Abstract
In this paper I draw apart two different contexts of Freirean pedagogical practice that I label interactional and institutional. The interactional refers to the immediate learning environment with relation to the interaction between the students and the teacher. In contrast, the institutional refers to how the institutions of education are managed, constructed, and organised and how they relate to the individuals those institutions are composed of. I begin by presenting a brief overview of Freire’s argument in favour of a revolutionary pedagogy. I then highlight how this project is represented at both interactional and institutional levels with a particular focus upon the practice of the revolutionary leaders and their role in the development of the humanisation of the oppressed. In presenting the interactional and institutional elements of Freire’s pedagogy separately the tension between the individual and the state is made plain and the limitations of his politico-educational project are drawn out. I argue that due to an inconsistent application of the relationship between means and ends in Freire’s politico-educational project an incoherence between the interactional and institutional levels of education is highlighted. In responding to this limitation of Freire’s politico-educational project with a thoroughly interconnected relationship of means and ends I show that there remains a necessary conflict between the interests of the individual and the state. As a result of this a door is opened for the development of an argument in favour of the disestablishment of education and state from a Freirean perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There does exist a theoretical thread between the works of Freire and Dewey. However, this thread is little explored. Muraro (2013) offers a rare and insightful exposition of the connection between these two great pedagogical giants.
References
Apple, Michael W., and Luís Armando Gandin. 2003. Educating the state, democratizing knowledge: The citizen school project in Porto Alegre, Brazil. In The state and the politics of knowledge, ed. Michael W. Apple, 193–219. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
Au, Wayne. 2009. Fighting with the text: Contextualising and recontextualising Freire’s critical pedagogy. In The Routledge international handbook of critical education, ed. Michael W. Apple, 221–231. Abingdon: Routledge.
Budge, Tim. 2014. Freire’s legacy for communities seeking change in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Paulo Freire: The global legacy, ed. Michael Peters and Tina Besley, 187–198. Pieterlen: Peter Lang.
Collins, Denis E., and Paulo Freire. 1977. His life, works and thought. Mahwah: Paulist Press.
Dewey, John. 2008. Human nature and conduct. In The middle works of John Dewey, 1899–1924, volume 14: 1922, ed. Boydston Jo Ann, 1–227. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Elbow, Peter. 1973. Pedagogy of the bamboozled. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 56 (2): 247–258.
Freire, Paulo. 1996. Letters to Cristina: Reflections on my life and work. Abingdon: Routledge.
Freire, Paulo. 1978. Pedagogy in process: The letters of Guinea-Bissau. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.
Freire, Paulo. 2017. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Translated by Myra Bergman Ramos. London: Penguin Books.
Freire, Paulo, and Donaldo P. Macedo. 2004. Literacy: Reading the word & the world. Abingdon: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Gadotti, Moacir. 1994. Reading Paulo Freire: His life and work. New York: State University of New York Press.
Gadotti, Moacir, and Carlos Alberto Torres. 2009. Paulo Freire: Education for development. Development and Change 40 (6): 1255–1267.
Guilherme, Alexandre, and W. John Morgan. 2018. Considering the role of the teacher: Buber, Freire and Gur-Ze’ev. Educação & Realidade 43 (3): 783–798.
Irwin, Jones. 2012. Paulo Freire’s philosophy of education: Origins, developments, impacts and legacies. London: Continuum.
Livingston, Alexander. 2017. Between means and ends: Reconstructing coercion in Dewey’s democratic theory. American Political Science Review 111 (03): 522–534.
Mackie, Robert. 1981. Contributions to the thought of Paulo Freire. In Literacy and revolution: The pedagogy of Paulo Freire, ed. Robert Mackie, 93–119. London: Continuum.
Mayo, Peter. 2015. Hegemony and education under neoliberalism insights from Gramsci. Abingdon: Routledge.
Muraro, Darcísio Natal. 2013. Relações Entre a Filosofia e a Educação de John Dewey e de Paulo Freire. Educação & Realidade 38 (3): 813–829.
Noddings, Nel. 1991. Women and evil. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Roberts, Peter. 1996. Rethinking conscientisation. Journal of Philosophy of Education 30 (2): 179–196.
Roskelly, Hephzibah. 2000. The risky business of doing group work. In The writing teacher’s sourcebook, 4th ed, ed. Edward P.J. Corbett et al., 123–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schugurensky, Daniel. 2012. Citizen school. In Paulo Freire encyclopedia, ed. Danilo Romeu Streck, 51–53. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Schugurensky, Daniel. 2014. Paulo Freire. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Torres, Carlos Alberto. 2014. First Freire: Early writings in social justice education. Columbia: Teachers College Press, Teachers College Columbia University.
Waks, Leonard J. 1999. The means-ends continuum and the reconciliation of science and art in the later works of John Dewey. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35 (3): 595–611.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilcock, N. The Incoherence of the Interactional and Institutional Within Freire’s Politico-Educational Project. Stud Philos Educ 39, 399–414 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09714-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09714-z