Abstract
In Japanese, desiderative (and potential) predicates derived from transitive verbs allow their direct object to be marked with the nominative marker ga, instead of the expected accusative marker o. This article argues that the nominative/accusative alternation in a desiderative construction has an information-structural implication. Nominative-marking on the object indicates its focushood, i.e., that it is either the focus of the utterance or part thereof, whereas accusative-marking has no such information-structural bearing. This claim is motivated by the observation that the direct object of a desiderative predicate resists nominative-marking when it is not adjacent to the predicate (“adjacency effect”). Under our account, the adjacency effect can be regarded as a variety of the garden-path effect, stemming from the discrepancy between the default (expected) locus of the focus and the pragmatic information conveyed by nominative-marking. With three sets of experimental data (from two acceptability judgment experiments with written stimuli and one rating experiment with auditory stimuli), we demonstrate that (i) the adjacency effect is real, and (ii) it can be mitigated by prosodic or contextual cues signaling the focushood of the object. The second finding conforms well to our hypothesis that the adjacency effect is a processing-based phenomenon, rather than a reflection of a purely syntactic constraint.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, Gerry, and Mark Steedman. 1988. Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30 (3): 191–238.
Beckman, Mary E., Julia Hirschberg, and Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2005. The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, ed. Sun-Ah Jun, 9–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bever, Thomas. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Cognition and the development of language, ed. John R. Hayes, 279–362. New York: Wiley.
Bobaljik, Jonathan D., and Susi Wurmbrand. 2007. Complex predicates, aspect, and anti-reconstruction. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16 (1): 27–42.
Crain, Stephen, and Mark Steedman. 1985. On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological syntax processor. In Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational and theoretical perspectives, ed. David R. Dowty, Lauri Karttunen, and Arnold M. Zwicky, 320–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engdahl, Elisabet, and Enric Vallduví. 1996. Information packaging in HPSG. Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science 12: 1–32.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information structure: The syntax–discourse interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fiengo, Robert, and William McClure. 2002. On how to use -wa. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11 (1): 5–41.
Harada, Yasunari, and Naohiko Noguchi. 1992. On the semantics and pragmatics of dake (and only). In Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory II, ed. Chris Barker, and David Dowty, 125–144.
Heycock, Caroline. 2008. Japanese -wa, -ga, and information structure. In The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, ed. Shigeru Miyagawa, and Mamoru Saito, 54–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hwang, Hyun Kyung. 2011. Scope, prosody, and pitch accent: The prosodic marking of wh-scope in two varieties in Japanese and South Kyeongsang Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Ishihara, Shin-ichiro. 2001. Stress, focus, and scrambling in Japanese. In MITWPL 39, ed. Elena Guerzoni, and Ora Matushansky, 142–175. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Ishihara, Shin-ichiro. 2011. Focus prosody in Tokyo Japanese wh-questions with lexically unaccented wh-phrases. In Proceedings of the 17th international congress of phonetic science, ed. Wai-Sum Lee, and Eric Zee, 964–969.
Ishihara, Shin-ichiro. 2015. Syntax-phonology interface. In The Handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology, ed. Haruo Kubozono, 569–618. Amsterdam: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ishii, Yasuo. 2001. Presuppositional effects of scrambling reconsidered. In Linguistics and interdisciplinary research: Proceedings of the COE international symposium, ed. Kazuko Inoue, and Nobuko Hasegawa, 79–101. Center of Excellence in Linguistics, Graduate School of Language Sciences, Kanda University of International Studies.
Kim, Alan Hyun-Oak. 1988. Preverbal focusing and type XXIII languages. In Studies in syntactic typology, ed. Michael Hammond, Edith A. Moravcsik, and Jessica Wirth, 147–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1994. Nominative objects: The role of TP in Japanese. In MIT working papers in linguistics 24: Formal approaches to Japanese linguistics 1, ed. Masatoshi Koizumi, and Hiroyuki Ura, 211–230. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1995. Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1998. Remarks on nominative objects. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 16: 39–66.
Koizumi, Masatoshi. 2008. Nominative object. In The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, ed. Shigeru Miyagawa, and Mamoru Saito, 141–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kubozono, Haruo. 1989. Syntactic and rhythmic effects on downstep in Japanese. Phonology 6 (1): 39–67.
Kubozono, Haruo. 1993. The organization of Japanese prosody. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
Kuno, Susumu. 1972. Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3 (3): 269–320.
Kuno, Susumu. 1973a. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kuno, Susumu. 1973b. Nihon bunpoo kenkyuu [Studies of the Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Taishukan.
Kuno, Susumu. 1978. Danwa no bunpoo [Grammar of discourse]. Tokyo: Taishukan.
Ladd, D.Robert. 1984. Declination: A review and some hypotheses. Phonology Yearbook 1: 53–74.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Makino, Seiichi. 1982. Japanese grammar and functional grammar. Lingua 57 (2): 125–173.
Martin, Samuel E. 1975. A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move?: Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nomura, Masashi. 2003. The true nature of nominative objects in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 26th annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, ed. Elsi Kaiser, and Sudha Arunachalam, 169–183. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 9 (1). Philadelphia, PA: Penn Graduate Linguistics Society.
Nomura, Masashi. 2005a. Nominative case and AGREE(ment). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Nomura, Masashi. 2005b. Remarks on the scope of nominative objects in Japanese. In The proceedings of the Sixth Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics, ed. Yukio Otsu, 269–292. Tokyo: Hitsuzi Shobo.
Oshima, David Y. 2009. On the so-called thematic use of wa: Reconsideration and reconciliation. In Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation 23 (1): 405–414.
Oshima, David Y. forthcoming. Focus particle stacking: How a contrastive particle interacts with ONLY and EVEN. In Proceedings of workshop on Altaic formal linguistics 11.
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Pierrehumbert, Janet B., and Mary E. Beckman. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reape, Michael. 1994. Domain union and word order variation in German. In German in head-driven phrase structure grammar, ed. John Nerbonne, Klaus Netter, and Carl J. Pollard, 151–198. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Reape, Michael. 1996. Getting things in order. In Discontinuous constituency, ed. Harry Bunt, and Arthur van Horck, 209–253. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Rooth, Mats. 1996. Focus. In The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, ed. Shalom Lappin, 271–291. London: Basil Blackwell.
Sag, Ivan A., Hans C. Boas, and Paul Kay. 2012. Introducing sign-based construction grammar. In sign-based construction grammar, ed. Hans C. Boas, and Ivan A. Sag, 1–29. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Saito, Mamoru. 1982. Case marking in Japanese: A preliminary study. Cambridge, MA: Ms., MIT.
Sano, Masaki. 1985. LF movement in Japanese. Descriptive and Applied Linguistics 18: 245–259.
Schütze, Carson T., and Jon Sprouse. 2013. Judgment data. In Research methods in linguistics, ed. Robert J. Podesva, and Devyani Sharma, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1975. Perceptual strategies and the phenomena of particle conversion in Japanese. In Papers from the parasession on functionalism, ed. Robin E. Grossman, 469–480. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Sugahara, Mariko. 2003. Downtrends and Post-FOCUS intonation in Tokyo Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Sugimoto, Takeshi. 1986. Kaku joshi [Case particles]. In Iwayuru nihongo joshi no kenkyuu [Studies on so-called particles in Japanese], ed. Kei-ichiro Okutsu, Yoshiko Numata, and Takeshi Sugimoto, 227–382. Tokyo: Bonjinsha.
Tada, Hiroaki. 1992. Nominative objects in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 14: 91–108.
Takahashi, Masahiko. 2010. Case, phases, and nominative/accusative conversion in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19 (4): 319–355.
Takano, Yuji. 2003. Nominative objects in Japanese complex predicate constructions: A prolepsis analysis. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21 (4): 779–834.
Tamura, Suzuko. 1969. Nihongo no tadooshi no kibookei/kanookei to joshi [The desiderative/potential forms of Japanese transitive verbs and particles]. Bulletin of the Institute of Language Teaching, Waseda University 8: 16–33.
Ura, Hiroyuki. 1996. Multiple feature-checking: A theory of grammatical function splitting. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Ura, Hiroyuki. 1999. Checking theory and dative subject constructions in Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8 (3): 223–254.
Ura, Hiroyuki. 2000. Checking theory and grammatical functions in generative grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vallduví, Enric, and Elisabet Engdahl. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34 (3): 459–520.
Vermeulen, Reiko. 2005. Possessive and adjunct multiple nominative constructions in Japanese. Lingua 115 (10): 1329–1363.
Vermeulen, Reiko. 2012. The information structure of Japanese. In The expression of information structure, ed. Manfred Krifka, and Renate Musan, 187–216. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ward, Gregory, and Betty J. Birner. 2011. Discourse effects of word order variation. In Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning 2, ed. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, 1934–1963. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Yatsushiro, Kazuko. 1999. Case licensing and VP structure. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nambu, S., Hwang, H.K., Oshima, D.Y. et al. The nominative/accusative alternation in Japanese and information structure. J East Asian Linguist 27, 141–171 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-018-9169-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-018-9169-1