Effects of course modality in summer session: Enrollment patterns and student performance in face-to-face and online classes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100710Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Large-scale study analyzing more than 72,000 enrollments in 433 courses.

  • Student- and course-level factors can influence enrollment in online courses.

  • Students perform slightly worse in online courses than in face-to-face courses.

  • At-risk students are not at a greater disadvantage in online courses.

Abstract

Online summer courses offer opportunities to catch-up or stay on-track with course credits for students who cannot otherwise attend face-to-face summer courses. While online courses may have certain advantages, participation patterns and student success in summer terms are not yet well understood. This quantitative study analyzed four years of institutional data cumulating in 72,441 course enrollments of 23,610 students in 433 courses during summer terms at a large public research university. Multi-level logistic regression models indicated that characteristics including gender, in-state residency, admission test scores, previous online course enrollment, and course size, among others, can influence student enrollment by course modality. Multi-way fixed effects linear regression models indicated that student grades were slightly lower in online courses compared to face-to-face courses. However, at-risk college student populations (low-income students, first-generation students, low-performing students) were not found to suffer additional course performance penalties of online course participation.

Introduction

Online learning and distance education are becoming an integral part of higher education in the United States. In 2003, only 15.6% of all degree-seeking U.S. undergraduate students had enrolled in at least one distance education class during their higher education career. As of 2014, more than a quarter of all undergraduate students (27.7% or 4.8 million students) had enrolled in at least one distance education class (Snyder, de Brey, & Dillow, 2016). Similarly, higher education administrators increasingly value online education as a critical component of long-term strategic plans for their institutions (Allen & Seaman, 2013). Advocates suggest that online learning might not only provide more cost-effective instruction but also increase access to learning opportunities and college completion for students (Shea & Bidjerano, 2014).

However, most research on college-level online course settings suggests that students do not perform as well in online courses compared to traditional face-to-face courses with respect to course completion, course grades, and subsequent college enrollment (Atchley, Wingenbach, & Akers, 2013; Bettinger, Fox, Loeb, & Taylor, 2017; Figlio, Rush, & Yin, 2013; Jaggars & Xu, 2016; Xu and Jaggars, 2011, Xu and Jaggars, 2013, Xu and Jaggars, 2014). These performance gaps are often attributed to student abilities in self-directed learning, which is particularly important in fully online course work to stay on pace with the course learning materials and objectives (Broadbent, 2017; Cho, Kim, & Choi, 2017; Firmin et al., 2014; Kizilcec, Pérez-Sanagustín, & Maldonado, 2017; Parkes, Stein, & Reading, 2015; You, 2016). Nonetheless, online courses can fulfill an important role to complement an institution's traditional face-to-face course schedule and to help advance students' academic success in higher education. For instance, colleges that offer online courses during summer terms might provide students who work full-time off-campus or students who temporarily moved to a different city a flexible opportunity to maintain or even accelerate their time-to-degree (e.g., Fish & Kowalik, 2009; Taylor & Doane, 2003).

While numerous research studies have compared the outcomes of either online courses with face-to-face courses or summer with non-summer courses across post-secondary contexts, the research base on the intersection of online learning and summer course learning remains thin. This study attempts to address this gap by examining student enrollment during summer terms and the effect of course modality on student performance. Consequently, this study is framed by the following three research questions:

Research question 1: What types of students enroll in college courses during summer terms?

Research question 2: What student- and course-level characteristics predict student enrollment in online courses (compared to face-to-face courses) during summer terms?

Research question 3: What is the impact of course modality on student course performance during summer terms?

Section snippets

Distance learning in higher education

Online college courses can have certain advantages over traditional face-to-face courses. Most importantly, online instruction allows students to take courses at any time from virtually any location. This provides students with more flexible learning opportunities, to learn at a time that is most beneficial for their schedule, unlike face-to-face courses, which are dictated by a specific time and place (Nguyen, 2015). Online courses also better serve student needs by providing greater access to

Data sources and sample

This study was conducted at a large public research university in California, as part of a National Science Foundation-funded project that systematically explores the effectiveness of online, hybrid, and flipped STEM courses in large research universities. Data for this study were provided from a number of sources on campus that collect and curate institutional data including Admissions, Office of Financial Aid and Scholarships, Summer Session, the Registrar's Office, the Office of

Description of summer course enrollments

In summer terms from 2014 to 2017, 23,610 degree-seeking students enrolled in 433 different courses cumulating in a total of 72,441 course enrollments (Table 2). There were 8788 students (37.22%) who enrolled in both online and face-to-face courses representing a total of 37,743 course enrollments (52.10%). Out of the 433 courses included in this study, 400 courses had face-to-face sections and 79 courses had online sections. Notably, 46 courses had both online and face-to-face course sections

Discussion and conclusions

This study contributes to our understanding about who enrolls in online summer courses and how enrollment in an online course associates with academic success. Four conclusions of the study inform educational policy makers and higher education administrators.

First, the characteristics of students enrolled in undergraduate courses during summer terms are similar to those of students enrolled during the regular academic year. Notably, the distributions of gender, socioeconomic status, and prior

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Teaching and Learning Research Center at the University of California, Irvine and the National Science Foundation through the EHR Core Research Program (ECR), Award 1535300. The views contained in this article are those of the authors, and not of their institutions or the National Science Foundation.

References (48)

  • M. Parkes et al.

    Student preparedness for university e-learning environments

    The Internet and Higher Education

    (2015)
  • A.P. Rovai

    In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs

    The Internet and Higher Education

    (2003)
  • P. Shea et al.

    Does online learning impede degree completion? A national study of community college students

    Computers & Education

    (2014)
  • D. Xu et al.

    The impact of online learning on students’ course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system

    Economics of Education Review

    (2013)
  • J.W. You

    Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning

    The Internet and Higher Education

    (2016)
  • C. Adelman

    The Toolbox Revisited: Paths to Degree Completion from High School Through College

    (2006)
  • I.E. Allen et al.

    Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States

    (2013)
  • P.D. Allison

    Fixed effects regression models

    (2009)
  • J.S. Anastasi

    Full-semester and abbreviated summer courses: An evaluation of student performance

    Teaching of Psychology

    (2007)
  • T.W. Atchley et al.

    Comparison of course completion and student performance through online and traditional courses

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning

    (2013)
  • A.M. Austin et al.

    Impact of course length on student learning

    Journal of Economics and Finance Education

    (2006)
  • M. Bailey et al.

    On-campus, distance or online? Influences on student decision-making about study modes at university

    Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

    (2018)
  • E.P. Bettinger et al.

    Virtual classrooms: How online college courses affect student success

    American Economic Review

    (2017)
  • E.B. Dev

    Strategically using the summer to strengthen colleges and universities

    Summer Academe: A Journal of Higher Education

    (2005)
  • 1

    University of Tübingen, Germany.

    2

    University of California, Irvine, United States of America.

    View full text