Abstract
Complex decision-making in organizations is a process frequently assigned to teams. An expected benefit of utilizing teams is that, due to an expanded pool of available information, outcomes may be superior to those of an individual decision-maker. However, research using the Hidden-Profile Paradigm (i.e., a research design where each team member has information that must be shared to arrive at an accurate solution) has consistently shown that team members regularly fail to exploit their unique information to produce accurate decisions. This failure may be due to a combination of social, individual, and contextual factors, information processing inaccuracies, and cognitive biases. The current study sought to determine whether individuals’ perception of competence relative to other team members influences information sharing and decision accuracy in hidden-profiles. Further, the interactive effects of competitive versus cooperative environmental factors were examined. Two-person teams were assembled to solve a hidden-profile task. Team members were led to believe that they were either more or less competent than their team-mate, and instructed to either cooperate or compete with one another. Results indicated that teams comprising individuals who perceived themselves as relatively less competent shared more information; however, decision accuracy was found to be better only under a cooperative environment. In addition, intention to strategically withhold information from one’s team-mate was found to be higher for teams under a competitive environment. The study has implications for hidden-profile research and for team decision-making in organizations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Amason AC (1996) Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams. Acad Manag J 39(1):123–148. https://doi.org/10.2307/256633
Baumann MR, Bonner BL (2013) Member awareness of expertise, information sharing, information weighting, and group decision making. Small Group Res 44(5):532–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413494415
Bazerman MH, Chugh D (2006) Decisions without blinders. Harv Bus Rev 84(1):88–97
Bock GW, Zmud RW, Kim YG, Lee JN (2005) Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. Manag Inf Syst Quart 29(1):87–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2012.02.001
Bowman JM, Wittenbaum GM (2012) Time pressure affects process and performance in hidden-profile groups. Small Group Res 43(3):295–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412440055
Brodbeck FC, Kerschreiter R, Mojzisch A, Schulz-Hardt S (2007) Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: the information asymmetries model. Acad Manag Rev 32(2):459–479. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24351441
Budescu D, Maciejovsky B (2016) The subtle effects of incentives and competition on group performance. Behav Brain Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15001326
De Dreu CK (2007) Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing perspective. J Appl Psychol 92(3):628–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.628
Emich KJ (2012) How expectancy motivation influences information exchange in small groups. Small Group Res 43(3):275–294
Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 7(2):117–140
Franz TM, Larson JR Jr (2002) The impact of experts on information sharing during group discussion. Small Group Res 33(4):383–411
Greenberg J, Baron RA (2008) Behavior in organizations. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Hayek AS, Toma C, Oberlé D, Butera F (2015) Grading hampers cooperative information sharing in group problem solving. Soc Psychol 46(3):121–131. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000232
Hills A (2011) Foolproof guide to statistics using IBM SPSS. Pearson Australia, Frenchs Forest
Hinsz VB, Tindale RS, Vollrath DA (1997) The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychol Bull 121(1):43–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43
Hollingshead AB (1996) Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making the effects of communication media. Hum Commun Res 23(2):193–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00392.x
Hu J, Liden RC (2015) Making a difference in the teamwork: linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness. Acad Manag J 58(4):1102–1127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.1142
Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J Econ Perspect 5(1):193–206
Kim PH (1997) When what you know can hurt you: a study of experiential effects on group discussion and performance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 69(2):165–177. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2680
Kim PH (2003) When private beliefs shape collective reality: the effects of beliefs about coworkers on group discussion and performance. Manag Sci 49(6):801–815. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.6.801.16025
Kimmerle J, Wodzicki K, Jarodzka H, Cress U (2011) Value of information, behavioral guidelines, and social value orientation in an information-exchange dilemma. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 15(2):173–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021467
Klocke U (2007) How to improve decision making in small groups: effects of dissent and training interventions. Small Group Res 38(3):437–468
Lu L, Yuan YC, McLeod PL (2012) Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: a meta-analysis. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 16(1):54–75
Mesmer-Magnus JR, DeChurch LA (2009) Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 94(2):535–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773
Mitusch K (2006) Non-commitment in performance evaluation and the problem of information distortions. J Econ Behav Organ 60(4):507–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.09.007
Poortvliet PM, Anseel F, Janssen O, Van Yperen NW, Van de Vliert E (2012) Perverse effects of other-referenced performance goals in an information exchange context. J Bus Ethics 106(4):401–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1005-8
Robbins SP, Judge T (2016) Essentials of organizational behavior. Pearson Education, London
Rosenbaum ME, Moore DL, Cotton JL, Cook MS, Hieser RA, Shovar MN, Gray MJ (1980) Group productivity and process: pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(4):626–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.626
Sassenberg K, Landkammer F, Jacoby J (2014) The influence of regulatory focus and group vs. individual goals on the evaluation bias in the context of group decision making. J Exp Soc Psychol 54:153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.009
Schulz-Hardt S, Mojzisch A (2012) How to achieve synergy in group decision making: lessons to be learned from the hidden profile paradigm. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 23:305–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2012.744440
Sohrab SG, Waller MJ, Kaplan S (2015) Exploring the hidden-profile paradigm: a literature review and analysis. Small Group Res 46(5):489–535
Stasser G (1992) Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: a “thought experiment”. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 52(1):156–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90049-D
Stasser G, Stewart D (1992) Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: solving a problem versus making a judgment. J Pers Soc Psychol 63(3):426–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426
Stasser G, Titus W (1985) Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: biased information sampling during discussion. J Pers Soc Psychol 48(6):1467–1478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
Stasser G, Titus W (1987) Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. J Pers Soc Psychol 53(1):81–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81
Stasser G, Stewart DD, Wittenbaum GM (1995) Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: the importance of knowing who knows what. J Exp Soc Psychol 31(3):244–265. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1012
Steinel W, Utz S, Koning L (2010) The good, the bad and the ugly thing to do when sharing information: revealing, concealing and lying depend on social motivation, distribution and importance of information. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 113(2):85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.07.001
Super JF, Li P, Ishqaidef G, Guthrie JP (2016) Group rewards, group composition and information sharing: a motivated information processing perspective. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 134:31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.04.002
Thomas-Hunt MC, Ogden TY, Neale MA (2003) Who’s really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Manag Sci 49(4):464–477. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.464.14425
Toma C, Butera F (2009) Hidden profiles and concealed information: strategic information sharing and use in group decision making. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 35(6):793–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333176
Toma C, Butera F (2015) Cooperation versus competition effects on information sharing and use in group decision-making. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 9(9):455–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12191
Toma C, Vasiljevic D, Oberlé D, Butera F (2013) Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making. Br J Soc Psychol 52(1):161–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02105.x
Wang S, Noe RA (2010) Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Hum Resour Manag Rev 20(2):115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
Wittenbaum GM (1998) Information sampling in decision-making groups: the impact of members’ task-relevant status. Small Group Res 29(1):57–84
Wittenbaum GM (2000) The bias toward discussing shared information: why are high-status group members immune. Commun Res 27(3):379–401
Wittenbaum GM, Hollingshead AB, Botero IC (2004) From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Commun Monogr 71(3):286–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000299894
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dayeh, V., Morrison, B.W. The Effect of Perceived Competence and Competitive Environment on Team Decision-Making in the Hidden-Profile Paradigm. Group Decis Negot 29, 1181–1205 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09701-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09701-2