Skip to main content
Log in

Running the STEM Gauntlet: The Complicity of Four-Year Universities in the Transfer Penalty

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Students who transfer between institutions of higher education often experience a transfer penalty or a decrease in the odds of degree completion. While the transfer pathway is deemed a responsibility shared between 2- and 4-year institutions, failures in the transfer process are typically attributed to community colleges. The aim of this study was to examine the post-transfer experiences of STEM community college transfer students with particular emphasis placed on how institutional policies and practices at 4-year institutions contributed to the transfer penalty and poorer attainment rates of this population. Implications for future research and interventions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman, C. (2005). Moving into town—And moving on: The community college in the lives of traditional age students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved May 18, 2017, from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/comcollege/index.html.

  • Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfonso, M. (2006). The impact of community college attendance on baccalaureate attainment. Research in Higher Education,47(8), 873–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (2001). The American model in comparative perspective. In P. Altbach & P. J. Gumport (Eds.), In defense of higher education (pp. 11–37). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Community Colleges. (2012). Community college trends and statistics. Retrieved May 18, 2017, from https://www.aacc.nche.edu/ABOUTCC/TRENDS/Pages/default.aspx

  • American Association of Community Colleges. (2018). Trends in community college enrollment and completion data, 2016. Retrieved July 8, 2018, from https://www.aacc.nche.edu/2016/12/01/trends-community-college-enrollment-completion-data-2016/.

  • Anderson, L. (2018). 50-state comparison: Transfer and articulation policies. Denver: Education Commission of the States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschaffenburg, K., & Maas, I. (1997). Cultural and educational careers: The dynamics of social reproduction. American Sociological Review,62, 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell, P., Heil, S., & Reisel, L. (2011). Competing explanations of undergraduate noncompletion. American Educational Research Journal,48(3), 536–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P. (2005). Nine themes of college student retention. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success (p. 215). Washington, DC: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. M. (2007). The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship on student success. The Review of Higher Education,30(4), 441–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. B. (2000). Organizational behavior at colleges and student outcomes: A new perspective on college impact. The Review of Higher Education,23(2), 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. Cultural Theory: An Anthology,1, 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1979). The inheritors: French students and their relation to culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, E. M., Hurst, D. G., & Peng, S. (2001). Community college transfer rates to 4-year Institutions using alternative definitions of transfer (NCES 2001-197). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budny, D., Bjedov, G., & LeBold, W. (1997). Assessment of the impact of the freshman engineering courses. In Frontiers in education conference, 1997. 27th annual conference. Teaching and learning in an era of change. Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 1100–1106). IEEE.

  • Carlan, P. E., & Byxbe, F. R. (2000). Community colleges under the microscope: An analysis of performance predictors for native and transfer students. Community College Review,28(2), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cejda, B. D. (1997). An examination of transfer shock in academic disciplines. Community College Journal of Research and Practice,23(3), 379–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cejda, B. D., Kaylor, A. J., & Rewey, K. L. (1998). Transfer shock in an academic discipline: The relationship between students' majors and their academic performance. Community College Review,26(3), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Schlossberg, N. K. (2002). Getting the most out of college. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (2003). The American community college. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T., & Casey, K. (1999). Transfer student experiences: Comparing their academic and social lives at the community college and university. College Student Journal,33(1), 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, K. (1987). The effects of community colleges: Aid or hindrance to socioeconomic attainment? Sociology of Education,60(2), 86–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, A. C. (2003). From access to outcome equity: Revitalizing the democratic mission of the community college. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,586(1), 92–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, A. C., Bensimon, E. M., Gabbard, G., Singleton, S., Macias, E., Dee, J., et al. (2006). Transfer access to elite colleges and universities in the United States: Threading the needle of the American dream. Boston: University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. R. (2009). The effect of community college enrollment on bachelor’s degree completion. Economics of Education Review,28(2), 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (1989). Comprehensive process analysis: Understanding the change process in significant therapy events. In M. J. Packer & R. B. Addison (Eds.), Entering the circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology (pp. 165–184). Albany: State University New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. C. & Lakin, J. M. (2018). Parallel pathways: Exploring how divergent academic norms contribute to the transfer shock of STEM students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New York, NY.

  • Ellis, M. M. (2013). Successful community college transfer students speak out. Community College Journal of Research & Practice,37(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920903304914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenske, R. H., Porter, J. D., & DuBrock, C. P. (2000). Tracking financial aid and persistence of women, minority, and needy students in science, engineering, and mathematics. Research in Higher Education,41(1), 67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaga, C. T. (2006). The process of transition for community college transfer students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice,30(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920500248845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, K. (1997). Increasing African Americans' participation in higher education: African American high-school students' perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education,68(5), 523–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandara, G., Alvarado, E., Driscoll, A., & Orfield, G. (2012). Building pathways to transfer: Community colleges that break the chain of failure for students of color. Los Angeles: The Civil Rights Project, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved May 18, 2017, from https://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/college-access/diversity/building-pathways-totransfercommunity-colleges-that-break-the-chain-of-failure-forstudents-of-color.

  • Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education,53(2), 229–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 8–22). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J. C., & Harrington, A. R. (2002). Academic performance of community college transfer students and" native" students at a large state university. Community College Journal of Research and Practice,26(5), 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldrick-Rab, S. (2007). Promoting academic momentum at community colleges: Challenges and opportunities. New York: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, T. G., Copa, J. C., & Wright, D. L. (2004). Is eight enough? A longitudinal look at the progression of community college students toward a bachelor’s degree. Paper presented at the annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Boston, MA.

  • Goodman, J., Schlossberg, N. K., & Anderson, M. (2006). Counseling adults in transition: Linking theory to practice. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, S. J., & Williams, R. A. (2012). The promise of the transfer pathway opportunity and challenge for community college students seeking the baccalaureate degree. New York: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist,25, 517–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L., & Skomsvold, P. (2011). Community college student outcomes: 1994–2009. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, S., & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education,70(4), 324–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussar, W. J., & Bailey, T. M. (2011). Projections of education statistics to 2020 (NCES publication no. 2011–026). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

  • Johnson, M. D. (2005). The academic performance of transfer versus “native” student in natural resources and sciences. College Student Journal,39(3), 570–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., Williams, A., Whitaker, S., Yingling, S., Inkelas, K., & Gates, J. (2018). Call to action: Data, diversity, and STEM education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning,50(2), 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsillis, J., & Rubinson, R. (1990). Cultural capital, student achievement, and educational reproduction: The case of Greece. American Sociological Review,55, 270–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2011). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations: ASHE Higher Education Report (Vol. 116). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laanan, F. S. (1996). Making the transition: Understanding the adjustment process of community college transfer students. Community College Review,23(4), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laanan, F. S. (2001). Transfer student adjustment. New directions for community colleges, 2001(114), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laanan, F. S. (2004). Studying transfer students: Part I: instrument design and implications. Community College Journal of Research and Practice,28, 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920490424050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laanan, F. S. (2006). Making the transition: Understanding the adjustment process of community college transfer students. Community College Review,23, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laanan, F. S. (2007). Studying transfer students: Part II: dimensions of transfer students’ adjustment. Community College Journal of Research and Practice,31, 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920600859947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakin, J. M., & Elliott, D. C. (2016). STEMming the shock: Examining transfer shock and its impact on STEM major and enrollment persistence. Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 28(2), 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Lareau, A. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory,6, 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. B. (2003). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society,32(5), 567–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugerman, M., Rover, D. T., Shelley, M. C., & Mickelson, S. K. (2015). Determining graduation rates in engineering for community college transfer students using data mining. International Journal of Engineering Education,31(6A), 1448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarowicz, T. A. (2015). Understanding the transition experience of community college transfer students to a 4-year university: Incorporating Schlossberg’s transition theory into higher education. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

  • Lichtenberger, E. J., & Dietrich, C. (2012). College readiness and the potentially overlapping outcomes of community college entrants (Policy Research: IERC 2012–3). Edwardsville, IL: Illinois Educational Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, B. T., & Kurlaender, M. (2009). Do community colleges provide a viable pathway to a baccalaureate degree? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,31(1), 30–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longanecker, D. A. (2008). Mission differentiation vs. mission creep: Higher education’s battle between creationism and evolution. In National conference of state legislators (Vol. 1, p. 2001). Retrieved May 18, 2017, from https://www.wiche.edu/files/gwypf/dal_mission.pdf.

  • Longden, B. (2004). Interpreting student early departure from higher education through the lens of cultural capital. Tertiary Education and Management,10(2), 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J., & Baum, S. (2016). Trends in community colleges: Enrollment, prices, student debt, and completion. College Board Research Brief, 4, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, C. (2011). The Completion Agenda: A Call to Action. Reclaiming the American dream: Community colleges and the nation’s future (21st century report). Washington, DC: AACC.

  • Mehan, H. (1992). Understanding inequality in schools: The contribution of interpretive studies. Sociology of Education,65, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melguizo, T., Kienzl, G. S., & Alfonso, M. (2011). Comparing the educational attainment of community college transfer students and four-year college rising juniors using propensity score matching methods. The Journal of Higher Education,82(3), 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, D. B., & Attewell, P. (2014). The community college route to the bachelor’s degree. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714521865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C., & Shulock, N. (2007). Beyond the open door: Increasing student success in the california community colleges. Sacramento: Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy, California State University- Sacramento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, C. M. (2012). Transfer: An indispensable part of the community college commission (Policy Brief 2012–03PBL). Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2011). Affordability and transfer: Critical to increasing baccalaureate degree completion. San Jose, CA: Policy Alert.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCES. (2017). Estimates provided on NCES (2017) term enrollment estimates: Fall 2017. Washington, DC: NCES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevarez, C., & Wood, L. (2010). Community college leadership and administration: Theory, practice, and change. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Packard, B. W. L., Gagnon, J. L., LaBelle, O., Jeffers, K., & Lynn, E. (2011). Women’s experiences in the STEM community college transfer pathway. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmadessa, A. L. (2017). America’s college promise: Situating President Obama’s initiative in the history of federal higher education aid and access policy. Community College Review,45(1), 52–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99–157). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Phillippe, K., & Mullin, C. M. (2011). Community college estimated growth: Fall 2010. Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provasnik, S., & Planty, M. (2008). Community colleges: Special supplement to the condition of education 2008. Statistical analysis report. NCES 2008-033. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

  • Reason, R. D. (2009). An examination of persistence research through the lens of a comprehensive conceptual framework. Journal of College Student Development,50(6), 659–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. L., & DesJardins, S. L. (2009). The use of matching methods in higher education research: Answering whether attendance at a 2-year institution results in differences in educational attainment. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 47–97). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. V., & Garnier, M. A. (1985). Class reproduction among men and women in France: Reproduction theory on its home ground. American Journal of Sociology,91(2), 250–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandy, J., Gonzalez, A., & Hilmer, M. J. (2006). Alternative paths to college completion: Effect of attending a 2-year school on the probability of completing a 4-year degree. Economics of Education Review,25(5), 463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlossberg, N. K. (1984). Counseling adults in transitions. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D., Dundar, A., Wakhungu, P. K., Yuan, X., Nathan, A., & Hwang, Y. (2017). Completing college: A state-level view of student attainment rates. Signature report no. 12a. Herndon, VA: National Student Clearinghouse.

  • Starobin, S., Laanan, F. S., & Burger, C. J. (2010). Role of community colleges: Broadening participation among women and minorities in STEM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strenta, A. C., Elliot, R., Adair, R., Matier, M., & Scott, J. (1994). Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education,35(5), 513–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (1992). An anthropological analysis of student participation in college. Journal of Higher Education,63(6), 603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (1999). Models of minority college-going and retention: Cultural integrity versus cultural suicide. Journal of Negro Education, 80–91.

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, B. (2001). Redefining the community college transfer mission. Community College Review,29(2), 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, B. K., & Wilson, K. (2006). "A hand hold for a little bit": Factors facilitating the success of community college transfer students to a large research university. Journal of College Student Development,47(4), 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wawrzynski, M. R., & Sedlacek, W. E. (2003). Race and gender differences in the transfer student experience. Journal of College Student Development,44(4), 489–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, R. (2008). The effects of social and cultural capital on student persistence: Are community colleges more meritocratic? Community College Review,36(1), 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, A. A., Wattenbarger, J. L., Gollattscheck, J. F., & Suppiger, J. E. (1994). America’s community colleges: The first century. Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younger, T. K. (2009). The case for degree completion: African American transfer students at a traditionally white institution. University of Maryland, College Park, Dissertation Abstracts International, 71(2), 476A (accession no. AAI3391357).

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by a Fidler Grant from the National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane Cárdenas Elliott.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elliott, D.C., Lakin, J.M. Running the STEM Gauntlet: The Complicity of Four-Year Universities in the Transfer Penalty. Res High Educ 61, 540–565 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09586-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09586-4

Keywords

Navigation