Abstract
Second person singular pronouns are widely used in generic contexts, referring to people in general rather than to the single addressee of the utterance. Based on the assumption that pronouns are morphosyntactically complex elements, this paper argues that only pro-\(\upphi \)Ps in the sense of Déchaine and Wiltschko (2002) are licit in those environments while fully fledged pro-DPs are necessarily interpreted indexically. It is argued that the latter contain an interpretable but unvalued time-feature in D which restricts the interpretation of the entire structure to a specific temporal stage of the individual denoted by the pronoun. The article shows that in German, English, and Dutch this time-feature is valued by utterance time, thus leading to an indexical interpretation of the pronoun. From a broader perspective, the time-feature is proposed to be universally present in indexical pronouns. Ultimately, its properties are responsible for crosslinguistic variation in the syntax and semantics of first and second person pronouns.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis. 2002. Arbitrary pronouns are not that indefinite. In Proceedings of Going Romance 2000, ed. Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen, and Paola Monachesi, 1–14. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Barbiers, Sjef, Olaf Koeneman, and Marika Lekakou. 2009. Syntactic doubling and the structure of wh-chains. Journal of Linguistics 46: 1–46.
Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219.
Bennis, Hans. 2004. Pronoms de la deuxième personne en néerlandais: Contrastes en forme et en interpretation. Franco-British Studies 33 (34): 10–22.
Berendsen, Egon. 1986. The phonology of cliticization. Dordrecht: Foris.
Bliss, Heather, and Bettina Gruber. 2015. Temporal restrictions on personal pronouns: The composition of Blackfoot proclitics. Lingua 156: 175–199.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1979. To catch a metaphor: You as norm. American Speech 54: 194–209.
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, ed. Henk van Riemsdijk, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Carlson, Gregory N. 1980. Reference to kinds in English. New York: Garland Publishing.
Carlson, Gregory N. 1989. The semantic composition of English generic sentences. In Properties, types, and meaning, ed. Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara H. Partee, and Raymond Turner, volume 2: Semantic Issues, 167–191. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Carlson, Gregory N., and Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.). 1995. The generic book. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. The variability of impersonal subjects. In Quantification in natural languages, ed. Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer, and Barbara H. Partee, 107–143. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1988. On si constructions and the theory of arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 521–582.
Cohen, Ariel, and Nomi Erteschik-Shir. 2002. Topic, focus, and the interpretation of bare plurals. Natural Language Semantics 10: 125–165.
de Hoop, Helen, and Sammie Tarenskeen. 2014. It’s all about you in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics 88: 163–175.
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, and Martina Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442.
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, and Martina Wiltschko. 2010. When and why can \(1^{st}\) and \(2^{nd}\) person pronouns be bound variables?. Manuscript, University of British Columbia.
Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 1997. The syntax of temporal relations: A uniform approach to tense and aspect. In Proceedings of WCCFL 16, ed. Curtis Emily, Lyle James, and Gabriel Webster, 145–159. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2000. The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 157–186. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2007. The syntax of time arguments. Lingua 117: 330–366.
Egerland, Verner. 2003. Impersonal pronouns in Scandinavian and Romance. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 71: 75–102.
Elbourne, Paul D. 2005. Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Enç, Mürvet. 1987. Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 633–657.
Etxeberria Otaegi, Urtzi. 2005. Quantification and domain restriction in Basque. Doctoral Dissertation, University of the Basque Country.
Everaert, Martin. 1986. The syntax of reflexivization. Dordrecht: Foris.
Geist, Ljudmila. 2007. Predication and equation in copular sentences: Russian vs. English. In Existence: Semantics and syntax, ed. Ileana Comorovski, and Klaus von Heusinger, 79–105. Berlin: Springer.
Gillon, Carrie. 2006. The semantics of determiners: Domain restriction in Skwxwú7mesh. Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Gruber, Bettina. 2013. The spatiotemporal dimensions of person: A morphosyntactic account of indexical pronouns. Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
Jackendoff, Ray S. 2007. Language, consciousness, culture: Essays on mental structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kadmon, Nirit. 1992. On unique and non-unique reference and asymmetric quantification. New York: Garland Publishing.
Kayne, Richard. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kitagawa, Chisato, and Adrienne Lehrer. 1990. Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 739–759.
Koster, Jan. 1978. Locality principles in syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The generic book, ed. Gregory N Carlson, and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 125–175. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, ed. Johan Rooryck, and Laurie Zaring, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In SALT VIII, ed. Devon Strolovich, and Aaron Lawson, 92–110. Amherst: GLSA.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2006. Making a pronoun. Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/WI1OThiO/.
Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Godehard Link, and Gennaro Chierchia. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In The generic book, ed. Gregory N. Carlson, and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 1–124. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Maier, Emar, and Kees de Schepper. 2010. Fake Indexicals in Dutch: A challenge for Kratzer (2009). Manuscript: Radboud University Nijmegen.
Malamud, Sophia A. 2012. Impersonal indexicals: One, you, man and du. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15: 1–48.
Martí, Luisa. 2003. Contextual variables. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Moltmann, Friederike. 2006. Generic one, arbitrary PRO and the first person. Natural Language Semantics 14: 257–281.
Musan, Renate. 1995. On the temporal interpretation of noun phrases. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Neeleman, Ad, and Kriszta Szendröi. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 671–714.
Partee, Barbara H. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, ed. Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh, and Martin Stokhof, 354–366. Dordrecht: Foris.
Partee, Barbara H. 1989. Binding implicit variables in quantified contexts. In CLS 25, Part One, The general session, ed. Caroline Wiltshire, Randolph Graczyk, and Bradley Music, 342–365. Chicago: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.
Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, ed. Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy K. Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Postal, Paul. 1966. On so-called pronouns in English. In Report of the 17th annual round table meeting on languages and linguistics, ed. Francis Dinneen, 177–206. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Preminger, Omar. 2011. Agreement as a fallible operation. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.
Reuland, Eric. 2001. Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 439–492.
Ritter, Elizabeth, and Martina Wiltschko. 2009. Varieties of INFL: TENSE, LOCATION, and PERSON. In Alternatives to cartography, ed. Hans Broekhuis, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck, and Henk van Riemsdijk, 153–202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ritter, Elizabeth, and Martina Wiltschko. 2014. The composition of INFL: An exploration of tense, tenseless languages, and tenseless constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 1331–1386.
Rullmann, Hotze. 2004. First and second person pronouns as bound variables. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 159–168.
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Speas, Margaret, and Carol L. Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in grammar, ed. Anna Maria Di Sciullo, 314–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stowell, Tim. 1993. The syntax of tense. Manuscript, UCLA, Los Angeles.
Stowell, Tim. 1995. The phrase structure of tense. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, ed. Laurie Zaring, and Johan Rooryck, 277–291. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stowell, Tim. 2007. The syntactic expression of tense. Lingua 117: 437–463.
Tarenskeen, Sammie. 2010. From you to me (and back)—the flexible meaning of the second person pronoun in Dutch. Master’s thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.
van Koppen, Marjo. 2005. One probe—two goals: Aspects of agreement in Dutch dialects. Doctoral Dissertation, Leiden University.
van Koppen, Marjo. 2012. The distribution of phi-features in pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 135–177.
von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on quantifier domains. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Weerman, Fred, and Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul. 2002. Pronouns and case. Lingua 112: 301–338.
Westerståhl, Dag. 1984. Determiners and context sets. In Generalized quantifiers in natural languages, ed. Johan van Benthem, and Alice ter Meulen, 45–71. Dordrecht: Foris.
Williams, Edwin. 1983. Semantic vs. syntactic categories. Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 423–446.
Wiltschko, Martina, and Elizabeth Ritter. 2015. Animating the narrow syntax. The Linguistic Review 32: 869–908.
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2012a. Agree(ment): Looking up or looking down?. MIT Guest Lecture Handout.
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2012b. The syntax of valuation in auxiliary-participle constructions. In Coyote Papers, Vol. 20, ed. Jaehoon Choi, E. Alan Hogue, Jeffrey Punske, Deniz Tat, Jessamyn Schertz, and Alex Trueman, pp. 154–162. Tucson: University of Arizona.
Zagona, Karen. 1990. Times as temporal argument structure. Manuscript, Seattle: University of Washington.
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2008. On the semantics and pragmatics of pronominal features. Handout CIL 18, Korea University, Seoul.
Zobel, Sarah. 2010. Non-standard uses of German 1st person singular pronouns. In New frontiers in artificial intelligence: JSAI-isAI 2009 Workshops, ed. Kumiyo Nakakoji, Yohei Murakami, and Eric McCready. Berlin: Springer.
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1996. Clitics, scrambling, and head movement in Dutch. In Approaching second. Second position clitics and related phenomena, ed. Aaron L. Halpern, and Arnold M. Zwicky, 579–611. Stanford: CSLI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Gruber, B. Temporal and atemporal uses of ‘you’: indexical and generic second person pronouns in English, German, and Dutch. J Comp German Linguistics 20, 199–227 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-017-9090-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-017-9090-4