Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding How the Perceived Usefulness of Mobile Technology Impacts Physics Learning Achievement: a Pedagogical Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated how students’ and teachers’ pedagogical roles in mobile learning moderated the relationship between high school students’ perceived usefulness of mobile technology and the actual use frequency, as well as how students’ perceived usefulness impacted their physics learning achievement. We examined 803 high school freshmen who used 20 specific functions of tablets in physics learning for five months. Based on pedagogical roles students and teachers played, 15 of the 20 functions were classified into three pedagogical categories: five for student-led, five for teacher-led, and five for collaborative functions (Journal of Science Education and Technology; Zhai, Li, & Chen, 28: 310–320, 2019). Results indicate that students perceived the collaborative functions as the most useful ones compared to student- and teacher-led functions. Also, the use frequency of mobile functions was highly aligned with students’ perceived usefulness by pedagogical category, and the pedagogical category was found to moderate the association between the perceived usefulness and the actual use frequency. That is, the relationship between the perceived usefulness and the use frequency varied significantly across the three pedagogical categories. We also found the use frequency mediated the relationship between perceived usefulness and physics learning achievement particularly for the collaborative functions. The male and female students tended to have different perceptional accountability of mobile technology for their physics learning achievement. Specifically, male students’ perception of collaborative functions positively predicted their physics learning achievement, while female students’ perception of student-led functions positively predicted their physics learning achievement. Both male and female students’ perception of teacher-led functions negatively predicted their physics learning achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly, 227-247.

  • Ainsa, T. (2013). Early childhood pre-service teachers’ response to mobile technology: creative projects, analysis, and reflection on learning experiences. Education, 134(2), 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Balushi, S. M., Al-Musawi, A. S., Ambusaidi, A. K., & Al-Hajri, F. H. (2017). The effectiveness of interacting with scientific animations in chemistry using mobile devices on grade 12 students’ spatial ability and scientific reasoning skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alqahtani, M., & Mohammad, H. (2015). Mobile applications’ impact on student performance and satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(4), 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister, S. (2010). Integrating the iPod Touch in K–12 education: visions and vices. Computers in the Schools, 27(2), 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernacki, M. L., Byrnes, J. P., & Cromley, J. G. (2012). The effects of achievement goals and self-regulated learning behaviors on reading comprehension in technology-enhanced learning environments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(2), 148–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-C., Yan, C.-F., & Tseng, J.-S. (2012). Perceived convenience in an extended technology acceptance model: mobile technology and English learning for college students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 592–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. Y., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). Students’ context-specific epistemic justifications, prior knowledge, engagement, and socioscientific reasoning in a mobile augmented reality learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 399–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G.-D., Chang, C.-K., & Wang, C.-Y. (2008). Ubiquitous learning website: scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques. Computers in Education, 50(1), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. C., Block, L., & Jesness, R. (2012). A case study of mobile learning pilot project in K-12 schools. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 5(2), 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K. H., & Gräbe, C. (2016). The use of mobile learning in science: a systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., ... & Münkemüller, T. (2013). Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27-46.

  • Escobar-Rodriguez, T., & Monge-Lozano, P. (2012). The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Computers in Education, 58(4), 1085–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falloon, G. (2017). Mobile devices and apps as scaffolds to science learning in the primary classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(6), 613–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. The American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashim, A. S., Ahmad, W. F. W., & Ahmad, R. (2011). Mobile learning course content application as a revision tool: the effectiveness and usability. Paper presented at the 2011 International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligence Robotics.

  • Hassanein, K., Head, M., & Wang, F. (2010). Understanding student satisfaction in a mobile learning environment: the role of internal and external facilitators. Paper presented at the 2010 Ninth International Conference on Mobile Business and 2010 Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable (ICMB-GMR).

  • Hochberg, K., Kuhn, J., & Müller, A. (2018). Using smartphones as experimental tools—effects on interest, curiosity, and learning in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 385–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, K., Becker, S., Louis, M., Klein, P., & Kuhn, J. (2020). Using smartphones as experimental tools—a follow-up: cognitive effects by video analysis and reduction of cognitive load by multiple representations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-15.

  • Hox, J. J., & Bechger, T. M. (1998). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Family Science Review, 11, 354–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. J., Yang, T. C., Tsai, C. C., & Yang, S. J. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex science experiments. Computers in Education, 53(2), 402–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: the teachers’ perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 525–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, T., Pirim, T., Boswell, K., Reithel, B., & Barkhi, R. (2006). Determining the intention to use biometric devices: an application and extension of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 18(3), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, R., Iacovides, J., Owen, M., Gavin, C., Clibbery, S., Darling, J., & Drew, B. (2011). Digital games, gender and learning in engineering: do females benefit as much as males? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 178–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information Management, 35(4), 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. (2018). Mediation. Retrieved on December 25, 2019 from http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm#IE.

  • Kim, S., & Garrison, G. (2009). Investigating mobile wireless technology adoption: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Frontiers, 11(3), 323–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Meldrum, J., & Vallett, D. (2012). Measuring science interest: Rasch validation of the science interest survey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 643–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, I.-F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C.-H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers in Education, 54(2), 600–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C.-Y., Wu, C.-J., Wong, W.-K., Lien, Y.-W., & Chao, T.-K. (2017). Scientific modeling with mobile devices in high school physics labs. Computers in Education, 105, 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). 1:1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: a study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). Integrating mediators and moderators in research design. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(6), 675–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, L. L., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2004). A model of business school students’ acceptance of a web-based course management system. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(1), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oprea, M., & Miron, C. (2014). Mobile phones in the modern teaching of physics. Romanian Reports in Physics, 66(4), 1236–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-MeléNdez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers in Education, 63, 306–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purba, S. W. D., & Hwang, W. Y. (2017). Investigation of learning behaviors and achievement of vocational high school students using an ubiquitous physics tablet PC app. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reychav, I., & McHaney, R. (2017). The relationship between gender and mobile technology use in collaborative learning settings: an empirical investigation. Computers in Education, 113, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros, S., Hernández, R., Caminero, A., Robles, A., Barbero, I., Maciá, A., & Holgado, F. P. (2015). On the use of extended TAM to assess students' acceptance and intent to use third-generation learning management systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1250–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossing, J. P., Miller, W. M., Cecil, A. K., & Stamper, S. E. (2012). iLearning: the future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. Journal of the Scholarship of Teachign and Learning, 12(2), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, I. M., Bocheco, O., & Habak, C. (2018). A survey of student and instructor perceptions of personal mobile technology usage and policies for the classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 617–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scornavacca, E., Huff, S., & Marshall, S. J. C. o. t. A. (2009). Mobile phones in the classroom: if you can’t beat them, join them. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sha, L., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., Seow, P., & Wong, L. H. (2012). Recognizing and measuring self-regulated learning in a mobile learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 718–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L., Zhai, X. (2020). Understanding the perceived usefulness of mobile technology in physics learning: a pedagogical perspective. Paper presented to the 2020 annual conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Portland, OR. (Cancelled)

  • Shin, H.-S., Song, Y.-U., & Sung, N.-H. (2010). The impact of perception on the difference between mobile and stationary Internet toward the intention to use mobile Internet. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 15(3), 99–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonola, S. A., & Joy, M. S. (2014). Mobile learning security issues from lecturers’ perspectives (Nigerian universities case study)’. In 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 7-9).

  • Stowell, J. R. (2015). Use of clickers vs. mobile devices for classroom polling. Computers in Education, 82, 329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers in Education, 94, 252–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2015). A cross-cultural examination of the impact of social, organizational and individual factors on educational technology acceptance between B British and L Lebanese university students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 739–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D., Kennedy, D. M., Kuan, K., Kwok, R., & Lai, J. (2007). Do mobile device applications affect learning? Paper presented at the 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’07).

  • Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. L., & Hanafi, A. (2007). Gender differences in attitudes towards information technology among Malaysian student teachers: a case study at Universiti Putra Malaysia. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 158–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, X., & Li, M. (2018). Does higher extent of mobile-technology-integrated physics learning indicate greater effects? Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.

  • Zhai, X., Zhang, M., & Li, M. (2018). One-to-one mobile technology in high school physics learning: understanding its use and outcome. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 516–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, X., Li, M., & Chen, S. (2019). Examining the uses of student-led, teacher-led, and collaborative functions of mobile technology and their impacts on physics achievement and interest. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(4), 310–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, X., Zhang, M., Li, M., & Zhang, X. (2019). Understanding the relationship between levels of mobile technology use in high school physics classrooms and the learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 750–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: review of research. Computers in Education, 94, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics and Science Education, University of Georgia, 115J Aderhold Hall, 110 Carlton St., Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Xiaoming Zhai

  2. Department of Career and Information Studies, University of Georgia, 850 College Station Road, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Lehong Shi

Authors
  1. Xiaoming Zhai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lehong Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoming Zhai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhai, X., Shi, L. Understanding How the Perceived Usefulness of Mobile Technology Impacts Physics Learning Achievement: a Pedagogical Perspective. J Sci Educ Technol 29, 743–757 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09852-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09852-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation