Abstract
Labour mobility is critical for adjusting imbalance between local labour markets. Yet, labour markets appear still very localized. Existing studies on job search report that the choice of search methods influences job outcomes, with social contacts accounting for a substantial fraction of job matches. Whether search methods are conducive to local or national jobs has not been examined yet. This paper establishes a link between job search and regional mobility, investigating the impact of search methods on unemployment exits within and across local labour markets. The effect of search methods is estimated by a Propensity Score Matching approach, using data from the British Household Panel Survey. Results show that only direct approach to employers enhances the job hazard with regional move. Conversely, social contacts and advertisements are found to increase the hazard to local employment, although the effect of social contacts wears off as the unemployment spell prolongs. No impact is found by Employment Agencies on either exit. These findings suggest that the widespread use of social contacts, while enhancing job matches in the local labour market, might contribute to restrict labour mobility. Therefore, they bear support to policies promoting diffusion and efficacy of alternative methods, particularly when the target is long-term unemployment. Results also point out the opportunity of reforms of the job search assistance and placement service offered by Employment Agencies, taking these limitations into account.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This prediction rests on the assumption that, while employed workers share information about job opportunities with unemployed workers in their network, unemployed workers keep the information for themselves.
Population figures are drawn from Nomis, Office for National Statistics, ONS UK (www.nomisweb.co.uk).
The boundary definition of LADs in use in the present data is the one in place before the local government changes of 2009, with a total of 434 LADs. In 2000 the population of LADs was on average 135,682, ranging between 2,100 (Isles of Scilly) and 985,100 (Birmingham). Population estimates are drawn from Nomis, Office for National Statistics, ONS UK (www.nomisweb.co.uk).
A PSM analysis was not performed for SEMP (steps to start business) because this method is used by a very small fraction of unemployed (9%); note that this method has received only scant attention by previous literature (see Section 2.1)
The probit specification was preferred over the logit because it provided better matching diagnostics.
Information on employment growth was not available at the TTWA level.
Defining the hazard ratios reported in Table 5 for one possible method/exit combination as HR0, HR3 (t > 3), and HR12 (t > 12), the absolute hazard ratio for the interval 3–12 can be derived as \(\exp (\log (HR_{0})+\log (HR_{3}))\), and the absolute hazard ratio for the interval 12–\(\infty \) as \(\exp (\log (HR_{0})+\log (HR_{3})+\log (HR_{12}))\). Note that the absolute hazard ratio for the interval 0–3 correspond to HR0.
References
Abadie A, Imbens GW (2008) On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica 76(6):1537–1557
Abadie A, Imbens GW (2016) Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 84(2):781–807
Addison JT, Portugal P (2002) Job search methods and outcomes. Oxf Econ Pap 54(3):505–533
Ali MS, Groenwold RHH, Pestman WR, Belitser SV, Hoes AW, de Boer A, Klungel OH (2013) Time-dependent propensity score and collider-stratification bias: An example of beta 2-agonist use and the risk of coronary heart disease. Eur J Epidemiol 28(4):291–299
Ali MS, Groenwold RHH, Belitser SV, Souverein PC, Martin E, Gatto NM, Huerta C, Gardarsdottir H, Roes KCB, Hoes AW, de Boer A, Klungel OH (2016) Methodological comparison of marginal structural model, time-varying Cox regression, and propensity score methods: the example of antidepressant use and the risk of hip fracture. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 25(Suppl. 1):114–121
Austin PC (2013) The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios. Stat Med 32(16):2837–2849
Austin PC (2014) The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: Reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Stat Med 33(7):1242–1258
Austin PC (2016) Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis. Stat Med 35(30):5642–5655
Austin PC, Fine JP (2019) Propensity-score matching with competing risks in survival analysis. Stat Med 38(5):751–777
Austin PC, Stuart EA (2015) Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med 34(28):3661–3679
Bachmann R, Baumgarten D (2013) How do the unemployed search for a job? Evidence from the EU Labour Force Survey. IZA J Eur Labor Stud 2(22):1–25
Battu H, Ma A, Phimister E (2008) Housing tenure, job mobility and unemployment in the UK. Econ J 118(527):311–328
Battu H, Seaman P, Zenou Y (2011) Job contact networks and the ethnic minorities. Labour Econ 18(1):48–56
Bayer P, Ross SL, Topa G (2008) Place of work and place of residence: informal hiring networks and labor market outcomes. J Polit Econ 116(6):1150–1196
Beaman LA (2012) Social networks and the dynamics of labor market outcomes: Evidence from refugees resettled in the U.S. Rev Econ Stud 79(1):128–171
Becker SO, Egger PH (2013) Endogenous product versus process innovation and a firm’s propensity to export. Empir Econ 44(1):329–354
Bentolila S, Michelacci C, Suarez J (2010) Social contacts and occupational choice. Economica 77(305):20–45
Bertola G (1999) Labor markets in the European Union. Working Paper RSC 99/24, European University Institute
Blanchard OJ, Katz LF (1992) Regional evolutions. Brook Pap Econ Act 1992(1):1–75
Blau D, Robins F (1990) Job search outcomes for the employed and unemployed. J Polit Econ 98(3):637–655
Böheim R, Taylor MP (2001) Job search methods, intensity and success in britain in the 1990s. ISER Working Paper 7, University of Essex
Bonin H, Eichhorst W, Florman C, Hansen MO, Skiöld L, Stuhler J, Tatsiramos K, Thomasen H, Zimmermann K F (2008) Geographic mobility in the European Union: Optimising its economic and social benefits. IZA Research Report, 19
Bover O, Muellbauer J, Murphy A (1989) Housing, wages and UK labour markets. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 51(2):97–136
Bramoullé Y, Saint-Paul G (2010) Social networks and labor market transitions. Labour Econ 17(1):188–195
Brookhart M A, Schneeweiss S, Rothman KJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Stürmer T (2006) Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol 163(12):1149–1156
Brown M, Setren E, Topa G (2016) Do informal referrals lead to better matches? Evidence from a firm’s employee referral system. J Labor Econ 34(1):161–209
Bryson A, Dorsett R, Purdon S (2002) The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of labour market policies. Working Paper 4, Department for Work and Pensions
Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J Econ Surv 22(1):31–72
Caliendo M, Schmidl R, Uhlendorff A (2011) Social networks, job search methods and reservation wages: Evidence for Germany. Int J Manpow 32(7):796–824
Caliendo M, Cobb-Clark DA, Uhlendorff A (2015) Locus of control and job search strategies. Rev Econ Stat 97(1):88–103
Calvo-Armengol T, Jackson M (2004) The effects of social networks on employment and inequality. Am Econ Rev 94(3):426–454
Calvo-Armengol T, Jackson M (2007) Networks in labor markets: Wage and employment dynamics and inequality. J Econ Theory 132(1):27–46
Cappellari L, Tatsiramos K (2015) With a little help from my friends? Quality of social networks, job finding and job match quality. Eur Econ Rev 78:55–75
Cattaneo MD (2010) Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability. J Econ 155(2):138–154
Cingano F, Rosolia A (2012) People I know: Workplace networks and job search outcomes. J Labor Econ 30(2):291–332
Coombes MG, Wymer C, Charlton M, Bailey S, Stonehouse A, Openshaw S (1997) Review of travel-to-work areas and small area unemployment rates. Labour Market Trends 16(105):9–12
Coulson NE, Fisher LM (2002) Tenure choice and labour market outcomes. Hous Stud 17(1):35–49
Coulson NE, Fisher LM (2009) Housing tenure and labor market impacts: The search goes on. J Urban Econ 65(3):252–264
D’Agostino RB, Lee ML, Belanger AJ (1990) Relation of pooled logistic regression to time dependent Cox regression analysis: The Framingham Heart Study. Stat Med 9(12):1501–1515
Decressin J, Fatas A (1995) Regional labor market dynamics in Europe. Eur Econ Rev 39(9):1627–1655
DellaVigna S, Paserman MD (2005) Job search and impatience. J Labor Econ 23(3):527–588
Devine T, Kiefer N (1991) Empirical labour economics: The search approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dohmen TJ (2005) Housing, mobility and unemployment. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35(3):305–325
Dustmann C, Glitz A, Schönberg U, Brücker H (2015) Referral-based job search networks. Rev Econ Stud 83(2):514–546
Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York
European Commission (2001) High level task force on skills and mobility Final report, Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs, Brussels
European Commission (2010) An agenda for new skills and jobs: A European contribution towards full employment, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Strasbourg
Fewell Z, Hernán M A, Wolfe F, Tilling K, Choi H, Sterne J A (2004) Controlling for time-dependent confounding using marginal structural models. Stata J 4(4):402–420
Flatau P, Forbes M, Hendershott PH, Wood G (2003) Homeownership and unemployment: The roles of leverage and public housing, NBER Working Paper, 10021
Frijters P, Shields MA, Price SW (2005) Job search methods and their success: A comparison of immigrants and natives in the UK. Econ J 115(507):F359–F376
Galeotti A, Merlino L (2014) Endogenous job contact networks. Int Econ Rev 55(4):1201–1226
Gayat E, Resche-Rigon M, Mary JY, Porcher R (2012) Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: A Monte Carlo study. Pharm Stat 11(3):222–229
Goss EP, Phillips JM (1997) The impact of home ownership on the duration of unemployment. Rev Regional Stud 27(1):9–27
Green A, Owen D (1990) The development of a classification of travel-to-work areas. Prog Plan 34(105):1–92
Green CP (2012) Employed and unemployed job search methods: Australian evidence on search duration, wages and job stability Working Papers 50029416, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department
Gregg P, Wadsworth J (1996) How effective are state employment agencies? Jobcentre use and job matching in Britain. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 58(3):443–467
Gregg P, Machin S, Manning A (2004) Mobility and joblessness. In: Seeking a premier economy: The economic effects of British economic reforms, 1980-2000, University of Chicago Press, pp 371–410
Hassler J, Mora JVR, Storesletten K, Zilibotti F (2005) A positive theory of geographical mobility and social insurance. Int Econ Rev 46(1):263–303
Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd PE (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Rev Econ Stud 64(4):605–654
Hellerstein JK, McInerney M, Neumark D (2011) Neighbors and coworkers: The importance of residential labor market networks. J Labor Econ 29(4):659–695
Hellerstein JK, Kutzbach MJ, Neumark D (2014) Do labor market networks have an important spatial dimension? J Urban Econ 79:39–58
Hernán MA, Brumback B, Robins JM (2000) Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. Epidemiology 11(5):561–570
Hirano K, Imbens GW, Ridder G (2003) Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71(4):1161–1189
Holzer H (1988) Search method use by unemployed youth. J Labor Econ 6(1):1–20
Hughes G, McCormick B (1981) Do council housing policies reduce migration between regions? Econ J 91(364):919–937
Hughes G, McCormick B (1987) Housing markets, unemployment and labour market flexibility in the UK. Eur Econ Rev 31(3):615–645
Imbens G, Lynch L (2006) Re-employment probabilities over the business cycle. Port Econ J 5(2):111–134
Imbens GW (2000) The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika 87(3):706–710
Imbens GW, Rubin DB (2015) Causal inference in statistics, social and biomedical sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ioannides YM, Loury LD (2004) Job information networks, neighborhood effects, and inequality. J Econ Lit 42(4):1056–1093
Jimeno JF, Bentolila S (1998) Regional unemployment persistence (Spain, 1976-1994). Labour Econ 5(1):25–51
Kramarz F, Nordström Skans O (2014) When strong ties are strong: Networks and youth labour market entry. Rev Econ Stud 81(3):1164–1200
Kroft K, Lange F, Notowidigdo MJ (2013) Duration dependence and labor market conditions: Evidence from a field experiment. Q J Econ 128(3):1123–1167
Lancaster T (1990) The econometric analysis of transition data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Laschever R (2009) The doughboys network: Social interactions and the employment of World War I veterans, university of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, unpublished manuscript
Lechner M (2001) Identification and estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption. In: Econometric evaluation of labour market policies, Springer, pp 43–58
Lechner M (2002) Program heterogeneity and propensity score matching: An application to the evaluation of active labor market policies. Rev Econ Stat 84 (2):205–220
Lechner M (2008) A note on the common support problem in applied evaluation studies. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 91(/92):217–235
Ljungqvist L, Sargent TJ (1998) The European unemployment dilemma. J Polit Econ 106(3):514–550
Longhi S, Taylor M (2011) Explaining differences in job search outcomes between employed and unemployed job seekers. IZA Discussion Paper, 5860
Lopez MJ, Gutman R (2017) Estimation of causal effects with multiple treatments: A review and new ideas. Stat Sci 32(3):432–454
Loury LD (2006) Some contacts are more equal than others: Informal networks, job tenure, and wages. J Labor Econ 24(2):299–318
Machin S, Manning A (1999) The causes and consequences of long-term unemployment in Europe. In: Ashenfelter OC, Card D (eds) Handbook of labour economics, vol 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3085–3139
Manning A (2009) You can’t always get what you want: The impact of the Jobseeker’s Allowance. Labour Econ 16(3):239–250
Manning A, Petrongolo B (2017) How local are labor markets? Evidence from a spatial job search model. Am Econ Rev 107(10):2877–2907
McCaffrey DF, Griffin BA, Almirall D, Slaughter ME, Ramchand R, Burgette LF (2013) A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models. Stat Med 32(19):3388–3414
McCulloch A (2003) Local labour markets and individual transitions into and out of poverty: evidence from the british household panel study waves 1 to 8. Environ Plan A 35(105):551–568
McGee AD (2015) How the perception of control influences unemployed job search. Int Labor Relation Rev 68(1):184–211
Monchuk DC, Kilkenny M, Phimister E (2014) Rural homeownership and labour mobility in the United States. Reg Stud 48(2):350–362
Morescalchi A (2016) The puzzle of job search and housing tenure. A reconciliation of theory and empirical evidence. J Reg Sci 56(2):288–312
Munch JR, Rosholm M, Svarer M (2006) Are home owners really more unemployed? Econ J 116(514):991–1013
Nickell S, Layard R (1999) Labor market institutions and economic performance. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3. Elsevier, pp 3029–3084
Osberg L (1993) Fishing in different pools: Job-search strategies and job-finding success in Canada in the early 1980s. J Labor Econ 11(2):348–386
Oswald AJ (1996) A conjecture on the explanation for high unemployment in the industrialized nations: Part 1, Working paper, University of Warwick
Oswald AJ (1997) Thoughts on NAIRU. J Econ Perspect 11(1):227–228
Oswald AJ (1999) The housing market and Europe’s unemployment: A non-technical paper. Working paper, University of Warwick
Partridge M, Rickman D (1997) The dispersion of US state unemployment rates: The role of market and non-market equilibrium factors. Reg Stud 31(6):593–606
Pellizzari M (2010) Do friends and relatives really help in getting a good job? Ind Labor Relations Rev 63(3):494–510
Petrongolo B (2009) The long-term effects of job search requirements: Evidence from the UK JSA Reform. J Public Econ 93(11–12):1234–1253
Plug E, van der Klaauw B, Ziegler L (2018) Do parental networks pay off? Linking children’s labor-market outcomes to their parents’ friends. Scand J Econ 120(1):268–295
Puhani PA (2001) Labour mobility: An adjustment mechanism in Euroland? empirical evidence for Western Germany, France and Italy. German Econ Rev 2(2):127–140
Robins JM, Hernán MA, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11(5):550–560
Rosenbaum P, Rubin D (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–50
Rosenbaum P, Rubin D (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat 39(1):33–38
Rouwendal J, Nijkamp P (2010) Homeownership and labour market behaviour: Interpreting the evidence. Environ Plan A 42(2):419–433
Rubin D B (2001) Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2(3–4):169–188
Sansale R, DeLoach SB, Kurt M (2019) Unemployment duration and the personalities of young adults workers. J Behav Experimen Econ 79:1–11
Schmitt J, Wadsworth J (1993) Unemployment benefit levels and search activity. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 55(1):1–24
Schmutte IM (2015) Job referral networks and the determination of earnings in local labor markets. J Labor Econ 33(1):1–32
Shimer R, Werning I (1998) Liquidity and insurance for the unemployed. Am Econ Rev 98(5):1922–1942
Siddique AA, Schnitzer ME, Bahamyirou A, Wang G, Holtz TH, Migliori GB, Sotgiu G, Gandhi NR, Vargas MH, Menzies D et al (2019) Causal inference with multiple concurrent medications: A comparison of methods and an application in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Stat Methods Med Res 28(12):3534–3549
Topa G (2001) Social interactions, local spillovers and unemployment. Rev Econ Stud 68(2):261–295
Topa G (2011) Labor markets and referrals. In: Benhabib J, Bisin A, Jackson MO (eds) Handbook of social economics, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1193–1221
Topa G (2019) Social and spatial networks in labour markets. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 35(4):722–745
Upward R (1999) Constructing data on unemployment spells from the PSID and the BHPS. Tech. rep. Centre for Research on Globalisation and Labour Markets. School of Economic Studies, Nottingham
Uysal SD, Pohlmeier W (2011) Unemployment duration and personality. J Econ Psychol 32(6):980–992
Van den Berg G, van der Klaauw B (2006) Counseling and monitoring of unemployed workers: Theory and evidence from a controlled social experiment. Int Econ Rev 47(3):895–936
Van den Berg GJ, Gorter C (1997) Job search and commuting time. J Business Econ Stat 15(2):269–281
Van den Berg GJ, Van Ours IC (1996) Unemployment dynamics and duration dependence. J Labor Econ 14(1):100–125
Van Vuuren A (2009) A the impact of homeownership on unemployment in The Netherlands. In: Van Ewijk C, Van Leuvensteijn M (eds) Homeownership and the labour market in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Viinikainen J, Kokko K (2012) Personality traits and unemployment: Evidence from longitudinal data. J Econ Psychol 33(6):1204–1222
Weber A, Mahringer H (2008) Choice and success of job search methods. Empir Econ 35(1):153–178
Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgments
I gratefully acknowledge the UK Data Service and the Department for Work and Pensions for access and support to data. I thank Euan Phimister and Ada Ma for sharing their code on the creation of the duration data set. I thank also seminar participants at the 56th ERSA Congress in Vienna and at the CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. Finally, I thank David Bowie for inspiring me the title of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Description of variables
This section lists and describes the variables used in estimation.
-
Search methods dummies. DAE: applied directly to an employer. ADS: studied or replied to advertisements. EA: contacted a private employment agency or Job Centre. SOCNET: asked friends or contacts. SEMP: took steps to start own business.
-
Age. 4 age bands: 16–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–65.
-
Female. Binary variable identifying females.
-
Unemployment benefit. Binary variable identifying whether the individual has received unemployment benefit or income support as an unemployed person in the last year.
-
Highest education. Categorical variable identifying the highest educational qualifications, with the following states: No qualifications; O Levels or equivalent; A Levels of equivalent; nursing and other qualifications; first degree or above (including teaching).
-
Marital status. Binary variable identifying married people (or living as a couple).
-
Children 0–15 years. Binary variable indicating whether the individual has own children under age of 16 in the household.
-
Housing tenure. Categorical variable identifying the following categories: homeowners; social renters; private renters.
-
Last wage. Monthly net wage earned in the last job. Expressed in 2008 real GBP. Missing cases were imputed by estimating a wage equation with the count of search methods and unemployment duration in addition to covariates used in the analysis.
-
Reservation wage. Self-reported amount in response to the following question: “What is the lowest weekly take-home pay you would consider accepting for a job?” Normalized to monthly value and expressed in 2008 real GBP. Missing cases were imputed similarly to last wage.
-
Employment growth. Growth rate (%) in employment at the Local Authority District level. This information was not available for LADs of Northern Ireland for the period under investigation, hence the national value was used. The series is drawn from Nomis, Office for National Statistics (ONS), UK (www.nomisweb.co.uk).
-
Last job occupation. Defined by the 1990 Standard Occupational Classification (SOC), with the following possible categories: managers and administrators; professional, associate professional and technical occupations; clerical and secretarial occupations; craft and related occupations; personal and protective service occupations; sales occupations; plant and machine operatives; other occupation; no previous job.
-
Last job industry sector. Industrial sectors are defined using the 1992 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC). SIC 1992 is divided in the following sectors: (A) Agriculture, Hunting and Forestry; (B) Fishing; (C) Mining and Quarrying; (D) Manufacturing; (E) Electricity, Gas and Water Supply; (F) Construction; (G) Wholesale and Retail Trade: Repair of Motor Vehicles, Motorcycles and Personal Household Goods; (H) Hotels and Restaurants; (I) Transport, Storage and Communication; (J) Financial Intermediation; (K) Real Estate, Renting and Business Activities; (L) Public Administration and Defence: Compulsory Social Security; (M) Education; (N) Health and Social Work; (O) Other Community, Social and Personal Service Activities; (P) Private Households with Employed Persons; (Q) Extra-Territorial Organisations and Bodies. For the present analysis, the following categories have been aggregated into a residual category called “Others”, due to their limited representation: (A), (B), (C), (E), (J), (L), (P) and (Q). For waves before the 12th, industry sector is recorded with the 1980 classification, therefore codes have been converted to the 1992 classification using Jennifer Smith’s one-to-one mapping. The table is downloadable at https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/jcsmith/sicmapping/resources/direct/.
-
Region dummies. Defined as follows: Yorkshire and Humberside, and North East; North-West; Midlands; East Anglia; South East; South West; Wales; Scotland; Northern Ireland.
-
Year dummies. 1996–2008
Appendix B: Full results for treatment selection models
Appendix C: Diagnostics on PS matching procedure
Appendix D: Estimates of competing-risks unemployment duration model without matching
Appendix E: Robustness Checks
About this article
Cite this article
Morescalchi, A. A new career in a new town. Job search methods and regional mobility of unemployed workers. Port Econ J 20, 223–272 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-020-00175-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-020-00175-3