Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:27:39.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clarifications of a Puzzle: The Decline in Nutritional Status at the Onset of Modern Economic Growth in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2019

John Komlos  and
Brian A'Hearn
John Komlos
Affiliation:
John Komlos is Professor Emeritus, Department of Economics, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Ludwigstrasse 33/IV, Munich D-80539. E-mail: john.komlos@gmx.de.
Brian A'Hearn
Affiliation:
Brian A'Hearn is Fellow and Tutor in Economics, Pembroke College, Oxford OX1 1DW, United Kingdom. E-mail: brian.ahearn@pmb.ox.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bodenhom, Guinnane, and Mroz (2017) are critical of anthropometric research using based on non-random samples. Declining height trends in military and prison data, they argue, are artifacts of negative selection during favorable labor market conditions. We study height trends in the United States in the antebellum decades, which coincided with the onset of modem economic growth. We find that neither the historical evidence nor their own statistical analysis support their views. The decline in physical stature in the decades before the Civil War was real, as Zimran (2019) has also shown.

Type
Article
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 1129 - 1153
Copyright
© The Economic History Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We appreciate suggestions pertaining to real wages during the Civil War from Frank Lewis of Queens University and Robert Margo of Boston University. Tim Guinnane and Tom Mroz kindly shared with us simulation code used in an earlier, working paper version of the article. Helpful comments by three anonymous referees are also gratefully acknowledged.

References

REFERENCES

A'Hearn, Brian. “The Antebellum Puzzle Revisited: A New Look at the Physical Stature of Union Army Recruits during the Civil War.” In The Biological Standard of Living in Comparative Perspectives, edited by John, Komlos and Joerg, Baten, 250–67. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, Fred, Bateman, and William, N. Parker. “The Farm, The Farmer, and the Market.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, edited by Stanley, L. Engerman and Robert, E. Gallman, 245–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhorn, Howard. “A Troublesome Caste: Height and Nutrition of Antebellum Virginia's Rural Free Blacks.” Journal of Economic History 59, no. 4 (1999): 972–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhorn, Howard, Timothy, Guinnane, and Thomas, Mroz. “Sample-Selection Biases and the ‘Industrialization Puzzle'.” Journal of Economic History 77, no. 1 (2017): 171–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Scott A. “Height of Female Americans in the 19th Century and the Antebellum Puzzle.” Economics and Human Biology 9, no. 2 (2011): 157–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Susan B., Scott, Sigmund Gartner, Michael, R. Haines, Alan, L. Olmstead, Richard, Sutch, and Gavin, Wright, eds. Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to the Present: Millennial Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Coolidge, Richard H. Statistical Report of the Sickness and Mortality of the Army of the United States, Compiled from the Records of the Surgeon General's Office Embracing a Period of Sixteen Years, from January 1839, to January 1855. Senate Document 96, 34th Congress, 1st Session. Washington, DC: A.O.P. Nicholson, Printer, 1856.Google Scholar
Costa, Dora L. “Pensions and Retirement: Evidence from Union Army Veterans.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, no. 2 (1995): 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Lee. “Antebellum Puzzle: The Decline in Heights at the Onset of Modern Economic Growth.” In Handbook of Economics and Human Biology, edited by John, Komlos and Inas, Kelly, 751–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Craig, Lee, Goodwin, Barry, and Thomas, Grennes. “The Effect of Mechanical Refrigeration on Nutrition in the United States.” Social Science History 28, no. 2 (2004): 325–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranfield, John, and Kris, Inwood. “The Great Transformation: A Long-Run Perspective on Physical Well-Being in Canada.” Economics and Human Biology 5, no. 2 (2007): 204–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuff, Timothy. The Hidden Cost of Economic Development: The Biological Standard of Living in Antebellum Pennsylvania. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
DeCanio, Stephen, and Joel, Mokyr. “Inflation and the Wage Lag during the American Civil War.” Explorations in Economic History 14, no. 4 (1977): 311–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floud, Roderick, Robert, Fogel, Bernard, Harris, and Sok, Chul Hong. The Changing Body: Health, Nutrition, and Human Development in the Western World since 1700. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, Robert W., Stanley, L. Engerman, Roderick, Floud, et al. “The Economic and Demographic Significance of Secular Changes in Human Stature: The U.S. 17501960.” NBER Working Paper, Cambridge, MA, April 1979.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert W., Stanley, L. Engerman, Clayne, Pope, and Larry, Wimmer. “Union Army Recruits in White Regimens in the United States, 1861–1865.” [Computer file]. (ICPSR 9425-v2). Chicago: University of Chicago, Center for Population Economics [producer], Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1990. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09425.v2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, Claudia D., and Frank, D. Lewis. “The Economic Cost of the American Civil War: Estimates and Implications.” Journal of Economic History 35, no. 2 (1975): 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Benjamin A. Investigations in the Military and Anthropological Statistics of American Soldiers. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press, 1869.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R. “Health, Height, Nutrition, and Mortality: Evidence on the ‘Antebellum Puzzle' from Union Army Recruits for New York State and the United States.” In The Biological Standard of Living in Comparative Perspectives, edited by John, Komlos and Joerg, Baten, 155–80. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R. “Population, by Region and Urban-Rural Residence: 1790–1990.” In Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to the Present: Millennial Edition, edited by Susan, B. Carter, Scott, Sigmund Gartner, Michael, R. Haines, Alan, L. Olmstead, Richard, Sutch, and Gavin, Wright, Tables Aa1-109. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R., Lee, A. Craig, and Thomas, Weiss. “The Short and the Dead: Nutrition, Mortality, and the ‘Antebellum Puzzle' in the United States.” Journal of Economic History 63, no. 2 (2003): 382–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, John. “The Height and Weight of West Point Cadets: Dietary Change in Antebellum America.” Journal of Economic History 47, no. 4 (1987): 897–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, John. “Toward an Anthropometric History of African-Americans: The Case of the Free Blacks of Antebellum Maryland.” In Strategic Factors in Nineteenth Century American Economic History: A Volume to Honor Robert W. Fogel, edited by Claudia, Goldin and Hugh, Rockoff, 297–329. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 52, 1992.Google Scholar
Komlos, John. “Anomalies in Economic History: Reflections on the ‘Antebellum Puzzle'.” Journal of Economic History 56, no. 1 (1996): 202–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, John. “Shrinking in a Growing Economy? The Mystery of Physical Stature during the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Economic History 58, no. 4 (1998): 779–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, John. “A Three-Decade ‘Kuhnian' History of the Antebellum Puzzle: Explaining the Shrinking of the US Population at the Onset of Modern Economic Growth.” Journal of The Historical Society 12, no. 4 (2012): 395–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, John. “Shrinking in a Growing Economy Is Not So Puzzling after All.” Economics and Human Biology 32 (2019): 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, John, and Brian, A'Hearn. “The Decline in the Nutritional Status of the U.S. Antebellum Population at the Outset of Modern Economic Growth.” NBER Working Paper No. 21845, Cambridge, MA, January 2016.Google Scholar
Komlos, John, and Brian, A'Hearn. “Replication: Clarifications of a Puzzle: The Decline in Nutritional Status at the Onset of Modern Economic Growth in the United States.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019. https://doi.org/10.3886/E111961V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, John, and Peter, Coclanis. “On the ‘Puzzling' Antebellum Cycle of the Biological Standard of Living: the Case of Georgia.” Explorations in Economic History 34, no. 4 (1997): 433–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. “Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections.” American Economic Review 63, no. 3 (1973): 247–58.Google Scholar
Lang, Stefan, and Marco, Sunder. “Non-Parametric Regression with BayesX: A Flexible Estimation of Trends in Human Physical Stature in 19th Century America.” Economics and Human Biology 1, no. 1 (2003): 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margo, Robert A., and Richard, H. Steckel. “Heights of Native-Born Whites during the Antebellum Period.” Journal of Economic History 43, no. 1 (1983): 167–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmstead, Alan L., and Paul, W. Rhode. “Farms - number, population, land, and value of property: 1850–1997.” In Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to the Present: Millennial Edition, edited by Susan, B. Carter, Scott, Sigmund Gartner, Michael, R. Haines, et al., Tables Da14-27. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Rees, Ray, John, Komlos, Ngo, Van Long, and Ulrich, Woitek. “Optimal Food Allocation in a Slave Economy.” Journal of Population Economics 16, no. 1 (2003): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Arthur. “Some Thoughts on the Distribution of Earnings” Oxford Economic Papers 3, no. 2 (1951): 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, Sarah, Flood, Ronald, Goeken, Josiah, Grover, Erin, Meyer, Jose, Pacas, and Matthew, Sobek. IPUMS USA: Version 9.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2019. https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V9.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. “The Health of American Slaves: New Evidence and Analysis.” Unpublished Manuscript. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Social Science History Association, 1995.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. “Strategic Ideas in the Rise of the New Anthropometric History and Their Implications for Interdisciplinary Research.” Journal of Economic History 58, no. 3 (1998): 803–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunder, Marco. “The Height of Tennessee Convicts: Another Piece of the ‘Antebellum Puzzle.' ” Economics and Human Biology 2 no. 1 (2004): 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunder, Marco. “Upward and Onward: High-Society American Women Eluded the Antebellum Puzzle.” Economics and Human Biology 9, no. 2 (2011): 165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunder, Marco. “The Height Gap in 19th-Century America: Net-Nutritional Advantage of the Elite Increased at the Onset of Modern Economic Growth.” Economics and Human Biology 11, no. 3 (2013): 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey, and Peter, Lindert. American Inequality: A Macroeconomic History. New York: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas. “U.S. Labor Force Estimates and Economic Growth, 1800–1860.” In American Economic Growth and Standards of Living before the Civil War, edited by Robert, Gallman and John, Wallis, 19–78. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Yoo, Dongwoo. “Height and Death in the Antebellum United States: A View through the Lens of Geographically Weighted Regression.” Economics and Human Biology 10, no. 1 (2012): 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zehetmayer, Matthias. “The Continuation of the Antebellum Puzzle: Stature in the US, 1847–1894.” European Review of Economic History 15, no. 2 (2011): 313–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimran, Ariell. “Does Sample-Selection Bias Explain the Antebellum Puzzle? Evidence from Military Enlistment in the Nineteenth-Century United States.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, 2017.Google Scholar
Zimran, Ariell. “Sample-Selection Bias and Height Trends in the Nineteenth-Century United States.” Journal of Economic History 79, no. 1 (2019): 99–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Komlos and A'Hearn supplementary material

Komlos and A'Hearn supplementary material 1

Download Komlos and A'Hearn supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 296.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Komlos and A'Hearn supplementary material

Komlos and A'Hearn supplementary material 2

Download Komlos and A'Hearn supplementary material(File)
File 45.6 KB