Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spotlight on Area Models: Pre-service Teachers’ Ability to Link Fractions and Geometric Measurement

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To shed light on the value of the area model as a tool to elicit pre-service teachers’ (PSTs’) understanding of fractions and area, we explored their understanding of the fractional knowledge and geometric measurement knowledge incorporated in the area model by providing PSTs area models in an atypical way. We administered a written questionnaire to 82 PSTs at a large Midwestern university in the USA. We used an inductive content analysis approach, including both qualitative and quantitative analyses, to analyze the data. Almost half of the PSTs provided incorrect answers and faulty reasoning. We identified two main strategies for correct reasoning and five sources of the misconceptions embedded in the PSTs’ incorrect reasoning. Finally, we drew implications from our analysis for designing mathematics methods courses that support effective use of area models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. K. J. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 843–908). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista, M. T. (2012). Cognition based assessment and teaching of geometric measurement (Length, Area, and Volume): Building on students' reasoning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista, M. T., Frazee, L. M., & Winer, M. L. (2018). The interaction between spatial processes and mathematical reasoning and concepts in pre-proof geometry. In K. Mix & M. T. Battista (Eds.), Visualizing mathematics: The role of spatial reasoning in mathematical thought (pp. 195–228) Research in Mathematics Education series. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

  • Battista, M. T., Winer, M. L., & Frazee, L. M. (2017). How spatial reasoning and numerical reasoning are related in geometric measurement. In E. Galindo & J. Newton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 355–362). Indianapolis, IN: Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadez, T. H., & Kolar, V. M. (2018). How fifth-grade pupils reason about fractions: A reliance on part-whole subconstructs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99, 335–357.

  • Chamberlin, M. T., & Candelaria, M. S. (2018). Learning from teaching teachers: A lesson experiment in area and volume with prospective teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 20(1), 86–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciosek, M., & Samborska, M. (2016). A false belief about fractions - what is its source? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., Cheeseman, J., McDonough, A., & Clarke, B. (2003). Assessing and developing measurement with young children. In D. H. Clements & G. Bright (Eds.), Learning and teaching measurement: 2003 Yearbook (pp. 67–80). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. M., Roche, A., & Mitchell, A. (2008). Ten practical tips for making fractions come alive and make sense. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(7), 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confrey, J. (1994). Splitting, similarity, and rate of change: A new approach to multiplication and exponential functions. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in learning of mathematics (pp. 291–330). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.

  • Cramer, K., & Whitney, S. (2010). Learning rational number concepts and skills in elementary classrooms. In D. V. Lambdin & F. K. Lester (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics: Translating research to the elementary classroom (pp. 15–22). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K., Wyberg, T., & Leavitt, S. (2008). The role of representations in fraction addition and subtraction. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(8), 490–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V., Gorbov, S. F., Mikulina, G. G., & Savel’eva, O. V. (1999). Mathematics: Class 1. State University of New York: Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deliyianni, E., Gagatsis, A., Elia, I., & Panapira, A. (2016). Representational flexibility and problem-solving ability in fraction and decimal number addition: A structural model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(Suppl. 2), S397–S417.

  • Graeber, A. O., & Tirosh, D. (1989). Preservice elementary teachers’ explicit beliefs about multiplication and division. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(1), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2015). Relationships between students’ fractional knowledge and equation writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(2), 196–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2016). Students’ distributive reasoning with fractions and unknowns. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9704-9.

  • Hodges, T. E., Cady, J., & Collins, R. L. (2008). Fraction representation: The not-so-common denominator among textbooks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(2), 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629–667). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2002). An analysis of difficulties encountered in teaching Davydov’s mathematics curriculum to students in a U.S. setting and measures found to be effective in addressing them (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Binghamton.

  • Lee, J. (2006). Teaching algebraic expressions to young students: The three-day Journey of 'a+ 2'. School Science and Mathematics, 106(2), 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. Y. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ flexibility with referent units in solving a fraction division problem. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(3), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9771-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. Y., & Hackenberg, A. J. (2014). Relationships between fractional knowledge and algebraic reasoning: The case of Willa. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 975–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9442-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. Y., & Cross Francis, D. (2016). 5 Ways to improve children’s understanding of length measurement. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(4), 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. Y., & Lee, J. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the use of representations and suggestions for students’ incorrect use. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(9), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. Y., & Lee, J. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ selection, interpretation, and sequence of fraction examples. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10062-0.

  • Lehrer, R. (2003). Developing understanding of measurement. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifer (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 179–192). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmur, O., Yan, X., & Zazkis, R. (2019). Fraction images: The case of six and a half. Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2019.1627239.

  • Martin, T., & Schwartz, D. L. (2005). Physically distributed learning: adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fraction concepts. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 587–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J., & Shaughnessy, M. M. (2010). Beyond pizzas & pies: 10 essential strategies for supporting fraction sense, grades 3-5. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellone, M., Ramploud, A., & Carotenuto, G. (2020). An experience of cultural transposition of the El’konin-Davydov curriculum. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09942-7.

  • Mitchell, A. E. (2011). Interpreting students’ explanations of fraction tasks, and their connections to length and area knowledge (Doctoral dissertation). Australian Catholic University, Australia. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4226/66/5a961e7fc686c.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of State School Officers [NGA & CSSO]. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlik, B. (2007). False convictions – definition and examples. In Mathematical activity in classroom practice and as research object in didactics: Two complementary perspectives. Proceedings of the CIEAEM 59 Congress (pp. 299–300). Hungary: Budapest.

  • Schmittau, J. (2003). Cultural historical theory and mathematics education. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageryev, & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 225–245). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schmittau, J. (2010). The relevance of Russian elementary mathematics education. In A. Karp & B. R. Vogeli (Eds.), Russian mathematics education: History and world significance (pp. 253–278). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflection on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), 268–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (2010). Children’s fractional knowledge. New York, NY: Springer.

  • Switzer, J. M. (2016). Sharing a birthday cake. Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(9), 520–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TeachingWorks. (n.d.). High-leverage content. Retrieved from http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-content.

  • van de Walle, J., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

  • Vinner, S., & Hershkowitz, R. (1980). Concept images and common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometrical concepts. In R. Karplus (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 177–184). Berkeley, CA: University.

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning (Vol. 6). London, England: Falmer.

  • Zazkis, R., & Lijedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020291317178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeybek, Z., & Cross Francis, D. (2017). Let’s cut the cake. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(9), 542–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Clements, M. A., & Ellerton, N. F. (2015). Conceptual mis (understandings) of fractions: From area models to multiple embodiments. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27, 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, Farmer Education Building 440E, 1050 S. Forest Mall, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

    Mi Yeon Lee

  2. Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA

    Ji-Eun Lee

Authors
  1. Mi Yeon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ji-Eun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi Yeon Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, M.Y., Lee, JE. Spotlight on Area Models: Pre-service Teachers’ Ability to Link Fractions and Geometric Measurement. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 1079–1102 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10098-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10098-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation