Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neo-Davidsonian ontology of events

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent Neo-Davidsonian accounts of the semantics of progressive constructions of action verbs (‘John is building a house’) reflect an ontological distinction between processes or incomplete events on the one hand, and complete events on the other. This paper has two goals. First, it attempts to show that this putative ontological distinction is beset with problems. The second goal of this paper is to offer the beginnings of a positive proposal that seeks to show how the ontologically austere Davidsonian can account for the truth conditions of progressive constructions without the need for an enriched ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach, E. (1981). On time, tense and aspect: An essay in English metaphysics. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 62–81). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E. (1986). The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B., & Galton, A. P. (2004). A unifying semantics for time and events. Artificial Intelligence, 153, 13–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M., & Partee, B. (1972). Towards the logic of tense and aspect in English. Bloomington: IULC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H. (2005). In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bunt, H. C. (1985). Mass terms and model-theoretic semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1972). Truth and mass nouns. The Journal of Philosophy, 69(10), 236–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., McCloskey, M., & Green, B. (1981). Naive beliefs in ‘sophisticated’ subjects: Misconceptions about trajectories of objects. Cognition, 9, 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. (1998). Thematic roles and the individuation of events. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp. 35–51). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. (1998a). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. (1998b). Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp. 53–104). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. (1991). On the individuation of events. Synthese, 86, 229–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, T. (2011). The matter of events. Review of Metaphysics, 65(1), 3–39.

  • Davidson, D. ([1967] 1980). The logical form of action sentences. Reprinted in D. Davidson (1980), Essays on actions and events (pp. 105–123). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Davidson, D. ([1969] 1980). The individuation of events. Reprinted in D. Davidson (1980), Essays on actions and events (pp. 163–180). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Dowty, D. R. (1977). Toward a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English ‘imperfective’ progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 45–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. R. (1989). On the semantic content of the notion ‘Thematic Role’. In B. Partee, G. Chierchia, & R. Turner (Eds.), Properties, types and meanings (pp. 69–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Drake, S. (1975). Impetus theory reappraised. Journal of the History of Ideas, 36(1), 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of language. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, G. (2006). Attitude problems: An essay on linguistic intensionality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, A., & Mizoguchi, R. (2009). The water falls but the waterfall does not fall: New perspectives on objects, processes and events. Applied Ontology, 4(2), 71–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. T. ([1962] 1980). Reference and generality (3rd edn.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Gill, K. (1993). On the metaphysical distinction between processes and events. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 23, 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, H. A., Jr. (1965). Linguistics and English grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (1980). The logic of common nouns. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. (1983). The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semantics. The Journal of Philosophy, 80, 100–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. (2009). Tense, aspect, and indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. ([1995] 2009). Tensed thoughts. Reprinted in J. Higginbotham (2009), Tense, aspect, and indexicality (pp. 53–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Higginbotham, J. ([2004] 2009). The English progressive. Reprinted in J. Higginbotham (2009), Tense, aspect, and indexicality (pp. 126–156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Higginbotham, J. ([2006] 2009). Anaphoric tense. Reprinted in J. Higginbotham (2009), Tense, aspect, and indexicality (pp. 102–115). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hoepelman, J., & Rohrer, C. (1980). On the mass count distinction and the French imparfait and passe simple. In C. Rohrer (Ed.), Time, tense and aspect (pp. 629–645). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J. (2002). Review work: Causing actions by Paul M. Pietroski. Mind, 111(441), 159–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J. (2012). Actions and activity. Philosophical Issues, 22, 232–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, O. (1923). The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jóhannsdóttir, K. M. (2011). Aspects of the progressive in English and Icelandic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia.

  • Kautz, H. A. (1991). A formal theory of plan recognition and its implementation. In J. F. Allen, H. A. Kautz, R. N. Pelavin, & J. D. Tenenberg (Eds.), Reasoning about plans (pp. 69–126). San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (1993). Supervenience and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, F. (1992). The progressive. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, P. (1995). Plurality, conjunction, and events. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon, J. (1967). Comments on D. Davidson’s ‘The logical form of action sentences’. In N. Rescher (Ed.), The logic of decision and actions (pp. 96–103). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, J. (1980). The particularisation of attributes. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 58(2), 102–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, L. B. (1986). Events: A metaphysical study. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. J. (1998). The possibility of metaphysics: Substance, identity, and time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, C. (2005). Varieties of things: Foundations of contemporary metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Maienborn, C. (2007). On Davidsonian and Kimian States. In I. Comorovski & K. von Heusinger (Eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax (pp. 107–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, E. (2006). Events, sortals, and the mind-body problem. Synthese, 150, 99–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, E. (2009). Why there are no token states. Journal of Philosophical Research, 34, 215–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M. (1983a). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 248(4), 122–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M. (1983b). Naïve theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Green, B. (1980). Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion of objects. Science, 210, 1139–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, F. (2004). Properties and kinds of tropes: New linguistic facts and old philosophical insights. Mind, 123(1), 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, F. (2012). On the distinction between abstract states, concerete states, and tropes. In A. Mari, C. Beyssade, & F. Del Prete (Eds.), Genericity (pp. 293–311). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Mourelatos, A. (1978). Events, processes, and states. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2, 415–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1985). Underlying events in the logical analysis of English. In E. LePore & B. P. McLaughlin (Eds.), Actions and events: Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 235–267). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. ([1970] 1979). An analysis of mass terms and amount terms. Reprinted in F. J. Pelletier (Ed.) Mass terms: Some philosophical problems (pp. 137–166). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

  • Pelletier, F. J. ([1975] 1979). Non-singular reference: Some preliminaries. Reprinted in F. J. Pelletier (Ed.) Mass terms: Some philosophical problems (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

  • Pelletier, F. J., & Schubert, L. K. (2003). Mass expressions. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic (2nd ed., Vol. 10, pp. 249–336). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietroski, P. M. (2005). Events and semantic architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portner, P. (1998). The progressive in modal semantics. Language, 74(4), 760–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1985). Events and reification. In E. LePore & B. P. MacLaughlin (Eds.), Actions and events: Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 162–171). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Ramchand, G. C. (2007). Events in syntax: Modification and predication. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 476–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (1993). Direct reference: From language to thought. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkrantz, G. S. (1993). Haecceity: An ontological essay. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, S. (2004). Structuring events. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savellos, E. H. (1992). Criterion of identity and the individuation of natural-kind events. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52(4), 807–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savellos, E. H. (2000). When are events parts? Philosophical Papers, 29(3), 223–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, B. (1993). Plurals and events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P. (2000). Continuants and occurrents. Aristotelian Society: Supplementary, 74(1), 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. S. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, H. (1997). The ontology of mind: Events, states, and processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, H. (2013). Processes, continuants, and individuals. Mind, 122, 781–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, H. (2018). Occurrent states. In R. Stout (Ed.), Process, action, and experience (pp. 102–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó, Z. G. (2004). On the progressive and the perfective. Noûs, 38(1), 29–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó, Z. G. (2008). Things in progress. Philosophical Perspectives, 22, 499–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. ([1977] 1985). Tense and continuity. Reprinted in B. Taylor, Modes of occurrence: Verbs, adverbs and events (pp. 51–82). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Thomson, J. (1997). The right and the good. Journal of Philosophy, 94, 273–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, N. (1996). The individuation of events. Mind, 105(418), 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Z. ([1957] 1967). Verbs and times. Reprinted with revisions in Z. Vendler, Linguistics in philosophy (pp. 97–121). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Vlach, F. (1981). The semantics of the progressive. In P. J. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Tense and aspect (Vol. 14, pp. 271–292). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellwood, A., Hacquard, V., & Pancheva, R. (2012). Measuring and comparing individuals and events. Journal of Semantics, 29, 207–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, B. U. (n.d.). Coercion and the mass/count distinction. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Zhou, Z. (2018). What the progressive aspect tells us about processes. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01999-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucchi, A. (1997). Incomplete events, intensionality, and imperfective aspect. Natural Language Semantics, 7, 179–215.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank the anonymous reviewers of this journal for their helpful comments. I am also grateful to Mike Martin and Jennifer Hornsby.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for English Language Communication with Joint Appointment at the Dean’s Office, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, 10 Architecture Drive, Singapore, 117511, Singapore

    Ziqian Zhou

Authors
  1. Ziqian Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ziqian Zhou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Z. Neo-Davidsonian ontology of events. Linguist and Philos 44, 195–235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-019-09292-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-019-09292-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation