Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:47:55.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Etymology of Gothic Alew

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2019

Giuseppe Pagliarulo
Giuseppe Pagliarulo*
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Torino
*
Università degli Studi di Torino, Dipartimento di Lingue e Letterature straniere e Culture Moderne, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Torino, Italy [giuseppe.pagliarulo@unito.it]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gothic alew ‘oil’ is ultimately derived from Latin oleum. Its phonological features, however, seem hardly reconcilable with those of the Latin word. This has prompted scholars to postulate that the Latin word was not borrowed directly into Gothic but rather via a third language: continental Celtic, Illyrian or Raetic. This article examines the weaknesses of these theories and proposes that the unexpected features of the Gothic item may be explained in terms of proper Gothic or Latin developments, making direct derivation of alew from oleum the most plausible and parsimonious hypothesis.

Keywords

language contactGothic etymologyGermanic-Roman tradeLatin loanwords in GothicGothic phonology
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 201 - 212
Copyright
© Society for Germanic Linguistics 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, Richard. 1973. Length and monophthongization in Gothic. Indogermanische Forschungen 78. 113–140.Google Scholar
Bennett, William H. 1959. The phonemic status of Gothic w h q. Language 35. 427–432.Google Scholar
Bennett, William H. 1967. Merger and split in the Pre-Gothic vowel system: Historic Gothic ai/aj, au/aw, iu/iw. Linguistics 5. 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavenaile, Robert. 1956–1958. Corpus papyrorum Latinarum, vols. 1–4. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Cercignani, Fausto. 1979. The development of the Gothic short/lax subsystem. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 93. 272–278.Google Scholar
Cercignani, Fausto. 1984. The enfants terribles of Gothic breaking: hiri, aiþþau, etc. Journal of Indo-European Studies 12. 315–334.Google Scholar
Corazza, Vittoria. 1969. Le parole latine in gotico. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Google Scholar
Dilts, Michael R. 1977. Peripheral latinity in Albanian. Romance Philology 31. 283–298.Google Scholar
eDIL [Electronic Dictionary of the Irish Language]. Available at http://edil.qub.ac.uk/, accessed on April 17, 2018.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred, & Meillet, Alfred. 2001. Dictionnaire Etymologique de la langue latine. 4th revised edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Eska, Joseph F. 1990. Another look at Gaul. celicno- and Goth. kelikn. NOWELE 16. 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falluomini, Carla. 2017. Zum gotischen Fragment aus Bologna II: Berichtigungen und neue Lesungen. Zeitschrift für Deutsches Altertum und Deutsche Literatur 146. 284–294.Google Scholar
Green, Dennis H. 1998. Language and history in the early Germanic world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haarmann, Harald. 1970. Der lateinische Lehnwortschatz im Kymrischen. Bonn: Romanisches Seminar der Universität.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 1958. Gothic ai and au again. Language 34. 359–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth H. 1953. Language and history in Early Britain. Edinburgh: University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Valentin. 1934. Die gemeinslavischen Lehnwörter aus dem Germanischen. Helsinki: Druckerei der Finnischen Literaturgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1975. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 21st edn. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krahe, Hans. 1940. Der Anteil der Illyrier an der Indogermanisierung Europas. Die Welt als Geschichte 6. 54–73.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, Paul. 1948. Die frühesten sprachlichen Spuren von Germanen. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 69. 1–25.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1986. A Gothic etymological dictionary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Marchand, James W. 1955. Vowel length in Gothic. General Linguistics 1. 79–88.Google Scholar
Marchand, James W. 1957. Germanic short *i and *e: Two phonemes in one? Language 33. 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, James W. 1973. The sounds and phonemes of Wulfila’s Gothic. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, Gail K. 1946. Hiatus and vocalic quality in classical and vulgar Latin. Classical Philology 41. 226–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, Gail K. 1948. The development of Latin hiatus groups in the Romance languages. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 63. 765–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossé, Ferdinand. 1956. Manuel de la langue gotique. Paris: Aubier-Montagne.Google Scholar
Motta, Filippo. 2001. La sala del convivio dei fabbri gallici. Studi e ricerche di terminologia alimentaria, ed. by Consani, Carlo, 21–26. Alessandria: Dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1948. The phonemes of Gothic. Language 24. 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1987. On vowel length in Gothic. Festschrift for Henry Hoenigswald on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, ed. by Cardona, George, Zide, Norman H., & Hoenigswald, Henry M., 281–291. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Much, Rudolf. 1893. Die Südmark der Germanen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 17. 1–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisani, Vittore. 1964. Le lingue dell’Italia antica oltre il latino. 3rd edn. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Polomé, Edgar C. 1981. Lexical data and cultural contacts: A critique of the study of prehistoric isoglosses and borrowings. Logos semantikos: Studia linguistica in honorem Eugenio Coseriu, vol. 3, ed. by Dietrich, Wolf & Geckeler, Horst, 505–513. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Polomé, Edgar C. 1985a. Two etymological notes. Sprachwissenschaftliche Forschungen: Festschrift für Johann Knobloch, ed. by Ölberg, Hermann M., Schmidt, Gernot, & Bothien, Heinz, 309–323. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Ges. zur Pflege d. Geisteswiss.Google Scholar
Polomé, Edgar C. 1985b. Methodological approaches to the ethno- and glottogenesis of the Germanic people. Entstehung von Sprachen und Völkern: Glotto- und ethnogenetische Aspekte europäischer Sprachen. Akten des 6. Symposions über Sprachkontakt in Europa, Mannheim 1984, ed. by Ureland, Per Sture, 45–70. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don. 2006. A history of English, vol. 1: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Paul. 2013. From compound to derivative: The development of a patronymic ‘suffix’ in Gaulish. Continental Celtic word formation: The onomastic data, ed. by García Alonso, Juan Luis, 201–214. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Snædal, Magnus H. 2013. Gothic letter and phoneme statistics. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 130. 277–295.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. 1895. Gotisch alew. Indogermanische Forschungen 5. 344–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stender-Petersen, Adolf. 1927. Slavisch-germanische Lehnwortkunde. Göteborg: Elanders.Google Scholar
Streitberg, Wilhelm, Michels, Victor, & Jellinek, Max H.. 1936. Die Erforschung der indogermanischen Sprachen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1989. An den Quellen des lateinischen Wortschatzes. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.Google Scholar
Untermann, Jürgen. 1955. Über die historischen Voraussetzungen für die Entlehnung von got. alew. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 76. 390–399.Google Scholar
Väänänen, Veikko. 1981. Introduction au latin vulgaire. 4th edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1971. The phonology of Gothic vowels. Language 47. 90–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Herwig. 1979. Geschichte der Goten: Von den Anfängen bis zur Mitte des sechsten Jahrhunderts: Entwurf einer historischen Ethnographie. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1910. Grammar of the Gothic language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Zupitza, Ernst. 1897. Noch einmal gotisch alēw. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 22. 574–575.Google Scholar