Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-lb7rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-14T19:24:22.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frequency distributions of punctuation marks in English

Evidence from large-scale corpora

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2018

Kun Sun  and
Rong Wang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The analysis of punctuation in philology is mainly carried out with a view to better understand the meaning of the literature concerned. Punctuation is generally believed to play the role of ‘assisting the written language in indicating those elements of speech that cannot be conveniently set down on paper: chiefly the pause, pitch and stress in speech’ (Markwardt, 1942: 156). Most of us often ignore the importance of punctuation in writing systems and tend to believe that punctuation only depends on tradition and the personal styles of writers. In fact, punctuation marks may contribute significantly to the clarity of expression. Many linguists associate punctuation with intonation, but the truth is more complex than that – punctuation marks may affect orthography, morphology, syntactic relations, semantic information, and can even influence textual structure.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 23 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, N.S. 2001. ‘Comma and canaries: The role of punctuation in speech and writing.’ Language Sciences, 23(1), 15–67.Google Scholar
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Written and Spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
BNC (British National Corpus). 2007. The BNC Consortium. See http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/. Online at < http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/> (Accessed February 1, 2017).+(Accessed+February+1,+2017).>Google Scholar
Bohannon, J. 2010. ‘Google opens books to new cultural studies.’ Science, 330, 1600.Google Scholar
Bruthlaux, P. 1995. ‘The rise and fall of the semicolon: English punctuation theory and English teaching practice.’ Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Busà, G. M. 2014. Introducing the Language of the News. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Carmody, S. 2015. ‘Ngramr: Retrieve and plot Google N-gram data.’ R package version 1.4.5.Google Scholar
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R. & Newman, M. E. 2009. ‘Power-law distributions in empirical data.’ Annals of Applied Statistics, 51(4), 661–703.Google Scholar
COCA (Corpus of Contemporary American English). 2014. Compiled by Mark Davies, Brigham Young University. Online at < http://corpus.byu.edu/COCA/> (Accessed February 1, 2017).+(Accessed+February+1,+2017).>Google Scholar
COHA (Corpus of Historical American English). 2014. Compiled by Mark Davies, Brigham Young University. Online at < http://corpus.byu.edu/COHA/> (Accessed February 1, 2017).+(Accessed+February+1,+2017).>Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 1985. ‘How many millions? The statistics of English today.’ English Today, 1, 7–9.Google Scholar
Denby, L. 2010. ‘The language of Twitter: Linguistic innovation and character limitation in short messaging.’ Online at <https://lewisdenby.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/the-language-of-twitter-linguistic-innovation-and-character-limitation-in-short-messaging.pdf> (Accessed February 1, 2017).+(Accessed+February+1,+2017).>Google Scholar
GloWbE (Corpus of Global Web-Based English). 2013. Compiled by Mark Davies, Brigham Young University. Online at <http://corpus.byu.edu/glowbe/> (Accessed February 1, 2017).+(Accessed+February+1,+2017).>Google Scholar
Google Books. 2010/2016. ‘Google Books Ngram Viewer.’ Online at <https://books.google.com/ngrams> (Accessed February 1, 2017).+(Accessed+February+1,+2017).>Google Scholar
Haussamen, B. 1994. ‘The future of the English sentence.’ Visible Language, 28(1), 4–25.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, B. 1996. What’s the Point? A (Computational) Theory of Punctuation? PhD Diss. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Journalism BBC News style guide, 2018. ‘Grammar, spelling and punctuation.’ Online at <http://www.bbc.co.uk/academy/journalism/article/art20130702112133530> (Accessed July 22, 2018).+(Accessed+July+22,+2018).>Google Scholar
Kello, C. T., Brown, G, Ferrer–i–Cancho, R., Holden, J. G., Linkenkaer–Hansen, K. & Rhodes, T. 2010. ‘Scaling laws in cognitive sciences.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(5), 223–232.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. 1999. ‘The secret of punctuation.’ Online at <http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1999-05-12/features/9905120098_1_grammatical-task-semicolon-punctuation/2> (Accessed February 2, 2017).+(Accessed+February+2,+2017).>Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A. 2010. The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes. London: Routledege.Google Scholar
Ling, R. & Baron, N. 2007. ‘Text messaging and IM: Linguistic comparison of American college data.’ Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(3), 291–298.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, J. R. E. 2013. Singapore English: Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, H. E. 1894. The History of the English Paragraph. PhD Diss. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. 2011 ‘Real trends in word and sentence length.’ Online at <http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3534> (Accessed February 1, 2017).+(Accessed+February+1,+2017).>Google Scholar
Markwardt, A. H. 1942. Introduction to the English Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, C. 1987. A Linguistic Study of American Punctuation. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Michel, J. B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., The Google Books Team. 2011. ‘Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books.’ Science, 331, 176–182.Google Scholar
Mulvey, C. 2016. ‘The English project's history of English punctuation.’ English Today, 32(3), 45–51.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G. 1990. The Linguistics of Punctuation. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B. 1993. Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Partridge, E. 1953. You Have a Point There: A Guide to Punctuation and its Allies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schou, K. 2007. ‘The syntactic status of English punctuation.’ English Studies, 88(2), 195–216.Google Scholar
The Punctuation Guide. 2018. ‘British versus American style.’ Online at <http://www.thepunctuationguide.com/british-versus-american-style.html> (Accessed July 22, 2018).+(Accessed+July+22,+2018).>Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar