Skip to main content
Log in

Student knowledge construction in service-learning: The role of varied experiences

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have examined the effects of service-learning on student outcomes, but the dynamics and the mechanism of student development have received little attention. The present study aims to investigate how students construct their understanding of course content through service-learning, as well as the role of varied experiences. Eighty-four students were randomly assigned to two different conditions: the low-varied experiences condition (n = 36), in which students served the same child with autism throughout the programme, and the highly-varied experiences condition (n = 48), in which students served two children with autism successively. A total of 483 reflective journals written by students in a 6-week timeframe were analysed. The results indicated that students gained benefits from service-learning in terms of knowledge construction, and the overall change in students’ knowledge construction fluctuated throughout the service-learning process. In addition, students in the highly-varied experiences condition also demonstrated some differences in knowledge construction changes, indicating that varied service experiences might interfere with students’ knowledge construction at the turning point of task changing. The implications for service-learning and instruction are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alibali, M. W. (1999). How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W., & Sax, L. J. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Service Participation, 39(3), 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S. M., & Koslowski, B. (2002). Adaptive expertise: Effects of type of experience and the level of theoretical understanding it generates. Thinking and Reasoning, 8(4), 237–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batchelder, T. H., & Root, S. (1994). Effects of an undergraduate program to integrate academic learning and service—Cognitive, prosocial cognitive, and identity outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17(4), 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beling, J. (2003). Effect of service-learning on knowledge about older people and faculty teaching evaluations in a physical therapy class. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 24(1), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluation the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, S., & Furco, A. (2002). Service-learning through a multidisciplinary lens (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringle, R. G. (2003). Enhancing theory-based research on service-learning. In S. H. Billig & J. Eyler (Eds.), Deconstructing service-learning: Research exploring context, participation, and impacts (pp. 3–21). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. A. (2011). Learning from service: The effect of helping on helpers’ social dominance orientation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(4), 850–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, D. R., Markert, R. J., & Lazarus, C. J. (2006). The relationship between service learning and medical student academic and professional outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 18(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casile, M., Hoover, K. F., & O’Neil, D. A. (2011). Both-and, not either-or: Knowledge and service-learning. Education and Training, 53(3), 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K., Burtis, P. J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Constructive activity in learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. I., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. G. (1999). Service-learning education in community-academic partnerships: Implications for interdisciplinary geriatric training in the health professions. Educational Gerontology, 25(7), 641–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby, A., Longmire-Avital, B., Chenault, J., & Haglund, M. (2013). Students’ motivation in academic service-learning over the course of the semester. College Student Journal, 47(1), 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delve, C. I., Mintz, S. D., & Stewart, G. M. (1990). Promoting values development through community service: A design. New Directions for Student Services, 50, 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyler, J., & Giles Jr., D. E. (2002). Beyond surveys: Using the problem solving interview to assess the impact of service-learning on understanding and critical thinking. In Service learning: The essence of the pedagogy (pp. 147–160). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

  • Fahy, P. J., Crawford, G., Ally, M., Cookson, P., Keller, V., & Prosser, F. (2000). The development and testing of a tool for analysis of computer mediated conferencing transcripts. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46(1), 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furco, A. (1996). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. Expanding boundaries: Service and learning. Washington, DC: Corporation for National Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelmon, S. B. (2001). Assessing service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and techniques: Campus Compact. Providence, RI: Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M. L., & Paterson, K. (1992). Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46(4), 539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D. E., & Eyler, J. (1994). The impact of a college community-service laboratory on students personal, social, and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17(4), 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, F., Yao, M., Zong, X., & Yan, W. (2016). The developmental characteristics of engagement in service-learning for Chinese college students. Journal of College Student Development, 57(4), 447–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. M., & King, J. R. (2007). Service learning and literacy tutoring: Academic impact on pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, J. A., & Bringle, R. G. (1997). Reflection: Bridging the gap between service and learning. College Teaching, 45(4), 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, J. A., Bringle, R. G., & Muthiah, R. (2004). Designing effective reflection: What matters to service-learning? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(1), 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsdingen, A., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2011). The effects of practice schedule and critical thinking prompts on learning and transfer of a complex judgment task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heo, J., King, C., Lee, J., Kim, H. M., & Ni, C. (2014). Learning from healthy older adults: An analysis of undergraduate students’ reflective essays. Asia–Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 537–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs, D., & Brand, C. F. (2010). Learning from the inside out: A method for analyzing reflective journals in the college classroom. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(1), 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. R., & Abes, E. S. (2003). Developing student understanding of HIV/AIDS through community service-learning: A case study analysis. Journal of College Student Development, 44(4), 470–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, C., & Baldwin, E. (2004). Students promoting economic development and environmental sustainability: An analysis of the impact of involvement in a community-based research and service-learning program. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 5(4), 384–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy-U’Ren, A. L. (2008). A decade of service-learning: A review of the field ten years after JOBE’s seminal special issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 811–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Superiority of collaborative learning with complex tasks: A research note on an alternative affective explanation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque-Bristol, C., Knapp, T. D., & Fisher, B. F. (2010). The effectiveness of service learning: It’s not always what you think. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(3), 208–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque-Bristol, C., & Stanek, L. R. (2009). Examining self-determination in a service learning course. Teaching of Psychology, 36(4), 262–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. H. (1982). Using the “thinking aloud” method in cognitive interface design (technical report RC-9265). Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Guo, F., Yao, M., Wang, C., & Yan, W. (2016). The role of subjective task value in service-learning engagement among Chinese college students. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, B. L. (2007). Service learning in life-span developmental psychology: Higher exam scores and increased empathy. Teaching of Psychology, 34(1), 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure, J. R., Sonak, B., & Suen, H. K. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. K., & Gamble, W. C. (2006). Community service for youth: The value of psychological engagement over number of hours spent. Journal of Adolescence, 29(2), 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. K., & Yen, S. (2005). Group differences in academic achievement: Service learning in a child psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 32(1), 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molee, L. M., Henry, M. E., Sessa, V. I., & McKinney-Prupis, E. R. (2010). Assessing learning in service-learning courses through critical reflection. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(3), 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, W., & Streb, M. (2001). Building citizenship: How student voice in service-learning develops civic values. Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, S. S. (2009). The effects of program characteristics and psychological engagement on service-learning outcomes: A study of university students in Hong Kong. Adolescence, 44(174), 375–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollis, S., Button, C., & Fairweather, M. (2005). The influence of professional expertise and task complexity upon the potency of the contextual interference effect. Acta Psychologica, 118(3), 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 144–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, V. A., Jernstedt, G. C., Hawley, J. K., Reber, E. S., & DuBois, C. A. (2005). Effects of a small-scale, very short-term service-learning experience on college students. Journal of Adolescence, 28(3), 359–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(1), 90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roofe, N. L. (2011). Improving families’ nutrition knowledge through service learning. Journal of Allied Health, 40(4), 194–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scales, P. C., Roehlkepartain, E. C., Neal, M. K. J. C., & Benson, P. L. (2006). Reducing academic achievement gaps: The role of community service and service-learning. Journal of Experiential Education, 29(1), 38–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlagmuller, M., & Schneider, W. (2002). The development of organizational strategies in children: Evidence from a microgenetic longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81(3), 298–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E. Q. (2011). Promoting social justice advocacy through service-learning in higher education. Journal of Student Affairs at New York University, 7, 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seider, S., Rabinowicz, S., & Gillmor, S. (2012). Differential outcomes for American college students engaged in community service-learning involving youth and adults. Journal of Experiential Education, 35(3), 447–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Chen, Z. (1998). Developmental differences in rule learning: A microgenetic analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 36(3), 273–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method—A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46(6), 606–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, L., & Cleary, B. (2006). The influence of service learning on students’ personal and social development. College Teaching, 54(4), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R., et al. (1995). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31, 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, L. (1998). Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students’ learning experiences during an experiment. Higher Education, 36(2), 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, P. (1997). Developing education students’ conceptions of the learning process in different learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2006). Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: Balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veerman, A., & Veldhuis-Diermanse, E. (2001). Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the first European conference on CSCL. Maastricht: McLuhan Institute, University of Maastricht.

  • West, D. C., Park, J. K., Pomeroy, J. R., & Sandoval, J. (2002). Concept mapping assessment in medical education: A comparison of two scoring systems. Medical Education, 36(9), 820–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. (1993). Instructional design and situated learning: Paradox or partnership? Educational Technology, 33(3), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, Z. (2005). The construction of scheme in problem-solving: Study on children’s categorizing for word problems. Psychological Development and Education, 1, 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, Z., & Yu, G. (2003). Acquisition and change of strategy in mathematical problem solving: A microgenetic study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(6), 786–795. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, Z., & Zhang, L. (2006). The change of representation and its correlates: A microgenetic study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38(4), 532–542. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Xin, Z., & Lin, C. (2013). The measurement and microgenetic study of routines in two person problem solving. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(10), 1119–1130. (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities (Grant No. 15JJD190002), and Foundation for Young Scholars from the National Office for Education Sciences Planning (No. EMA170440).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meilin Yao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 4.

Table 4 The coding scheme of concept construction

Appendix 2

See Table 5.

Table 5 The coding scheme of concept relation construction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Yao, M., Guo, F. et al. Student knowledge construction in service-learning: The role of varied experiences. Instr Sci 47, 399–422 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09489-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09489-y

Keywords

Navigation