinarity is apparent, with this research stream finding a home in a variety of disciplines including

What do we know about adolescent girls' leader development through existing research?

To address our first research question, our coding process resulted in the identification of five overarching themes in the adolescent girls' leader development literature. These themes, detailed below, are (1) Leader emergence, motivation, and identity; (2) Relationships with peers and adults; (3) Varieties of leader development opportunities; (4) Exercising agency in leader development programs; and (5) Integration of leader development into the school curriculum.

Moving towards a theoretical understanding of adolescent girls' leader development

Our second research question drives us to consider how social cognitive theory (SCT) could frame and guide our understanding of adolescent girls' leader development. In reviewing the literature, we echo Ely et al.'s (2011) observation about the situation for adult women in leadership: the state of research and theorizing on adolescent girls' leader development lags far behind the demand for girls to learn about leadership. As shown in Table 3, over half of the articles in our review either did

What are the implications of research on adolescent girls' leader development for adult leader development programs?

By understanding some of the unique pathways through which girls emerge as leaders, identify with particular conceptualizations of leadership, and learn leadership through developmental experiences, we can identify several implications for adult leader development programs. Therefore, our final research question sought to provide a guide for leader development professionals on how the adolescent girls' leader development literature can inform adult leader development programs. In the following,

Conclusion

While efforts have been made to reduce gender inequality in adult leadership attainment, addressing inequality early is one way to help bridge the leadership gender gap. Our analysis of the adolescent girls' leader development literature contributes in three different ways. First, we presented an integrated and detailed overview of the diverse literature on adolescent girls' leader development research to create a shared understanding across five thematic clusters. Second, we interpreted the

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Professor Marion Festing and Professor Russ Vince for their comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We acknowledge the collaboration and assistance of Dr. Anita Devos and thank Jennifer Veres and Karryna Madison for research assistance in an earlier stage of this project.

References (189)

  • L. Guillén et al.

    Is leadership a part of me? A leader identity approach to understanding the motivation to lead

    The Leadership Quarterly

    (2015)
  • P.D. Harms et al.

    Leader development and the dark side of personality

    The Leadership Quarterly

    (2011)
  • S.K. Johnson et al.

    The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders

    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

    (2008)
  • L. Abeysekera et al.

    Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research

    Higher Education Research & Development

    (2015)
  • H. Aguinis et al.

    First decade of organizational research methods: Trends in design, measurement, and data-analysis topics

    Organizational Research Methods

    (2009)
  • J. Antonakis et al.

    Can charisma be taught? Tests of two interventions

    Academy of Management Learning & Education

    (2011)
  • J. Arbaugh et al.

    An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments

    Academy of Management Learning & Education

    (2006)
  • N. Archard

    Leadership understanding and practice in girls' schools: A review of web based public documents

    Leading and Managing

    (2009)
  • N. Archard

    Peer influence on female student leadership attainment, capacity and development: A staff and student perspective within a girls' school context

    Leading and Managing

    (2011)
  • N. Archard

    Student leadership development in Australian and New Zealand secondary girls’ schools: A staff perspective

    International Journal of Leadership in Education

    (2012)
  • N. Archard

    Adolescent leadership: The female voice

    Educational Management Administration & Leadership

    (2013)
  • N. Archard

    Preparing adolescent girls for school and post-school leadership: Recommendations to school educators from educational staff, female students, and women leaders

    International Journal of Adolescence and Youth

    (2013)
  • N. Archard

    Women's participation as leaders in society: An adolescent girls' perspective

    Journal of Youth Studies

    (2013)
  • R. Ayman et al.

    Leadership: Why gender and culture matter

    American Psychologist

    (2010)
  • K.L. Badura et al.

    Motivation to lead: A meta-analysis and distal-proximal model of motivation and leadership

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (2020)
  • K.L. Badura et al.

    Gender and leadership emergence: A meta-analysis and explanatory model

    Personnel Psychology

    (2018)
  • A. Bandura

    Social cognitive theory

  • A. Bandura

    Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective

    Asian Journal of Social Psychology

    (1999)
  • A. Bandura

    Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (2001)
  • A. Bandura

    The evolution of social cognitive theory

  • J. Barling et al.

    Persistent exposure to poverty during childhood limits later leader emergence

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (2016)
  • D. Bevelander et al.

    Ms. Trust: Gender, networks and trust - implications for management and education

    Academy of Management Learning & Education

    (2011)
  • N. Blanchet-Cohen et al.

    Creating settings for youth empowerment and leadership: An ecological perspective

    Child & Youth Services

    (2014)
  • B.D. Blume et al.

    Communication apprehension: A barrier to students’ leadership, adaptability, and multicultural appreciation

    Academy of Management Learning & Education

    (2013)
  • T.J. Bouchard et al.

    Genes, evolution, and personality

    Behavior Genetics

    (2001)
  • R.B. Briner et al.

    Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool

  • H.H. Brower

    Sustainable development through service learning: A pedagogical framework and case example in a third world context

    Academy of Management Learning & Education

    (2011)
  • S. Brutus et al.

    State of science in industrial and organizational psychology: A review of self-reported limitations

    Personnel Psychology

    (2010)
  • K. Bussey et al.

    Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation

    Psychological Review

    (1999)
  • M. Casile et al.

    Both-and, not either-or: Knowledge and service-learning

    Education + Training

    (2011)
  • J. Cassell et al.

    The language of online leadership: Gender and youth engagement on the internet

    Developmental Psychology

    (2006)
  • M. Caton et al.

    Fostering healthy development among middle school females: A summer program

    Journal of School Counseling

    (2010)
  • K.-Y. Chan et al.

    Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: Understanding the motivation to lead

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (2001)
  • P.D. Cherulnik et al.

    Physical appearance and leadership: Exploring the role of appearance-based attribution in leader emergence

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    (1990)
  • D. Chrobot-Mason et al.

    Lean in versus the literature: An evidence-based examination

    Academy of Management Perspectives

    (2019)
  • D. Collinson et al.

    Teaching leadership critically: New directions for leadership pedagogy

    Academy of Management Learning & Education

    (2015)
  • M. Crossan et al.

    Developing leadership character in business programs

    Academy of Management Learning & Education

    (2013)
  • T. Curran et al.

    School-based positive youth development: A systematic review of the literature

    Journal of School Health

    (2017)
  • N.P. Dawes et al.

    How youth get engaged: Grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs

    Developmental Psychology

    (2011)
  • D.V. Day et al.

    Leadership development: An outcome-oriented review based on time and levels of analyses

    Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

    (2015)
  • Cited by (14)

    • A collaborative model for leadership education in high-potential university women students

      2021, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text