Skip to main content
Log in

The dimensions of prospective elementary and middle school teachers’ problem posing for integer addition and subtraction

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elementary and middle school prospective teachers participated in semi-structured problem posing for integer addition and subtraction. The prospective teachers (n = 98) posed a variety of different stories, but this paper focuses on the temperature stories they posed. Results include descriptions of their posed temperature stories through the lens of the various dimensions (i.e., problem types, realism, consistency, correctness). Prospective teachers posed mainly state-translation-state problem types and rarely posed state-state-distance, state-state-translation, or translation-translation-translation problem types. They often changed the structure of their number sentences. Although they posed mostly realistic and mathematically correct temperature stories, the stories compromised realism or consistency in order to use state-translation-state problem types. Coordinating of the various dimensions (e.g., problem types, consistency) when problem posing requires flexibility with problem types. This work highlights the complexity of posing temperature stories, and coordinating the various dimensions highlights the need for prospective teachers to experience problem posing. Implications for problem posing with integers and temperature are extended to all contexts that inherently support translation and relativity. In the discussion, we coordinate the different problem types with various number sentences and dimensions. Unpacking the various dimensions illuminates prospective teachers’ thinking and offers a way of considering integers and contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We gave 16 − 4 = □ to all PTs as well. PT 91 did not pose a temperature story for this number sentence, but posed temperature stories for all of the remaining number sentences that had negative integers.

References

  • Almeida, R., & Bruno, A. (2014). Strategies of pre-service primary school teachers for solving addition problems with negative numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 719–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altiparmak, K., & Özdoğan, E. (2010). A study on the teaching of the concept of negative numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(1), 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aqazade, M., Bofferding, L., & Farmer, S. (2017). Learning integer addition: Is later better? North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education 39th conference proceedings.

  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In G. Martin (Ed.).

  • Research compendium for the principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27–44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? (pp. 14–46). New Jersey: American Educator, Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of teacher education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, R. (2010). Behind and below zero: sixth grade students use linear graphs to explore negative numbers. In P. Brosnan, D. B. Erchick, & L. Flevares (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (vol. 4, pp. 219–226). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.

  • Bell, A. (1984). Short and long term learning experiments in diagnostic teaching design. In B. Southwell (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th conference of the international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 55–62). Sydney, Australia: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

  • Bishop, J. P., Lamb, L. L., Philipp, R. A., Whitacre, I., & Schappelle, B. P. (2014a). Using order to reason about negative integers: the case of Violet. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86, 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9519-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. P., Lamb, L. L., Philipp, R. A., Whitacre, I., Schappelle, B. P., & Lewis, M. L. (2014b). Obstacles and affordances for integer reasoning: An analysis of children’s thinking and the history of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 19–61. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. P., Lamb, L. L., Philipp, R. A., Whitacre, I., & Schappelle, B. P. (2016). Leveraging structure: logical necessity in the context of integer arithmetic. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(3), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2016.1183091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bofferding, L. (2010). Addition and subtraction with negatives: acknowledging the multiple meanings of the minus sign. In P. Brosnan, D. Erchick, & L. Flevares (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 703–710). Columbus, OH.

  • Bofferding, L. (2014). Negative integer understanding: characterizing first graders’ mental models. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(2), 194–245. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.2.0194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bofferding, L. (2018). Playing with prerequisite knowledge: Making sense of integer concepts. In L. Bofferding & N. M. Wessman-Enzinger (Eds.), Exploring the integer addition and subtraction landscape: perspectives on integer thinking. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bofferding, L., & Farmer, S. (2019). Most and least: differences in integer comparisons based on temperature comparison language. International Journal of Science and Math Education, 17(3), 545–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bofferding, L. & Richardson, S. E. (2013). Investigating integer addition and subtraction: a task analysis. In M. Martinez & A. Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 111–118). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.

  • Bofferding, L., & Wessman-Enzinger, N. M. (2017). Subtraction involving negative numbers: Connecting to whole number reasoning. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 14, 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2015). Problem-posing in mathematics education: some answered and unanswered questions. In F. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: from research to effective practice (pp. 3–35). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Hiebert, J., & Moser, J. (1981). Problem structure and first-grade children’s initial solution processes for simple addition and subtraction problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (2015). Children’s mathematics: cognitively guided instruction (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. M. (2001). Using metaphors to understand and solve arithmetic problems: Novices and experts working with negative numbers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 3(2–3), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2001.9679970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrysostomou, M., & Mousoulides, N. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge of negative numbers. In M. Pinto & T. Kawakaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (vol. 2, pp. 265–272). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME.

  • Cobb, P. & Yackel, E. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 458–477.

  • Davis, B., & Renert, M. (2014). The math teachers know: profound understanding of emergent mathematics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (1997). The development of fifth-grade children’s problem-posing abilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 183–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (1998). Children’s problem posing within formal and informal contexts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, H. (2000). “-Pat + Pat = 0”: Intellectual play in elementary mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(2), 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, A. (2002). The extension of the natural-number domain to the integers in the transitions from arithmetic to algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 171–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. (2008). Unpacking “pedagogical content knowledge”: conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janvier, C. (1985). Comparison of models aimed at teaching. In L. Streefland (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th conference of the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 135–140). Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

  • Kilhamn, C. (2009). Making sense of negative numbers through metaphorical reasoning. In C. Bergsten, B. Grevholm, & T. Lingefjärd (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematical knowledge. Proceedings of madif6 (pp. 30–35). Linköping, Sweden: SMDF.

  • Kilhamn, C. (2018). Different differences: Metaphorical interpretations of ‘difference’ in integer addition and subtraction. In L. Bofferding & N. M. Wessman-Enzinger (Eds.), Exploring the integer addition and subtraction landscape: perspectives on integer thinking. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebeck, P. (1990). Scores and forfeits. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(3), 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, A. A. (2006). Negative math: How mathematical rules can be positively bent. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marthe, P. (1979). Additive problems and directed numbers. In D. Tall (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 317–323). Coventry, England: PME.

  • McCormick, K. K., & Essex, N. K. (2017). Capturing children’s multiplication and division stories. Teaching Children Mathematics, 24(1), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinković, J. (2015). Conceptualizing problem posing via transformation. In F. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: from research to effective practice (pp. 48–70). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, S. (1997). Story telling as sense-making: children’s ideas about negative numbers. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 5, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%2520Standards.pdf

  • Nurnberger-Haag, J. (2018). Take it away or walk the other way? Finding positive solutions for integer subtraction. In L. Bofferding & N. M. Wessman-Enzinger (Eds.), Exploring the integer addition and subtraction landscape: perspectives on integer thinking. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peled, I. (1991). Levels of knowledge about signed numbers: effects of age and ability. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th international group for the psychology of mathematics education conference (Vol. 3, pp. 145–152). Assisi, Italy: Conference Committee.

  • Peled, I., & Carraher, D. W. (2008). Signed numbers and algebraic thinking. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 303–328). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1948). To understand is to invent: the future of education. New York: The Viking Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, M. S., & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and solving problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5(1), 49–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roswell, D. W., & Norwood, K. S. (1999). Student-generated multiplication word problems. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd international conference for the psychology in mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 121–128). Haifa, Israel: Conference Committee.

  • Saxe, G. B., Diakow, R., & Gearhart, M. (2013). Towards curricular coherence in integers and fractions: a study of the efficacy of a lesson sequence that uses the number line as the principle representational context. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(3), 343–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. B., Kohn, A. S., & Resnick, L. B. (1993). Positives about negatives: a case study of an intermediate model for signed numbers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(1), 37–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0301_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silber, S., & Cai, J. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ free and structured problem posing. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 48(2), 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, M., & Akyuz, D. (2012). A proposed instructional theory for integer addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 428–464. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, M., & Akyuz, D. (2018). Teaching integers to students with disabilities: three case studies. In L. Bofferding & N. M. Wessman-Enzinger (Eds.), Exploring the integer addition and subtraction landscape: perspectives on integer thinking (pp. 75–108). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing in school mathematics. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Melbourne, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, E. S. (2012). What is the difference? Using contextualized problems. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 17(8), 472–478. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.17.8.0472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. W., & Dreyfus, T. (1988). Integers as transformations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(2), 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, C. L. (2012). Additive relationships and signed quantities (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).

  • Vergnaud, G. (1982a). A classification of cognitive tasks and operations of thought involved in addition and subtraction problems. In T. Carpenter, J. Moser, & T. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: a cognitive perspective (pp. 25–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, G. (1982b). Cognitive psychology and didactics: Signified/signifier and problems of reference. In A. Vermandel (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 70–76). Antwerp, Belgium: PME.

  • Wessman-Enzinger, N. M. (2015). Developing and describing the use and learning of Conceptual Models for Integer Addition and Subtraction of grade 5 students. Normal, IL: Proquest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessman-Enzinger, N. M. (2018). Descriptions of the integer number line in United States school mathematics in the 19th century. Mathematical Association of America Convergence: Loci. https://www.maa.org/press/periodicals/convergence/descriptions-of-the-integer-number-line-in-united-statesschool-mathematics-in-the-19th-century.

  • Wessman-Enzinger, N. M. (2019a). Consistency of integer number sentences to temperature problems. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 24(5), 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessman-Enzinger, N. M. (2019b). Integers as directed quantities. In A. Norton & M. Alibali (Eds.), Constructing number (pp. 279–305). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessman-Enzinger, N. M., & Mooney, E. S. (2014). Informing Practice: Making sense of integers through story-telling. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 20(4), 202–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitacre, I., Bishop, J. P., Lamb, L. L. C., Philipp, R. A., Schappelle, B. P., & Lewis, M. (2012). Happy and sad thoughts: an exploration of children’s integer reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 356–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitacre, I., Bishop, J. P., Lamb, L. L. C., Philipp, R. A., Bagley, S., & Schappelle, B. P. (2015). ‘Negative of my money, positive of her money’: secondary students’ ways of relating equations to a debt context. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.956822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitacre, I., Schoen, R. C., Champagne, Z., & Goddard, A. (2016). Relational thinking: What’s the difference? Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(5), 303–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitacre, I., Azuz, B., Lamb, L. L. C., Bishop, J. P., Schappelle, B. P., & Philipp, R. A. (2017). Integer comparisons across the grades: students’ justifications and ways of reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole M. Wessman-Enzinger.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wessman-Enzinger, N.M., Tobias, J.M. The dimensions of prospective elementary and middle school teachers’ problem posing for integer addition and subtraction. J Math Teacher Educ 25, 1–33 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09477-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09477-x

Keywords

Navigation