Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the relationship between in-service teachers’ beliefs and technology adoption in Brazilian primary schools

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper analyses possible reasons for the gap between teachers’ actions and intentions, reported by research on practices with the use of ICT. The theoretical approach is informed by teachers’ beliefs, which are discriminated in two categories: pedagogical and epistemic. A qualitative fieldwork research undertaken in eight public primary schools in Rio de Janeiro between 2014 and 2019 presents empirical evidence of the relationship between ICT use in the classroom and teachers’ beliefs. Data collection took place in two phases, and the data set consists of: (1) sixty four semi-structured interviews with teachers of the eight schools; (2) two focus groups with teachers in two schools, selected among the eight initial schools. Main findings show the importance of ICT self-efficacy at the core of teacher’s pedagogical beliefs, as skills and knowledge are built upon direct experience and observation of others. Furthermore, epistemic beliefs are strongly related to pedagogical beliefs and teachers’ attitudes. Findings show that the most innovative teachers are those who conceive ICT as a cultural artefact, have an ecological view of the classroom, and translate their intentions into actions, facing uncertainty and possible failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Graphic 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aesaert, K., & Braak, J. (2014). Exploring factors related to primary school pupils’ ICT self-efficacy: A multilevel approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, M. (2019). The charisma machine: The life, death, and legacy of one laptop per child. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology: Special Issue: Self-Efficacy Theory in Contemporary Psychology, 4, 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, M. (2001). Key concepts in ELT. Teacher’s beliefs. ELT Journal, 55(2), 186–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozdogan, D., & Özen, R. (2014). Use of ICT technologies and factors affecting pre-service ELT teachers’ perceived ICT self-efficacy. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(2), 186–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? The Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrêa, J. G. (2019). Os estilos motivacionais dos professores: entre a autonomia e o controle do uso das TICs. I Simpósio Internacional de Tecnologias Digitais na Educação, UFMA, São Luís, MA, Proceedings.

  • Day, C. (1999). Desenvolvimento Profissional de Professores. Os desafios da aprendizagem permanente. Porto: Porto Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2014 [1910]). How we think. Oxford/GBR: Pergamonmedia.

  • Duarte, R. (2002). Pesquisa qualitativa: reflexões sobre o trabalho de campo. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 115, 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742002000100005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Kaya, E. (2019). Epistemic beliefs and teacher education. Science: Philosophy, History and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15326-7_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teacher beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st century teaching and learning. In H. R. Fives & M. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher beliefs (pp. 403–418). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdig, R. (2006). Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00559.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatti, B. A. (2012). Grupo focal na pesquisa em ciências sociais e humanas. Brasília: Líber Livro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldene de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondim, S. M. G., & Bendassolli, P. F. (2013). Significados, sentidos e função psicológica do trabalho: Discutindo essa tríade conceitual e seus desafios metodológicos. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 32(1), 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Examining the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy, their digital competence, strategies to evaluate information, and use of ICT at school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinsfeld, B. D., & Pischetola, M. (2019). Discourse on technologies in public policies on education. Educação & Pesquisa. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634201945205167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D. D., & Piper, R. T. (2016). A technology integration education (tie) model for millennial preservice teachers: Exploring the canonical correlation relationships among attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral controls, motivation, and technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) competencies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. L., & Russell, D. B. (2000). Exploring some distinctions for the design of learning systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 7(4), 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson-Proctor, R., Burnett, P., & Watson, G. F. (2006). ICT integration and teachers’ confidence in using ICT for teaching and learning in Queensland state schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 511–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. (2019). Pedagogical Innovation through the eyes of teacher educators. In K. Graziano (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference (pp. 1922–1930). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Maggioni, L., & Parkinson, M. M. (2008). The role of teacher epistemic cognition, epistemic beliefs, and calibration in instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9081-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzajani, H., Mahmud, R., Ayub, A. F. M., & Luan, W. S. (2015). A review of research literature on obstacles that prevent use of ICT in pre-service teachers’ educational courses. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 3(2), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mtebe, J. S. (2020). Applying UNESCO ICT competency framework to evaluate teachers’ ICT competence levels in Tanzania. In Keengwe, J. (Ed.), Handbook of research on innovative pedagogies and best practices in teacher education. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9232-7.ch020.

  • Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 27, 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, B. (2019). Does cultural capital matter in professional settings? Educational value profiles among the personnel in kindergartens. International Research in Early Childhood Education., 9(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pischetola, M. (2014). Teaching with laptops: a critical assessment of one-to-one technologies. In M. Stocchetti (Ed.), Media and education in the digitalage – concepts, assessments, subversions (pp. 203–214). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pischetola, M. (2015). Technology for Inclusion and Change: comparative research studies on one-to-one programs in Italy, Ethiopia and Brazil. In S. Pereira (Ed.), Digital Literacy (pp. 129–164). Humus Lda: Technology and Social Inclusion. Making sense of one-to-one computer programmes around the world. Famalição.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pischetola, M. (2016). Inclusão digital e educação: a nova cultura da sala de aula. Petrópolis (RJ): Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pischetola, M. (2019). Teachers and technologies in Brazilian schools: a study from the perspective of media ecology. Italian Journal of Sociology ofEducation, 11(2), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2019-2-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pischetola, M., & Cabrera, J. P. (2019). Tecnologias, mediação pedagógica e a partilha de sentidos no contexto escolar. Revista Histedbr, 19, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.20396/rho.v19i0.8652681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pischetola, M., & Miranda, L. V. T. (2020). Systemic thinking in education and a situated perspective on teaching. Ciência & Educação, Bauru, 26, e20015. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320200015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pischetola, M., Albuquerque, P., Heinsfeld, B. D., Santos, E. R. B., Corrêa, J. G., Silva, M. P. R. N., et al. (2019). Tecnologias, pensamentosistêmico e os fundamentos da inovação pedagógica. Curitiba: Editora CRV. https://doi.org/10.24824/978854443795.7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: First Vintage Books Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedner, D. T. T., & Pischetola, M. (2020). A inovação das práticas pedagógicas com uso de tecnologias digitais no ensino superior: um estudo no âmbito da formação inicial de professores. ETD-Educação Temática Digital. (in press).

  • Robertson, M., & Al-Zahrani, A. (2012). Self-efficacy and ICT integration into initial teacher education in Saudi Arabia: Matching policy with practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1136–1151. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohaan, E. J., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2012). Analysing teacher knowledge for technology education in primary schools. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9147-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, E. R. B. (2019). A autoeficácia: fio condutor entre as práticas pedagógicas e as tecnologias digitais. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação), Dep. Educação, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.

  • Santos, E. R. B., & Albuquerque, P. L. (2018). Autoeficácia computacional docente e reflexão como elementos facilitadores das inovações em sala de aula. In XIX ENDIPE, Salvador/Bahia, 3–6 setembro de 2018. Anais… Salvador/Bahia.

  • Santos, E. R., & Pischetola, M. (2020). A percepção da eficácia coletiva nas práticas pedagógicas com as tecnologias digitais. In D. Mill, B. Veloso, G. Santiago, & M. Santos (Eds.), Escritos sobre Educação e Tecnologias: entre provocações, percepções e vivências. São Paulo: Artesanato Educacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2015). Revisiting teachers’ computer self-efficacy: A differentiated view on gender differences. Computers and Human Behavior, 53, 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokku, S. R., & Anwar, M. (2019). Factors affecting the integration of ICT in education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1244/1/012043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S. (2010). Transformative learning and sustainability: Sketching the conceptual ground. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, D., & Sein, M. K. (2018). An ecological model of bridging the digital divide in education: A case study of OLPC deployment in Nepal. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84, e12018. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J. (2020). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of teacher education. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_111-1.

  • Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Educational Research Association., 50(3), 1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit- Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039001165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Magda Pischetola

Authors
  1. Magda Pischetola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magda Pischetola.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pischetola, M. Exploring the relationship between in-service teachers’ beliefs and technology adoption in Brazilian primary schools. Int J Technol Des Educ 32, 75–98 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09610-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09610-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation