Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The form and position of pronominal objects with non-nominal antecedents in Scandinavian and German

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper discusses a possible correlation between the placement of pronominal objects with non-nominal antecedents in Norwegian, and the use of the pronouns es ‘it’ and das ‘that’ in German. For Norwegian object shift (OS), it has been shown that while pronominal objects with non-nominal antecedents generally do not shift, this is not the case when these elements take on the discourse function of continuing topics. In this paper, we show that a very similar pattern can be observed in German. However, this is not related to whether object pronouns scramble or not, but rather to which pronominal form is used to refer back to the clausal antecedent. In German, das is generally used to refer back to non-nominal antecedents, however, es is also sometimes an option. In this study, we find parallels between the use of OS and es, on the one hand, and lack of OS and das, on the other, and propose that the former is preferred when the proposition the proform refers back to is part of the common ground in the discourse. This ties in nicely with previous research on Norwegian OS, as in order for a proposition to constitute a continuing topic in the discourse, it has to be established as part of the interlocutors’ common ground.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderssen, Merete and Kristine Bentzen. 2011. Scandinavian object shift reanalyzed as TP-internal topicalization. Paper presented at the Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop (CGSW) 26, Amsterdam, June 2011.

  • Anderssen, Merete and Kristine Bentzen. 2012. Norwegian object shift as IP-internal topicalization. Nordlyd: 39(1), The Grammar of Objects. 1–23.

  • Andréasson, Maia. 2008. Not all objects are born alike—Accessibility as a key to pronominal object shift in Swedish and Danish. In Proceedings of the LFG08 conference, eds. Miriam Butt & Tracy Halloway King, 26–45. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Andréasson, Maia. 2009. Pronominal object shift—Not just a matter of shifting or not. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andréasson, Maia. 2010. Object shift or object placement in general. In Proceedings of the LFG10 conference, eds. Miriam Butt & Tracy Halloway King, 26–42. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Bentzen, Kristine. 2013. Object shift. Nordic Atlas of Linguistic Structures (NALS). http://www.tekstlab.uio.no/nals.

  • Bentzen, Kristine & Merete Anderssen. 2012. Norwegian object shift: The role of reference and topichood. Paper presented at the Workshop on Scandinavian Object Shift, University of Göteborg, March 2012.

  • Bentzen, Kristine, Merete Anderssen, and Christian Waldmann. 2013a. Object shift in spoken Mainland Scandinavian: A corpus study of Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36 (2): 115–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentzen, Kristine, Jason Merchant, and Peter Svenonius. 2013b. Deep properties of surface pronouns: Pronominal predicate anaphors in Norwegian and German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 16 (2–3): 97–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corver, Norbert, and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1994. Studies on scrambling. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delfitto, Denis, and Norbert Corver. 1998. Feature primitives and the syntax of specificity. Rivista di Linguistica 10 (2): 281–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Linguistic inquiry monographs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Molly, and Eloise Jelinek. 1995. Distributing arguments. Natural Language Semantics 3: 123–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2005. Sound patterns of syntax: Object shift. Theoretical Linguistics 31 (1/2): 47–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Danny, and David Pesetsky. 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31 (1/2): 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frascarelli, Mara, and Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In On information structure, meaning and form, ed. Susanne Winkler and Kerstin Schwabe, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Werner, André Meinunger, and Kerstin Schwabe (eds.). 2016. Inner-sentential propositional proforms: Syntactic properties and interpretative effects. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givón, Thomas. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, ed. Thomas Givón, 5–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grewendorf, Günther, and Wolfgang Sternefeld. 1990. Scrambling and barriers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gundel, Jeanette, Michael Hegarty, and Kaja Borthen. 2003. Cognitive status, information structure, and pronominal reference to clausally introduced entities. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12: 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider, Hubert. 2006. Mittelfeld phenomena. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 3, ed. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 204–274. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haider, Hubert & Inger Rosengren. 1998. Scrambling. Sprache & Pragmatik 49. Germanistisches Institut der Universität Lund.

  • Hellan, Lars, and Christer Platzack. 1995. Pronouns in Scandinavian languages: An overview. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 56: 47–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2004. Scrambling, optionality and non-lexical triggers. In Triggers, ed. Anne Breitbarth and Henk van Riemsdijk, 173–203. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2012. Some notes on scrambling and object shift. In Discourse and grammar: A festschrift in honour of Valeria Molnar, ed. Johan Brandler, David Håkansson, Stefan Huber, and Eva Klingvall, 305–321. Lund: Center for Languages and Literature, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and English. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.

  • Holmberg, Anders. 1999. Remarks on Holmberg’s generalization. Studia Linguistica 53 (1): 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack. 1995. The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, Joan, and Sandra Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen, Janne Bondi, Joel Priestley, Kristin Hagen, Tor Anders Åfarli & Øystein Alexander Vangsnes. 2009. The Nordic Dialect Corpus—An advanced research tool. In Proceedings of the 17th Nordic conference of computational linguistics NODALIDA 2009. NEALT Proceedings Series Volume 4, eds. Kristiina Jokinen & Eckhard Bick.

  • Josefsson, Gunlög. 2003. Four myths of object shift … and the truth. In Grammar in focus. Festchrift for Christer Platzack, November 18, 2003, vol. II, ed. Lars-Olof Delsing, Cecilia Falk, Gunlög Josefsson, and Halldór Sigurðsson, 199–207. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josefsson, Gunlög. 2010. Object Shift and optionality: An intricate interplay between syntax, prosody and information structure. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 86: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josefsson, Gunlög. 2011. Deconstructing object shift. Talk presented at The VAMOS workshop: Objects—Information Structure, Prosody and Acquisition, April 4–6 2011, University of Tromsø.

  • Josefsson, Gunlög. 2012. Deconstructing (pronominal) object shift. Talk presented at the Workshop on Scandinavian Object Shift, March 2012, University of Gothenburg.

  • Kamio, Akio, and Margaret Thomas. 1999. Some referential properties of English it and that. In Function and structure, ed. Akio Kamio and Ken-Ichi Takami. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred, and Renate Musan. 2012. Information structure: Overview and linguistic issues. In The expression of information structure, ed. Manfred Krifka and Renate Musan. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lødrup, Helge. 2012. Some Norwegian ‘type anaphora’ are surface anaphora. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 24 (1): 23–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matić, Dejan, Rik van Gijn & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. 2014. Information structure and reference tracking in complex sentences: an overview. In Information structure and reference tracking in complex sentences, eds. Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten & Ana Vilacy Galucio, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Mikkelsen, Line. 2011. On prosody and focus in Object Shift. Syntax 14 (3): 230–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pütz, Herbert. 1986. über die Syntax der Pronominalform <es> im modernen Deutsch. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Marc. 2006. Object shift, phases, and transitive expletive constructions in Germanic. Linguistic variation yearbook, vol. 6, 139–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwabe, Kerstin, Werner Frey, and André Meinunger. 2016. Sentential proforms: An overview. In Inner-sentential propositional proforms: Syntactic properties and interpretative effects, ed. Werner Frey, André Meinunger, and Kerstin Schwabe, 1–21. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnacker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5–6): 701–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, Peter. 1963. Identifying reference and truth values. Theoria 30: 96–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudhoff, Stefan. 2003. Argumentsätze und es-Korrelate. Zur syntaktischen Struktur von Nebensatzeinbettungen im Deutschen. Berlin: WVB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudhoff, Stefan. 2016. Correlates of object clauses in German and Dutch. In Inner-sentential propositional proforms: Syntactic properties and interpretative effects, ed. Werner Frey, André Meinunger, and Kerstin Schwabe, 23–48. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2001. Object shift and scrambling. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, 148–202. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vikner, Sten. 1994. Scandinavian object shift and West Germanic scrambling. In Studies on scrambling, ed. Norbert Corver and Henk van Riemsdijk, 487–517. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikner, Sten. 2006. Object Shift. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. III, ed. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 392–436. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Language and Culture, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway

    Kristine Bentzen & Merete Anderssen

Authors
  1. Kristine Bentzen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Merete Anderssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristine Bentzen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bentzen, K., Anderssen, M. The form and position of pronominal objects with non-nominal antecedents in Scandinavian and German. J Comp German Linguistics 22, 169–188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-019-09105-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-019-09105-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation