Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Examination of Turkish Early Childhood Teachers’ Challenges in Implementing Pedagogical Documentation

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the challenges of pedagogical documentation from the perspectives of Turkish early childhood teachers. Pedagogical documentation was initially introduced as a teaching, learning, and assessment tool in early childhood education settings in Turkey through a three-year project. A total of 22 early childhood teachers working in a variety of early childhood programs participated in the study. Data were gathered via semi-structured and focus group interviews at the end of an intervention on the use of pedagogical documentation. The data analysis was based on an inductive approach, revealing that teachers encountered functional and attitudinal challenges in implementing pedagogical documentation. Three major themes or challenges emerged in this study: (a) challenges originating from contextual elements, (b) challenges originating from the nature of pedagogical documentation, and (c) challenges related to the adaptations of teachers to the pedagogical documentation process. The findings underline the need to transform teachers’ perspectives so that they are more amenable to child-centered practices while acknowledging the importance of collaboration with all stakeholders. In-service and pre-service training should be planned to support teachers’ understanding of pedagogical documentation and to ensure that teachers employ the pedagogical documentation process in their own practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghayan, C., Schellhaas, A., Wayne, A., Burts, D. C., Buchanan, T. K., & Benedict, J. (2005). Project Katrina. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 7(2), n2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alasuutari, M. (2014). Voicing the child? A case study in Finnish early childhood education. Childhood: A Journal of Global Child Research, 21(2), 242–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alasuutari, M., Markström, A. M., & Vallberg-Roth, A. C. (2014). Assessment and documentation in early childhood education. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, S. (2000). Pedagogical documentation: beyond observations. [Occasional paper No. 7]. Institute for Early Childhood Studies Victoria University of Wellington, New Zeland.

  • Alvestad, T., & Sheridan, S. (2015). Preschool teachers' perspectives on planning and documentation in preschool. Early Child Development and Care, 185(3), 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 5(2), 272–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. S., Schulman, K., & Shore, R. (2004). Class size: what’s the best fit? Preschool Policy Matters, 9, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bath, C. (2012). “I can’t read it, I don’t know”: Young children’s participation in the pedagogical documentation of English early childhood education and care settings. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(2), 190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowne, M., Cutler, K., DeBates, D., Gilkerson, D., & Stremmel, A. (2010). Pedagogical documentation and collaborative dialogue as tool of inquiry for pre-service teachers in early childhood education: an exploratory narrative. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buldu, M. (2010). Making learning visible in kindergarten classrooms: Pedagogical documentation as a formative assessment technique. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 1439–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buldu, M., Şahin, F., & Yılmaz, A. (2018). Okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının gelişim ve öğrenmelerinin desteklenmesinde pedagojik dokümantasyonun katkısının öğretmen görüşlerine göre incelenmesi [Exploring the contribution of pedagogical documentation to the development and learning of young children from teacher perspective]. İlköğretim Online [Elementary Education Online], 17(3), 1444–1462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M. (2011). Young children reflecting on their learning: teachers’ conversation strategies. Early Years, 31(3), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative enquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2006). Beyond quality in child care and education: postmodern perspectives (2nd ed.). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2013). Pedagogical documentation: A practice for reflection and democracy. In Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation (p. 152–167). Routledge.

  • de Sousa, J. (2019). Pedagogical documentation: the search for children’s voice and agency. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 27(3), 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emilson, A., & Samuelsson, I. P. (2014). Documentation and communication in Swedish preschools. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 34(2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: a guide to methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, B. B., Leichtman, M. D., Pillemer, D. B., & Shanteler, L. (2013). The effects of documentation on young children's memory. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(3), 568–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formosinho, J., & Peeters, J. (Eds.). (2019). Understanding pedagogic documentation in early childhood education: revealing and reflecting on high quality learning and teaching. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, S., & Gestwicki, C. (2002). Authentic childhood: Experiencing Reggio Emilia in the classroom. Albany, NY: Delmar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandini, L., & Goldhaber, J. (2001). Two reflections about documentation. In L. Gandini & C. Edwards (Eds.), Bambini: the Italian approach to infant/toddler care (pp. 124–145). New Yok: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamre, B. K., Partee, A., & Mulcahy, C. (2017). Enhancing the impact of professional development in the context of preschool expansion. AERA Open, 3(4), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrietha, L. (2012). Early childhood educators' perceptions of the use of documentation in emergent programs: Issues, benefits, barriers and questions (Unpublished master thesis). Halifax: Mount Saint Vincent University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, I. (1997). Basic concepts for qualitative research. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostyn, I., Mäkitalo, A., Hakari, S., & Vandenbussche, L. (2020). The professional actuation of pedagogical documentation in Belgian and Finnish early childhood education settings. Early Child Development and Care, 190(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1475368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandır, A., Özbey, S., & İnal, G. (2009). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin eğitim programlarını planlama ve uygulamada karşılaştıkları güçlüklerin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(6), 373–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashin, D. (2015). Pedagogical Documentation: Why? When? Who? What? Where? How? Retrieved from https://tecribresearch.wordpress.com/2015/05/17/pedagogical-documentation-why-when-who-what-where-how

  • Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C. (1996). The contribution of documentation to the quality of early childhood education. ED 393608. Retrieved from www.ericdigests.org/1996-4/quality.htm

  • Kline, L. (2008). Documentation panel: the ‘Making Learning Visible’ Project. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29, 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger, J., & Cardy, T. (2006). Documentation: a hard-to-reach place. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(6), 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knauf, H. (2015). Styles of documentation in German early childhood education. Early Years, 35(3), 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knauf, H. (2017). Documentation as a tool for participation in German early childhood education and care. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knauf, H. (2020). Documentation strategies: pedagogical documentation from the perspective of early childhood teachers in New Zealand and Germany. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(1), 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Hammond, L., & Bjervås, L. L. (2020). Pedagogical documentation and systematic quality work in early childhood: Comparing practices in Western Australia and Sweden. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1463949120928431.

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, R., & Hydon, C. (2019). Pedagogical documentation. In L. Gibbs & M. Gasper (Eds.), Challenging the intersection of policy with pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, H. (2015). Teachers' work with documentation in preschool: shaping a profession in the performing of professional identities. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(6), 638–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. (2007). Toward formative assessment: the use of pedagogical documentation in early elementary classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 232–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, S. (2010). Pedagogical documentation as research in early mathematics. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 56(1), 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from’ case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoNE. (2013a). Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programı [Early Childhood Curriculum]. Ankara: Temel Eğitim Genel Müdürlüğü.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoNE. (2013b). 0–36 Aylık Çocuklar için Eğitim Programı [Educational program for Children 0–36 Months]. Ankara: Temel Eğitim Genel Müdürlüğü.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoNE. (2019). National education statistics: Formal education 2018–2019. Ankara: MoNE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, M. J., Desrochers, L., & Cavicchi, N. M. (2007). Progettazione and documentation as sociocultural activities: Changing communities of practice. Theory Into Practice, 46(1), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paananen, M., & Lipponen, L. (2018). Pedagogical documentation as a lens for examining equality in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 188(2), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, M., & So, K. (2014). Opportunities and challenges for teacher professional development: a case of collaborative learning community in South Korea. International Education Studies, 7(7), 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., O'Connell, A. A., Mauck, S. A., Weber-Mayrer, M., Schachter, R. E., et al. (2017). Effectiveness of large-scale, state-sponsored language and literacy professional development on early childhood educator outcomes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 354–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, S. M., & Schwartz, K. (2011). Preservice teachers' perceptions of pedagogic documentation techniques in early childhood teacher preparation. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reggio Children. (2010). Indications: preschools and infant-toddler centres of the municipality of Reggio Emilia. Reggio Emilia: Istituzione of the Municipality of Reggio Emilia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B., & Duff, K. (2016). Families’ perceptions of early childhood educators’ fostering conversations and connections by sharing children's learning through pedagogical documentation. Education, 44(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1092457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, C. (1998). Projected curriculum constructed through documentation: Progettazione. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: the Reggio Emilia approach—advanced reflections (2nd ed., p. 113). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rintakorpi, K. (2016). Documenting with early childhood education teachers: pedagogical documentation as a tool for developing early childhood pedagogy and practises. Early Years, 36(4), 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rintakorpi, K., Lipponen, L., & Reunamo, J. (2014). Documenting with parents and toddlers: a Finnish case study. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 34(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2014.903233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rintakorpi, K., & Reunamo, J. (2016). Pedagogical documentation and its relation to everyday activities in early years. Early Child Development and Care. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1178637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sak, R., Tantekin- Erden, F., & Morrison, G. S. (2018). Preschool teachers’ beliefs and practices related to child centred education in Turkey. Education, 46(5), 563–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish National Agency for Education. (2008). Ten years after the pre-school reform Report 318. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T., & Wilson, D. (2010). Reflections on documentation: A discussion with thought leaders from Reggio Emilia. Theory into Practice, 49, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wien, C. A., Guyevskey, V., & Berdoussis, N. (2011). Learning to document in Reggio-inspired education. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 13(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz, A., Şahin, F., Buldu, M., Ülker Erdem, A., Buldu, E., & Ünal, H. B. (2015, September). Using documentation as a teaching tool in Turkish early childhood programs [Conference presentation abstract]. Twenty-fifth annual European Early Childhood Conference. Barcelona, Spain.

  • Zaslow, M., Tout, K., Halle, T., Whittaker, J. V., & Lavelle, B. (2010). Toward the identification of features of effective professional development for early childhood educators. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under the Grant No. 113K560.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arif Yılmaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of TED University (2013/10) and Ministry of National Education (MoNE) Directorate of Primary Education (2013/70297673/100/167068).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under the Grant No. 113K560 and an earlier version of the study was presented at the 18th AMSE-AMCE-WAER Conference.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yılmaz, A., Şahin, F., Buldu, M. et al. An Examination of Turkish Early Childhood Teachers’ Challenges in Implementing Pedagogical Documentation. Early Childhood Educ J 49, 1047–1059 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01113-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01113-w

Keywords

Navigation