Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Judicial Independence Under Authoritarian Rule: An Institutional Approach to the Legal Tradition of the West

  • Article
  • Published:
Hague Journal on the Rule of Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The autonomy of legal institutions is put on the most severe test when they are under attack by other organs of the state. The article discusses the Western legal tradition from an institutional perspective and the concepts of ‘institutions’, ‘path dependence’ and ‘rule of law’. Under this perspective, legal institutions have an autonomous development with characteristics that must be explained by their evolutionary origins. The article seeks to demonstrate that institutional theory deserves closer attention when studying law and political power and to place more the refined notions of the Western legal tradition and the Rule of law from legal research into the theoretical approach of institutional theory. Based on the example of judicial independence in Nazi Germany it seeks to test the explanatory power of institutional theory to legal phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) Report on the Independence of the Judicial System Part 1: The Independence of Judges, Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 82nd Plenary Session (Venice, 12–13 March 2010) CDL-AD(2010)004 paragraph 31.

  2. A critical overview and assessment of North’s theory of institutions is provided by Faundez (2016).

  3. Institutions as part of the factors shaping opportunities for judicial action is highlighted by Gloppen et al. (2010: 3).

  4. Tamanaha (2004) gives an overview over the many different meanings of “The Rule of Law”. See also Magen (2016) for an analysis of its importance to EU activity and identity.

  5. See Tamanaha (2004) chapter 3 in the relation between liberalism and the rule of law.

  6. Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals, vol. III, The Justice Case, Washington 1951, p. 31.

  7. The account here builds on Koch (1989), pp. 107–110.

  8. Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg 14 November 1945–1 October 1946 vol. 17, p. 487.

  9. The Justice Case, p. 1020.

  10. “Indeed, in regard to the rule-structure of a developed legal system, it is fascinating to follow the semi-analogue of one of those medieval cathedrals whose building reached across the centuries. In the law—at least in our own—there has never been an original entire plan by any master-architect; but that I think highly probable also in regard to many of those cathedrals which rested content over generations with a choir. In any event, for structured rules and structured stone alike, one finds unit after unit, set up aforetime, in a "style" whose reason has lost meaning to the later user, but whose form will bind him still. (…) And as with a medieval cathedral, work done in an older period-style persists beyond its own day. One finds shift of plan, sudden, irreverent, even rebellious-old wall, old stone, old ornament, being pressed into "modern" service, in a new design. Too, change small enough in scope can sometimes alter an entire aspect, as when the fourteenth century chapel-rows were built between the buttresses, and window and wall pushed outward to make great, smooth space-the buttresses, as the phrasing goes, "drawn in"; or when Gothic vaulting was made to upheave a nave designed for the balanced measure of the Romanesque; or ornate plaster masked upon ancient stone or brick or varicolor, and the horizontal whirl of baroque, in every image, thrown in to force upon eye-lifting Gothic an almost jazz-like rhythm.” K. N. Llewellyn, On the Good, the True, the Beautiful, in Law, 9 University of Chicago Law Review 1942 pp. 224–265.

References

  • Angermund R (1990) Deutsche richtershaft 1919–1945. Fischer, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubert V (1989) Continuity and development in law and society. Norwegian University Press, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell J (2013) Path dependence and legal development. Tul L Rev 87(4):787

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman HJ (1983) Law and revolution the formation of the western legal tradition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Canevaro M (2017) The rule of law as the measure of political legitimacy in the Greek City States. Hague J Rule Law 9:211–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole DS (2013) The varieties of comparative institutional analysis. Wis Law Rev 2013:383–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Conquest R (1968) Justice and the legal system in the USSR. The Bodley Head, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig PP (1997) Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework. Public Law 1997:467–487

    Google Scholar 

  • David R, Brierley JEC (1985) Major legal systems in the world today, 3rd edn. Stevens, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicey AV (1982) Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution, 8th edn. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertman T (1997) Birth of the leviathan: building states and regimes in medieval and early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Faundez J (2016) Douglass North’s theory of institutions: lessons for law and development. Hague J Rule Law 8:373–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel E (1941) The dual state a contribution to the theory of dictatorship. Oxford University Press, New York (republished by The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd, New Jersey, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D (2005) Law after Auschwitz towards a jurisprudence of the holocaust. Carolina Academic Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2011) The origins of political order from prehuman times to the French revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbe D (2000) Im Namen des Volkes?! Die Rechtlichen Grundlagen der Militärjustiz im NS-Staat und ihre „Bewältigung“ nach 1945. In: Nolz B, Popp W (eds) Erinnerungsarbeit Grundlage einer Kultur des Friedens. Lit, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloppen S, Wilson BM, Gargarellea R, Skaar E, Kinander M (2010) Courts and power in Latin America and Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graver HP (2015) Judges against justice on judges when the rule of law is under attack. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Graver HP (2018) Why Adolf Hitler spared the judges: judicial opposition against the Nazi state. German Law J (forthcoming)

  • Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2009) Governance matters VIII aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. In: Policy research working paper 4978. The World Bank Development Research Group Macroeconomics and Growth Team. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/4170/WPS4978.pdf

  • Koch HW (1989) In the name of the Volk political justice in Hitler’s Germany. I.B. Tauris, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder M (1987) The supreme labor court in Nazi Germany: a jurisprudential analysis. Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick N, Weinberger O (1986) An institutional theory of law new approaches to legal positivism. Kluwer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Magen A (2016) Cracks in the foundations: understanding the great rule of law debate in the EU. JCMS 54(5):1050–1061

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas H (2017) Furchtlose Juristen Richter und Staatsanwälte gegen das NS-Unrecht. C.H. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller J (2017) Medieval origins of the rule of law: the Gregorian Reforms as critical juncture? Hague J Rule Law 9:265–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrozek A, Śledzińska-Simon A (2017) Constitutional review as an indispensable element of the rule of law? Poland as the divided state between political and legal constitutionalism, VerfBlog, 2017/1/12. https://verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-review-as-an-indispensable-element-of-the-rule-of-law-poland-as-the-divided-state-between-political-and-legal-constitutionalism/

  • North DC (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5(1):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (2005) Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelikán J (ed) (1971) The Czechoslovak political trials, 1950–1954. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Political Sci Rev 94(2):251–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado M, Trebilcock M (2009) Path dependence, development, and the dynamics of institutional reform. Univ Toronto Law J 59:341–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rottleuthner H (1992) Steuerung der Justiz in der DDR. Krit Vierteljahr Gesetzgeb Rechtswiss 75:237–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Rass C, Quadflieg PM (2011) Nachkriegskarrieren von Wehrmachtjuristen Ganz normale Richter? Kriegserfarung und Nachkriegskarrieren von Divisionsrichtern der Wehrmacht. In: Perels J, Wette W (eds) Mit reinem Gewissen Wehrmachtrichter in der Bundesrepublik und ihre Opfer. Aufbau, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (2009) The authority of law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitter E (1976) Franz Gürtner, Politische biographie eines deutschen Juristen 1881–1941. Dunker & Humblot, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rundle K (2009) The impossibility of an exterminatory legality: law and the holocaust. Univ Toronto Law J 2009:65–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez Urribarri RA (2011) Courts between democracy and hybrid authoritarianism: evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court. Law & Soc Inquiry 36:854–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01253.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro M (1982) Courts a comparative and political analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamanaha B (2004) On the rule of law history, politics, theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tamm D (2005) How nordic are the old nordic laws? In: Tamm D, Vogt H (eds) How nordic are the nordic medieval laws?. Medieval legal history I. University of Copenhagen Press, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt S (2012) How to measure the rule of law. Kyklos 65:262–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron J (2012) The rule of law and the measure of property. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zweigert K, Kötz H (1998) Introduction to comparative law, 3rd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the Institute for Advanced Study, University of Durham, England for providing me with an excellent research environment for much of the time spent researching this article. I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful criticism and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Petter Graver.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graver, H.P. Judicial Independence Under Authoritarian Rule: An Institutional Approach to the Legal Tradition of the West. Hague J Rule Law 10, 317–339 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0071-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0071-8

Keywords

Navigation