Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conspicuous consumption and peer-group inequality: the role of preferences

  • Published:
The Journal of Economic Inequality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a model that predicts changes in household consumption following a mean preserving increase in consumption inequality. The model allows for multiple peer-groups (a high-consumption (HC) group and a low-consumption (LC) group) as well different degrees of conspicuousness between the goods. We find that following a mean preserving increase in consumption inequality, a household with a constant level of income will increase its consumption of the more conspicuous good when it has preferences consistent with (i) ‘keeping up with the Joneses’ and a relatively stronger HC effect or (ii) ‘running away from the Joneses’ and a relatively stronger LC effect. Using U.S. consumer expenditure data from 1986 to 2002, we find tremendous heterogeneity in household preferences. While U.S. households consistently demonstrate ‘keeping up with the Joneses’, the relative strengths of HC and LC effects vary across racial sub-groups as well as across goods. Likewise, while expenditure on clothing, jewelry, personal care, etc., is generally more conspicuous than expenditure on healthcare, home furnishings, vehicle maintenance, etc., among the LC group, it is less conspicuous among the HC group with some heterogeneity by race. We conclude that heterogeneity in preferences is a likely explanation for the differences in the observed relationship between conspicuous spending and peer group inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attanasio, O., Berloffa, G., Blundell, R., Preston, I.: From earnings inequality to consumption inequality. The Econ. J. 112, C52–C59 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., Duflo, E.: Inequality and growth: What can the data say? J. of Econ. Growth. 8(3), 267–299 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., Park, Y.: Emulation, inequality, and work hours: Was Thorsten Veblen right? Econ. J. 115, F397–F412 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramoulle, Y., Djebbari, H., Fortin, B.: Identification of peer effects through social networks. J. of Econometrics. 150, 41–55 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, J., Magee, L., Robb, A.L.: Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable. J. of the American Stat. Assoc. 83, 123–127 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P.: Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York City (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, F., Johansson-Stenman, O., Martinsson, P.: Do you enjoy having more than others? Survey evidence of positional goods. Economica. 74, 586–598 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, A., Kaus, W., Kiedaisch, C.: Conspicuous spending and the income distribution of social groups. Working Paper. Available at http://www.econ.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:4192a3385f-4d98-9f2b-0fc70136645a/Status_Inequality.pdf (2017)

  • Charles, K.K., Hurst, E., Roussanov, N.: Conspicuous consumption and race. Quart. J. of Econ. 124, 425–467 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chugh, S.: Relative consumption benchmarks. Econ. Letters. 100, 204–207 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cingano, F.: “Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 163, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjncwxv6j-en (2014)

  • Cojocaru, A.: Fairness and inequality tolerance: Evidence from the life in transition survey. J. of Comparative Econ. 42, 590–608 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrosio, C., Frick, J.: Individual wellbeing in a dynamic perspective. Economica. 79, 284–302 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Girogi, G., Pellizzari, M., Redaelli, S.: Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups. Am. Econ. J.: Applied Econ., April, 241–275 (2010)

  • Deaton, A.: Health, inequality, and economic development. J. of Econ. Lit. 41, 113–158 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupor, B., Liu, W.F.: Jealousy and equilibrium overconsumption. Am. Econ. Rev. 93, 423–428 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.: A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. of Econ. 114, 817–868 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, A.: Signalling, inequality, and the social structure. Economica. 72, 515–529 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J., Johnson, D., Smeeding, T.: Measuring trends in inequality of individuals and families: Income and consumption. Am. Econ. Rev. 103, 184–188 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R.: The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. Am. Econ. Rev. 75, 101–116 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D., Ostrov, D.: Conspicuous consumption dynamics. Games and Econ. Behavior. 64, 121–145 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, A., Konrad, K.: A signaling explanation for charity. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 1019–1028 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffetz, O.: A test of conspicuous consumption: Visibility and income elasticities. Rev. of Econ. and Stat. XCIII, 1101–1117 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, F.: Social Limits to Growth. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts (1976)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, E., Kornienko, T.: Status, Affluence, and Inequality: Rank-based Comparisons in Games of Status. Games and Econ. Behavior. 67, 552–568 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinkins, D.: Conspicuous consumption in the United States and China. J. of Econ. Behavior and Org. 127, 115–132 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M.: Inequality and crime. Rev. of Econ. and Stat. 82, 530–539 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, D., Perri, F.: Does income inequality lead to consumption inequality? Evidence and theory. Rev. of Econ. Studies. 73, 163–193 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L.F.: Identification and estimation of econometric models with group interactions, contextual factors, and fixed effects. J. of Econometrics. 140, 333–374 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C.: Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. of Econ. Studies. 60, 531–542 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., Sullivan, J.: Consumption and income inequality and the great recession. Am. Econ. Rev. 103, 178–183 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mujcic, R., Frijters, P.: Conspicuous consumption, conspicuous health, and optimal taxation. J. of Econ. Behavior and Org. 111, 59–70 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxoby, R.: Attitudes and allocations: status, cognitive dissonance, and the manipulation of attitudes. J. of Econ. Behavior and Org. 52, 365–385 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxoby, R.: Cognitive dissonance, status and growth of the underclass. Econ. J. 114, 727–749 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roychowdhury, P.: Visible inequality, status competition, and conspicuous consumption: Evidence from rural India. Oxford Econ. Papers. 69, 36–54 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solnick, S., Hemenway, D.: Are positional concerns stronger in some domains than in others? Am. Econ. Rev. 95, 147–155 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torras, M., Boyce, J.: Income, inequality, and pollution: A reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ. 25, 147–160 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neha Khanna.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 144 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 387 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harriger-Lin, J., Khanna, N. & Pape, A. Conspicuous consumption and peer-group inequality: the role of preferences. J Econ Inequal 18, 365–389 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-020-09447-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-020-09447-6

Keywords

JEL

Navigation