Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Defining spaces: resource centres, collaboration, and inclusion in Kazakhstan

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recognition and implementation of best practice collaborative partnerships are fundamental to developing inclusive schools and achieving positive outcomes. This is particularly important for those students requiring additional educational supports. In order to develop an individual approach to learning, and implement the necessary adjustments required to assist a student with specific needs, input from parents and other key stakeholders is considered important (Evans, in: Ashman (ed) Education for inclusion and diversity, Pearson, Melbourne, 2015). Azzopardi (Int J Incl Educ 15(1):179–192, 2011) argues that inclusion needs to be viewed as a process that encompasses the culture, policies and practices of a whole school and wider community. Even with the positive intentions from a range of contributors, the purpose and practice of collaborative relationships can vary significantly (Cloninger, in: Orelove, Sobsey, Gillies (eds) Educating students with severe and multiple disabilities: a collaborative approach. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore, 2017). The present study examines the collaborative experiences of key stakeholders at schools that are supported by NGO funded resource centres in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. A descriptive case study research design with a narrative framework explored the lived experiences of 22 teachers, principals, specialists and parents by highlighting the complex factors that are enabling or disabling the success of children with disabilities. The central focus for each semi-structured interview with participants was to describe and understand the current collaborative processes within newly established resource centres at three mainstream government schools in Kazakhstan. The results show how resource centres contribute to developing inclusive practices within the Kazakhstani context of current educational reforms and identify opportunities to enhance and contribute to the development of a successful model of support. The findings of this research have implications for key stakeholders concerning the immediate need for coherent and practical policy that embodies a shared vision and understanding of inclusive practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000). Student teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teacher’s attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzopardi, A. (2011). Conceptualising discursive communities: Developing community in contemporary society. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, C., Scriven, B., Durning, S., & Downes, C. (2011a). Facilitating the learning of all students: ‘Professional Positive’ of inclusive practice in Australian Primary Schools. Support for Learning, 26(2), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2011.01480.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, C., Topping, K., Jindal-Snape, D., & Norwich, B. (2011b). The importance of peer support for teaching staff when including children with special educational needs. School Psychology International, 33(2), 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. J. (2017). Designing collaborative education services. In F. P. Orelove, D. Sobsey, & D. L. Gillies (Eds.), Educating students with severe and multiple disabilities: A collaborative approach (5th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dartington, T., Miller, E. J., & Gwynne, G. V. (1981). A life together: The distribution of attitudes around the disabled. London, UK: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekeza-Tsomo, N. G. (2012). Factors contributing to the dropout rate of learners at selected high schools in King William’s Town (Doctoral dissertation).

  • Duke, J., Pillay, H., Tones, M., Nickerson, J., Carrington, S., & Ioelu, A. (2016). A case for rethinking inclusive education policy in developing countries. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(6), 906–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Bureau. (2011). Information sheet: Special education. Hong Kong: Author. Retrieved April 22, 2020 from https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/edusystem/special/resources/serc/index.html.

  • Evans, D. (2015). Fundamentals. In A. Ashman (Ed.), Education for inclusion and diversity (5th ed.). Melbourne, VIC: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fimyar, O., & Kurakbayev, K. (2016). ‘Soviet’ in teachers’ memories and professional beliefs in Kazakhstan: Points for reflection for reformers, international consultants and practitioners. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(1), 86–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forlin, C., Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Sprunt, B. (2015). Developing indicators for inclusive education in the Pacific Islands. Prospects, 2, 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaad, E. (2004). Cross-cultural perspectives on the effect of cultural attitudes toward inclusion for children with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(3), 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giangreco, M. F. (1997). Key lessons about inclusive education: A summary of the 1996 Schonell Memorial lecture. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 45(4), 375–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2007). Law on Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan № 319-III from July 27, 2007.

  • Hay, J. (2003). Implementation of the Inclusive education paradigm shift in South African education support services. South African Journal of Education, 23(2), 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iarskaia-Smirnova, E. (2011). Professional ideologies in Russian social work: Challenges from inside and outside. In S. Selwyn (Ed.), Social work education in countries of the East: Issues and challenges (pp. 425–448). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janney, R. E., Snell, M. E., Beers, M. K., & Raynes, M. (1995). Integrating students with moderate and severe disabilities into general education classes. Exceptional Children, 61(5), 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelas, Z., & Ali, M. (2014). Inclusive education in Malaysia: Policy and practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(10), 991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.693400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koay, T. L. (2014). Inclusion in Brunei Darussalam: The role of teacher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(10), 1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.693400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, J., Beckman, P. J., Hanson, M. J., Janko, S., Marquart, J. M., Horn, E. M., et al. (1997). The impact of changing roles on relationships between professionals in inclusive programs for young children. Early Education and Development, 8, 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makhalemele, T., & Nel, M. (2016). Challenges experienced by district-based support teams in the execution of their functions in a specific South African province. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(2), 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Science of the Repiblic of Kazakhstan & National Academy of Education named after Altynsarin. (2015). Konceptualniye podhody k razvitiyu inclusivnogo obrazovaniya v Respublike Kazakhstan. [Conceptual approaches to inclusive education development in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Retrieved on January 6th, 2018 from http://specialedu.kz/normativno-pravovaya%20baza/4/mat002.pdf.

  • Mulholland, M., & O'Connor, U. (2016). Collaborative classroom practice for inclusion: Perspectives of classroom teachers and learning support/resource teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(10), 1070–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarbayev, N. A. (2012). Address by the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

  • Nel, M., Engelbrecht, P., Nel, N., & Tlale, D. (2014). South African teachers’ views of collaboration within an inclusive education system. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(9), 903–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon-McBrayer, K. F. (2012). Implementing the SENCo system in Hong Kong: An initial investigation. British Journal of Special Education, 39(2), 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pun Wong, D. K., Pearson, V., & Kuen Lo, E. M. (2004). Competing philosophies in the classroom: A challenge to Hong Kong teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(3), 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollan, K., & Somerton, M. (2019). Inclusive education reform in Kazakhstan: Civil society activism from the bottom-up. International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1599451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, U., Forlin, C., Deppeler, J., & Yang, G. X. (2013). Reforming teacher education for inclusion in developing countries in the Asia Pacific region. Asian Journal of Inclusive Education, 1(1), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(1), 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelvin, M., Winter, E., & Flynn, P. (2013). Developing inclusive practice: Teacher perceptions of opportunities and constraints in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(10), 1119–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., & Gutkin, T. B. (2000). The ecology of school psychology: Examining and changing our paradiagm for the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 29(4), 485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1992). Behavioral parent-teacher consultation: Conceptual and research considerations. Journal of School Psychology, 30(2), 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., Kratochwill, T. R., & Bergan, J. R. (1996). Conjoint behavioural consultation: A procedural manual. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silova, I. (2011). Higher education reforms and global geopolitics: Shifting cores and peripheries in Russia, the Baltics, and Central Asia. Russian analytical digest, 97(30), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solis, M., Vaughn, S., Swanson, E., & Mcculley, L. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 49(5), 498–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepaniuk, I. (2019). Inclusive education in Eastern European countries: A current state and future directions. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1430180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, K. (2002). Differentiating integration: Special education in the Russian Federation. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250110099006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomusk, V. (2008). The Bologna Process and the enlightenment project: A bird’s eye view from the bottom of the slope. European Education, 40(2), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for action on special needs education: adopted by the World Conference on Special Needs Education; Access and Quality. Salamanca, Spain, 7–10 June 1994. UNESCO.

  • UNESCO. (2000). The Dakar framework for action: Education for all: Meeting our collective commitments. Dakar Senegal (pp. 26–28).

  • UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for all. ERIC Clearinghouse, Paris, France.

  • Vaughn, S., & Klingner, J. K. (1998). Students’ perceptions of inclusion and resource room settings. The Journal of Special Education, 32(2), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlasova, T. A., Lebedinskaia, K. S., & Machikhina, V. F. (1983). Otbor detei vo vspomogatel’nuyu shkolu: posobie dlia uchitelia [Selection of Children for Auxiliary Schools: A teachers’ handbook]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. (2006). Conjoint behavioural consultation: An emerging and effective model for developing home-school partnerships. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 2(2), 224–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, L., Chong, W., Neihart, M., & Huan, V. (2016). Teachers experience with inclusive education in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36, 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yurchak, A. (2005). Imaginary West: The elsewhere of late socialism. In Everything was forever, until it was no more: The last Soviet generation (pp. 158–206).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded with the assistance of DARA Foundation and Samruk Kazyna Trust. The research team would like to express their gratitude to the school personnel and families who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nazarbayev University Graduate School of Education, 53 Kabanbay Batyr, 010000, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan

    Michelle Somerton, Janet Helmer, Rita Kasa, Daniel Hernández-Torrano & Tsediso Michael Makoelle

Authors
  1. Michelle Somerton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Janet Helmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rita Kasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Hernández-Torrano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tsediso Michael Makoelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Somerton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This research was funded with the assistance of DARA Foundation.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Somerton, M., Helmer, J., Kasa, R. et al. Defining spaces: resource centres, collaboration, and inclusion in Kazakhstan. J Educ Change 22, 315–334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09384-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09384-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation