Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rule of Law Teleology: Against the Misuse and Abuse of Rule of Law Rhetoric

  • Essay
  • Published:
Hague Journal on the Rule of Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ‘rule of law’ is one of the most important ideas in contemporary constitutional and political discourse. Yet it can be understood in more or less ‘anatomical’ versus ‘teleological’ ways. Martin Krygier has helped us better understand this distinction, and showed how a teleological approach can help guard against the misuse of the rule of law as an ideal. In this short essay, I further show how the kind of teleological approach developed by Krygier can help guard against a related, but distinct danger—i.e. the danger of ‘abusive constitutionalism’, or the abusive application of rule of law ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosalind Dixon.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dixon, R. Rule of Law Teleology: Against the Misuse and Abuse of Rule of Law Rhetoric. Hague J Rule Law 11, 461–464 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00095-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00095-1

Navigation