Abstract
Previous studies have examined the effects of service-learning on student outcomes, but the dynamics and the mechanism of student development have received little attention. The present study aims to investigate how students construct their understanding of course content through service-learning, as well as the role of varied experiences. Eighty-four students were randomly assigned to two different conditions: the low-varied experiences condition (n = 36), in which students served the same child with autism throughout the programme, and the highly-varied experiences condition (n = 48), in which students served two children with autism successively. A total of 483 reflective journals written by students in a 6-week timeframe were analysed. The results indicated that students gained benefits from service-learning in terms of knowledge construction, and the overall change in students’ knowledge construction fluctuated throughout the service-learning process. In addition, students in the highly-varied experiences condition also demonstrated some differences in knowledge construction changes, indicating that varied service experiences might interfere with students’ knowledge construction at the turning point of task changing. The implications for service-learning and instruction are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alibali, M. W. (1999). How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 127–145.
Astin, A. W., & Sax, L. J. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Service Participation, 39(3), 251–263.
Barnett, S. M., & Koslowski, B. (2002). Adaptive expertise: Effects of type of experience and the level of theoretical understanding it generates. Thinking and Reasoning, 8(4), 237–267.
Batchelder, T. H., & Root, S. (1994). Effects of an undergraduate program to integrate academic learning and service—Cognitive, prosocial cognitive, and identity outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17(4), 341–355.
Beling, J. (2003). Effect of service-learning on knowledge about older people and faculty teaching evaluations in a physical therapy class. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 24(1), 31–46.
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluation the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome). New York: Academic.
Billig, S., & Furco, A. (2002). Service-learning through a multidisciplinary lens (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Bringle, R. G. (2003). Enhancing theory-based research on service-learning. In S. H. Billig & J. Eyler (Eds.), Deconstructing service-learning: Research exploring context, participation, and impacts (pp. 3–21). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Brown, M. A. (2011). Learning from service: The effect of helping on helpers’ social dominance orientation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(4), 850–871.
Brush, D. R., Markert, R. J., & Lazarus, C. J. (2006). The relationship between service learning and medical student academic and professional outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 18(1), 9–13.
Casile, M., Hoover, K. F., & O’Neil, D. A. (2011). Both-and, not either-or: Knowledge and service-learning. Education and Training, 53(3), 129–139.
Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40.
Chan, C. K., Burtis, P. J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Constructive activity in learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 97–118.
Choi, J. I., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53–69.
Clark, P. G. (1999). Service-learning education in community-academic partnerships: Implications for interdisciplinary geriatric training in the health professions. Educational Gerontology, 25(7), 641–660.
Darby, A., Longmire-Avital, B., Chenault, J., & Haglund, M. (2013). Students’ motivation in academic service-learning over the course of the semester. College Student Journal, 47(1), 185–191.
Delve, C. I., Mintz, S. D., & Stewart, G. M. (1990). Promoting values development through community service: A design. New Directions for Student Services, 50, 7–29.
Eyler, J., & Giles Jr., D. E. (2002). Beyond surveys: Using the problem solving interview to assess the impact of service-learning on understanding and critical thinking. In Service learning: The essence of the pedagogy (pp. 147–160). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Fahy, P. J., Crawford, G., Ally, M., Cookson, P., Keller, V., & Prosser, F. (2000). The development and testing of a tool for analysis of computer mediated conferencing transcripts. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46(1), 85–88.
Furco, A. (1996). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. Expanding boundaries: Service and learning. Washington, DC: Corporation for National Service.
Gelmon, S. B. (2001). Assessing service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and techniques: Campus Compact. Providence, RI: Brown University.
Gick, M. L., & Paterson, K. (1992). Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46(4), 539.
Giles, D. E., & Eyler, J. (1994). The impact of a college community-service laboratory on students personal, social, and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17(4), 327–339.
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.
Guo, F., Yao, M., Zong, X., & Yan, W. (2016). The developmental characteristics of engagement in service-learning for Chinese college students. Journal of College Student Development, 57(4), 447–459.
Hart, S. M., & King, J. R. (2007). Service learning and literacy tutoring: Academic impact on pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 323–338.
Hatcher, J. A., & Bringle, R. G. (1997). Reflection: Bridging the gap between service and learning. College Teaching, 45(4), 153–158.
Hatcher, J. A., Bringle, R. G., & Muthiah, R. (2004). Designing effective reflection: What matters to service-learning? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(1), 38–46.
Helsdingen, A., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2011). The effects of practice schedule and critical thinking prompts on learning and transfer of a complex judgment task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 383–398.
Heo, J., King, C., Lee, J., Kim, H. M., & Ni, C. (2014). Learning from healthy older adults: An analysis of undergraduate students’ reflective essays. Asia–Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 537–545.
Hubbs, D., & Brand, C. F. (2010). Learning from the inside out: A method for analyzing reflective journals in the college classroom. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(1), 56–71.
Jones, S. R., & Abes, E. S. (2003). Developing student understanding of HIV/AIDS through community service-learning: A case study analysis. Journal of College Student Development, 44(4), 470–488.
Keen, C., & Baldwin, E. (2004). Students promoting economic development and environmental sustainability: An analysis of the impact of involvement in a community-based research and service-learning program. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 5(4), 384–394.
Kenworthy-U’Ren, A. L. (2008). A decade of service-learning: A review of the field ten years after JOBE’s seminal special issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 811–822.
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Superiority of collaborative learning with complex tasks: A research note on an alternative affective explanation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 53–57.
Levesque-Bristol, C., Knapp, T. D., & Fisher, B. F. (2010). The effectiveness of service learning: It’s not always what you think. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(3), 208–224.
Levesque-Bristol, C., & Stanek, L. R. (2009). Examining self-determination in a service learning course. Teaching of Psychology, 36(4), 262–266.
Lewis, C. H. (1982). Using the “thinking aloud” method in cognitive interface design (technical report RC-9265). Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM.
Li, Y., Guo, F., Yao, M., Wang, C., & Yan, W. (2016). The role of subjective task value in service-learning engagement among Chinese college students. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 954.
Lundy, B. L. (2007). Service learning in life-span developmental psychology: Higher exam scores and increased empathy. Teaching of Psychology, 34(1), 23–27.
McClure, J. R., Sonak, B., & Suen, H. K. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 475–492.
McGuire, J. K., & Gamble, W. C. (2006). Community service for youth: The value of psychological engagement over number of hours spent. Journal of Adolescence, 29(2), 289–298.
Miller, K. K., & Yen, S. (2005). Group differences in academic achievement: Service learning in a child psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 32(1), 56–58.
Molee, L. M., Henry, M. E., Sessa, V. I., & McKinney-Prupis, E. R. (2010). Assessing learning in service-learning courses through critical reflection. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(3), 239–257.
Morgan, W., & Streb, M. (2001). Building citizenship: How student voice in service-learning develops civic values. Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 154–169.
Ngai, S. S. (2009). The effects of program characteristics and psychological engagement on service-learning outcomes: A study of university students in Hong Kong. Adolescence, 44(174), 375–389.
Ollis, S., Button, C., & Fairweather, M. (2005). The influence of professional expertise and task complexity upon the potency of the contextual interference effect. Acta Psychologica, 118(3), 229–244.
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133.
Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 144–161.
Reed, V. A., Jernstedt, G. C., Hawley, J. K., Reber, E. S., & DuBois, C. A. (2005). Effects of a small-scale, very short-term service-learning experience on college students. Journal of Adolescence, 28(3), 359–368.
Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(1), 90–108.
Roofe, N. L. (2011). Improving families’ nutrition knowledge through service learning. Journal of Allied Health, 40(4), 194–198.
Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5–18.
Scales, P. C., Roehlkepartain, E. C., Neal, M. K. J. C., & Benson, P. L. (2006). Reducing academic achievement gaps: The role of community service and service-learning. Journal of Experiential Education, 29(1), 38–60.
Schlagmuller, M., & Schneider, W. (2002). The development of organizational strategies in children: Evidence from a microgenetic longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81(3), 298–319.
Schwartz, E. Q. (2011). Promoting social justice advocacy through service-learning in higher education. Journal of Student Affairs at New York University, 7, 12–27.
Seider, S., Rabinowicz, S., & Gillmor, S. (2012). Differential outcomes for American college students engaged in community service-learning involving youth and adults. Journal of Experiential Education, 35(3), 447–463.
Siegler, R. S., & Chen, Z. (1998). Developmental differences in rule learning: A microgenetic analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 36(3), 273–310.
Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method—A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46(6), 606–620.
Simons, L., & Cleary, B. (2006). The influence of service learning on students’ personal and social development. College Teaching, 54(4), 307–319.
Spiro, R., et al. (1995). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31, 24–33.
Tynjälä, L. (1998). Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students’ learning experiences during an experiment. Higher Education, 36(2), 209–230.
Tynjälä, P. (1997). Developing education students’ conceptions of the learning process in different learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 277–292.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2006). Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: Balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 343–352.
Veerman, A., & Veldhuis-Diermanse, E. (2001). Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the first European conference on CSCL. Maastricht: McLuhan Institute, University of Maastricht.
West, D. C., Park, J. K., Pomeroy, J. R., & Sandoval, J. (2002). Concept mapping assessment in medical education: A comparison of two scoring systems. Medical Education, 36(9), 820–826.
Winn, W. (1993). Instructional design and situated learning: Paradox or partnership? Educational Technology, 33(3), 16–21.
Xin, Z. (2005). The construction of scheme in problem-solving: Study on children’s categorizing for word problems. Psychological Development and Education, 1, 69–73.
Xin, Z., & Yu, G. (2003). Acquisition and change of strategy in mathematical problem solving: A microgenetic study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(6), 786–795. (in Chinese).
Xin, Z., & Zhang, L. (2006). The change of representation and its correlates: A microgenetic study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38(4), 532–542. (in Chinese).
Zhang, M., Xin, Z., & Lin, C. (2013). The measurement and microgenetic study of routines in two person problem solving. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(10), 1119–1130. (in Chinese).
Funding
This research was supported by the MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities (Grant No. 15JJD190002), and Foundation for Young Scholars from the National Office for Education Sciences Planning (No. EMA170440).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Y., Yao, M., Guo, F. et al. Student knowledge construction in service-learning: The role of varied experiences. Instr Sci 47, 399–422 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09489-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09489-y