Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of Using Audience Response Systems Incorporating Student-Generated Questions on EFL Students’ Reading Comprehension

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While Audience Response System (ARS) such as Kahoot! can promote learner self-regulation and enhance comprehension by engaging cognitive processing on multiple levels, learning behavior in questioning with ARS was understudied. The present study explores the use of Kahoot! with student-generated questioning, to report the effect on students’ reading comprehension. This study involved two intact sixth grade elementary school classes, with a total of 48 students which were divided into an experimental group and a control group. All students first took the simulated GEPT (General English Proficiency Test)-Kids reading test as a pre-test. Each team was assigned a story commensurate with their reading level by the instructor. The experimental group used Kahoot! as an ARS to generate questions, while the control group presented their questions by PowerPoint. The data were analyzed in terms of the students’ pre-test and post-test GEPT-Kids scores, and the worksheets. The results indicated that although little significant improvement was recorded from the GEPT scores, the quality of the questions generated by the group using Kahoot! increased at a greater rate over time compared to the control group. The question-generation process showed that the Kahoot! group indicated a higher level of engagement and collaboration and also stimulated an active learning environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aljaloud, A., Gromik, N., Billingsley, W., & Kwan, P. (2015). Research trends in student response systems: A literature review. International Journal of Learning Technology, 10(4), 313–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, I. D. (2005). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. https://arxiv.abs/arXiv preprint physics/0508129.

  • Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036–1183.

  • Boyle, J. T., & Nicol, D. J. (2003). Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. ALT-J, 11(3), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslow, L. (2010). Wrestling with pedagogical change: The TEAL initiative at MIT. Change The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(5), 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, J., Black, E. P., & Rohr, J. (2009). An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(2), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W. C. (2006). English language education in Taiwan: A comprehensive survey. Bimonthly Journal of Educational Resources and Research, 69, 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.F. (2012). Planning and implementation of elementary school English education in Taiwan. Primary school English-language education in Asia, pp. 129–143.

  • Chen, C. H., & Yeh, H. C. (2019). Effects of integrating a questioning strategy with game-based learning on students’ language learning performances in flipped classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(3), 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. C., & Tsai, Y. C. (2012). Research on English teaching and learning: Taiwan (2004–2009). Language Teaching, 45(2), 180–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1915). The school and society (revised ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, K. C. (2017). The effect of the video game quizlet on the acquisiton of science vocabulary for children with learning disabilities. Rowan University.

  • Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students' understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, S. W. (2009). Catalytic assessment: Understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 285–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.F. (2016). EF English Proficiency Index. Retrieved October 24, 2017, from https://www.ef.edu/epi/.

  • El Shaban, A. (2017). The use of Socrative in ESL classrooms: Towards active learning. Teaching English with Technology, 17(4), 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • ETS. (2017). Report on Test Takers Worldwide. Retrieved October 23, 2017, from https://www.ets.org/s/toeic/pdf/ww_data_report_unlweb.pdf.

  • Han, J. H., & Finkelstein, A. (2013). Understanding the effects of professors' pedagogical development with Clicker Assessment and Feedback technologies and the impact on students' engagement and learning in higher education. Computers & Education, 65, 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, W. C. & Hsu, S. T. (2016). The effectiveness of using computer technology to strengthen English as a medium of instruction courses in Taiwan tertiary education: Proceedings of the 2016 3rd International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI). (pp. 476–481). IEEE.

  • Hung, H. T. (2017). Clickers in the flipped classroom: Bring your own device (BYOD) to promote student learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 983–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iaremenko, N.V. (2017). Enhancing English language learners’ motivation through online games. Information Technology and Training Tools59, (3), 126–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmons, R., & Hall, C. (2018). How useful are our models? Pre-service and practicing teacher evaluations of technology integration models. TechTrends, 62(1), 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2009). Toward a theory of learner-centered training design: An integrative framework of active learning. In S. W. Kozlowski & E. Salas (Eds.), Learning, training, and development in organizations (pp. 283–320). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K.-W. (2018). The learner and the learning process: Research and practice in technology-enhanced learning. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), Handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 1–17). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. M., & Oh, E. J. (2014). Exploring the effects of a learner response system on EFL reading. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 130–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W. C. (2015). The early bird catches the worm? Rethinking the primary-junior high school transition in EFL learning. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrabi, S. A. R. (2018). Technology enabled active learning in electrical engineering. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31(3), 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, T. (2004). General guidelines of grade 1–9 curriculum of elementary and junior high school education. In.

  • Ness, M. (2017). Using informational and narrative picture walks to promote student-generated questions. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(5), 575–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. (2007). E-assessment by design: Using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1), 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I). Excellence and Equity in Education. Retrieved October 23, 2017, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/.

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.

  • Plump, C. M., & LaRosa, J. (2017). Using Kahoot! in the classroom to create engagement and active learning: A game-based technology solution for elearning novices. Management Teaching Review, 2(2), 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüschoff, B., & Ritter, M. (2001). Technology-enhanced language learning: Construction of knowledge and template-based learning in the foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(3–4), 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Elez, M., Pardines, I., Garcia, P., Miñana, G., Roman, S., Sanchez, M., et al. (2014). Enhancing students’ learning process through self-generated tests. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaaruddin, J., & Mohamad, M. (2017). Identifying the effectiveness of active learning strategies and benefits in curriculum and pedagogy course for undergraduate TESL students. Creative Education, 8(14), 2312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang, H. F., & Chang-Chien, I. J. (2010). The effect of self-questioning strategy on EFL learners' reading comprehension development. International Journal of Learning, 17(2), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieh, R., & Chang, W. (2013). Implementing the interactive response system in a high school physics context: Intervention and reflections. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(5), 748–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, D., Oh, E. Y., & Glazewski, K. (2017). Student-generated questioning activity in second language courses using a customized personal response system: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1425–1449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, A. (2016). Improving the ESL graduate writing classroom using Socrative:(Re) considering exit tickets. TESOL Journal., 7(4), 989–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stover, S., & Ziswiler, K. (2017). Impact of active learning environments on community of inquiry. Executive Editor, 29(3), 458–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, C.-Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2018). Investigating the effects of flipped learning, student question generation, and instant response technologies on students’ learning motivation, attitudes, and engagement: A structural equation modeling. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2453–2466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taboada, A., Bianco, S., & Bowerman, V. (2012). Text-based questioning: A comprehension strategy to build English language learners' content knowledge. Literacy Research and Instruction, 51(2), 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsao, F. F. (2004). How to achieve a breakthrough in English learning in an EFL context like Taiwan. English Teaching & Learning, 28(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uçar, H. & Kumtepe, A. T. (2017). Using the game-based student response tool kahoot! In an online class: Perspectives of online learners: Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 303–307). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Walsh, R. (2017). Turning the smartphone into an EAP classroom learning device through Kahoot!. In EUROCALL 2017.

  • Wichadee, S., & Pattanapichet, F. (2018). Enhancement of performance and motivation through application of digital games in an English language class. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F.-Y., Chang, Y.-L., & Wu, H.-L. (2015). The effects of an online student question-generation strategy on elementary school student English learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 10(1), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, H. C., & Lai, P. Y. (2012). Implementing online question generation to foster reading comprehension. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1152–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Z. G., & Yu, L. H. (2017). Correlations between learners’ initial EFL proficiency and variables of clicker-aided flipped EFL class. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1587–1603.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 106-2628-S-224-001-MY3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chiayi Municipal Singchia Elementary School, 51, Chongqing Road, Chiayi City, Taiwan

    Benjamin R. Mays

  2. National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123, University Road Section 3, Douliu, Yunlin, Taiwan

    Hui-Chin Yeh

  3. Department of Applied Foreign Languages, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123, University Road Section 3, Douliu, Yunlin, Taiwan

    Nian-Shing Chen

Authors
  1. Benjamin R. Mays
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hui-Chin Yeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nian-Shing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Benjamin R. Mays or Hui-Chin Yeh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Question Quality Rubric

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mays, B.R., Yeh, HC. & Chen, NS. The Effects of Using Audience Response Systems Incorporating Student-Generated Questions on EFL Students’ Reading Comprehension. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 29, 553–566 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00506-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00506-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation