Abstract
This study explores the relationship between factors related to the implementation of school reform in technology and variables related to students’ acceptance of technology, in particular, of tablets. In order to do this, 2659 students in 208 schools were surveyed using an instrument developed according to the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Additionally, the school reform process was assessed using the UNESCO matrix of school reform in technology. From this data, a multilevel mixed model was tested. Results showed that management and planning had positive effects on use intention and performance expectancy. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) in curricular design had negative effects on the same variables. Teachers’ professional development had no effects in any of the analyses. Infrastructure had negative effects on use intention and social influence, and positive effects on students’ self-efficacy. This study shows using robust quantitative methods and a large sample size that school reform in ICTs is a complex process that cannot be reduced to the provision of infrastructure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blikstad-Balas, M., & Davies, C. (2017). Assessing the educational value of one-to-one devices: Have we been asking the right questions? Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 311–331.
Borba, B. M. R., & Marin, A. H. (2017). Impacts of emotional problems and behavior indicators on performance at school. Revista Colombiana de Psicologia, 26(2), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n2.59813.
Cacciamani, S., Villani, D., Bonanomi, A., Carissoli, C., Olivari, M. G., Morganti, L., et al. (2018). Factors affecting students’ acceptance of tablet PCs: A study in italian high schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(2), 120–133.
Castañeda, M. F., & Corredor, J. (2016). Las nuevas tecnologías y el sujeto docente: incidencia de las relaciones con las nuevas tecnologías en docentes colombianos y en sus prácticas. In Ochoa, L. (Ed.), Investigación e innovación educativas: docentes (pp. 141–174). Bogotá: Editorial Universidad de Colombia.
Castellanos, V., Latorre, D., Mateus, S., & Navarro, C. (2017). Explanatory model of academic performance from self-efficacy and behavior problems. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 26(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n1.56221.
Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 320–334.
Corredor, J., & Gaydos, M. (2014). Language games: How gaming communities shape second-language literacy. In H. Gerber, S. Abrams, & M. Burgess (Eds.), Bridging literacies with videogames (pp. 103–128). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
Corredor, J., Gaydos, M., & Squire, K. (2014). Seeing change in time: Video games to teach about temporal change in scientific phenomena. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9466-4.
Corredor, J., & Rojas, L. (2016). Narrative and conceptual expertise in massively multiplayer online role playing games. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 8, 44–67. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGCMS.2016010104.
Courtois, C., Montrieux, H., De Grove, F., Raes, A., De Marez, L., & Schellens, T. (2014). Student acceptance of tablet devices in secondary education: A three-wave longitudinal cross-lagged case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 278–286.
Dexter, S. (2011). School technology leadership: Artifacts in systems of practice. Journal of School Leadership, 21(2), 166–189.
Dündar, H., & Akçayır, M. (2014). Implementing tablet PCs in schools: Students’ attitudes and opinions. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 40–46.
Egeberg, G., Thorvaldsen, S., & Ronning, J. A. (2016). The impact of cyberbullying and cyber harassment on academic achievement. In E. Elstad (Ed.), Digital expectations and experiences in education (pp. 183–204). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
El-Gayar, O., Moran, M., & Hawkes, M. (2011). Students’ acceptance of tablet PCs and implications for educational institutions. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 58–70.
Elstad, E. (2016a). Digital expectations and experiences in education. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
Elstad, E. (2016b). Educational technology-expectations and experiences. In E. Elstad (Ed.), Digital expectations and experiences in education (pp. 3–28). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
Elstad, E. (2016c). Why is there a wedge between the promise of educational technology and the experiences in a technology-rich pioneer school. In E. Elstad (Ed.), Digital expectations and experiences in education (pp. 3–28). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551.
Gálvez-Nieto, J. L., Vera-Bachmann, D., Trizano-Hermosilla, I., Polanco, K., & Salvo, S. (2018). Psychometric properties of the reduced version of the positive adolescent development value scale (EVDPA-R) in Chilean students. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 27, 69–84. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v27n2.65500.
Gouveia, V. V., de Moura, H. M., de Oliveira, S. L. C., do Nascimento, A. M., de Oliveira, G. I., & Gouveia, R. S. V. (2018). Cheating admission self report scale: Evidence of factorial validity and precision. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 27, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v27n1.64467.
Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16, 21–46.
Haack, K. R., & Falcke, D. (2017). Rel@tions.com: Differentiating internet mediated and non-mediated love relationships. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 26, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n1.53241.
Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139–156.
Hauge, T. E. (2016). On the life of ICT and school leadership in a large-scale reform movement. In E. Elstad (Ed.), Digital expectations and experiences in education (pp. 3–28). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51, 1499–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001.
Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2016). Students’ acceptance of tablet PCs in the classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1215172.
Lugo, M. T., & Kelly, V. (2011). La matriz TIC. In Lugo, M. T. (Ed.), Una herramienta para planificar las Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación en las instituciones educativas. Buenos Aires: UNESCO, Instituto Internacional de Planteamiento de la Educación.
Mallmann, C. L., Lisboa, C. S. M., & Calza, T. Z. (2017). Cyberbullying and early maladaptive schema in Brazilian adolescents. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 26(2), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n2.60631.
Meelissen, M. R. M., & Drent, M. (2008). Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 969–985.
Moran, M., Hawkes, M., & Gayar, O. E. (2010). Tablet personal computer integration in higher education: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use technology model to understand supporting factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(1), 79–101.
Nguyen, L., Barton, S. M., & Nguyen, L. T. (2015). iPads in higher education—Hype and hope. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12137.
Nunes, F., & Mota, C. P. (2018). Parenting styles and dimensions questionnaire—Adaption of the observer reporting version to the Portuguese population. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 27, 117–131. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v27n1.64621.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education?. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Thomas, T. D., Singh, L., Gaffar, K., Thakur, D., Jackman, G. A., Thomas, M., et al. (2014). Measurement invariance of the UTAUT constructs in the Caribbean. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 10, 102–127.
Tikkanen, T. (2016). A small step strategy to boost integration of digital technology in learning and teaching at an upper-secondary school. In E. Elstad (Ed.), Digital expectations and experiences in education (pp. 3–28). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36, 157–178.
Villani, D., Morganti, L., Carissoli, C., Gatti, E., Bonanomi, A., Cacciamani, S., et al. (2018). Students’ acceptance of tablet PCs in Italian high schools: Profiles and differences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12591.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corredor, J., Olarte, F.A. Effects of school reform factors on students’ acceptance of technology. J Educ Change 20, 447–468 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09350-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09350-6