English for specific playfulness? How doctoral students in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics manipulate genre
Introduction
“I will not mix genres.
I repeat: genres are not to be mixed. I will not mix them”
Derrida (1980, Transl. by Ronell)
Derrida & Ronell’s (1980) words encapsulate the “enigma of genre” (p.56): limit, interdiction, norm, law; but also practice, event, a concept that foreshadows what is likely to transpire. The core of this duality is “the law of impurity” of genres (Derrida & Ronell, 1980, p. 57): they are both created and constantly contaminated by their recitation, their repetition, and the sum of their (situated) anomalies. The scholarship around genre analysis and genre pedagogy has long recognized the inherent contradictory nature of genres. Genre-based pedagogical approaches to academic writing have foregrounded both conventions and situational variation, and while analysis of typical generic features is foundational, the fostering of rhetorical consciousness, rhetorical flexibility, and the ability to manipulate genres through deliberate authorial choices is also strongly advocated (Cheng, 2018, Johns, 2002, Swales, 1990, Tardy, 2016).
The “law of impurity” (Derrida & Ronell, 1980 p. 57) also exposes the risks inherent in an educational approach that scaffolds the recognition of conventional forms of genre production, namely focusing on what is typical while neglecting the deceptive nature of this typicality, or in the words of Swales (2017, p. 251), promoting “stultifying standardization” in academic writing. The risk of standardization occurs when students are not led to see that genres are tools to get something done, and as such are adaptable in response to each communicative situation (Miller, 1984). As Tardy (2016, p. 129) emphasizes, “the question is not whether genres should be taught, but rather how instruction can best facilitate learners' ability to use genres effectively”. To this end, Tardy underscores the necessity to help students develop an understanding of genres’ innovation potential: the fact that when skillfully and intentionally manipulated, they can help writers achieve rhetorical goals, including “alternative ways of understanding an issue or constructing knowledge; expressing oneself in unique ways; engaging readers; and resisting, changing and critiquing dominant discourses” (Tardy, 2016, p. 131). Ultimately, this is a perplexing dilemma for teachers of academic/research writing and a significant challenge for our doctoral writers: can doctoral writers engage critically with genre conventions, using their genre knowledge to establish legitimacy through their own authorial choices, and still meet genre expectations? Can students express their creativity and engagement in writing, despite the potential risks inherent in genre manipulation? Are our students willing and able to adapt “the genre recipe” to their taste?
In this paper, we explore what doctoral students in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) do with their genre knowledge in the months following a genre-based course in writing for research. STEM students constitute an interesting group, as writers in science and engineering have been called a “forgotten tribe” (Emerson, 2017), and their writing practices considered relatively standardized and rigid when compared to those in the social science and humanities (see also Tardy, 2016). For these students, the development of genre knowledge may occur prevalently via socialization, rather than via writing instruction, and as a result their understanding of scientific genres may remain relatively implicit. Therefore, it is both intriguing and important to explore what PhD students in STEM do with their knowledge of genre conventions after being exposed to a genre pedagogy course, and to obtain empirical evidence that genre-based pedagogy promotes a conscious, intentional, and potentially agentive use of genres. Our aim is to investigate whether our participants glumly surrender to the dictates of the genre “law”, or instead seem aware and take advantage of the impure nature of genres (Derrida & Ronell, 1980). Do they, manipulate, adapt, or even play with genre conventions when they write?
Section snippets
Literature review and theory
Before returning to genre pedagogy, we will briefly discuss learning to write in the sciences, to highlight the unique challenges shared by the participants of this study.
Setting and participants
This study is part of a larger project conducted at a technical university in Scandinavia. Participants were 30 doctoral students in STEM (see Table 1), recruited from 6 consecutive runs of an 8-week course on writing research articles (RA) over two years. The course aims to foster students’ proficiency in writing RAs and their ability to make discipline-specific and strategic writing choices. Typically, students are required to have already written an RA prior to taking the course. The course
Findings
Here, we present the data in accordance with the emergent themes.
Discussion and conclusion
In this study, we aimed to examine whether genre pedagogy stifles students’ attempts at genre manipulation, or whether the approach can promote playfulness in writing, or at least an enhanced sense of control over conventions. To this end, we examined how students across STEM disciplines intentionally use genre knowledge/awareness in authentic writing contexts.
Our findings suggest that rather than pushing students towards conformity, genre pedagogy has the potential to foster students' agency
Acknowledgments
This study was partially supported by the Magnus Bergwall foundation [grant number 2016-01494] and the Åke Wiberg foundation [grant number H16-0110]. Heartfelt gratitude for their time and confidence goes to the participants. May the force be with you.
Raffaella Negretti is associate professor in academic and scientific writing in English at Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Communication and Learning in Science. Her research spans academic writing, metacognition, and genre pedagogy, appearing in English for Specific Purposes, Journal of Second Language Writing, Applied Linguistics, and Higher Education.
References (49)
Results sections in in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis
English for Specific Purposes
(2009)Measuring the voice of disciplinarity in scientific writing: A longitudinal exploration of experienced writers in geology
English for Specific Purposes
(2014)- et al.
Let G=(V,E) be a graph": Turning the anstract into the tangible in introductions in mathematics research articles
English for Specific Purposes
(2014) Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction
Journal of Second Language Writing
(2007)Rhetorical structures of biochemistry research articles
English for Specific Purposes
(2005)Open-access writing: An investigation into the online drafting and revision of a research article in pure mathematics
English for Specific Purposes
(2016)Becoming a researcher: Re-inventing writing spaces
Journal of English for Academic Purposes
(2018)- et al.
Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course
Journal of Second Language Writing
(2018) Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles
System
(2002)- et al.
Anguish and anxiety, stress and strain: Attending to writers’ stress in the dissertation process
Journal of Second Language Writing
(2019)
Science research students' composing processes
English for Specific Purposes
Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims
English for Specific Purposes
‘Tough love and tears’: Learning doctoral writing in the sciences
Higher Education Research and Development
Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency
Shaping written knowledge: The genre activity of the experimental article in science
Speech acts, genres, and activity systems: How texts organize activity and people
Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication
Mathematicians writing
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Learning to write a research article: Ph.D. students' transitions toward disciplinary writing regulation
Research in the Teaching of English
Genre and graduate level research writing
Genre, identity, and the brain: Insights from neuropsychology
The Journal of General Education
Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible
American Educator
Action research for second language teachers: Going beyond teacher research
Applied Linguistics
Graphics and invention in academic engineers' writing for publication
Cited by (14)
Task evolution in English for Academic Purposes writing materials: The case of “Information Transfer” to “Critical Commentary”
2023, Journal of Second Language WritingFrame-based formulaic features in L2 writing pedagogy: Variants, functions, and student writer perceptions in academic writing
2023, English for Specific PurposesProscribed informality features in published research: A corpus analysis
2022, English for Specific PurposesCitation Excerpt :Future studies could use triangulation techniques by correlating reader perceptions of informality with the salient linguistic features of the texts, providing insights into the mind of readers to identify what stands out in the language as (in)formal. Finally, that informality features occur infrequently in academic writing does not mean that writers need to surrender to such standards or avoid any kind of playfulness in their writing, a point made salient by Negretti and McGrath (2020). As Swales (2017) put it, “experimentation in both style and substance should be open to all the bolder-hearted, to all the malcontents of excessive and stultifying standardization, whoever they are and wherever they be” (p. 251).
The potential power of play in second language academic writing
2021, Journal of Second Language WritingCitation Excerpt :Just as language play allows language learners an opportunity to appropriate language, make it their own, and engage in it more authentically (e.g., Kramsch & Sullivan, 1996), genre play allows novice genre writers to assert themselves within a discourse that may feel alienating. In a study of 30 English as an additional language (EAL) doctoral students writing research articles, Negretti and McGrath (2020) found that playful genre manipulations were at times used to challenge or critique genre conventions, for example using more attitude markers or boosters than would be typical. These intentional transformations indexed the students’ growing sense of agency and empowerment as writers.
Know your roles: Alleviating the academic-professional tension in the case analysis genre
2021, English for Specific PurposesCitation Excerpt :Providing flexible strategies for meeting genre expectations along with detailed descriptions of a genre's expected features is a way of enabling student agency. Thus, our findings counter existent critiques of genre-based instruction and its potential constraints on student writing (cf. Hyland, 2007; Negretti & McGrath, 2020). We continue to explore this in our on-going analysis of student writing as we use our findings to further refine our scaffolding materials to help students meet the dual academic and professional demands of the case analysis genre.
Relationships Among English Language Proficiency, Self-efficacy, Motivation, Motivational Intensity, and Achievement in an ESP/EAP Context
2023, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
Raffaella Negretti is associate professor in academic and scientific writing in English at Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Communication and Learning in Science. Her research spans academic writing, metacognition, and genre pedagogy, appearing in English for Specific Purposes, Journal of Second Language Writing, Applied Linguistics, and Higher Education.
Lisa McGrath is a senior lecturer in educational linguistics at the Sheffield Institute of Education, Sheffield Hallam University. Her research focuses on genre and English for research and publication purposes, and has appeared in English for Specific Purposes, Journal of Second Language Writing, Applied Linguistics, and Higher Education.