Skip to main content
Log in

The Incoherence of the Interactional and Institutional Within Freire’s Politico-Educational Project

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I draw apart two different contexts of Freirean pedagogical practice that I label interactional and institutional. The interactional refers to the immediate learning environment with relation to the interaction between the students and the teacher. In contrast, the institutional refers to how the institutions of education are managed, constructed, and organised and how they relate to the individuals those institutions are composed of. I begin by presenting a brief overview of Freire’s argument in favour of a revolutionary pedagogy. I then highlight how this project is represented at both interactional and institutional levels with a particular focus upon the practice of the revolutionary leaders and their role in the development of the humanisation of the oppressed. In presenting the interactional and institutional elements of Freire’s pedagogy separately the tension between the individual and the state is made plain and the limitations of his politico-educational project are drawn out. I argue that due to an inconsistent application of the relationship between means and ends in Freire’s politico-educational project an incoherence between the interactional and institutional levels of education is highlighted. In responding to this limitation of Freire’s politico-educational project with a thoroughly interconnected relationship of means and ends I show that there remains a necessary conflict between the interests of the individual and the state. As a result of this a door is opened for the development of an argument in favour of the disestablishment of education and state from a Freirean perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There does exist a theoretical thread between the works of Freire and Dewey. However, this thread is little explored. Muraro (2013) offers a rare and insightful exposition of the connection between these two great pedagogical giants.

References

  • Apple, Michael W., and Luís Armando Gandin. 2003. Educating the state, democratizing knowledge: The citizen school project in Porto Alegre, Brazil. In The state and the politics of knowledge, ed. Michael W. Apple, 193–219. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Au, Wayne. 2009. Fighting with the text: Contextualising and recontextualising Freire’s critical pedagogy. In The Routledge international handbook of critical education, ed. Michael W. Apple, 221–231. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, Tim. 2014. Freire’s legacy for communities seeking change in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Paulo Freire: The global legacy, ed. Michael Peters and Tina Besley, 187–198. Pieterlen: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Denis E., and Paulo Freire. 1977. His life, works and thought. Mahwah: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 2008. Human nature and conduct. In The middle works of John Dewey, 1899–1924, volume 14: 1922, ed. Boydston Jo Ann, 1–227. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, Peter. 1973. Pedagogy of the bamboozled. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 56 (2): 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo. 1996. Letters to Cristina: Reflections on my life and work. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo. 1978. Pedagogy in process: The letters of Guinea-Bissau. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo. 2017. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Translated by Myra Bergman Ramos. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo, and Donaldo P. Macedo. 2004. Literacy: Reading the word & the world. Abingdon: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadotti, Moacir. 1994. Reading Paulo Freire: His life and work. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadotti, Moacir, and Carlos Alberto Torres. 2009. Paulo Freire: Education for development. Development and Change 40 (6): 1255–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilherme, Alexandre, and W. John Morgan. 2018. Considering the role of the teacher: Buber, Freire and Gur-Ze’ev. Educação & Realidade 43 (3): 783–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Jones. 2012. Paulo Freire’s philosophy of education: Origins, developments, impacts and legacies. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, Alexander. 2017. Between means and ends: Reconstructing coercion in Dewey’s democratic theory. American Political Science Review 111 (03): 522–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, Robert. 1981. Contributions to the thought of Paulo Freire. In Literacy and revolution: The pedagogy of Paulo Freire, ed. Robert Mackie, 93–119. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, Peter. 2015. Hegemony and education under neoliberalism insights from Gramsci. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muraro, Darcísio Natal. 2013. Relações Entre a Filosofia e a Educação de John Dewey e de Paulo Freire. Educação & Realidade 38 (3): 813–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, Nel. 1991. Women and evil. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Peter. 1996. Rethinking conscientisation. Journal of Philosophy of Education 30 (2): 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roskelly, Hephzibah. 2000. The risky business of doing group work. In The writing teacher’s sourcebook, 4th ed, ed. Edward P.J. Corbett et al., 123–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schugurensky, Daniel. 2012. Citizen school. In Paulo Freire encyclopedia, ed. Danilo Romeu Streck, 51–53. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schugurensky, Daniel. 2014. Paulo Freire. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, Carlos Alberto. 2014. First Freire: Early writings in social justice education. Columbia: Teachers College Press, Teachers College Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waks, Leonard J. 1999. The means-ends continuum and the reconciliation of science and art in the later works of John Dewey. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35 (3): 595–611.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Wilcock.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilcock, N. The Incoherence of the Interactional and Institutional Within Freire’s Politico-Educational Project. Stud Philos Educ 39, 399–414 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09714-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09714-z

Keywords

Navigation